Pega CRM vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

"Pega offers a clear parent-child case relationship that's easily created and maintained. Dependencies can be configured, where reaching a specific stage in a parent case automatically triggers a child task in a child case, while the parent case remains on hold until a certain condition is met before moving forward. This configuration allows multiple users to work on cases in parallel. Many of these settings are readily available within Pega case settings. Overall, Pega's case management is unparalleled compared to other options."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"One of the most valuable features of Pega CRM for our team's productivity is its ease of setup, thanks to its configuration-driven approach."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to pull information about the customer on-the-fly so they feel the interaction is more personal."

"It also reduces the duration per call, and it ensures a first time resolution of the issue."

"The product's deployment phase was easy."

"Great flexibility and its locking mechanism enable multiple users to work on the same case seamlessly."

"We can effortlessly manage the data within it, and it offers ease of use and high flexibility to present the data across various vendors."

"The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."

"Using the tool actually ends up teaching you about making workflows more efficient."

"The platform's most valuable feature is the ability to perform most tasks reliably. It efficiently integrates with other systems and automates various tasks."

"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."

"I am impressed with the tool's recording feature."

"Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow."

"The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience."

"It was very smooth and very seamless to create automations."

"The disadvantage of the tool stems from the fact that it does not allow users to make database-level modifications."

"The UI is lagging and needs to be improved."

"They should enable the data-driven streaming feature inside it."

"It would be beneficial to enhance the pricing and support implementation options as they are currently quite expensive."

"The UI should be improved."

"There has been a common acknowledgment among customers that this solution is an expensive tool and they often opt for cheaper tools like Comodo"

"Price is always a concern for many organizations. They often think Pega is expensive, and sometimes they don't fully understand the pricing model."

"For many of the clients, they have a separate system or separate layer of UI and a separate layer of the business rules engine, which Pega has taken care of in the recent releases."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."

"The orchestration needs to be better."

"I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included."

"You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data."

"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."

"The OCR capabilities of the solution could be improved."

"Rule versioning and deployment to enable parallel development could still be improved​"

"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."

"We have numerous uses of the solution in our organisation. Almost 72 applications are integrated with Pega CRM, and some of them are shutting down for various reasons including the high licensing costs. There is a strong focus in the market and offices on cost reduction."

"The pricing is on the higher side."

"It is expensive."

"In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."

"Pega is pretty costly."

"Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."

"​I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost​."

"Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."

"The licensing cost is too high."