SmartBear TestComplete vs TestingWhiz comparison

SmartBear and Cygnet Infotech are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.6, while Cygnet Infotech is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.0. SmartBear holds a 4.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Cygnet Infotech’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cygnet Infotech users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 75 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,240 Views
3,064 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TestingWhiz

Read 1 TestingWhiz review

131 Views
102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

TestingWhiz

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SmartBear TestComplete and TestingWhiz based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: November 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (6th)

TestingWhiz

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Ranking in Regression Testing Tools

14th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 4.8%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TestingWhiz is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Vijay-Sawale

Test Associate & Manager at Opus Technologies

Low code features and good customization but needs more customer-requested features

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation The organization was able to provide customers with business solutions by giving demos of various tools, assisting in securing…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great."

"The solution has a very nice interface."

"Runs in different remote machines. We have multiple versions of the software being tested."

"The integration with various tools is important."

"Recording and playback of tests were easier with SmartBear TestComplete...It is a scalable solution."

"Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional."

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps."

"The product has many features."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

"TestingWhiz is a low code, no code tool with integration facilities, such as with Jira, and can be used over the cloud."

Cons

"The artificial intelligence needs to be improved."

"The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS."

"Headless testing would be a big improvement."

"Right now, when you buy the solution, you need to pay for one solution. You receive one set up and you install it and it's just in that one machine. It would be ideal if they could offer one subscription where you can connect to different machines with a group subscription."

"At times, identifying or locating an element can be somewhat challenging. However, in a recent test update, they introduced Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability. This introduction has reduced the challenges to some extent, as we can now utilize OCR if the normal method doesn't work. Nevertheless, there is still significant potential for improvement in TestComplete's ability to identify various object elements. I don't have any specific concerns to mention. I have observed significant improvements in TestComplete over the past few years, especially in its support for highly dynamic object elements used in products like Salesforce Dynamics 365. In earlier versions, there were numerous challenges, but the current version is far superior to its predecessors."

"This solution could be improved by making it easier to visualize where there is a failure without having to look at it in detail."

"The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."

"I didn't use it very heavily. One issue that I found was that there wasn't a quick way or a button to move Visual Basic scripts to TestComplete. We have a lot of such scripts in our organization, and it would be very useful to have some option to easily move these scripts. It is currently possible to convert these scripts to TestComplete, but it is not easy. I have to write some code, but everything is not available immediately."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

"Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

"The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"The pricing is pretty reasonable."

"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."

"The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."

"SmartBear TestComplete is an expensive tool."

"The price of SmartBear TestComplete could be less. The main challenge is when it comes to node-locked. They should use a subscription model, such as a monthly-based subscription or, a quarterly-based subscription. Their floating license is very expensive, and this high price should be reduced or provide, at a minimum, a subscription model."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

The solution's pricing is too high. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing nine and a half out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The learning curve of the solution's user interface is a little high for new users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TestingWhiz?

It is cheaper compared to other tools. The tool is web-based with various licenses, including professional and enterprise editions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TestingWhiz?

Some features need to be implemented based on customer customization requests, which are currently not available. Additionally, there is a need to improve the handling of less critical issues which...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TestingWhiz?

We utilized the solution to showcase our capabilities to customers or clients, and demonstrate how it can save money and achieve a return on investment through automation.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 21% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 10% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

October 2024

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download TestingWhiz product report

Learn More

SmartBear

Cygnet Infotech

Overview

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

TestingWhiz is a Codeless Automation Testing Tool for Software, Web, Mobile, Database, Cloud, Web Services and API testing. It is pillared on a strong architecture combined with intuitive Automation Engine and short learning curve that promises to take your test automation to the next level.

Sample Customers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Verizon, IBM, Symantec, VMware, Hyundai, Choice Hotels, Intel, Autodesk, Frost

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, BrowserStack and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.