Accessibility, ease of use (Web GUI, MobileApps). In general, compared with other software, it's easy to install/implement and build structures. It's also cost effective.
Monitoring Specialist at a construction company with 10,001+ employees
Overall Ease Of Use Is Good Though To Modify Sensors You May Need Support
Pros and Cons
- "Accessibility, ease of use (Web GUI, MobileApps). In general, compared with other software"
- "Mostly, this software has sensors for devices to monitor specs and you can build or develop or modify various sensors, according to your company's needs. But you may need to do that with coding or plugins or with the support of Paessler AG, the manufacturer."
What is most valuable?
How has it helped my organization?
Every department in my company uses this tool for SMS or e-mail alerts regarding its devices.
What needs improvement?
Mostly, this software has sensors for devices to monitor specs and you can build or develop or modify various sensors, according to your company's needs. But you may need to do that with coding or plugins or with the support of Paessler AG, the manufacturer.
For how long have I used the solution?
About one and a half years.
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about PRTG Network Monitor. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It depends on your company's IT infrastructure. Mostly security issues (firewall/proxy permissions, etc.) are the ones that could cause stability problems in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Because we are a relatively new user, I can't really comment on this.
How are customer service and support?
Support is mostly done via support tickets. Nothing is perfect, I’d give them eight out of 10. They do as much as they can.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have used SAP ITIM. We switched because PRTG is more cost effective then SAP ITIM monitoring.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup is straightforward. Not a big deal in general.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
If you're looking for a cost effective software I’d suggest this product. If you have worked with/used a more professional product or need a more professional/complex product, I would not recommend this one. If you want a straightforward and easy solution, PRTG Network Monitoring is one of the best.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I was not the decision maker so no comment.
What other advice do I have?
If you're looking for "easy", "simple", and "user friendly", I would recommend this product.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Reliable support, stable, and scalable
Pros and Cons
- "PRTG Network Monitor can improve Layer 2 and Layer 3 network maps and the GUI more user-friendly. Additionally, they should bundle the features so I can monitor everything on one particular device."
What needs improvement?
PRTG Network Monitor can improve Layer 2 and Layer 3 network maps and the GUI more user-friendly. Additionally, they should bundle the features so I can monitor everything on one particular device.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using PRTG Network Monitor for over one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
PRTG Network Monitor is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of PRTG Network Monitor is good. We only need to buy licenses from PRTG Network Monitor and add more devices or sites, or customers to it. It is easy.
We have four technicians and one senior technician using PRTG Network Monitor. If something goes down, they can see the problem and then either go to the site or approach the situation remotely.
How are customer service and support?
The support from PRTG Network Monitor has been reliable. They have been available when we need them.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of PRTG Network Monitor is simple. Adding a device for monitoring only takes a few minutes. The technician can add a device to monitor without problems.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of PRTG Network Monitor is reasonable for the features that the solution provides. They charge you per monitoring, not per node, it is per port that you need for a device.
If they could have pricing per device that would be a benefit.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others is if you can't afford SolarWinds and those other expensive solutions, PRTG Network Monitor is the best value for money.
I rate PRTG Network Monitor an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Buyer's Guide
PRTG Network Monitor
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about PRTG Network Monitor. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Network Department MAnager at Engineering Consultants Group S.A.
Provides stable and reliable network monitoring
Pros and Cons
- "It gives me a live view of the traffic on the WAN."
- "It would be nice if it gave us alerts via Gmail or SMS message."
What is our primary use case?
Within our organization, only the network department uses this solution — there are eight of us.
What is most valuable?
It gives me a live view of the traffic on the WAN. It produces reports on errors and faulty devices. It also produces a lot of logs on what is afoot. I can produce many reports using it.
What needs improvement?
It needs to have more monitoring on end-user devices. We can monitor a set of network devices, but not end-users' devices.
It would be nice if it gave us alerts via Gmail or SMS message.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for five years.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
PRTG Network Monitor is both scalable and stable.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is excellent.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward — it's just a simple cover server.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We are currently evaluating many other security solutions.
What other advice do I have?
I would recommend this solution because it's great for monitoring network traffic and producing reports.
Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Has a good alerting system and customizable bandwidth
Pros and Cons
- "We like the alerting system, the SNMP monitoring and the customization of the bandwidth."
- "The automation should be improved."
What is our primary use case?
We are using the latest update.
We use the solution for our firewall interface and bandwidth monitoring.
The solution may be modified to meet one's requirements. Mine are simply for SNMP bandwidth monitoring for my network interfaces. Others may have different needs when it comes to the solution.
What is most valuable?
The capabilities the solution provides us meet our needs. We feel the solution and its features to be valuable.
We like the alerting system, the SNMP monitoring and the customization of the bandwidth. It dives deeply into the information concerning metrics. These are the reasons we chose to go with the solution.
What needs improvement?
The automation should be improved. I am talking about automation by code and processes and provisioning the IP desk. Should the automation capabilities be addressed, I would raise my rating from an eight to a ten out of ten.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using PRTG Network Monitor for many years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution has good performance and I find it to be stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution suits our scalability needs. We also onboard many other systems.
How are customer service and support?
We have our own technical team. As such, there has been no need for us to be in touch with technical support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Prior to the solution, we made use of Zabbix and continue to do so in respect of customers and management. We also tried out another product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was simple, really straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
Our team handled the entire setup, internally.
Of course, the solution requires maintenance once deployed, as does every software in respect of upgrade, configuration and data backup requirements. This is part of one's product governance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our price involves less than 5,000 tiers.
We are satisfied with the price.
What other advice do I have?
When software version releases come out, we simply install and upgrade them.
The solution is cloud-based. We hosted our platform into our own cloud infrastructure.
For the moment, we are not looking for integration with other products.
There are, perhaps, 25 users making use of the solution in our organization.
The solution boasts good performance.
I would certainly recommend the solution to others.
I rate PRTG Network Monitor as an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Manager
Good auto-discovery feature, and most of the sensors are available, but it should be more customizable
Pros and Cons
- "We have asked questions of their technical support and they have a very good response time."
- "Other monitoring tools that I have used are easier to use."
What is our primary use case?
We are a system integrator and this is one of the monitoring products that we implement for our clients.
Our customers use it for monitoring their networks.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is autodiscovery.
Most of the sensors are available for it, such as traffic sensors and SNMP sensors. They have a very wide library that we can use.
What needs improvement?
From a view perspective, it should be more customizable.
Other monitoring tools that I have used are easier to use.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with PRTG Network Monitor for two months. The company has been using it for approximately two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Over the approximately two years that the company has been using this product, it has been very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This is a scalable product. We have six people in the company that use it.
I have specific requirements for data that I have to gather. Of more than 400 data points that are available, I only need approximately 40. So, at this point, I'm only utilizing about 10% of the capability.
How are customer service and support?
We have asked questions of their technical support and they have a very good response time. They immediately jump in and solve any issues that we have, as well as answer our inquiries.
I would rate the technical support a four out of five.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In the past, I have worked with a lot of different monitoring tools.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing fees are billed annually and there are no costs in addition to this.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated several other solutions and one of the reasons that we chose PRTG is because they provided us with a free trial that included all of the sensors. This gives you the opportunity to test the product and see it work. After that, if you are satisfied with it, you can purchase it.
The other solutions that we tried will give you only a few sensors. You do not have the full functionality of the system available for testing.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, this is a good product but there are other monitoring tools that are easier to use.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
Cloud support engineer at grupo cma
Simple to set up, easy to configure, and offers good stability
Pros and Cons
- "The installation is not that complex."
- "The database needs improvement."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution as a monitoring tool. We use it mostly for looking at changes in the resources' behavior. Pretty much it's the use we have primarily. The second one is to provide a report of the total consumption of the resources that we use. We pretty much have to monitor systems.
What is most valuable?
We haven't played with many options. I know it offers a lot of different plugins for certain solutions, such as a VPN monitor and also website monitor. We haven't configured those as we are under the management direction, and if they don't allow it, pretty much we use the options that we have and the plan for the department.
The simplicity of the software is great.
The configuration is not hard to handle.
The installation is not that complex.
The best part of the tool is the simplicity of the tool itself.
The product can scale well.
What needs improvement?
The database needs improvement. They use plain text for the data. That's probably not a concern for them, however, sometimes we need to enhance some of the reports and we cannot do that. If they move to a transactional database, it will be better for users to get access to different kinds of reports. Right now, it's pretty straightforward in terms of what you can do, and you cannot apply customization or get specific data.
They have something called maps where you can configure or set up a view for the different devices. They have different options than the ones that we have, such as a pie chart option, and likely offer different kinds of graphs. It would be nice to show you the real-time status using these graphs.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using the solution for about three years at this point.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is great. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of the product is quite good.
How are customer service and support?
I contacted technical support in the past. The few times I got a pretty straightforward answer, although the service was probably not the fastest. It was by email, which can be less immediate than a phone call. In general, however, it was good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We're also using OneView for HPE BladeSystem for monitoring.
How was the initial setup?
The product was easy to implement. The simplicity of the tool is the key to successful sales on this monitoring solution. All the options are straightforward for the users as well. It's not that complex to implement.
To fully deploy the solution into our environment took a couple of days.
What other advice do I have?
We're using the latest version of the solution. We updated the version less than a month ago.
I'd advise potential new users, if they are looking for an easy tool to deploy and manage, it's the way to go. If they are looking for complex reports, I will say stay away from this product.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Director - Operations at Shell Networks & Solutions Ltd
Straightforward to set up, good pricing, and has good integration capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup was easy. We didn't have any issues with the process and everything rolled out smoothly."
- "Their penetration within the market could be much better. If their pricing was lower, even though it's reasonable now, it might help them achieve this."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution in order to monitor the network performance and stability.
What is most valuable?
The pricing of the solution is pretty good. We don't find it too unreasonable. It's pretty compatible if you look at it in comparison to the competition.
The solution offers good integration capabilities.
The initial setup was easy. We didn't have any issues with the process and everything rolled out smoothly.
What needs improvement?
Their penetration within the market could be much better. If their pricing was lower, even though it's reasonable now, it might help them achieve this.
The solution needs a better graphical grid. A good example of what I mean is SolarWinds, which has an excellent graphical grid. It would help with organizations that have a bit more complexity.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been working with the solution for the last ten years. It's been a decade. I've worked with the product for a long time.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability seems to be quite reliable. It's a good product. I can't comment on dealing with any bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
How are customer service and technical support?
I've never personally had the chance to contact technical support. Having never reached out directly, it would be hard to discuss their knowledgeability or responsiveness.
How was the initial setup?
We found the initial setup to be pretty straightforward. It wasn't too complex. We didn't have any trouble setting everything up.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the implementation ourselves, in-house. We didn't need to hire any outside consultants or integrators.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing of the solution is fair and in line with the rest of the market. It's not too high.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
While I didn't properly evaluate SolarWinds, I have seen other people using it and I found that it had a very nice graphical grid and GUI.
What other advice do I have?
We only use the product ourselves. We're end-users and customers, not resellers or consultants.
For smaller networks, I would recommend this solution. That said, if the network is complex, I would recommend a company evaluates another product instead. Something like SolarWinds may be a better option in cases of complexity. It's not the scalability, rather graphically, the GUI you get in terms of displays and things of that nature look much better in SolarWinds. I should preface this recommendation by saying that I have not used it. I've seen people using it. I feel that looks much better and would be better suited based on what I have seen.
Overall, I would rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If it had a better graphical grid similar to SolarWinds, I would rate it higher.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We can monitor everything from one place and get email or SMS notifications.
What is most valuable?
Easy to setup, many avaliable sensors, easy import of MIB, cheap
How has it helped my organization?
We can monitor everything from one place and get email or SMS notifications.
We are monitoring QoS for site-to-site VPNs.
What needs improvement?
Creating maps
For how long have I used the solution?
3 years
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Deployment is straightforward.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
From time to time, you need to reboot the PRTG probe server.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No, you can add more probes very easily even from prtg web console.
How are customer service and technical support?
7/10, main issue is that the company is in Germany and their support works during Europe business hours.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used Solarwinds, to set it up and tweek took a very long time, and very expensive compare to PRTG.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You will not find anything cheaper that really does the job.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free PRTG Network Monitor Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Network Monitoring Software IT Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Monitoring SoftwarePopular Comparisons
New Relic
SolarWinds NPM
Cisco DNA Center
ThousandEyes
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Nagios XI
LogicMonitor
Centreon
Nagios Core
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
ScienceLogic
Buyer's Guide
Download our free PRTG Network Monitor Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- PRTG vs. SolarWinds: Which is a better Network Monitoring Tool?
- Should we choose Nagios or PRTG?
- Choosing a monitoring solution for cloud services: Azure Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor
- Can PRTG be used to monitor Oracle SOA suite components or should we choose Nagios instead?
- When evaluating Network Performance Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
- What Questions Should I Ask Before Buying a Network Monitoring Tool?
- UIM OnPrem - SaaS
- Anyone switching from SolarWinds NPM? What is a good alternative and why?
- What is the best tool for SQL monitoring in a large enterprise?