One Identity Manager Reviews

We use it to manage the roles that everybody receives for our network. We use it to create an overarching business role and then we have individual, direct assignments to provide extra permissions where needed.

It definitely makes the overall structure extremely organized. It doesn't help to minimize gaps in governance, but it definitely helps the administrator see exactly where the gaps are so that issues can be resolved.

It also helps streamline aspects of application governance including application access decisions and application auditing. In terms of auditing, for every application we use, we undergo an audit, mainly for the number of roles we are allowed to give out and the access that everybody is allowed to have. With One Identity, we are easily able to pull up the individual roles and it tells us exactly who has a given role.

One of the valuable features is that it is relatively organized. I definitely appreciate that aspect. It is also relatively simple to use with a very easy flow to the GUI. The user interface is really top-notch. Whatever we need to do with it, we are able to see just how to do it right away.

Customization is also fairly easy. There really isn't a whole lot to it.

And one of the main things that we use it for is the creation and modification of business roles. That way, we can assign just one role to a user and they have all the permissions that they would need. We also use the solution to extend the governance to cloud apps. For users who need to work with the cloud on a daily basis, it makes assigning their privileges a lot easier.

There is a small area inside the administrator's GUI that could be a little bit more organized.

I have used One Identity Manager for about three years.

It seems pretty stable. I haven't seen it go down.

The scalability seems to be on par with what we need. We're able to add and remove exactly as needed.

The other solution that I used was Active Directory.

I was not involved in the deployment. But in terms of maintenance on our side, it is just the typical configuration of business roles and direct assignments.

One of the variables it really depends on is the replication time that is set for it to replicate and pull all of the new changes that have been made from the user GUIs. But I work with a relatively large network, so our replication time is different from that of an average company or user.

I have a very positive opinion of One Identity Manager. In all honesty, it's the best application that I've used. I give it my 100 percent recommendation.

Our company hosts our on-premises application with this solution. It is not a complete SaaS product but rather a hosted environment in their tenancy. 

We have an internal team of four administrators and site developers who manage the solution and provide support to 2,000 employees. Our operational model includes contracting with professional services for new development, managing releases, and deployment. 

The solution is a typical, conventional IGA but the tool itself offers many options for customization. Some other products are easier to implement but don't have the same customization capabilities. 

The product must include SaaS in the future. 

The use of the administrative tools is cumbersome because too many are required for configurations. For example, the solution requires master usage of eight different client tools so it is excessive to manage the product. A small fix or deployment requires opening three or four different client tools that are not intuitive or easy to use.

The user experience and interface need additional improvements. Version 8.2 included improvements to the GUI and the inclusion of Angular JS which is better. However, the interface for 8.5 is a bit basic. 

Mastery of VB.NET is required to develop using the solution. Most developers use Java or .Net and VB.NET kills the vibe. We have to use VB.NET internally when working within the solution and that really needs to be modernized. To be honest, no developer is interested in learning VB.NET because it is a substandard language compared to newer options. 

I have been using the solution for six years. 

The solution is very stable and we rate it a twelve out of ten. However, reaching that stability is torture. 

We had issues and bugs because of customization requirements and it took us a year to go live. Too many custom processes cause issues even though the end result is stable. Gathering things to implement and install takes time. In our case, the implementation document for us to go live was 500 pages and that was a bit terrifying. 

The solution is scalable and the database is the key element in integrations. Everything connects to the central database which is a benefit because then the database becomes the central configuration management tool. If you upload DLL code to the database, it pushes it to other components. It is a well-designed central configuration approach. 

This approach can be a bit of a drain on performance because everything is connected to the central database. It is important to keep on top of database health with the solution.

Support needs to be better because this is a framework-style product and your own developer needs to be able to work efficiently with theirs. Sometimes a problem is in the development code, not the core product functionality. It takes too much time, as operational support to investigate and find the root cause. The solution offers amazing functionality for the framework, but if you didn't write the code yourself you are in trouble. 

For example, if a third party writes code and then their involvement ends, an issue in production that needs support won't get it because the third party's code error is an unsupported area. 

If your company's active management processes are not aligned with ISO or NIST standards, a lot of customization is required and this is the best solution. For ITSM, this is also the solution to use. 

If your processes are aligned then other solutions are appropriate. For a product like SalesPoint, the solution might be ServiceNow. 

The initial setup is very complex and I rate it a four out of ten. 

Deployment depends on the project scope. If the project is smaller, you can connect with Active Directory and auto RMS on the same day. However, if you want joiners, movers, or leaders to go live, it becomes more complex. 

The pricing is good and I think more money is made out of selling professional services than the product itself. 

Developers who have worked with the product won't need the assistance of professional services. It is easy to implement once you are accustomed to the product. 

Someone new to the product would need 20-30 days of services a year and in that scenario, it is expensive to develop and maintain. 

I rate this solution a six out of ten. 

We're a consulting company and provide professional services. If the customer has the solution, we end up using it. 

It offers really powerful processes. For example, when a person is joining a company, or changing teams, or leaving, it's easy to create a management flow for the onboarding or offboarding process. It helps manage all of the accounts a person might need to have access to. It integrates with several platforms and has specific connectors that make it very useful. It works with the majority of applications an enterprise might be using, such as Salesforce or various cloud providers. It also integrates well with SAP. 

It provides a unified view of logically connected solutions. It can connect to accounts related to employee identities under governance. It's probably the main reason a client would use the solution. The entire reason to deploy such a solution would be to have governance over accounts and have access to the life cycle of the account. 

The solution is a single platform for enterprise-level administration and governance of users, data, and privileged accounts. 

It can be fairly easy to customize, depending on a user's particular needs. If you are integrating with some very common solutions, it's pretty straightforward. 

The solution offers various business roles to help map company structure, name, and provision. You can tie permissions to specific roles very effectively. You can implement role-based access control.  

We've used it to extend governance to cloud apps. This is important to us. The common trend is to move to cloud applications. Even local clouds afford the same level of permissions. Having a standardized layer in between definitely helps. 

We immediately noted the benefits of the solution. However, it depends on the type of user. Common enterprise users can get quick results. Those responsible for identity access management or compliance see the results quickly. They'll benefit almost immediately. The normal user, however, may not understand the difference. 

You can use the solution to minimize security gaps and close the gaps between privileged and standard users. 

It can help consolidate procurement and licensing. It can help you understand how many users need access to specific applications to help you get better numbers as to what is needed and not overbuy licenses. 

The solution helps us streamline application access decisions, application compliance, and application auditing. You can get reports. It's nice. It helps with visibility and planning. 

It helps reduce footprints and minimizes access from unrelated teams. 

The user interface can be a bit clunky. It could be more modern. 

Its documentation could be better, especially around complex configurations. 

Support could be better as it is part of the user experience of the product itself.

I've used the solution for the past year. That said, we do not use the solution in my company directly. 

The solution is pretty stable. I haven't experienced any major issues. 

It's a scalable product. You can integrate with many platforms, and it works well with the majority of common enterprise platforms. It's pretty scalable overall. 

I've contacted support in the past. There is premiere and regular support, and I've used both. I work mostly on the client's behalf, which I would reach out to would depend on the client's contract. 

Premiere support has more advanced engineers and is more available to the users.

Normal support could be better in terms of the level of service. They should offer more services during the initial deployment and configuration. 

Neutral

I have used competitors in the past.

One of my colleagues handled the configuration and setup process. I've never experienced a deployment. 

If any maintenance is needed, it will depend on the deployment model. For example, if it is on-prem, it would need a bit more maintenance than if it were deployed on the cloud. There may be access and configuration reviews or integrations with other platforms that may be ongoing on occasion. 

Given the fact that you can save a lot of time and headaches around compliance, it is worth paying for this - if you are an enterprise. SMEs may find the cost high, even though they could benefit from the offering. 

We're One Identity partners. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. 

We operate in three regions and use One Identity Manager for identity governance.

One Identity Manager enables us to manage SAP systems efficiently. We can configure user settings and assign global and business roles, adding them to the directory regardless of their account activation status.

One Identity Manager integrates SAP accounts with employee identities. We can create accounts by importing job data into the server. However, if an employee's data is missing, we must input it first to create their profile.

One Identity Manager provides a single platform for enterprise-level administration and governance of users' data and privileged accounts.

The interface is intuitive, displaying all employee details and allowing for direct edits after account creation.

Customizing One Identity Manager is easy to do.

One Identity Manager allows us to manage business roles, including adding and removing them through the deployment flow sheet.

One Identity Manager is user-friendly, offering both ease of understanding and management. From a central console, we can apply both business and referral roles.

One Identity Manager helps to make procurement and licensing easier.

One Identity Manager helps us achieve an identity-centric zero-trust model. 

One Identity Manager's account creation feature stands out as its most valuable functionality.

I would like One Identity Manager to offer an easier way for users to learn to use their new features.

I have been using One Identity Manager for two years.

One Identity Manager is stable.

The initial deployment of One Identity Manager was straightforward. We have three environments where we deploy the load sheets to servers in a top-down approach. For removal, we follow the same procedure in reverse order.

I would rate One Identity Manager nine out of ten.

We use One Identity Manager to control what our users access.

Having a single platform helps streamline operations and connect to multiple systems, centralizing information for improved access and efficiency by eliminating the need for redundant software.

The UI is intuitive and user-friendly, so it doesn't require much training.

One Identity Manager has helped streamline our processes. Now we are all synced and data is not lost between teams.

One Identity Manager provides governance helping minimize the gaps within our test, dev, and production servers.

One Identity Manager provides governance helping minimize the gaps between privileged users and standard users.

One Identity Manager helps streamline application auditing.

The self-service functionality of One Identity Manager is arguably the most valuable feature. It allows us to easily initiate access requests for new hires through a user-friendly interface. This information is automatically sent to HR for review. Similarly, for departing employees, the intuitive interface enables us to import their details and trigger the termination process seamlessly.

I would like to have more advanced features and reporting added to One Identity Manager.

I have been using One Identity Manager for four years.

I have not experienced any stability issues with One Identity Manager.

One Identity Manager is scalable.

I would rate One Identity Manager a seven out of ten.

No maintenance is required on our end.

I recommend that organizations considering One Identity Manager ensure it aligns with their use cases and user base before implementation.

The primary use case involves overseeing comprehensive identity and access provisioning, along with managing the onboarding and de-provisioning processes for users. This includes orchestrating the creation of new projects, conducting simulations, and ensuring synchronization between a core solution and other target systems.

We utilize One Identity Manager to assist in SAP management. When connecting to an SAP target system, the synchronization of data is facilitated. Following the data sync process, all users can be reviewed within One Identity Manager under the SAP user tab. Furthermore, this tool allows us to publish data seamlessly from One Identity to various target systems.

Identity Governance and Administration is particularly beneficial for addressing the complexities associated with managing SAP, especially when dealing with aspects like transaction code (t-code) profiles and rules. It's important to note that while One Identity Manager doesn't specifically handle t-codes, it does provide functionality through the manager for managing files, rules, and other relevant features associated with transaction codes.

I haven't observed specialized workflows or specific business logic for SAP in One Identity Manager.

One Identity Manager serves as a consolidated platform for enterprise-level administration, offering governance over user data, privileged accounts, and related aspects. It's particularly effective in managing privileged accounts. By incorporating the manager, administrators can easily assign resources, facilitating the seamless management of admin accounts. The available features within the manager enable the creation of special identities, such as admin accounts.

The user experience with One Identity Manager is excellent. It's highly user-friendly, with well-organized features that make exploration intuitive. Everything, including account definitions, is easily accessible in the manager module. You can efficiently check the status and associations of objects, such as which projects or other objects are linked to a specific one.

Customizing the manager to meet our specific needs is crucial, as there are some limitations tied to factors like database performance. These limitations are often dependent on the volume of data being imported or synchronized. It's important to note that the platform's performance can be impacted when dealing with a high volume of data, potentially leading to degradation in performance.

I've utilized the Business Roles feature to map company structures, and it's a highly valuable tool as it allows you to define a set of rules for various markets. This feature facilitates logic and rule sets associated with market specifications. Under the business roles section, you can easily identify how markets can request access through IT software products and sales tools. Each business role is linked to specific SAP roles, creating a layered structure. This functionality simplifies understanding of the connection between SAP roles and business roles. If you're searching for a particular SAP role, you can efficiently locate it within the corresponding business role and vice versa. The platform also makes it easy to check mappings, and if new business roles need to be created, the process is streamlined within the Manager.

The Manager aids in reducing governance gaps among Test, Dev, and Production Servers. By synchronizing data monthly from the production system to the development and sandbox environments, this approach effectively minimizes any potential gaps in governance coverage.

It assists in streamlining decisions related to application access.

It does not include features for application compliance and auditing. Application auditing is not a capability provided. We do have Application rules in place, and for auditing, we utilize the attestation feature available in the Manager. However, it's important to note that managing the entire application is not within the scope of the tool.

In the Manager tools, my favorite feature is the ability to obtain a comprehensive overview of any user efficiently. The portfolio view simplifies this process, eliminating the need to check through Tableau or other tools. Another significant advantage is the quick and easy creation of mappings, roles, and IT configurations for various products within One Identity Manager. This feature stands out as a valuable and time-saving capability in the manager tools.

In our Governance and management tool, One Identity Manager plays a crucial role in connecting SAP accounts to employee identities. This integration ensures that all identities are linked to their respective employee profiles. This connection is of utmost importance because if, for instance, a login is enabled for a specific user, maintaining a consistent ID becomes essential. With One Identity, this process becomes seamless, allowing the replication of related attributes across all relevant systems and ensuring a cohesive identity management approach.

I would like them to enhance the search functionality to enable faster processing when looking for objects. Ideally, the system should automatically identify relevant entries and promptly present the results, eliminating the need for users to input search criteria each time they look for specific objects.

I have been using it for the last six years.

I would rate its stability capabilities eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability abilities nine out of ten.

Whenever we require support from One Identity, we initiate a service request, and the support team is readily accessible. They typically respond within twenty-four hours and effectively assist us with any issues we encounter. The support from One Identity has been reliable and responsive. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

The initial deployment was straightforward and smooth, mainly due to the clarity provided in the installation guide. Following the step-by-step instructions outlined in the documentation from the One Identity solution made the deployment and setup process very simple.

With the assistance of an architect, I managed the deployment process by completing just the configurations for the initial installation of One Identity. Maintenance during deployment is essential, especially when there are significant changes and script modifications aimed at improving performance. System maintenance is a necessary step in ensuring optimal functionality, and we routinely undertake these tasks.

The system lacks the capability to empower application orders in the line of Business Management to independently make governance decisions for applications without requiring IT involvement.

It did not assist us in realizing an Identity-centric Zero Trust model.

I recommend that individuals working with this system should possess some knowledge of Microsoft SQL and be familiar with server configurations. A good understanding of SQL servers can simplify the process of comprehending and managing cloud repairs. I would rate it nine out of ten.

We use the solution for managing identity access in a production company with nearly 6,000 users and more than 10,000 employees.

The main benefit is that it makes it easier to comply with GDPR. It makes it much, much easier. Also, it helps with data privacy and everything. It reduced the workload on the help desk and other departments that deal with user access and provisioning providers for users.

The solution offers good integration with other environments such as SAP and Active Directory, et cetera. We are managing access and managing all the provisioning of user access and accounts.

We manage the product to help manage SAP. The solution is okay for providing an enterprise view for the management of logically disconnected SAP accounts. It is quite complicated since SAP has quite a structure for these roles and accesses, however, it is quite manageable in One Identity and it is well supported with proper support from our external provider. We finally managed to make it perform. It is now working well.

One Identity Manager connects SAP accounts to employ identities under governance. This is important. We had it implemented before only based on requests without active-active connection. There were quite a lot of non-matched users, and what happened a lot was that we would have users who had left the company and were still active in SAP. So now when a user leaves the company it’s not an issue. Also, the SAP account is already provisioned. This ensures data protection and the privacy of users and everything.

If I were to assess One Identity Manager for providing us with a single platform for enterprise-level administration and governance of users, data, and privileged accounts, I’d rate it highly. From a rating of five, I’d rate it 4.9.

The solution's user experience and intuitiveness are good. It’s extensive. 

How easy it is to customize really depends on the level of desired customizations. There are some customizations out of the box while others require quite a lot of coding. In that case, I’d suggest a person uses support or gets external support.

You do need to learn it. It’s not something you get from the beginning. It’s not like Windows. It is more complicated. You need to know a few things from the back end, however, as you learn it, it becomes easy.

I've used the solution for four or more years. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We have chosen the product, especially for its governance for all the processes of the company, onboarding of employees, and lifecycle processes.

All our lifecycle processes have been improved. Some processes used to last around five days. Now, there are about one day or a couple of hours. This is very good for the user experience of our workers.

We are very satisfied of the privilege account governance feature, because we implemented a lot of processes around privilege account management that we didn't have before, which is a very good thing.

For the recertification and segregation of duties, it's easier to know all the information about our employees. If we need to delete some information, we can do it from a central point, then it can be deleted on all our searches. This is very good for GDPR.

The most valuable features of the product are the recertification, segregation of duties, and user experience.

The simplicity of the policy and role management features make it easy to use for implementing policies and configuring them.

When you see the product for the first time, it seems very complicated, but it's not. To improve the product, it should be made to seem simpler when you see it for the first time.

For the moment, we don't have any problems in production. Therefore, it is a good product.

The product is quite scalable, except for the database which is not highly available. This is where scalability could be improved.

We have the premium support and are very satisfied. They are always answer our questions very quickly. For the moment, we are very satisfied, but I think it's because we are paying for the premium support.

The initial setup is straightforward and easy to install. If it's your first time with the product, it can be very complicated because there are about 40 to 50 executables. However, when you know the product, it's simple.

The product is quite flexible. In the beginning, the product is an enormous solution. Then, after some training and experience, it becomes easier to implement.

It has helped to increase employee productivity.

We are satisfied with the product.