Pega Platform Reviews

We had an audit team for order management, primarily focused on mobile communications. This encompassed tasks such as SIM card dispatch and user configurations.

The most notable feature is the dynamic workflow changes, allowing adjustments without completing the entire cycle. Transitioning from test to build to production was seamless and on the fly, which is something truly remarkable about Pega. Additionally, the workflow creation doesn't require users with extensive technical skills, thanks to its low-code platform, making it accessible and efficient.

The pricing could be flexible and have multiple options. It is mainly suitable for large enterprises. They could have subscription plans to cater SMEs.

I have been using Pega BPM for four to five years.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten.

The product might not have been developed, possibly due to the absence of a dedicated product owner overseeing its development. Those who did the coding might not have performed up to standard. Improvements could be made in that area, as the code quality was lacking, affecting the scalability of the product.

300-400 users are using this solution. I rate the solution’s scalability as a five point five because we have lot of performance issues.

The setup process is fairly complex, and we always need an integrator for implementing it. It requires expertise in the platform. It's essential to have someone with Pega expertise rather than relying solely on regular users.

Pega is expensive than Versace. I rate the solution’s pricing a six on ten.

When it comes to Pega, I haven't come across any particularly outstanding out-of-the-box functionalities. However, I appreciate their local, no-code approach, which makes it easy for users to quickly grasp how to create work solutions. Although case management is included, it doesn't seem as flashy compared to other VPNs.

Pega was coming with lot of out of the box integration options with APIs and others but, we did not drive the AI part.

Based on the specific use case, I would recommend it to companies prioritizing user functionality over scalability in their portfolio. However, it's crucial to collaborate with a skilled integrator to ensure smooth implementation.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

For an upcoming project, my manager told us to look at all the different capabilities between the Pega, Appian, and the Camunda. We don't know the use case yet. We need to know the use case, however, at this point, we are just exploring different tools, BPM tools.

The integration is good. It can be capable of different integrations. 

There is a Pega Decision Hub, which is just a text-based analytical site. Based upon the text-based analytics and it can decide and trigger a case.

There are a lot of new features in Pega that are great.

I like case management in Pega. For the case management applications, so it's really fast to develop and it can scale and be extended based upon the business requirements.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. 

The documentation and training available are great.

Pega is coming out with Pega Express, which is kind of a low-code development platform. The business rules can be built in a Pega Express Portal, which is more specifically built for business users and not technical users. That way, even non-technical people are able to build their own business processes easily.

The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed.  

With Camunda, containerization is the most helpful feature. It can containerize and it can have its own deployment process. Pega may be adding that feature in a future release, however, right now, that's lacking and needs to be addressed.

I'd like to see Pega support microservices architecture, which it doesn't do right now.

We have been using the solution for more than six years.

The scalability is excellent. It can scale as much as you need it to. It's one of the great aspects of the product.

I've never directly contacted technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. We have our own internal team that can troubleshoot.  

That said, we used to connect with Pega on issues and it's my understanding that support tickets can be addressed very quickly. Support-wise it's very extensive. 

I also trained in Appian. 

The initial setup is straightforward. There is no complexity. There is documentation around the installation process and upgrade process as well. Pega will also provide you with good training materials in the Pega Express Portal, which is helpful for teams who are planning for new developments. That way, they can learn easily and understand everything.

It's a great product, Pega, however, cost-wise, it is a little expensive compared to other BPM tools. That's where I feel that they can improve.

Now, we are exploring other software, like Camunda. We just want to see the different designs or decide which tool is better for our application.

We are a customer and an end-user.

We have been using Pega for more than six years, and at this point, we also want to just explore the other BPM tools. It's kind of for considering cost efficiency also. We are looking at the cost of the development effort or the scalability of the tool. While I like Pega, I'm just exploring the other BPM tools with respect to Pega.

While it depends on the application you are using, if you're planning for an enterprise application that can interact with different applications, Pega would be a good option.

Sometimes if you have a smaller workflow, for example, if you're just introducing a smaller workflow in an existing application and you just want to leverage only that workflow-related feature, you don't need Pega. You can just have any workflow tool, like Camunda or Appian. Cost-wise, Pega may cost you more.

If you're planning to leverage all the features in Pega, like case management and low-code, no-code and RPA, robotic process automation, and other high level or case management, if you are planning to leverage all these different kinds of features that are available in Pega, just go with Pega. And if you're just planning to leverage only a kind of workflow, you don't need to go with Pega. You can just go with other BP flows or BPM process models like Camunda. 

There are a lot of features that you can explore in fault tolerance and error handling, exception handling, et cetera. There are other items as well if you're in the development stage, and something like Page will likely be helpful. I don't know of other tools that will support anything to that extent.

There are still some limitations in the solution. I'd rate it at an eight out of ten, as there are still some improvements that can be made. 

Regarding the primary use cases of Pega BPM, I can say that my company deals with multiple domains, like the government sector, banking, financial institutions, telecom, health care, and multiple domains that require Pega BPM.

The most valuable feature of the solution, I believe, is case management, which sets it apart from the rest of the solutions in the market.

I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market. I look forward to seeing the UX part of the solution improved in a much better manner.

I have been using Pega BPM for nine and a half years. My company's customers use the solution. My company has a partnership with Pega.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's technical support is good. My company is able to acquire the required assistance from the solution's technical support team, and they also provide consultancy services. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I wouldn't say that I have used any other solutions previously, but I was trained to use TIBCO, a low-code platform.

The initial setup of Pega BPM is neither easy nor complex, so it falls somewhere in the middle. Pega has provided options for automation for the setup phase, but still, its setup phase is not as direct as some of the other tools in the market.

Pega BPM has set a path for its setup phase, wherein you need to go ahead with Helm chart automation since Pega is a very wide solution, and infrastructures can differ for different companies. Pega doesn't offer something specific, like Terraform. In other technologies, the product gets installed with one click or just a few clicks, but with Pega, a person has to work a lot on the infrastructure part as well.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on-premises. My company provides the solution on Pega Cloud, technology-specific clouds, client-specific clouds, or on-premises.

The complete implementation process for Pega BPM would take a minimum of two to three days, prioritizing the infrastructure first and then the product.

Two people, one from the infrastructure end and one from the product end, which is the technical support person from Pega, would be needed to complete the deployment of the product. There is also the need to have Pega's partner who does the installation, making him or her the third person involved in the deployment.

The price of Pega BPM falls on the higher side of the spectrum if I were to compare it with other solutions in the market. What sets Pega BPM apart from other solutions in the market is that it has many features, including the use of AI and modern gen AI, which currently is not something you can experience in any other tools in the market. The aforementioned details contribute to making Pega BPM a leader in the market.

I would say the people who have realistic business process management kinds of use cases can go ahead and purchase Pega BPM blindfolded since it serves as a great case management tool, better than any other tool in the market. Pega BPM provides great visibility to its users, especially when you are involved in designing, where it will show you the number of stages, steps, processes, data, and even the people or parties who were involved, making it a great tool for case management. Presently, Pega BPM is heading towards the inclusion of more AI, owing to which it can be considered as one of the leaders in the market. The CRM part of the solution is one of its key selling features.

Though the solution's UX is good for developers, when you have to deliver the product to the customer, you don't get too many options for customization that can help you create an appealing view.

I rate the overall solution an eight and a half to nine out of ten.

The company has a strategic partnership with Pega. I was the general sales manager. 

This is a customizable product. It's low code and can be restored quickly if needed. 

The solution is expensive and it put many of our customers off. After a while, the company was no longer prepared to work directly with customers which created problems. 

I recently stopped using this solution because I changed jobs but I had used it for 18 months. 

The product is stable. 

The technical support is very good. 

Positive

We helped our customers implement this solution because the company had its own in-house dedicated team. 

This product is quite expensive. 

This product is suitable for pretty much any size of organization. I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

I mainly use Pega BPM to look at conversations and try to create a better experience for the customer.

Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems.

In the next release, Pega should include process mining.

I've been working with Pega BPM for three years.

Pega BPM is stable - I haven't seen any glitches because of usage or anything like that.

Pega BPM is scalable.

Pega's technical support could be better.

Neutral

The initial setup was complex.

It was easy to learn, adapt, and go through Pega BPM's low code builders. I would give Pega BPM a rating of nine out of ten.

Pega is an Intelligent Automation Platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area.

One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to improve the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM.

The RPA tool within this solution needs further enhancement to compete with other RPA tools in the market. They are focusing more on the overall platform rather than working on the RPA. Document AI tools could be an added functionality, for example. Alternatively, customers will need to purchase another RPA tool to complement the whole solution if they have very advanced RPA needs across their business.

I have used this solution for one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The technical support is good.

The initial setup was not that complex but also was not that simple.

We often recommend this solution to our customers. It is a wonderful solution. There are not many professionals working with this tool which is important to note.

If the core need of a customer is for BPM and automation, this is a suitable solution. If their needs exceed a BPM solution, such as modernizing different kinds of applications, there may be other suitable solutions. 

This is a good solution from a technical perspective and is based on a very reliable and scalable platform.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

The solution can be used to quickly manage and monitor processes in your organization. 

I have found the solution to be flexible and they provide good support. 

In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well. 

The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The solution is stable.

We have a customer that has over 6,000 users using the solution.

The solution provides very good support. They have the experience, knowledge, and are always helpful. 

I have used previously used Camunda, jBPM, and IBM solutions.

The version for private use on your workstation is easy to install. However, if you want to prepare a platform, it is not easy. All good solutions are not easy to install and tend to be complex and because of this, I would not say this solution is any more complex than any other good solution.

The amount of technical team needed depends on the project. For small implementations, we use one to two people and for big projects, we can have over 30 developers.

The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.

This solution is one of the best tools on the market right now. I would recommend it to others.

I rate Pega BPM a ten out of ten.

I am currently using it in my current organization. I have recently joined a new organization that also uses Pega, but in my previous organization, we used Pega for a couple of use cases where we set up automated workflows and other things.

We were doing straight-through processing and had everything set up. And we had RPA, and BluePrism bots there that we wanted to decommission, we set up Pega to do so.

We had issues with RP as a technology, as well as numerous challenges with some critical processes. Now, what used to always fail, too many bots and too many handoffs, both human and automated, is where we thought we would build APIs and integrate Pega.

When we were implementing in 2012, we also used Pega phones. It was a complete front office to back office interaction that was created, followed by case management. But I'm not sure, if you say case management as a feature, there's also knowledge management, which is present, but case management is what I've used extensively. 

Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable.

If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example.

It currently has OpenSpan, but OpenSpan is a different thing entirely, as you call it in robotics order. 

If the BPM and robotics could be integrated more easily, then I believe both could be used.

It is not at all integrated. OpenSpan operates in a completely different manner, and Pega operates in a completely different manner. Part of it is called Pega robotics, but it has nothing in common, in my opinion.

I have used Pega BPM for quite some time. I started using Pega BPM in 2012, it has been for 10 years.

However, because I was leading at the time, I didn't have much experience with the tool. There was one client at the time, where my role was to lead a 60-person team. 

We actually did massive implementations. We used that finance framework to create a lot of workflows, at least three to four workflow applications that were quite large, as well as a lot of integrations and such. 

We did use it extensively from 2012 to 2015. We are still using it.

Pega BPM is definitely a stable product.

Pega BPM is scalable.

I am not sure how well it will work because we have a lot of requirements that I see today, we have a lot of emails, that we want to set up, all of these as workflow. I am still trying to understand and see how all of these emails will be converted to case management and email listeners, how much it can be scaled, and whether it'll work properly or not when the volumes increase because we have a huge demand right now. We also have to see how Pega will support us.

We haven't reached the point where we can scale to maximum capacity to see how the product performs. However, we can currently see that the product is scaling based on our requirements.

Because I am new to the organization I don't know how many users it has. But, in the previous organization, I believe there were many business units that used it, including the front of house and back of house. I wouldn't have a figure in mind.

At my previous company, I was one of the business units that used it. I wouldn't know, but from my business unit's perspective, the front of house was probably 200 people.

It is used daily, and we get through our smart forms, we get the inputs, and then the back office creates the interaction, and the back office works on it.

They have a very good support system.  You must have your contacts in place, and they must respond to you based on the escalated level. It's fairly consistent.

I would rate the technical support a four out of five.

Positive

So far, I have primarily used Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere for RPA.

The initial setup was difficult because, as previously stated, there were numerous integrations. However, we had excellent support from the ECS team, the Pega team, and the platform setup. 

Once we got it set up, I would say we were pretty stable. Once done correctly and set up properly, it should be more stable than an RPA solution, in my opinion.

I would rate the initial setup a four out of five.

The initial setup was done in-house.

It was in-house when I did my setup. It was not a cloud setup, but rather an in-house setup. We did an upgrade, and everything was done in-house.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.