NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM comparison

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and NETSCOUT vSTREAM are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.7, while NETSCOUT vSTREAM is ranked #84. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to NETSCOUT vSTREAM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NETSCOUT vSTREAM users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Read 51 NETSCOUT nGeniusONE reviews

4,060 Views
3,004 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews

799 Views
759 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and NETSCOUT vSTREAM compete in the network performance management category. While NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has an advantage in support and system visibility, NETSCOUT vSTREAM's feature set makes it appealing to tech buyers despite its higher price.

Features: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers advanced real-time monitoring, robust data correlation, and versatile application monitoring capabilities. NETSCOUT vSTREAM provides support for virtualized environments, efficient data processing, and seamless integration with cloud infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE could enhance its support for virtualization and cloud environments, improve adaptability to agile infrastructures, and strengthen integration with cloud-based tools. NETSCOUT vSTREAM could benefit from simplifying its deployment, increasing the responsiveness of its customer service, and expanding its monitoring capabilities beyond virtual environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE offers straightforward on-premises deployment with extensive documentation and accessible support channels. NETSCOUT vSTREAM focuses on cloud-based deployment, which may be more complex but suits flexible infrastructures. nGeniusONE leads in deployment ease, while vSTREAM provides unique benefits for cloud environments.

Pricing and ROI: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE involves upfront setup costs with long-term ROI due to its extensive monitoring solutions. NETSCOUT vSTREAM requires a higher initial investment, with ROI enhanced by its virtualization capabilities. nGeniusONE is cost-effective for traditional networks, whereas vSTREAM offers more value for cloud-driven strategies.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,360 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT nGeniusONE is 1.2%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE	1.2%
NETSCOUT vSTREAM	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

EdwardShim

General Manager at MOCOMSYS

Offers detailed network monitoring but requires improvement in deployment complexity and pricing

The price is really high, making it difficult for many financial companies to purchase immediately; it will take time for them to afford any budget for the purchase. The traffic data correlation feature's effectiveness with performance issues for clients remains uncertain as there are questions that need to be addressed through engineers regarding how many customers are actually using it. Regarding pricing and value for money, while the solution has the potential to save time and money for clients in the long term, monitoring solutions for performance management or network monitoring do not cause immediate damage to a company. It could lead to damage over time, but financial and management teams typically cannot see the immediate crisis. This is why many big companies Samsung and Hyundai try to build their own monitoring solutions using open-source tools and their own engineers, though it has not been successful.

Read full review

Keval Lodaya

Network Engineer at Inniti Network Solution

A user-friendly solution that is easy to install and improves visibility

I would like to see improvements made to the user guide. From my personal experience, it is helpful to see a list of steps describing what to do next in different situations. An example is what to do and what to back up in the case of certain types of failure. There are also cases where a customer can't understand specific features. Enhancements to the user guide would be helpful for this. More features for network fragmentation would be helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The VoLTE model, call search and Media Monitor were essential when we launched VoLTE. We're relying heavily on them to troubleshoot our VoLTE calls."

"It's a consolidated, single tool that talks to multiple platforms. It's not vendor-proprietary; it's independent. It provides interoperability with different products, whether they are routing products, switching products, wireless, wired, load balancing, or proxy. It works with anything you can name."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The packet-based searching capability of NETSCOUT is highly valued as it allows us to better analyze the network."

"The speed that you can get from the top of a problem all the way down to the packet layer of troubleshooting analysis."

"The visual and graphical interfaces in the display that it provides for us to show our senior leadership. We can show them what is actually happening, instead of a spreadsheet."

"With the Vprobes, we quickly identified issues on the application servers, which we normally couldn't, where it usually would be a full circle round between our NOC and server people."

"Deep packet inspection is a very useful tool as it works in real time and uses serial packet-level analysis."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pros

"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."

"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."

Cons

"It would be beneficial to see more AI capabilities included in nGeniusONE to further streamline processes and allow lower-level tech support to handle issues more effectively without escalating them."

"I would like more in-depth convergence between all the applications, especially when I look for information through a data mine."

"The GUI has gotten better over time but there could be some improvement in how the GUI is built."

"The scalability needs some work. From a probe perspective, we are limited to a certain amount of throughput on the devices themselves. Without having actual hooks into the bare metal hardware for the solutions, it's a bit of a "thumb in the air" as to when we hit our capacity or when our high watermark is."

"For individual subscriber tracings, sometimes it does not capture all the messages. There is a little bit of room for improvement there."

"NETSCOUT nGeniusONE's pricing is higher compared to the competitors. It is more than 15-18 percent of competitor costs. It also needs to add AI features."

"The price is really high, making it difficult for many financial companies to purchase immediately; it will take time for them to afford any budget for the purchase."

"The dependency mapping is good, but I am hopeful that they will build some type of partnership and relationship with ServiceNow. I want to see NETSCOUT partner with ServiceNow so they can leverage Service Now Discovery and Service Mapping to automate the build of the service dependency mappings inside of nGeniusONE."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE cons

"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."

"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."

"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense."

"We have a premium customized contract for the solution."

"The scalability becomes very expensive quickly."

"The platform is expensive."

"Their pricing is very competitive with other solutions... But what I like about NETSCOUT's licensing is that it's shared across all their platforms. They don't create a new licensing scheme for every one of their products. So for nGeniusONE, you buy a certain license level, and it works on all of their products."

"Licensing is flexible, it's not tied to anything else. We can easily switch up the licensing piece... Obviously, NETSCOUT is a little bit in the higher range, but it gives you value for money. You get what you pay for."

"Make sure you get the low down on your licensing and understand the licensing requirements before making a purchase, especially when it comes to an upgrade. Make sure that it suits your needs before you commit to it. For example, we purchased ATA at version 6.2.1. At that time, the licensing covered everything we need. NETSCOUT comes out with 6.2.2, stating that in order to upgrade, you had to purchase CyberStream licensing. Now that requires some additional funding from both a capital investment and a maintenance cost. That's something that should have been said, "Well, if you want these additional features, you will need to purchase these CyberStreams." Otherwise, we should be allowed to continue on the basic operations as it is now through the newer releases without being stuck."

"The price is only for acquisition; it's not a licence."

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE pricing and cost advice

"Licensing is quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	37

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

What do you like most about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NETSCOUT nGeniusONE?

Regarding its high price, I give NETSCOUT nGeniusONE a seven.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 9% of the time

Dynatrace vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 8% of the time

ThousandEyes vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 7% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

Compared 5% of the time

More NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Competitors

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 36% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 24% of the time

NetMon vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 20% of the time

More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report

Also Known As

NETSCOUT nGenius, nGeniusONE

vSTREAM

Overview

The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software provides you with tools to monitor and display information about your network both historically and in real time. The nGenius Real-Time Monitor software allows you to understand your current network usage and to plan for future needs. It also allows you to proactively troubleshoot problem areas in your network.

NETSCOUT

The vSTREAM virtual appliance complements existing Adaptive Session Intelligence (ASI)-based instrumentation to provide the same level of visibility within virtualized and cloud infrastructures that is already possible in physical environments. The vSTREAM virtual appliance is ideal for monitoring service-critical traffic running within virtualized or cloud infrastructures, either locally on a host or as an aggregation point for multiple hosts. With complete visibility across physical, virtual and cloud networks, the vSTREAM virtual appliance presents real-time views of end-to-end call trace data and network-wide KPIs, to protect the reliability and availability of networks and application services.

NETSCOUT

Sample Customers

Cerner Corporation

Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

February 2026

Free Report: NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. NETSCOUT vSTREAM report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.