Pega Platform Reviews

The company has a strategic partnership with Pega. I was the general sales manager. 

This is a customizable product. It's low code and can be restored quickly if needed. 

The solution is expensive and it put many of our customers off. After a while, the company was no longer prepared to work directly with customers which created problems. 

I recently stopped using this solution because I changed jobs but I had used it for 18 months. 

The product is stable. 

The technical support is very good. 

Positive

We helped our customers implement this solution because the company had its own in-house dedicated team. 

This product is quite expensive. 

This product is suitable for pretty much any size of organization. I rate this solution eight out of 10. 

I mainly use Pega BPM to look at conversations and try to create a better experience for the customer.

Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems.

In the next release, Pega should include process mining.

I've been working with Pega BPM for three years.

Pega BPM is stable - I haven't seen any glitches because of usage or anything like that.

Pega BPM is scalable.

Pega's technical support could be better.

Neutral

The initial setup was complex.

It was easy to learn, adapt, and go through Pega BPM's low code builders. I would give Pega BPM a rating of nine out of ten.

Pega is an Intelligent Automation Platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area.

One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to improve the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM.

The RPA tool within this solution needs further enhancement to compete with other RPA tools in the market. They are focusing more on the overall platform rather than working on the RPA. Document AI tools could be an added functionality, for example. Alternatively, customers will need to purchase another RPA tool to complement the whole solution if they have very advanced RPA needs across their business.

I have used this solution for one year. 

This is a stable solution. 

This is a scalable solution. 

The technical support is good.

The initial setup was not that complex but also was not that simple.

We often recommend this solution to our customers. It is a wonderful solution. There are not many professionals working with this tool which is important to note.

If the core need of a customer is for BPM and automation, this is a suitable solution. If their needs exceed a BPM solution, such as modernizing different kinds of applications, there may be other suitable solutions. 

This is a good solution from a technical perspective and is based on a very reliable and scalable platform.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

The solution can be used to quickly manage and monitor processes in your organization. 

I have found the solution to be flexible and they provide good support. 

In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well. 

The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

The solution is stable.

We have a customer that has over 6,000 users using the solution.

The solution provides very good support. They have the experience, knowledge, and are always helpful. 

I have used previously used Camunda, jBPM, and IBM solutions.

The version for private use on your workstation is easy to install. However, if you want to prepare a platform, it is not easy. All good solutions are not easy to install and tend to be complex and because of this, I would not say this solution is any more complex than any other good solution.

The amount of technical team needed depends on the project. For small implementations, we use one to two people and for big projects, we can have over 30 developers.

The solution could be less expensive according to my customers. However, I think the price of the solution is fair.

This solution is one of the best tools on the market right now. I would recommend it to others.

I rate Pega BPM a ten out of ten.

I am currently using it in my current organization. I have recently joined a new organization that also uses Pega, but in my previous organization, we used Pega for a couple of use cases where we set up automated workflows and other things.

We were doing straight-through processing and had everything set up. And we had RPA, and BluePrism bots there that we wanted to decommission, we set up Pega to do so.

We had issues with RP as a technology, as well as numerous challenges with some critical processes. Now, what used to always fail, too many bots and too many handoffs, both human and automated, is where we thought we would build APIs and integrate Pega.

When we were implementing in 2012, we also used Pega phones. It was a complete front office to back office interaction that was created, followed by case management. But I'm not sure, if you say case management as a feature, there's also knowledge management, which is present, but case management is what I've used extensively. 

Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable.

If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example.

It currently has OpenSpan, but OpenSpan is a different thing entirely, as you call it in robotics order. 

If the BPM and robotics could be integrated more easily, then I believe both could be used.

It is not at all integrated. OpenSpan operates in a completely different manner, and Pega operates in a completely different manner. Part of it is called Pega robotics, but it has nothing in common, in my opinion.

I have used Pega BPM for quite some time. I started using Pega BPM in 2012, it has been for 10 years.

However, because I was leading at the time, I didn't have much experience with the tool. There was one client at the time, where my role was to lead a 60-person team. 

We actually did massive implementations. We used that finance framework to create a lot of workflows, at least three to four workflow applications that were quite large, as well as a lot of integrations and such. 

We did use it extensively from 2012 to 2015. We are still using it.

Pega BPM is definitely a stable product.

Pega BPM is scalable.

I am not sure how well it will work because we have a lot of requirements that I see today, we have a lot of emails, that we want to set up, all of these as workflow. I am still trying to understand and see how all of these emails will be converted to case management and email listeners, how much it can be scaled, and whether it'll work properly or not when the volumes increase because we have a huge demand right now. We also have to see how Pega will support us.

We haven't reached the point where we can scale to maximum capacity to see how the product performs. However, we can currently see that the product is scaling based on our requirements.

Because I am new to the organization I don't know how many users it has. But, in the previous organization, I believe there were many business units that used it, including the front of house and back of house. I wouldn't have a figure in mind.

At my previous company, I was one of the business units that used it. I wouldn't know, but from my business unit's perspective, the front of house was probably 200 people.

It is used daily, and we get through our smart forms, we get the inputs, and then the back office creates the interaction, and the back office works on it.

They have a very good support system.  You must have your contacts in place, and they must respond to you based on the escalated level. It's fairly consistent.

I would rate the technical support a four out of five.

Positive

So far, I have primarily used Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere for RPA.

The initial setup was difficult because, as previously stated, there were numerous integrations. However, we had excellent support from the ECS team, the Pega team, and the platform setup. 

Once we got it set up, I would say we were pretty stable. Once done correctly and set up properly, it should be more stable than an RPA solution, in my opinion.

I would rate the initial setup a four out of five.

The initial setup was done in-house.

It was in-house when I did my setup. It was not a cloud setup, but rather an in-house setup. We did an upgrade, and everything was done in-house.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

They use it for marketing and case management. It is also used for workflow process automation and market intelligence, using the solution’s AI capabilities.

The case management functionality of this solution has been most valuable.

There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before.

I have been using this solution for eight years.

This is a stable solution.

This is a scalable solution.

I would rate the customer service for this solution a four out of five.

Positive

The initial setup for this solution is not that complex.

The enterprise product has the best features as a cloud product. It is the market leader in the BPM space.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Pega BPM is used by us for customer onboarding, support, and care.

Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities. 

By creating a visual layout of the business process, designers can easily go and implement the business process. And from there, you can pretty much do it in concur. You can concentrate on each area of the business process and create user input tasks with defined role-based access controls on each of those user input tasks.

Pega's low code development is entirely based on object-oriented and application development. However, I believe it can be used in a low code application, such as development platform features such as tracking and dropping some user components. It has that support, but not to the extent that other platforms do, such as the app in or out system. They make it very simple to create UIs without the need to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript together to create pixel-perfect UIs. I believe Pega could improve in this area.

I have been working with Pega BPM for more than five years.

It's fairly stable and in performance as well.

We didn't have to put much effort into upgrading our platform and adding more resources. I would say that the platform is obviously very robust and capable of scaling to large enterprise-scale recommendations.

In our company, we have more than 300 people who use this solution.

Technical support is very good. They usually respond quickly to inquiries, whether they are about infrastructure or products.

The initial setup is straightforward. You can now create your business processes and begin designing forms for end users. On Cloud, it is pretty straightforward.

Maintenance is dependent on the size of the program or application. You would need at least two people. However, the number of people would vary depending on the size of the application and the program.

Some of the key pain points were addressed by the applications that were developed, primarily in terms of user satisfaction and implementing them in the business process. 

The return on investment was not a consumer web application where the product would be rolled out to the general public and revenue would be generated. 

It was designed primarily for internal business users, With the main goal of the application being to improve business processes and bring all offline processes online to have a digital footprint of those business processes, making tracking easier.

I am not aware of the cost. But, considering the licenses, user licenses, and infrastructure, I'd guess around a million USD.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market. For the learning curve, I would reduce two points.

We use this solution for HR automation or HR service delivery.

It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs. 

Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow.

Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer.

I have been using this solution for almost three years now. We started using it in late 2017.

It is stable. We haven't faced any downtime or any other issues.

It is quite scalable.

My team would know about it, and I personally don't really get into those details. After the implementation, our teams are on their own. I don't think they are reaching out to Pega support frequently because I don't see any product issues as such. Everything is configurable, and it is running daily.

It is not so complex, but it needs an intermediate level of skill set. It is not so complex, but it is also not so easy.

It is cost-effective for medium enterprises. It is cheaper than ServiceNow.

I would definitely recommend this solution. It is more cost-effective as compared to other products. It is the right product for medium enterprises rather than a highly-expensive solution such as ServiceNow, to which we are switching. When you're implementing it, you should configure it in the right way with all categories, subcategories, and other things.

I would rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.