Microsoft Exchange Reviews

We use Microsoft Exchange for emails.

Microsoft Exchange is comparable to the Outlook client. Both are Microsoft products, and most people are familiar with Outlook. This is why the best feature of Microsoft Exchange is the ease of use. It is more compatible with the client software, especially for Microsoft Outlook. There are a lot of features available that are required for businesses users.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately five years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable. However, there are other solutions that are more stable, such as Zimbra.

The solution is stable, but it could improve. It's crashing if there is a big mail database.  The Zimbra solution is better in this area.

We have approximately 200 people using this solution and we plan to continue to use this solution.

We have contacted support. The support for Microsoft Exchange and Office 365 is widely available and is good.

I have used Zimbra.

The installation is simple for the clients.

We have approximately three engineers that support this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for all communication exchanged with our team, customers, and all other internet exchanges. Additionally, it was used as a formal way of communication.

The backup and archiving features are valuable, it is user friendly too.

They could improve on the search function, it takes too much time.

I have been using the solution for five years.

It is a reliable solution.

We have approximately 20,000 users using the solution.

The installation was straightforward and it was supported by the IT team.

I was satisfied with the usage of Microsoft Exchange, I would recommend the solution.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

We use Microsoft Exchange Server for the users in our company.

We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install.

I think it could be more scalable.

Microsoft Exchange is stable.

It is scalable. We currently have 2000 users.

It's easy to install and took about three to four hours.

We were able to install it ourselves. A team of three handled the installation and maintenance.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Microsoft Exchange at ten.

It is easy to install. A team of three people were able to handle the installation and maintenance. 

All of Exchange's features are valuable. For example, we can configure the MAPI profile, IM profile, or mobile profile. 

Microsoft Exchange needs to improve how it handles and assigns policy and security.

I have been working with Exchange for the last 10 years.

The product is absolutely stable.

I think Exchange is somewhat scalable, but not exactly. For example, if we ever need to update our server, we have to create another server and migrate the mailboxes from one server to another. So, it's only somewhat scalable, not fully.

We are getting good technical support. We have an in-house support person, so we don't need any technical support most of the time. 

It's easy. Easy to use. Not complex.

It's reasonable. It's an affordable price.

I rate Microsoft Exchange nine out of 10. It's a good product that you can either implement on-premises or on the cloud. 

I use Microsoft Exchange for professional emails, and the collaboration tools, such as Teams, and SharePoint.  

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Exchange is the collaboration tools.

Microsoft Exchange could improve security. They can elevate a lot of security features.

I have been using Microsoft Exchange for approximately 10 years.

Microsoft Exchange is stable.

I have not used the support.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Microsoft Exchange an eight out of ten.

It is user friendly.

The management of .pst files and archiving need improvement.

Because there are so many threats these days, better encryption and security would be good as well.

I've been working for around nine years with Microsoft Exchange.

Sometimes, it's not that stable, but it is good for the most part.

I would advise you to do the training and then use Microsoft Exchange.

If I had to rate this solution on a scale from one to ten, I would rate it at eight.

My main use case is corporate messaging.

The most important things are its long reputation of stability and that it has a lot of options for corporate staff.

An area for improvement would be the convenience of working with Azure services from Exchange on-premise installations.

I've been using this solution for at least 15 years.

This is a very stable solution.

Exchange is very scalable, it's one of the most important things about this software.

We've had some issues getting responses from Microsoft support lately, as they seem not to be very interested in the Russian region nowadays.

Exchange isn't a very hard solution to implement, though the infrastructure can require some changes in advance. Deployment can take anywhere from a few months to a few years, depending on the size of the customer and the project.

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

I would rate this solution as eight out of ten.

My primary use case is for migrations, setting up hybrid identities, and integrating with other systems, for example, SharePoint.

Exchange has helped us with encryption.

Exchange has all the calibration features you need.

One thing for improvement would be to have an offline version of Exchange available for use if our connection goes down.

I've been using this solution for fifteen to sixteen years.

This product is stable.

Exchange is scalable.

I would give this solution a rating of nine out of ten.