SailPoint Identity Security Cloud Reviews

• Provisioning in multiple environments
• Certification
• Provisioning Auditing

Automated accounts provisioning during the on-boarding process.

Additional details during account aggregation failures to help quick troubleshooting.

We started with our customer last fall.

No issues encountered.

None.

Initial testing with a large amount of cubes (over 60K) went well.

Good.

Good - via a forum (Compass) and ticketing system.

SailPoin

Yes, we used Sun Identity Management and we switched because Sun IDM is coming to the end of its life.

It was straightforward as we have a lot of experience with Sun IDM.

I am part of a consulting service team who can provide Identity Management platform implementation. We have been helping our customer implement Sun IDM in the past and last fall, we helped the customer in SailPoint.

Oracle Identity Manager was the other one we helped evaluate.

Understand the customer's business practice regarding provisioning.

We use the on-premises and cloud deployment models. We use it for many uses like compliance control, provisioning, automated provisioning, password management, and identity governance.

The compliance features are the most valuable features. 

I would like for the client base to be improved. Also, they should change what they charge for the licenses.  

They should lower the price and technical support should be better. Their support takes a long time to respond and they're not straightforward.

The stability is good. 

Scalability is good. Based on compliance, it is good. 

We've had issues with support. 

The initial setup is straightforward. The time it takes to deploy depends on the size of the organization but it is reasonable. 

I would rate it a seven out of ten. Not a ten because of the support and because of the high price. 

We used this solution in one of our projects for provisioning rights in applications such as Active Directory and Office 365. It was also used for collecting information and centralizing it, which was then used to create rights.

There is a lot of documentation available.

The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources.

This solution is difficult to configure.

The interface should be simple and easier to use.

I have been working with SailPoint IdentityIQ for five months.

Technical support is very responsive. When I created a ticket, they responded the same day.

I had questions, more than issues when it came to technical support.

The project that I worked on involved an on-premises deployment, although it can also be deployed on the cloud or in a hybrid cloud environment.

My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to not begin without having the specification written and documented in advance. If you are implementing it for a client then you want to understand everything that the client wants to use, in advance of implementing.

SailPoint is very good when it comes to Identity Management, although I would appreciate it more if it were simpler to use.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

We use it for lifecycle management. We have joiner, leaver, rehire, and termination as well as user provisioning. We also do certifications and reporting.

Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable.

The UI needs to be more user friendly. More concentration on historical policy violations would be great.

In terms of new features, I would like to see artificial intelligence and machine language added.

I have been using SailPoint IdentityIQ for ten years.

It is stable.

It is scalable. We have 15 users in our organization.

SailPoint support is very good.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment was okay.

I used an in-house team.

SailPoint is higher in price as compared to Saviynt. The initial cost of SailPoint is very high. There are additional costs to the standard licensing fees.

I didn't evaluate previously, but I am currently evaluating Saviynt and IdentityNow.

I would rate SailPoint IdentityIQ a nine out of ten. I am happy with it.

I have experience with AirPods IAQ, primarily for identity and access management. I work on engineering the entire workflow of IAQ, including lifecycle certifications and application integrations as they relate to access management.

We find flexibility to be one of the most valuable features. The solution can be customized to adapt the workflow to our industry, offering considerable flexibility. 

Additionally, it is considered a good solution for large companies due to its scalability and ability to cater to the needs of many customers. It has also enhanced security and provided significant flexibility for our specifications module.

There are more functionalities in the Cloud that could be explored. It's good for big companies, however, I can't compare Identity Cloud with IAQ as we don't use it extensively.

I have five to six years of experience with the product.

The version I use now is very stable, especially compared to previous versions like eight point zero and eight point one.

The scalability is good. On a scale of one to ten, I rate it about seven or eight.

I don't handle the setup or configurations, however, our admin team finds it manageable.

We have a team that is responsible for the deployment. About 20% of the team is involved in deployment and configurations.

The product has provided return on investment in terms of enhanced security and flexibility.

I compared SailPoint with Saviynt, and I find IAQ detailed and good.

I would recommend SailPoint IAQ to big companies. 

Overall, I'd rate the solution around eight on a scale of one to ten.