We performed a comparison between SAP Cloud Platform and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."To be able to define multiple sub accounts in order to accommodate and separate development, test, and productive environments."
"It is a stable solution, as I never encountered issues when using it."
"The dashboard provides pretty good clarity."
"We primarily utilize SAP's ERP capabilities."
"The ability to build custom applications on the BTP platform, reducing customization on the SAP HANA system and improving performance and management."
"The product improved our company's business operations since we got value out of it."
"Improved our speed to bring our mobile applications into productive use in a cost-effective way."
"Cloud Platform's stability is great."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"We need to connect our ERP solution via the VPN. We need to make sure our ERP solutions aren't exposed to the outside world. Our teams really struggle with this."
"Planning features are limited to the finance module."
"What I would like to see improved is the learning curve."
"The product could be improved for consistent user interfaces."
"Shows errors without providing any analysis."
"It would be helpful to have additional samples for SoapUI that include interface methodologies and templates."
"The solution requires more flexibility overall."
"I want to see better pricing from the SAP Cloud Platform in the future. I also want more security and scalability from it."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
SAP Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 38 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 12th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 7 reviews. SAP Cloud Platform is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Cloud Platform writes "Provides seamless integration with CTI for streamlined data synchronization but complexity and challenges in migrating existing applications to the low-code model for custom application development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". SAP Cloud Platform is most compared with Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Mule Anypoint Platform and Salesforce Platform, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our SAP Cloud Platform vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.