Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Reviews

I like the self-registration capabilities.

The certificate authority aspect is excellent. 

I love that there is a single sign-on for Fortinet products. 

The initial setup is very easy.

It is a stable product.

The solution can scale as necessary.

Technical support is good. 

Fortinet has another product called FortiNAC. These two solutions work together well.

The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible.

I've used the solution for two years. It hasn't been too long. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches and we find that it does not crash or freeze.

It can scale if you need it to. The solution can expand. 

In general, Fortinet technical support is good. We have only had the solution for a small amount of time. We haven't used their support that much. Their response time has been very good. 

I found the initial implementation process to be simple and straightforward. I didn't find it to be overly complex. There aren't too many features, unlike an FortiNAC solution, that need to be set up.

I've evaluated the difference between Fortinet and Cisco in the past.

I'd advise new users to configure the backup, routine backup, to get the most out of the product. You can have problems if you don't.

In general, it's a simple product and we've enjoyed it. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

Our customers use Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for SSL VPN security. Our customers are from various industries including retail, finance, and manufacturing.

The tool's most valuable features are push notifications and integration with the FortiGate firewall. Push notifications provide an instant acceptance mechanism. When customers try to access SSL VPN, the solution sends a push notification to their mobile phone, and they can easily approve the access. The integration with FortiGate firewall is very easy if our customers use FortiGate for their firewall.

It also supports easy user management. You can easily manage user accounts and groups.In terms of benefits, the tool provides both cost savings and efficiency, but efficiency is more important for our customers. The main point of this solution is security, which is the most important thing. After that, maybe you can say time management - you can easily manage your access and permissions. Cost savings come third.

I think the tool could provide this solution on the cloud. It's currently an on-premises solution. A cloud-based version could make setup, installation, and management easier. With on-premises, you must pay capital expenses (CapEx) upfront. However, if the solution was cloud-based, it would be operational expenses (OpEx), which is often easier to manage. You can pay monthly instead of paying the total cost at once. In my opinion, OpEx is more easily manageable than CapEx.

I have been using the product for five years. 

The valuable features are:

• Two-factor authentication
• User ID with our LDAP service
• Integration with our other FortiGates

By using one of our units as a load-balancing slave, we were able to roll out location-based VPNs that created quicker connections to local servers for our end users. Furthermore, incorporating a LBS unit has provided preventative measures and ensured that our remote users can still connect if a failure occurs on our master authentication unit.

It was initially difficult to sync our high availability, load-balancing slave (LBS) to our master unit. There were some initial issues connecting it and syncing with our master FortiAuthenticator unit. After reaching out to Fortinet support, it turned out that the unit needed a software update.

I would like to see the following:

• Creating an easier implementation of software patches.
• Designing the admin profiles to sync across, instead of having to recreate them. (I see how this could be problematic with security measures.)

We've been using our master unit for about a year and our LBS for about six months.

We had some stability issues. Our first LBS unit wouldn't work properly the first time and that wasted a lot of time. Eventually, it died and we had to RMA the unit.

We didn't have any issues with scalability.

The technical support we received from Fortinet was responsive. When we experienced problems, they were able to fix our issues.

Before implementing our FortiAuthenticators, we used our main FortiGate as a way to push out two-factor codes to our users. After a while, this option was not working. As we continued to grow, we needed something more substantial and manageable.

The initial setup was somewhat difficult in syncing our LDAP service to our main FortiGate.

Before using the FortiAuthenticator, we pushed out tokens via our main FortiGate.

If you want a more efficient way to manage two-factor authentication for your users, or implement the unit as a cluster member role, the FortiAuthenticator can be incorporated very well into your environment.

We use it for single sign-on. After connecting to VPN it creates an active directory or up session and we know who it is and then we use Fortinet FortiAuthenicator. 

I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator not passing the locks. If I ask the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, give me the name of the group. FortiAuthenticator passes the lock, the group name, or the directory.

I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification. I would like to see a troubleshooting option. For troubleshooting or viewing the lock of the device set or separate the locks from the connected device. Maybe with any device connected to the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. And then I need the parsing device and type of locks of this device.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for the past two months. Before that, we were only testing Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.

I believe Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is stable.

We are finding it to be fully scalable at this point one hundred percent.

Technical support is excellent with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward. The only problem we faced was the POC. We configure only through self-configuration. If we had an integrator or consultant to configure Fortinet FortiAuthenticator it would be easier than doing a self-configuration.

It was easy for me, but I had to read the documents about LDAP authentication. I did an in-house self-configuration. It was time-consuming.

When we buy the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator device there is a comparison between price and security. We have a government organization and we want to buy cheap products.

I would rate Fortinet FortiAuthenticator an eight out of ten.

We are resellers of this solution and partners of Fortinet. I'm the managing director and we are based in South Africa. 

I really like the two-step authentication, it provides a higher level of security that we didn't have previously. Just having a password is not good enough anymore. 

There are some issues with integration. We also have a problem that the cost of the solution is linked to the dollar and that can result in significant unexpected price rises. 

I've been using this solution for a year. 

The solution is scalable, we have over 1,500 users. 

We had great technical support from an external company. 

The initial setup was relatively easy. There were some issues we had with the LDAP integration, but it was solved quite quickly. We had some outside assistance for the deployment. 

The actual cost is fair but when our exchange rate in South Africa goes through the roof, then the price changes quickly. It would assist us if the cost could be standardized or fixed. The exchange rate has a significant impact on us. 

I recommend this solution, it does what it's meant to. I rate FortiAuthenticator nine out of 10. 

We are a solution provider and we work with Fornet products, including FortiAuthenticator. I have installed it for a bank and their users authenticate their access through it.

Our implementation involved the creation of local users for the VPN, and they are authenticated using this product. This is the main purpose of it, and what had been requested by the client.

The most valuable feature is the authentication tokens.

There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported. This is something that Fortinet is working on.

I have been working with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for one year.

One of our clients has faced a lot of issues with FortiAuthenticator. For example, one of the devices restarted by itself, and the database was corrupted. To remedy this, we reinstalled the image and did the installation from scratch.

This is a scalable product.

The technical support by Fortinet is okay.

I work a lot with Fortinet products and I call the support often. They are very quick to respond and the support is very good.

I have worked on most of the Fortinet products, as well as with products from Palo Alto. At this time, the only single sign-on product that we use is FortiAuthenticator.

The initial setup was very complex. The was one cluster and one load balancer that had to be configured.

We expect to do another installation, although this time it will be using the RADIUS server.

What our engineers say about FortiAuthenticator is that when compared with other vendors, it has not yet reached the same level.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use Fortinet FortiAuthenticator to maintain security, and access, and monitor authentication and authorization processes. It enables the proper functioning of the CA server. We can use various authentication methods, including EFTOS parameters like PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) for the CA server.

The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication. It is inexpensive compared to Cisco and Clear Pass.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services. There could be a central management point for both the services similar to Cisco and Clear Pass.

We have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for around a year.

It is a stable product. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable product. It is suitable for medium and enterprise businesses. Its scalability is a seven or eight out of ten.

Fortinet provides good support services.

Positive

Compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Cisco is a complicated tool to use. It is difficult to configure as it has many features. It is scalable but needs to be a more stable product.

The initial setup is very easy. It takes an hour to complete.

The product is inexpensive compared to Cisco. I rate its pricing a three to five out of ten.

I recommend Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and rate it an eight out of ten.

We are using FortiAuthenticator for authentication to connect to our network, either through some software or VPN or SSL or CyberArk, anything.

Samuel is good. We are using Samuel. Also, the good thing is that it's easy to use, and the logs are very precise.

There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such.

We have been using this solution for approximately one and a half years.

It is very stable. We have never had any issues with this solution.

I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. Some improvements, but it's on our end as well because we are still using the older variant. 

We have around five to seven end users using this solution.

The customer service and support are awesome for FortiAuthenticator.

I've been using Fortinet for the last eight or nine years. So, for other professional solutions from Fortinet, the support is not so good. You have to open a case as usual, and some technical contact will get in touch with you if they're available. If not, we have to call a toll-free number manually, and they will connect us to an available agent who will check our case and then escalate it. For normal issues with no business impact, it's okay to wait for two or three hours, no problem. But in critical situations, it's challenging to reach them.

Positive

The initial setup is simple. It's not that difficult. You have to know the functionality of FortiProtect, the requirements, and it depends on your network. It's not that difficult to implement.

We have VMs and devices. But mostly, we are moving to VMs.

We design and then, Fortinet team will implement.

I would rate the pricing a four out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not that costly. It is cheap, easy to manage, easy to install, and easy to configure. 

We evaluated Palo Alto. It's easy to use, offers a lot of features in one box, and it's cost-effective. And the support is very good.

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.