SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Reviews

We use this solution for identity governance and to understand who has access to what and whether that access should be granted or not. We also use it for access to recertification automation which provides a complete report of who has what access in the organization at the press of a button. We are able to automate the entire process of joiners, movers, levers and the provisioning and deprovisioning of identities. 

When someone joins any organization, all their roles and access is provided at the click of a button. When they move from one department to the other, the accesses which are not required are revoked, and the ones which are necessary are provisioned. Sailpoint offers complete automation of the lifecycle of any user.

We are able to offer on-prem on cloud based deployments, depending on our customer's requirements. 

This solution has made our team more effective. We need less manual approvals when someone new joins our company. There is less paperwork and fewer support tickets raised for access. 

The number of integrations that they have is amazing. The flexibility of the tool is great and you can really customize a lot. The dashboards that can be created are very useful. The proactive revoking of accesses in the case of an attack is amazing.

The cost of this solution is high. The technical assistance center could be improved. They're very good, but considering the intricacies of the solution, they can further improve.

We have been using this solution for six and a half years.

This is a stable solution. 

This is a very scalable solution. A couple of million users can be scaled overnight.

I would rate this solution's technical support a three and a half out of five. 

Neutral

The initial setup is complex due to the handling of identity and access management. If you have the expertise and if you are trained well, then it is not difficult. Deployment takes between three and twelve months.

This is an expensive solution. I would rate it a two and a half out of five for pricing. 

I would recommend Sailpoint to others. 

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to manage the identity governance, from creating the IDs and their accesses to managing and revoking them. 

An issue needing improvement is that the solution is heavily focused on one's identity, while there has been a move to providing identity as a security service. While it provides these services, the solution can still not do the identity management for the cloud. As such, the security feature can be improved.

Essentially, it manages and helps to create all the IDs and to manage the identities and accesses. What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security. That's where tools like CyberArk or Netskope, which are more CASB tools, come into play.

I can think of no additional features needing improvement. 

I do not personally deal with SailPoint IdentityIQ but, as a security consultant, discuss with the customer its purchase. I have been doing so for three years.

The solution is pretty stable and simple to use.

The solution is scalable. 

I have not had experience with technical support.

The installation consists of two parts, the one for coming up with the rules, for which we go to the input, the other for providing some assistance in the creation of the rules and accesses. Once that part is done, the tooling part is pretty simple.

The installation is straightforward. 

I do not recall how long it took. 

The solution can be deployed both on-cloud and on-premises?

It's pretty stable and simple to use.

I have recommended the solution to three customers who have opted for it.

I would recommend this solution to others. 

From the perspective of its performance I would rate SailPoint IdentityIQ as a nine out of ten, in light of its identity governance. 

Access Governance has become and integral part of cyber security. It is essential to keep track of who has what access. Sailpoint IIQ simplifies this by providing an OOTB module for access certification. Administrators can create, schedule and design certification with just a few clicks.

A lot of OOTB connectors for managing various types of applications. Simplified process for application on boarding and provisioning.

Simplified Access Governance and Life Cycle Management. Easy to implement in comparison to other IAM tools.

Should have authentication modules as well

We had no issues with the deployment.

We had no issues with the stability.

There were no issues with scaling it for our needs.

The initial setup is straightforward. Easy installation and configuration.

Implement Sailpoint IIQ for Access Governance and for simplified Identity Management.

• Certification
• Full Life Cycle management of IT system accounts

• It has, for the first time, consolidated a single view of a user's access to the company's multiple IT systems
• This has now allowed us to confidently cleanup a large proportion of accounts that could not previously have been easily identified as no longer required
• Furthermore, it has forced ownership of non-user/non-individual accounts and accountability of them

• Reporting and some GUI aspects. Reporting lacks the flexibility of retrieving the vast amount of data that we know is in the database, but not easily accessible
• Scheduling also comes short, specifically when it comes to multiple jobs that are interdependent (e.g. preventing certain groups of jobs from running concurrently)

Five years across different companies.

Yes - Some application connectors (namely Lotus Notes) - have some fundamental flaws. But the major issue was cleaning up, what we expected to be, authoritative data - specifically HR data, and users not in HR (eg. contractors, etc) and ensuring global consistency and adherence to standards.

Not of the core product, but some issues with some of the connectors (especially Lotus Notes, and ServiceNow). This has led to some issues with daily batch jobs which either time out, hang, or are terminated and this has in turn, we suspect, created some internal DB link corruptions.

Not yet. Though current nightly batch jobs range from completing within 8 hours to 48 hours, with no obvious reasons as to why

Very good.

Very good.

Yes we did. We switched because the solution no longer offered support as it was sold to Sailpoint.

It was complex. Identity and account management is very heavily dependent on the accuracy, authority, and timing of the source data. As the implementation progressed, we became aware more and more that some of the missing detail (especially around the exceptions of when a central unique Employee number is actually "central" or consistent, or the complexity of some of the attributes - e.g. whether their validity is date dependent, allowing for multiple values, etc) will cause issues in the proposed processes and the timing of providing access when required.

We used a vendor whose level of expertise was excellent.

No ROI as of yet.

It was two years give or take.

Yes - NetIQ, Oracle, and SAP.

Spend double the time/money up front in fully understanding your business requirements, opportunities for process changes. Also ensure you get a detailed understanding of identity and access business processes and understand your HR (and other authoritative) data source.

Security and administration for any new/current access.

Manage process and search information.

It improves the function for CMS - the website is a centralized system to manage accounts and access for CMS applications.

It allowed to implement the automated processes when a new employee is hired. It allows to have a main central process for new hires.

I've used it for three years now.

No, but we encountered some bugs after the implementation and they were fixed.

A few of them - they were connection and performance issues but they both have been fixed.

Yes. We needed to contact Sailpoint directly to address the issue.

It was ok.

It needs to improve SLA.

The client made the decision.

Both vendor team and in-house.

I wasn't involved in the process, but other solutions were evaluated before choosing this one.

Verify the requirements and the growth.

• Provisioning in multiple environments
• Certification
• Provisioning Auditing

Automated accounts provisioning during the on-boarding process.

Additional details during account aggregation failures to help quick troubleshooting.

We started with our customer last fall.

No issues encountered.

None.

Initial testing with a large amount of cubes (over 60K) went well.

Good.

Good - via a forum (Compass) and ticketing system.

SailPoin

Yes, we used Sun Identity Management and we switched because Sun IDM is coming to the end of its life.

It was straightforward as we have a lot of experience with Sun IDM.

I am part of a consulting service team who can provide Identity Management platform implementation. We have been helping our customer implement Sun IDM in the past and last fall, we helped the customer in SailPoint.

Oracle Identity Manager was the other one we helped evaluate.

Understand the customer's business practice regarding provisioning.

We primarily use this solution for simplifying the IAM lifecycle, naming conventions, and application onboarding.

This solution has improved our organization through its ease of application onboarding, approvals, provisioning, and lifecycle UI performance.

I have found all of the features valuable and easy to use.

I think that the onboarding framework could be improved.

User provisioning and the role management features are good.

The advanced provisioning features require more improvement.

I have used this solution for seven years.

I would rate the technical support a 4/5.

The setup was straightforward.

I did evaluate other options.

I would recommend this product based on the customer requirements.