We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about JAMF, Microsoft, Kandji and others in Mobile Device Management (MDM)."We are able to manage our full fleet of devices and can simply integrate with all of our systems."
"I like the ability to modify it to suit our environment and the fact that, since it's an Apple-dedicated service, the integration is easy."
"It's as easy as procuring the licensing for the apps and then setting it to the volume purchasing back in Jamf."
"Thanks to Smart Groups and patch management, a lot of the work being done is via a hands-off approach."
"The remote wipe and lock features are by far the best tools."
"Some of the most valuable features for us include remote management, DEP enrollment, and zero-touch deployment."
"Configuration Profiles from Jamf Pro are awesome."
"There is also zero-day support to all new Apple OS."
"It uses detailed descriptions of the workstations, and that is good for me."
"The product is useful for patch management."
"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."
"Provides great insight into the functionalities of the data scope."
"The most valuable feature is the scalability."
"The technical support is good."
"I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."
"The ability to make collections and deploy to them has been great."
"The reporting with PowerBI could be improved."
"The list of applications for patch management isn't sufficient."
"The solution needs cheaper training."
"The integrated patch feature is good but needs some tweaking."
"Every once in a blue moon, we wind up with a rarely-seen superbug that takes support weeks to months to solve."
"I wish the inventory would have its own pane without having to do it as a search."
"A more modern UI in the next release will make the product absolutely perfect."
"I would like to have the ability to push scripts using MDM commands."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"I want the system to provide some dependency relations. I would also like to see the relationship between different machines."
"One area of improvement is regarding the patching of Office 365 products. We have some difficulties on this side, and it can be improved."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"The tool's deployment can be cumbersome."
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"SCCM does not scale well, which is one of the reasons we are not going to continue to use it."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jamf Pro is ranked 1st in Mobile Device Management (MDM) with 103 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". Jamf Pro is most compared with Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl and IBM MaaS360, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Kaseya VSA.
We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.