SentinelOne Singularity Complete Reviews

We are mainly using it to replace a product we used before for antivirus. My specific use case for SentinelOne is threat hunting. I'm a security professional in our organization, doing offensive security. I do pen tests and analysis, and I'm hunting for intruders in our network. That's the context in which I'm using SentinelOne.

We're using two parts of SentinelOne right now. The first one is the antivirus and that has improved our company in that we have been able to find about 25 percent more malware on our machines than the old solution did, and that's remarkable because we are a bigger company and we used a big solution from a big player in the market. Finding 25 percent more is a really big increase. 

In addition, previously we were not able to collect all the actions from our clients in the field, and search, systematically, through what they are doing and see if there is an intruder. It's the first time that is possible for us, with SentinelOne.

In terms of incident response time, it's too early to provide real numbers because we haven't finished the rollout around the world in our company. But from the trend I have seen, I would estimate we are saving about 20 percent in response time, compared to our old antivirus solution.

When talking about mean time to repair, our old solution had some problems on several clients, which resulted in having to completely restore the client. That is something we haven't had with SentinelOne, up until now. It's also difficult to estimate because we don't have it on every machine. The old product was on about 5,000 machines and I now have SentinelOne on 2,500 machines, so it's not a completely fair comparison. But if you need a number, it has also been reduced by 20 percent.

In addition, it has increased analyst productivity in our company. My main job is to analyze many of the malware threats and, again, penetration testing. But the connection to virus total is a very helpful thing and I am using it heavily. That reduces the payload I have to analyze manually and the amount of malware I have to execute in sandboxes. It has probably reduced my workload by about 50 percent. That's really great.

For me, the most valuable feature is the Deep Visibility. It gives you the ability to search all actions that were taken on a specific machine, like writing register keys, executing software, opening, reading, and writing files. All that stuff is available from the SentinelOne console. I'm able to see which software is permanent on a machine, and how that happened, whether by registry keys or writing it to a special folder on the machine. That's threat-handy. Deep Visibility has found threats we did not know were lingering on endpoints, but I am not allowed to speak further about this issue.

Because we are a bigger company, we are doing a step-by-step rollout. We don't have all countries fully in production, where "fully in production" means that SentinelOne is the only antivirus product on the machine. So in some countries we just have it reporting and not quarantining. For example, in China we have SentinelOne completely up and running, and there the Behavioral AI analysis is one of the reasons the antivirus is so effective. To be honest, we have to white-list some stuff which behaves weird but is really needed and not harmful to us.

The Behavioral AI recognizes novel and fileless attacks and responds in real-time and it does so really well. That is one of the things that has really brought us forward. It completely changes how we work with our antivirus solution. The previous product just gave us the information that the software had blocked something, while in SentinelOne we really see what was going on. We see the complete path of execution for a given malware: how it got on the machine and how it got executed. And then, SentinelOne stops it. It gets executed but then gets stopped, and that's something completely different from a pattern-based antivirus.

Another great benefit comes from the fact that SentinelOne doesn't rely on pattern updates. For some machines we have at customer sites, which are not reachable by internet or VPN, we have better protection than before because you don't need to update the SentinelOne agent every day to get the actual pattern from it. The Behavioral AI gives you protection even if you don't update the client. That's a great benefit for us at customer sites.

When it comes to the Storyline feature, as a penetration tester, I'm doing threat hunting. Every time malware gets executed on a machine, it's something I have to investigate. Normally we block it very early, on our proxy servers, for example, for all our users. Seeing how the malware got executed shows me the kinds of security holes we have are on our proxy servers. That's very important for strengthening some portions of our defense in other places.

The solution’s distributed intelligence at the endpoint is pretty effective, but from time to time I see that the agent is not getting the full execution history or command-line parameters. I would estimate the visibility into an endpoint is around 80 percent. There is 20 percent you don't see because, for some reason, the agents don't get all of the information.

Another area that could be improved is their handling of the updating of the agent. It is far from optimal. The agent changes often and about 5 percent of our machines can't be automatically updated to the newest agent. That means you have to manually uninstall the agent and install the new agent. That needs to be improved.

I have been using SentinelOne for about a year. Because we have been using it for a long time, we have several versions in production but we tend to use the most recent. The version we are using mainly is 4.5.2.136.

We literally haven't hit a minute of downtime. It's pretty stable and I haven't even given its stability a thought.

In the beginning, I saw that Deep Visibility was really fast. Then, with more and more agents reporting their daily work to the console at SentinelOne, I noticed a decrease of response time with the console. But what's really great is that they updated the console rapidly and the response time got better and better. Now I like the response time. There are ups and downs in the console response times, and in how fast the agents are reporting, but I have the feeling that SentinelOne monitors that and reacts if it gets too slow. Of course it's a trade off for SentinelOne between response times and costs. But right, it's more than we need.

In terms of expanding our usage, there's another very interesting product called Ranger. Right now we feel it's too expensive, but it might be interesting in the next two or three years. For now, we just want to finish our rollout.

My overall experience with their technical support has been positive.

SentinelOne does not provide equal protection across Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, but it's the first antivirus solution we have had in our company which provides any antivirus protection for all these very relevant operating systems. None of our previous antivirus solutions were on Linux and on Mac. That is really helpful for us because we have it all under one hood.

This is the first time we have used an antivirus software as a service and it was the easiest set up I have ever had in my life, and I have been doing this stuff for many years. The console was set up by SentinelOne, literally in 20 minutes. The deployment of the agent took me five minutes for the first machines and they reported within those five minutes. That was the fastest ramp-up I've ever seen.

There are three IT security guys who are concerned with information security in our company. Normally I don't do antivirus stuff. My colleagues are information security officers as well and don't care about antivirus. But I got this project to roll it out it all over the world because I'm one of the technical guys who is capable of doing it. So strictly speaking, I'm doing it alone—one person for 5,500 computers. But at least we have people in every time zone who are capable of using the SentinelOne console, more or less. Altogether, there are six people in our company who actually access the solution, including me.

We had an implementation strategy. Because we had a major pain point in China, we started rolling it out there. Because it's in a completely different time zone and the people are completely different in their mindset, this was one of the critical areas for us. It worked like a charm. I installed 230 machines within five days, and then I recognized that SentinelOne was finding so much more than our old antivirus solution that I started to really do a rollout plan. 

As part of that plan, we always install SentinelOne side-by-side with our old solution, and that works great. They say, "Don't ever have two antivirus solutions on one computer," but that's not true for SentinelOne. You can configure both and they work together. In the first step, SentinelOne is on the machine, just reporting to the console. That way, I see which software gets executed, software that SentinelOne might find problematic, and I do whitelisting or blacklisting, depending on the software. Once I don't get much software that I have to whitelist, I put the client into a kill and quarantine mode and every software gets removed automatically. Once the agent is in kill and Quarantine mode, the old antivirus solution is uninstalled. That's how we do it, country-by-country.

The time it took was affected by the Coronavirus. As a result of that, many of the machines were not onsite and many of the people weren't online, or were only on VPN. I don't distribute SentinelOne by VPN because people at home normally don't have a big bandwidth and I didn't want to stress it even more. I kept in mind that they were covered by our old solution, so there was no big need to really push it forward. But the 2,500 machines we have installed took six months.

SentinelOne gives their customers access to the SentinelOne API and that made it possible for me to write software for the deployment of SentinelOne. I'm speaking to the company to get permission to publish this software as open source. That might help many other companies that are facing the same problems I have in rolling it out all over the world.

It would be easier to calculate ROI if we had already rolled it out to every machine, because the number I have to compare it with is for the complete installation on all machines. My feelings say "Yes, we have seen ROI," but I don't really have good numbers that I could give you.

There are no fees other than their standard licensing fees.

We compared five products. We had a matrix with weights and the requirements we needed from a new antivirus solution. We did three proofs of concept and SentinelOne won it easily.

It was difficult to compare them because we had one other product that worked with artificial intelligence as well, but with a completely different mechanism. We also had three traditional antivirus products based on patterns, and it was really difficult to compare the features of SentinelOne with the competitors. That was the reason we decided to do a POC.

The biggest lesson I have learned is that SentinelOne is an antivirus product which gives you, on the one hand, all information you could dream of if you need to analyze software or malware, especially, on the machine. On the other hand, it's simple and fast and easy to use, and that's something I really appreciate.

We have been playing around with the solution's ActiveEDR technology, to get an idea of what is possible. We have not gotten so far that we use it for building KPIs and the like. But we have noticed it and it seems it could be a big game-changer for us, but I can't really provide much information on that topic.

While I really use Storyline right now, I'm the only one who does so in our company. I'm not sure if we will use it in our company on a large scale. That's the other side of this product. We don't have many people who are able to work with the information you get out of the module from SentinelOne.

We don't use the rollback feature, we just use quarantine right now. We haven't had any outbreak of cryptoware encrypting files. So as of now, we haven't needed it. That might change in the future.

I would rate SentinelOne a 10 out of 10, and I don't give 10s easily. I really love how simple and effective the product is. I really love the visibility it gives me into the endpoint. I really love that they open their product to the customer to enhance it with custom-made software, giving you the APIs to program it. Those are all things competitors don't have.

I really feel like the software has made my life easier. As I said before, my workload for malware analysis dropped by 50 percent. That's why I'm really thankful and really appreciate the product. I would say to everyone, at least give it a try. For our company, it really fits.

In general, we replaced our entire antivirus and anti-spyware with SentinelOne. We use it across all platforms, from servers to workstations, to Macs, to Windows, to Linux, Virtual Desktop Infrastructure, and embedded systems - on-premise and in the cloud. We also use their console and their threat-hunting. We needed a solution that was simple and intuitive, without having multiple agents.

We have also started evaluating their IoT, for the discovery of all IoT devices. This is 

It has improved our operational efficiencies. It saves us time because it does that first level of EDR automatically and that allows us to focus on certain things that it tells us about.

And we have better confidence because of all the threats that have been remediated. In fact, the moment we started deploying, we started picking up stuff that was in a dormant state on machines.

SentinelOne has absolutely reduced the number of threats. We get thousands of hits around the world. I'm looking in the console right now and there are 14,639 suspicious detections in the last few days. Of those, it has blocked 87. Another 30 were mitigated right away, and 24 active threats are being investigated now. Remediation of those threats could not be automated because it needs a response to do certain things right.

The strength of SentinelOne is that it has an automated, active EDR. It does that first level of what a SOC analyst would do, automatically, using artificial intelligence, so we can focus on other things. Active EDR not only notifies you, but it actually fixes that first level. That is unheard of. Very few, if any, companies do that.

The reason we went into this whole selection process and selected SentinelOne is that their strategy is "defense-in-depth." They do not only do what the traditional AV endpoint security solutions used to do, but they go further by looking at behaviors and patterns. Additionally, their big differentiators are in the dept of behavior analysis. There are other companies that claim this - albeit in a lighter flavor. 

The whole behavioral analysis helps us get to the root causes. We can understand and pictorially see the "patient zero" of any threat. It shows the first one who got whatever that threat is. When you look at their console and you see a threat, you can not only pick up the raw data to do forensics on it, but it can actually tell you a storyline: who patient zero was and how this whole threat has spread through your environment or on that machine itself; how it happened. Then, you can check on these things yourself. That's crazy good.

In addition, there is no dependency on the cloud to fully protect. Many products you see today, especially those called next-generation, depend on getting some information from the cloud. With this solution, you don't need to connect. It has the intelligence on the endpoint itself. That's useful because you're not always connected to the cloud. You could be in a lab. We've got laboratories where they aren't necessarily connected to the internet, but you want to have the latest intelligence of machine learning to see that you're doing the right thing. SentinelOne doesn't have to be connected. It's already got that behavioral stuff built-in.

They have a rollback and remediation facility as well. If you've got a virus or some malware on a machine, it's going to detect it and it can actually just clean up that part of that malware. You don't have to do anything else. And if you have ransomware, for example, it will pick it up before it causes a problem. And if it didn't, you can actually roll back and get it to the previous good version.

It integrates well with other products. We've got other cloud services that we use for security, and the intelligence is shared between SentinelOne and the CASB that we have.

And with the threat-hunting, you can validate what it's telling you: Is it a real threat or is it just something that is suspicious?

It can tell you everything that's running on an endpoint: What applications are running there and which of those applications are weak and that you have to watch out for. That's one of their free add-ons. You can do queries, you analyze, you can see who touched what and when. You can check the activities, settings, and policies.

Another advantage is that you can break up consoles. You can have them all in the cloud, or you can have some available physically. You may want to keep certain logs local and not share them because of GDPR. You can do those kinds of things. It's very adaptable and malleable.

If you have an agent on your machine, it will find out what things are neighbors to your machine. You can control machines at different levels. You can even control a device on your machine. If there is, for example, a USB device on your machine, I can control it and not let you use that USB device. I can actually get into your console and do stuff.

The other strength of SentinelOne is that you get almost all these features out-of-the-box. They add many features as a default, you don't pay extra, unlike many other companies. There are services you do pay extra for. I mentioned that SentinelOne handles that first level SOC security analyst-type work. But if you need a deeper understanding, with research, they've got a service for that and it's one that we're using. I was convinced that our current team wasn't good enough, so we had to get that service. It's actually very cost-effective, even cheaper than other ways of getting that level of understanding.

They are already reporting on application vulnerabilities in the landscape and working on providing remediation - another big win. 

Regarding the IoT feature, it's on the fence whether they're going to charge for it but that's an add-on module. However, it's not like you have to do anything to install it. You just have to click something in the solution.

The area where it could be improved is reporting. They have some online reporting, but it would be nice to be able to pick and choose. When I'm looking at the console, I would love to be able to pull certain things into a report, the things that are specific to me. They're very responsive. They regularly ask customers to provide feedback. They've been working on their reporting since the last feedback meetings. It's not only me but other customers as well who would like to see improvements in the reporting.

 File Integrity Monitoring is not a gap, but to do it you have to type several times. It's not the few-click intuitive situation.

It would be nice to have some data leakage included. Also, when it comes to data leakage, while you can get out everything that a person does on a machine, there needs to be a proper way of doing so, like other products that are just focused on data leakage.

I can't wait to see their advances in the cloud infrastructure (containers and serverless).

It would be nice (and is critical) to allow administrators to notate when they make changes to the console configurations - perhaps a tag for reporting. I might, for example, whitelist an application. If I did that today and I leave the company at some point, someone might wonder why I did this. There should be a place to easily notate everything.

I started validating and testing the product back in the fall timeframe of 2017. By the time the proof of concept was done, we were signing the product by the end of 2017 or January of 2018.

In our company, if something happens with a solution, everybody will know, and it will be out of the environment in a jiffy.

So far, the scalability is going really well. It's really lightweight. Using the console, you can break it up into regions. It's integrated with Active Directory and we have it set up as the "research lab" in Melville, New York and something else in China.

Right now, it's our product of choice for endpoint protection. I suspect our usage will grow a lot once they enable the IoT; what they call Ranger.

Technical support started off mainly by email, but support is probably the single biggest improvement since we started with SentinelOne two years ago. They always had the intelligence, like any techie person, but techies are not necessarily good communicators. They always had answers, right up to the top. Their CEO is also a very technical person. But they have improved how tech support is delivered by 100-fold.

We had McAfee, and we were using it for other things too.

I'd never heard of SentinelOne in 2017. I knew of the other big guns but I came across it just by chance by looking at studies that spoke about SentinelOne. I had their sales guys and engineers demonstrate but it didn't mean anything. I still thought it might be fluff. So we had to test it and go through that whole rigmarole.

For all intents and purposes, they delivered. You have to remember that they were fighting a battle against all the big guns in the industry, solutions that were already entrenched. When we did our test, we actually broke a couple of their competitors, not because we wanted to. We were just comparing and doing it as a proof of concept. SentinelOne kept catching everything that I thought the other guys should have caught.

Also, they were never defensive; they were straight-easy to work with. Their responsiveness was also very good. If we needed to get something — and this might be because of the size of their company — we could go right up the chain and something would happen right away. If changes were required they happened really fast.

The initial setup was straightforward. I co-authored a book on evaluating products and one of the things that you have to take into account is ease of use and how intuitive things are. Some people may not consider that important, but I consider it important.

In general, it was easy to set up. That was one of the reasons I was pleasantly surprised.

What can make it difficult is the environment you are in. For example, we have "freeze periods" during about half the year, where we cannot make any changes. So, during retail, during Christmas, Chinese New Year, Black Friday, etc., nothing can change in the environment and we cannot deploy anything.

Other things, outside of the environment, were that there are financial/fiscal periods, every quarter, where we cannot change certain things. And we have different silos: a server group, a Windows group, a Mac group, and a Linux group that didn't want to touch anything. Everyone had some bad taste left in their mouths at some point in time, not necessarily with SentinelOne, but in general. If everything is working, why change it? So there were some political things, internally. We have about 35 different companies around the world. Each has a variation of things and there is every version of every thing out there. And some have badly written code too that shows up as malware; it manifests just like malware.

For deployment and maintenance it was me. I did almost everything. There were only one or two people. Obviously, we have to follow the sun because we're global, so at times there might have been three or four people involved, but generally it was one or two who were coordinating it. They know the product and how to deploy it and what needed to be done, but I needed those guys around the globe. They had to coordinate with each of those groups I mentioned. But we owned it and we were accountable for it. We have segregated duties. Even though I'm in security, I don't have the rights to get onto our Windows Servers and make changes. I have to ask the server guys to do something and that's why things take time. That's why you need people to coordinate it.

But, once it was detecting those threats, I felt that even though we had an outsourced team, they were lacking in knowledge. If I told them, "Hey, this is malware," without the right experience, they wouldn't know what the heck to do with it. That was the challenge. That's why we went with SentinelOne's managed service. They have people who can deal with it and sort out the things that are real.

The way you do it is that you don't just McAfee take off a machine and put this one in. You run them simultaneously for some time, and then take one out. I wanted to see if something would happen, or it started messing things up, or if people would start calling saying, "Hey, there's something going on in my machine."

We didn't work with any third-party. Over the years, I've seen that a lot of these guys tend to have biases.

We have absolutely seen a return on our investment because it has created that first-level SOC. Plus, it has all these other functions. It has replaced McAfee. We don't need a file integrity monitoring product. And we can see application vulnerabilities without using another product. And they keep adding features. Once they add this IoT feature, the ROI will be much more.

Initially, I was just researching solutions using independent reports and industry reviews. I don't necessarily agree with everything in industry reviews, but I used them to narrow down the field and to figure out which solutions I needed to look at. I also looked into whether there were any legal issues the companies were fighting. In that first phase, I got it down to about four or five that I would take to the next level and actually touch them with live malware. The reason the other ones fell off is either they were too focused on one thing or there were some legal things. The industry is small. You hear things, not necessarily officially, but unofficially you hear things.

I looked at McAfee, CrowdStrike, Carbon Black, Palo Alto Traps, Cylance, Endgame, Tanium.

In my evaluation, back in 2017, I wanted to see the features of each and match them up with our requirements. What were our influences? What was important to us? I tried to map that into what features were available at the time, or look at whether a product could consolidate another product that we had so that we would no longer need that other product. I also looked at operational efficiencies, security efficiency, and whether it meets all our compliance goals.

Then I went to the lab where I had real malware. There was a whole method to that madness of testing. 

McAfee failed miserably, even with their later product. It would have been easier for us to stick with the incumbent, but it couldn't pick up on malware. There was something it never detected. With that type of next-generation, machine-learning algorithm, it's not so much the algorithm as it is the intelligence, the data that they collect over time.

At the time, Palo Alto Traps was not ready for prime time - immature console, limited support across all our platforms and focus on exploits.

I broke Cylance, surprisingly. I didn't expect that. I'm not even a researcher, per se. I have other jobs in our company. When I managed to break them I was looking at how they responded. I'm not expecting everyone to be perfect, but I found them very defensive. They would say, "Oh, it's only one in 100 or 200 or 300 pieces of malware". But it was the way they responded to things. It took a while for them to get back to me, and they were more concerned about whether I was doing the same thing with the others.

The other weakness of Cylance was that, for anything else, like remediation and response to something, you had to buy another piece. It wasn't part of the product, whereas, with SentinelOne, it was part of the product, without paying anything more.

Some of our folks were convinced that CrowdStrike was the way to go but our tests proved otherwise. CrowdStrike has some good features, but it requires going to the cloud. And secondly, whenever you get events, you almost have to use their service, so you're paying them to help resolve something. It gets expensive.

Separately, I did a compatibility test where I checked our environment: I deployed it in a sampling of some of our machines to see if it run without creating another mess.

When you do a thorough proof of concept, you already have all the details, so nobody's going to mess with you. I compared everything. At the end of the day, I gave my boss a report and said, "This is it. You decide."

Have a look at it. Compare it. It's a very good product to have.

It gives you a lot more insight. It has combined many products into one agent and it's expanding. There are a lot of things it can do now on the cloud, like containers. It gives you insight into a lot of the threats with the hunting ability. I have learned from the tool to see how our environment is. I've learned about certain behaviors of our applications, just by observing what pops up.

There is a console that is in the cloud and there are agents that are all over. You put these agents on Macs or Windows or Linux, or on whatever the cloud versions are of all these virtual devices. We are spread out across the globe. We've got nearly 50,000 endpoints in different parts of the world. We generally stay as close to the latest version of the agent as possible, but we go through change-control and it is very strict. We don't just put things on endpoints. We validate and test in our environment because we have nearly every type of operating system and variations of them in our environment. Therefore, sometimes we are something like .1 or .2 of a version behind. In terms of the console, we are at the latest version.

As a company, we use all variations of clouds, from Ali Cloud, which is China to Azure; we're predominantly Azure. We have AWS and GCP. SentinelOne manages that console and we have access to it. We own that part, our console. It's on AWS, I believe.

Overall, is there room for improvement? Absolutely. There are gaps in the reporting because we need to give reports to different levels. Ideally, we want to just drag and drop things to create reports. They have very nice reports but they're canned. We want to be able to choose what goes into a report. Otherwise, it's right up there and I would give it a nine out of 10.

We are a service provider with a huge customer base. Singularity Complete is a tool we use to protect our clients from ransomware and other external threats. SentinelOne has been our strategic partner for a long time, and we are one of their platinum partners in Central Europe. It covers all endpoints like laptops, desktops, and servers. It's used everywhere. 

We manage multiple clients with Singularity Complete, and the clients are happy with the protection it offers against external threats or ransomware attacks. It's an excellent tool for detecting those and preventing much greater damage.

Once you deploy the tool and spend a few weeks fine-tuning it, Singularity helps reduce the number of alerts. It decreases your alerts by around 25 percent. Singularity frees up staff for other projects and tasks.

Singularity has reduced our mean time to detect and respond. At most, detection takes up to 30 minutes. The response time depends on your configuration. Quarantine is happening in real-time. 

I like Singularity's rollback features, threat-hunting, and Ranger Insights. The Ranger feature scans the network and provides visibility into all the unsecured assets. It doesn't require any agents or network changes. It just gives us information about the unsecured assets that aren't managed by the IT departments of any company. It detects the vulnerabilities but doesn't prevent them. 

Singularity's reporting isn't that great. The dashboards could be more customizable. It could be better integrated with other tools. SIEM tools provide better feeds. Singularity is a separate product altogether. It does not give enough information to integrate with different solutions to correlate better.

I have used Singularity for three years.

I rate Singularity Complete eight out of 10 for stability. 

I rate Singularity Complete nine out of 10. 

I rate SentinelOne support four out of 10. Their response is usually slow, even for priority one issues. They don't get on a call and fix the issue. They keep asking questions, so it gets frustrating sometimes. 

Positive

Deploying Singularity was straightforward. The only issue is with the interoperability with other tools running in the customer's environment. We faced some challenges, but those were the initial teething issues. The solution requires some maintenance. You need to continuously update the agents and apply patches. We need multiple people to maintain the solution because we are a service provider with a huge customer base, but if you are deploying it for one client, one engineer is enough.

If an organization does not use this tool and gets attacked by ransomware or a threat, and it will incur costs in terms of a ransom or business loss. Singularity reduces organizational risk by about 30 to 35 percent. 

Singularity is reasonable, but a few clients say it's expensive because they're comparing it with traditional antivirus. The pricing could be much cheaper for the Asia-Pacific region because it's a price-sensitive market.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of 10. Singularity Complete is a high-quality tool. The detections are good. We don't see many false positives. It's a good tool. It's still maturing but good. 

We have been growing, but we are still a pretty small team. We have integrated it with our other software, and we are getting logs out of it. We go into threat hunting and do a deep watch. We go in there, see those logs, and make more sense of things. It has been a real help.

In terms of its deployment model, we have private companies. It is mostly on-prem, but each plant is a little bit different. Anything and everything that touches our corporate environment gets it.

For the most part, it gives us time to react by getting things off the network and getting that account locked down for a minute. We can let a member of our team take a look at it and move on from there instead of letting something fly under the radar and letting the incident take place or continue to happen. We can put the spotlight on the incident, make someone take a look at it, and then we can get going.

The integrations I have been working with work great. They do exactly as advertised, and they have been helping me with my threat hunting and seeing what is out there. There are always things lurking in the weeds that you just do not know about, so being able to have that correlation and more insights is always helpful.

Singularity Complete has helped free up our staff for other projects and tasks. It is a small team. I am more of a one-man SOC. A lot of the incidents either come through me or someone else on the team if I am not there for vigilance, so being able to dive down and get an issue resolved quickly is helpful. I can then go back to another incident. Usually, they come in batches, so being able to go to the next one or go back to working on a major project has helped a great bit.

Singularity Complete has not helped to reduce alerts. To my knowledge, it stayed about the same. We have fewer false positives, but there are some other ones that I would rather look into. They are more on the identity side. Now that we have Singularity Identity, I am intrigued by what we will see there in terms of weird logins and other things. Now that we have the integration set up, I will get some alerts from there to go track down.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our organizational risk. When you get these new tools, you see everything that is wrong, and then you are like, "Oh, man," but at least we are seeing them and fixing them. In that sense, it has helped to reduce risks. I do not have the metrics, but we have been able to tackle some vulnerabilities and issues that have been big known ones.

Singularity Complete would help our organization save on its costs if we were not trying to expand so much. We are into manufacturing, and we grow a lot by mergers and acquisitions, so anywhere we can get security funding is a great point. It has helped us identify some things that we can do without. We can either reduce or eliminate those other tools and cascade down, so overall, it has reduced costs.

The Microsoft integrations are most valuable right now. One that I still have in the testing is putting user accounts into the high risk and letting our policies on that take place, and then have SentinelOne put it into network isolation as well until an incident is resolved.

There could be more integrations with more software. We have been looking at Palos and getting those put into the data lake. If there was a native integration for that, that would help a lot. They can just continue adding more integrations with these big brands and software security products. 

I have been with the company for two years, and it has been there since the time I have been there, so I can only say two years at most.

I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of stability. It is great in terms of stability and agents working as long as you do your due diligence and you do not leave it there to run just like every other product. If you leave it there with no attendance, it is going to do what it does, but if you are in there, doing your due diligence and making sure things are set, it is great. Auto updates are something I know that was implemented. That has been super helpful, so if you are doing what you need to do, it is a ten out of ten.

I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of scalability, especially because we have Ranger deployed. If we need to or if we have a merger, we can get them to put SentinelOne on a couple of devices for us and give us creds so that we can deploy to the rest from there in case they cannot get us in the SCCM or whatever else they are using.

Their support is great. Keith Fields and Mitch Milligan are always there. They have been super helpful. I knew Keith before Mitch was even part of our account. I have been working with Keith for a little bit, and he has been super insightful on different things that I did not know the tool could do or quicker ways to do things. Mitch has also been super helpful in getting us set up. 

We just bought Singularity Identity, and Keith, Mitch, and Paul have been there to give us those meetings on what we need. They really understand what our business is, and they look into our console to help us out at times as well. It has been great. I would rate their support a ten out of ten.

Positive

It was already in place when I joined the organization. We run Defender as well. It is like a dual-stack. We have E5 for other reasons, and we use it because it is already there, but our team has gone for SentinelOne. We have had other people, especially the research teams, who want to use their own agent, but we are so comfortable with SentinelOne's abilities and what we have set up to keep us secure that we have looked away from those other SIEMs who want their agent. We have looked away from other software in the realm of MDR that may not work with SentinelOne. It is a staple piece for us that would be a hard buy to remove.

It works great. One thing I wish I had done more in college is hands-on with EDR agents. I went to Purdue for the cybersecurity network engineering major. They had classes and labs for forensics, but one thing we did not get too much hands-on was EDR. I believe they lived in the world of Microsoft for their operations there. Since I have been working here, Singularity Complete has been a great product. We are expanding. We have gone into these other modules and platforms, and we have always had a great experience.

It is a mature solution. It has been here longer than ten years. I graduated from college in 2021 and from high school in 2017. It has been around longer than I have known cyber practices. It is a good one. Always do your research and compare, but it is definitely a top one. I believe it is up there on the Gartner's Quadrants as well. It is up there for a reason.

We will use it more as we get more tools and integrate it. Currently, some of the things are still in beta. I am not leveraging it to its full capability because things are either in testing or we are looking at the software that is going to be connected. From what I have seen and based on the demos and how the beta is going, I have to give it a ten out of ten.

We use SentinelOne Singularity Complete to protect our environment against malware, unwanted programs, and ransomware.

We implemented SentinelOne Singularity Complete for better overall visibility on our endpoints. SentinelOne Singularity Complete is excellent at remediating.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is great at ingesting and correlating data across our security solutions. I have better visibility and can see how many endpoints and groups are affected and how much the problem spread in our environment. I can see the scope of the work I need to do.

I use SentinelOne Hunter for threat hunting. It can be used in two ways, SentinelOne provides a library of pre-audit queries on different vulnerabilities, topics, and groups. We can use these queries to search for specific activities in our environment. If we have our own indicators of compromise, such as those from a CISA advisory, we can use the Scraper feature to scope those IOCs to our environment and look for them.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our alerts by 25 percent.

Singularity Complete has helped reduce our MTTD and our MTTR.

It has helped reduce our organizational risk.

I mostly use the dashboard to view infected endpoints on unresolved threats, so that I can prioritize my investigations. In incidents, SentinelOne's remediation is excellent; we can immediately see if the threat type is dynamic or static. In other words, if it has been executed. Additionally, I like the visibility that we have into machines, as we can log in and investigate them directly.

Singularity Complete's process stream has room for improvement.

I find CrowdStrike's vertical layout to be better than SentinelOne Singularity Complete's horizontal layout.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for one year.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is stable. We have only had minimal issues with the solution's performance.

SentinelOne Singularity Complete is scalable. The number of agents available on our endpoints is based on our license.

I would rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete nine out of ten.

We have one engineer who maintains SentinelOne Singularity Complete.

I recommend SentinelOne Singularity Complete based on each organization's business model and what it is protecting. Organizations should definitely consider this solution when evaluating other products. The remediation feature that SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers is superior to other EDR solutions and can help remediate a situation quickly.

We primarily use the solution as an antivirus and also as a network control with built-in policies regarding device control. 

The product is a lighter client. Our previous solution ran heavy on the workstations and caused performance issues. This is lightweight and doesn't take up system resources. 

You can use the solution right out of the box. It's ready to go with baseline policies and is good to use without any changes. It's only gotten better since we've added custom rules. 

It's simple to use and intuitive. It gives you good visibility and shows what is going on. 

The product works well with other SentinelOne solutions and third-party tools. It's pretty seamless. They make it pretty easy to integrate with other products and you can pull data pretty easily from the other solutions. 

The solution's ability to ingest and correlate across our security solutions is excellent. It has allowed us to blend data from another product we own. 

It's helped us consolidate our other security solutions.

The product provides network and asset visibility. The Ranger piece is probably one of the best items. We have other solutions for asset management, yet none is never 100%. With Ranger, we really get that visibility we need. Having Ranger built into one client and being easy to use has been perfect. It helps us prevent vulnerable devices from being compromised. We've discovered a few assets within our organization we were not managing fully and Ranger has helped us secure our environment just that little bit more. 

There are fewer complaints from users when scans are running. The previous solution just used up so many resources. This product runs seamlessly in the background and we know it's running since we get triggers on alerts that are legitimate catches. SentinelOne does a good job at detecting. It's reduced our alerts by 25%.

The product has helped to free up our staff for other projects and tasks. It's freed around 50% of their time. 

It's reduced our company's mean time to detect by 40% or more. It's also drastically improved the mean time to respond. We don't have to worry about false positives. We know when we get an alert that it's legitimate, and we need to act on it. That's improved by about 40% to 50%

The biggest thing for me in terms of improvements is the online console. There are frequent updates, and sometimes we'll get a little agitated getting signed in. However, on the product itself, I would not recommend any changes.

I've used the solution for a little over a year.

The solution is very stable. Our old solution required babysitting to make sure everything was running correctly.

Pretty much everybody in the company uses the solution. We have 1,300 deployed agents and ten administrators. 

The solution is absolutely scalable. 

I have not had to use technical support.

We previously used Sophos. The biggest reason for the switch to SentinelOne was the system resources that were used. Whenever it would kick in, I would get tickets related to machine performance. 

The console is on the cloud, however, the devices are on-premises. The initial setup was very straightforward. Overall, it was fairly quick. We had more trouble getting the older product uninstalled than SentinelOne installed. We did the implementation slowly based on the business requirements. We deployed it over the course of a month. 

The company does a good job with training and keeping its documentation up to date.

It does not require much maintenance. Every now and then we might have one or two false positives.

We've seen a great ROI on the product. Obviously, we're still within our contract. That said, we've definitely seen a ROI. We've had a couple of incidents where something wouldn't have been detected previously.

The solution is fairly priced for what you get. 

We're a customer and end-user.

They do an excellent job at remaining innovative - including with their detection engines and everything involved in their product. They are doing an excellent job compared to everyone else.

SentinelOne has not been around for many years - yet the product is ahead of its time.

With any solution, I'd advise doing a proof of concept first. After that, I would not shy away from fully deploying this solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The only thing that would improve the product is reducing the online console updates. 

Initially, we had only detection and response on each endpoint where we installed the agent. Now, we are expanding from detection and response to action. For example, if it finds something on the endpoint, it will not only detect and report it, but it will also respond and block it or isolate the endpoint.

It's all about protecting our endpoints and devices, including servers, Windows and Mac machines, whether laptops or desktops.

As a security guy, I don't need to have a VMware or Windows expert help me deploy this environment because it's purely cloud-based.

We had Trend Micro with an on-prem server from which we were pushing updates on a daily basis. We have connectivity between our head office and regional offices, but if that connection was overutilized, those updates would not be pushed in a timely manner. Now we don't have that issue. A laptop, for example, just pulls the updates automatically, and they don't need to come through a congested connection.

Overall, it has reduced our risk by 50 to 60 percent.

It is purely cloud-based, meaning you don't need to have something installed, such as a server on-prem. You have cloud management and can access it from anywhere, with integration with SSO, with one click. It's also very lightweight. It provides granular control as it is cloud-based, and there is no on-prem hardware or software to manage.

It protects against malware, suspicious activities, and suspicious people on the endpoint itself. The endpoint can be a user machine, a server, or an IoT device.

Another feature I like is that when there are indicators of compromise, such as hash files, IP addresses, or domain names, you can add them straight away with one click, and, boom, everyone will have them blocked right away.

The detection is very good and very fast. Once we install it, files or malicious software that are installed on the system are quarantined or deleted right away. The response is also fast.

We have many old machines with outdated software that have been compromised, with malicious software installed on them. It detects all these issues, including that the software is not updated and that they have all these malicious files. It helps us identify those endpoints. All those machines are sent to be upgraded and to have things removed or installed—whatever actions are needed. And for servers that are running software for the business and that can't be upgraded on-the-fly, isolated, or shut down right away, we create an isolated network for them and give access only to the particular users who need them.

Since SentinelOne Hologram was an Attivo Networks product acquired by Microsoft, I have to install a different agent on endpoints for that product. It would be better if the same SentinelOne agent could be used for both the EDR and deception technology. I don't want to have to install an additional agent on all 5,000 of our endpoints. If the SentinelOne EDR agent could be used for both Hologram and SentinelOne, that would be ideal.

It's been a year since we started using this product. We recently extended it to XDR for instant response. We have expanded with SentinelOne EDR.

It is very stable. So far, we haven't faced an issue.

The scalability is a nine out of 10.

The support is excellent.

As a strategic security partner they are a nine out of 10.

Positive

We tried CrowdStrike. The issue with it was that it was not compatible with older iOS and Windows OSes. We have some old servers in our data center that are now undergoing a migration process. On top of that, we have some Windows machines that are running on Windows 8, and it did not support them. We had to switch to SentinelOne since it supports those clients. CrowdStrike is also a very expensive solution.

Trend Micro is not smart; sometimes it's unable to detect malicious files.

SentinelOne is faster. It scans and detects issues and vulnerabilities on endpoints in real time. That's the main thing you look for when it comes to EDR.

The initial deployment was straightforward and simple for us. We just needed to install the agent on the end-user machines, open communication to their cloud URLs through our firewalls, and do some initial configuration on the console with help from their team.

We have a hybrid structure, not only on-prem. We have services running in the cloud as well as on-prem. We have multiple locations across regions and in different countries.

It's not difficult to maintain since it's purely on the cloud. If there are updates, they notify us. That is the maintenance activity. They update our services. Once all the environments move to the cloud, we won't need to worry about maintenance anymore. It depends on the vendor; there's nothing much to do on our end. They push any end-user updates, or they make them available to us and we push them out from the console.

It was not done in-house. We worked directly with SentinelOne support. They provided trial versions for two to three months and assigned SentinelOne engineers to help deploy it on some machines as a PoC. There were three or four people involved in total, including their engineers. After that PoC we bought the product.

We have a SOC solution as well, and we are trying to integrate playbooks. With the SIEM solution, we are able to run multiple playbooks without issues. Using our proxy gateway and detection technology, we have pretty good options to create playbooks without any hard configuration.

The quality and maturity of the solution are excellent. I would recommend SentinelOne.

We use Singularity to protect our staff computers, the hospital network, and virtual machine servers. Singularity helps us ensure our environment is fully protected in light of the increasing cyberattacks hospitals face.  

Singularity's Ranger feature provides deep visibility. We implemented some rules, and Ranger scans the system based on the criteria we set. Ranger's ability to scan without agents or network changes is crucial because we want to minimize the number of changes needed on end-user machines. It's an excellent tool for minimizing risk and detecting threats before they disrupt our network.

The solution has decreased the number of alerts we see. We get notifications and email alerts that some user machines are compromised. Singularity does a good job with bad files and data, allowing us to tackle those threats before they become bigger problems.

Singularity has helped free up staff time. For example, it automatically updates virus definitions so we don't need to do that work manually. Singularity pulls the latest virus definitions on its own. It actively monitors our machines without us having to do anything.

It has reduced our mean time to detect by about 70 percent. Singularity has reduced the mean time to respond by roughly 90 percent because we can choose to respond to a threat by rolling back, deleting, or quarantining it. It greatly reduces our overall risk by about 30 percent. 

Singularity's rollback feature is one of the primary reasons we bought the product. If there's an attack on the machine, the system can automatically roll back the data and the hard drive of the machine that was attacked.

The interoperability is solid. We've integrated Google Authenticator with SentinelOne for multifactor authentication, so it works well. We also use Citrix multifactor authentication. It works well with our other systems. 

The performance could be better. Singularity lags a bit, and it's a resource-hungry application, so it takes a while to load. 

I have used Singularity for about a year.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity seven out of 10 for stability. The stability and performance could be better. 

Singularity is highly scalable. We can easily cover all our machines with it. 

I rate SentinelOne's support seven out of 10. SentinelOne's customer service isn't that great. There's only so much they can do before they just tell you to look at the documentation.

Neutral

The deployment was straightforward. We worked with a trainer and implementation specialist over at Sentinel. Four people from our team and one from the vendor were involved. After installation, the primary maintenance is ensuring the agents are deployed to the end-user machines. 

Singularity is fairly priced. 

I rate SentinelOne Singularity Complete eight out of 10. It's a high-quality product compared to what else is on the market. When implementing Singularity, it helps to organize your machines into groups like laptops, servers, and desktops and then push the agent to those groups separately.