Less headaches to worry about backups. 99% of the time, I don't have to touch it. Set up the jobs and let it go. 1% is the setup of new backups and verification the new backups work.
Systems Administrator at a construction company with 51-200 employees
The best part of their service is their tech support. They keep following up until they know everything is right.
Pros and Cons
- "Replication to Forever Cloud."
- "Follow up for the DRaaS service setup. I'm still waiting to schedule a DRaaS test after upgrading several months ago."
How has it helped my organization?
What is most valuable?
- Backup and restore
- Replication to Forever Cloud
- Tech support
What needs improvement?
Follow up for the DRaaS service setup. I'm still waiting to schedule a DRaaS test after upgrading several months ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes. I was backing up too much information. Changed from doing two physical appliances, one local, and one remote to two local and a Forever Cloud for remote. This doubled our storage space for backups and solved the problem.
Buyer's Guide
Unitrends
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Unitrends. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No.
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service:
Good customer service. No problems with my sales rep.
Technical Support:
High level of tech support. The best part of their service. They keep following up until they know everything is right.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've used physical tape, NetBackup, Arcserve IT, Backup Exec, and high-speed tape caching. It's great going right to disk.
How was the initial setup?
I didn't do the initial setup. However, when we converted the second remote to a local support, they guided me through the entire process.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented straight through Unitrends Support
What was our ROI?
More sleep!
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
When you purchase initially, get into the program which gives replacement hardware for free when you renew your support agreement. It makes the renewal down the road so much easier to cost justify.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Datto.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Manager at a healthcare company with 201-500 employees
It has drastically cut down on our restore time
Pros and Cons
- "Unitrends has helped us cut down the time that it takes to restore a server to its original configuration."
- "The amount of updates which are being released. Updates should be limited to two or three a year, focusing more on quality instead of a rushed bug release."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use Unitrends to assist when a file or server level restore/backup is needed. We perform nightly backups of all servers, as well as a monthly backup to disk, which is stored offsite.
How has it helped my organization?
Unitrends has helped us cut down the time that it takes to restore a server to its original configuration. Before, we only had the file structure backing up on a nightly basis and were utilizing bare metals.
Unitrends has drastically cut down on our restore time.
What is most valuable?
The scheduling and event viewer is easy to use and a helpful item when setting up new servers to be backed up. It determines what errors are being generated as a result of an issue.
What needs improvement?
The amount of updates which are being released. We were running 9.2 for the longest time when 10 came out. We were advised to upgrade, then two weeks later, we were told to wait. Since version 10 came out, there have been multiple versions released for Unitrends. Updates should be limited to two or three a year, focusing more on quality instead of a rushed bug release.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No stability issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No scalability issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
One of the best features is the customer service. When submitting online, the techs are quick to return my call and are very patient and helpful in answering all my questions.
I recently had an issue backing up a specific server (and without sending an email), the tech emailed me at 4 AM and provided a solution to the error which was generated.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Since I have been with the company, we have always used Unitrends.
What was our ROI?
I do not know.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
You should be aware how much the monthly costs are to use, what the initial costs for hardware are, and what the options to expand are, if needed.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate anyone else.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Unitrends
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Unitrends. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Systems Engineer at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing is all included in the appliance, but it could be a little more customizable
Pros and Cons
- "VM backup is much faster and more reliable, as I can test my backups with Data Copy Access jobs."
- "It is very easy to set up and get started. Almost too easy. We racked this device and had it up and running in less than 15 minutes."
- "It would be great to have the job throttle/limit the max number of backups on a single ESXi host."
- "It could be a little more customizable."
What is our primary use case?
Backup replacement for Backup Exec. Also, we are replicating backups from one datacenter to another.
How has it helped my organization?
VM backup is much faster and more reliable, as I can test my backups with Data Copy Access jobs.
What is most valuable?
It is very easy to set up and get started. Almost too easy. We racked this device and had it up and running in less than 15 minutes. The racking of the appliance took the longest, as it is heavy.
What needs improvement?
We have a huge VMware infrastructure with multiple hosts that use local storage. Backup jobs of VMs seem to target one host at a time, so if there are 10 VMs on that host getting backed up, it hammers that ESXi host until sometimes the jobs hang and nothing more occurs. It would be great to have the job throttle/limit the max number of backups on a single ESXi host.
For how long have I used the solution?
Still implementing.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Everything has been stable since implementation.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Not yet.
How are customer service and technical support?
So far, they have gone out of their way to assist us if there are questions or issues.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, we utilized Backup Exec and a Dell DR4000 disk appliance. We were going to replace the DR4000 with a DR6300, but found that the cost of Unitrends was about the same as the DR6300. We liked the fact that the Unitrends appliance was all-in-one.
How was the initial setup?
Very simple. You just put in a name and an IP address, then browse to the website to get to the console, deploy agents, and start backing it up.
What about the implementation team?
In-house implementation.
What was our ROI?
Not calculated.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of Unitrends definitely draws you in. The licensing is all included in the appliance, which is a great incentive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes, we looked at Backup Exec and the DR6300, as well as the Dell EMC iDPA 5800. The price of the iDPA was steep and they would not let us demo a unit.
What other advice do I have?
So far, so good. It could be a little more customizable, but hopefully reviews like this and feature request updates that I have submitted move that along.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Cslt-Sol Architect/Dev at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I really like the way appliances are updated but I think instead of deploying the VBAs from vCenter, it would be really nice if only the first deployment is needed from vCenter.
Recently I got an opportunity to play around with Unitrends backup solution, which is still in beta. For those of who are not aware, PHD Virtual is now part of Unitrends. At first I was a bit skeptical because I have seen products being wasted after an acquisition. But in this case I think I am quite happy with the progress the product has made under the new name.
My goal is to share my views on my testing of the product and also try and explain the new architecture. Once you get a hang of it, its really simple and makes a lot of sense. In my initial attempt, I sort of screwed things up but that was mostly because I was being hasty and didn’t bother reading the few simple concepts.
Like in previous version, the one we will discuss here, version 8 revolves around the good ole VBA. However now the VBA does a lot more and has delivered on the promises in the past. For example: my previous complain was lack of single pane of glass to manage multiple VBAs, that’s no longer a problem here. In fact they went a step further and made it possible to manage VBAs that could be deployed in Citrix or even Hyper V environments.
Architecture:
In version 7, the concept of appliance roles was introduced and version 8 continues with this model. Each appliance can be dedicated to a single role or a single appliance can have multiple roles configured. So what are those roles?
Presentation (P) – The Presentation appliance is the appliance running the web-based interface you use to configure and manage your installation. Only one presentation appliance is necessary per installation, across all configured environments (including across all hypervisor types). All management and configuration of PHD Virtual Backup occurs through the Presentation Appliance’s web interface.
Management (M) – Each Environment requires one appliance designated as the Management Appliance. This appliance performs inventory and other hypervisor-specific tasks and manages the work of the Engine appliances. Each environment you add to your PHDVB deployment requires the IP address of one appliance to act as Management appliance. The Presentation Appliance can also be designated as a Management Appliance.Engine (E) – Engine appliances perform the actual data processing and send data to their configured data stores. Engine is the most common role an appliance will take on in your deployment. Appliances with the Presentation and Management role can also be configured with the Engine appliance.
Note: As a general recommendation, you will need at least one Engine appliance for every 10 TB of source data you will protect (or every 1 TB of data if using XenServer or 5 TB is using CIFS backup storage).
So for any deployment you will need at least one VBA that has the P M and E roles. If the environment is small enough, a single VBA can host all those roles. And then add more engines as the environment grows. You can tell someone was thinking scaling. The latest version of the beta also incorporates a tutorial video that gives you a high level view of what the VBA roles may look like when laid down. This will also assist you in determining what will be ideal for your environment. I highly recommend you watch this before moving forward with the full configuration.
Deploying:
I am stealing a diagram from Unitrends documentation to explain how the roles can be laid out.
In the example above, as you can tell three VBAs are deployed. It’s a very small two host environment but it maybe a good idea to isolate the engine for the P and M roles if expansions are anticipated down the road. Technically you could with a single engine unless you needed different kinds of backup datastores to backup the data. Yes the engine does NFS, CIFS and attached storage, however you can only have one type of storage per engine. So in the example above, you could assume maybe VBA2 uses NFS and VBA3 uses attached storage. Its also possible that the hosts are running really large VMs that exceed the 10TB limit per engine and that’s why two VBA are deployed.
What could be another reason for two VBAs in the example above? Is it possible that host1 is running esxi and host2 is running Hyper-V? I would say YES its possible to manage two different environments using the same portal but there is one important piece that we are missing, the engine. Take a look at the diagram below:
The diagram above is identical to the one before it with one key difference. Host 2 also has a manager VBA which means the example above could very well work for environment 1 being vSphere based and environment 2 being Hyper V or even Citrix based. Isn’t that awesome!?
Your engine is attached to a disk where the backups are stored. When attaching the storage, you can set encryption to be on if helps you sleep better or some compliance has that requirement. You can also set the compression rate of the backup and block size. Below is some useful information to make those assessments.
Backup Compression:
• Use BDS Setting – The default setting, this option will use the compression setting applied to the backup data store. The default setting at the backup data store is GZIP.
• Uncompressed – No compression is applied to the backup data. This can be useful (or required) when using storage devices that perform additional compression.
GZIP – This compression method performs the highest compression level resulting in reduced amount of storage space used. The additional compression used by GZIP will impact performance – backup speed and overall backup time.
• LZOP – This method results in less compression than GZIP but in most cases will impact performance much less, resulting in compressed backups faster than the GZIP alternative.
Block Size:
• Use BDS Setting – The default setting, this option will use the block size setting applied to the backup data store. The default setting at the backup data store is 1 MB.
• 512 KB, 1 MB, 2 MB, 4 MB – The size of the backup block used to store backup data should not be adjusted in most situations unless instructed to by support. Adjusting the block size can impact backup and restore performance.
My wow moment:
The deployment is really simple. If you can deploy an OVF you are gold as long as you understand the architecture. Because I didn’t in the beginning I managed to screw up my initial deployment. The folks over at Unitrends were kind enough to get on a call with me to take a look at my issues. On first glance I was informed that I need to update my appliances just like any good ole vendor would suggest. My eyes started to roll until I found out how simple that really is.
The folks over at Unitrends sent me a link to a file which took a few seconds, I unzipped it went to the config tab of the portal on my VBA, hit upload, selected the file with the .phd extension and hot save. And that was it. So I figured if I only have to do that to each VBA it shouldn’t be too bad. But I was informed, because I did it from the presentation VBA that knows the managers and the engines in my environment, all the appliances will be updated and I will get a message once that completes. Sure enough 10 mins later I got the message and as I hit OK, all the branding had changed from PHD to Unitrends and all my appliances were updated. Way better than my original plan of redeploying with the latest appliance. I know this doesn’t highlight the tools backup abilities, but I think the tool itself has proven it can do backups and more over the years. But to me the manageability of your backup solution is key.
One key thing to note is there is also an auto update feature that will pretty much negate the need for you to update the appliance at all as it will happen on its own.
The portal and UI:
When you login to the portal you get a holistic view of your entire environment. This includes number of VMs, number of VMs that have been protected with backups, recent restores, jobs, alerts, available storage etc all in one place. Don’t forget you could be pulling this information from your entire environment that could be hypervisor agnostic. I think this dashboard brings good value to the table and gives a good high level on things. You can hit the cog on the right to change the frequency of how often this data is updated, the default is 5sec.
The errors and some alerts are really my doing. I didn’t realize it was a bad idea to try and backup 400gb of data on a 40gb backup volume. But I was quickly able to add more storage and get past that.
The rest of the tabs are pretty self-explanatory. The protect tab allows you backup, replicate VMs, the Recover tab exactly what it says. You can do full restores or even File level restores. One of the things I like is the ability to change he mac on the VM when doing a full restore, its good to see features from the past are still baked in. The Jobs tab lets you create new jobs, monitor them and view recent jobs.
I really like the report tabs because it presents all the useful information you can think of right out of the box in a very pretty way. Way prettier than I can ever make it because I just don’t have that kind of patience or talent. There are reports around VMs, virtual appliances (this tells you the version your VBAs are running), replication, archives and storage. So there should be all kinds of reports for you to pass around in meetings not just with pretty colors but also very useful information.
The Configure tab is where all the magic happens. This is where you add the multiple VBAs and assign them the appropriate roles. This is also where you can do the update all my VBA magic with a single click. Your SMTP info for email alerting and also the credentials for FLR are stored here.
Lastly another thing that’s covered in this tab brings me to my next topic.
Licensing:
The solution gets installed with a trial license at first. And once you realize you kinda like this, they want money. Urgghh those evil people. Jokes aside, this is also a key factor for a lot of organization on how much will it cost. I don’t have the pricing information at this time. However I do know the product is licensed on a per socket basis. Meaning the sockets of the hosts. So if you have 10 hosts with 4 sockets each that you need to protect all the VMs on you will need 10*4 = 40 licenses. Hopefully the cost will be acceptable like in the past.
Conclusion:
Overall I really like the solution. I didn’t cover a lot of the actual backup technology used in the back because most of that has been covered by others and myself in the past. I will post a few links to my previous reviews. I wanted to point out all the new things that I saw and wanted to go over the architecture so that you understand what will it take to deploy this product. If you have half a working brain like myself, all you will need is this post and access to a vCenter where you can deploy the OVF. And you will feel like an all-important backup guru like myself (that’s a joke, I am anything but). Just make sure you watch the tutorial video once you eploy the first VBA, that will really make things extremely simple for you.
The one thing I really like was the way appliances are updated and I think I made that quite clear when I was on the phone with Unitrends. Like everything else there are things that one can desire. Though this is kinda hard to come up with at this point, but I think instead of deploying the VBAs from vCenter, it would be really nice if only the first deployment is needed from vCenter and the rest could be handled from within the solutions portal. Perhaps there could be a report that suggests adding more engines etc to improve performance maybe. The data is already there it seems like, just need to tie it all together. In the end, good job PHD virtual you have done great. And Unitrends don’t let us down because we are spoiled.
This post originally appeared here.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Infrastructure Analyst at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
The whole appliance needs to be more resilient. If you are a large organization, this is a product for you.
Pros and Cons
- "It is fairly stable."
- "If you are a large organization, this is a product for you."
- "There are some questions as to how safely they are storing backup data."
What is our primary use case?
It performs as a backup product.
How has it helped my organization?
The whole appliance needs to be more resilient. It lost our database, and that is something that cannot happen. If the data was written and managed a little better, we would not lose our entire backup. A bit more thought needs to be put into the process.
What needs improvement?
There are some questions as to how safely they are storing backup data. We had an issue about a year ago, but it actually ended up wiping our entire backup history, because one of the databases got corrupted, and we couldn't recover the backup data. Six to seven years of backup data just disappeared. So, obviously we weren't too happy. It's one of the primary reasons we're looking at the market and have gone down a different route for backups, essentially.
I also think there should be a lesser focus on the physical appliance, which was virtualized. I'm willing to look at it from the ground up and go actually a bit more resiliency, we don't want to lose the entire database because it took a snapshot of the appliance. This is a pretty common thing. We unravel all this data that's backed up if we need to collaborate.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's fairly stable, it runs, it does a backup like you said. Things don't tend to go wrong until either VM upgrades or Unitrends breaks with an update. In terms of that it just carries on. It does its job, that's the main thing.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's scalable to a point. Yes, it is quite scalable.
How is customer service and technical support?
The technical support team is pretty good, actually. In all fairness to them, they are good. It is not their fault that their products are not functional in all aspects. But, from the support perspective, they did work quite hard to get things working in our favor. They did try their best. We cannot fault the support team for a problem with the product, itself.
How was the initial setup?
I was not involved with the initial setup. It was inherited by me.
What was our ROI?
Always look at your backups strategy, and what your RPO and RTO are. Also, understand your infrastructure and the risks involved, including how the backup works.
If you are a large organization or corporation, with multiple sites, you can replicate the data from one Unitrends device to anoter Unitrends divide appliance. Then, this is definitely a solution for you. But, if you are a smaller corporation or organization, and you are worried about your backups, Unitrends may not be your best product choice.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I have no advice about the pricing of the product.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I inherited the product, so I did not comparison shop or evaluate other products.
What other advice do I have?
It hasn't improved our backup because of the signal comeback with their solutions. They purchased RDR, but we don't know whether, I believe there's new functionality now in the current version, but it's not quite there yet. But there's still the pitfall there. If the database gets corrupted you lost access to your data unless it's stored under the appliance. So, you are basically doubling up on your data storage. So, I can't really say much more than that.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Unix/Apple System Administrator at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Able to migrate backup solutions without having to purchase a lot of hardware separately. Technical support has not been very helpful when there are complex issues.
Pros and Cons
- "Being an appliance-based solution, we were able to migrate backup solutions without having to purchase a lot of hardware separately."
- "Support is great for small simple issues, but anything more difficult, it is hard to get good resolutions without having to badger them and their management."
How has it helped my organization?
We had a pretty solid backup platform before. I wouldn't say Unitrends made anything better, besides ditching Symantec's per TB licensing model and saving us a lot of money.
What is most valuable?
Being an appliance-based solution, we were able to migrate backup solutions without having to purchase a lot of hardware separately.
What needs improvement?
Support is great for small simple issues, but anything more difficult, it is hard to get good resolutions without having to badger them and their management. I think maybe Unitrends' support teams are too small for the size of their customer base and numbers of incidents.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Issues with one appliance having disk-related issues happens often. There were many issues with this one appliance (with different causes). Another appliance is habitually having issues with archive times to Unitrends Archive device.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would like one management console for a whole environment that works quickly. It can be done, however anything you look up slows queries down because you might be searching multiple backup appliances at once.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
Like any other company, sales will tell you almost anything, but the real proof is when you get it in your environment for a test drive.
Technical Support:
Technical support has not been very helpful when there are complex issues. It is sometimes difficult to find someone who can answer questions the right way. I have had tickets that have changed hands, and each person claims to have fixed the issue while there are multiple reasons given for the problem.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Symantec Net Backup: It was too costly.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup was not difficult, but did require planning.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented through a partner, but much of the work was done by my own team.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Bacula, Rubrik (I think it was too new at that point), and Dell.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Technical Presales Consultant/ Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
An all-in-one enterprise backup solution that supports any operating system, but it can be more scalable.
Pros and Cons
- "I like the fact that you can recover the VMs inside the appliance. For example, they're basically running this appliance on a Linux-based distribution, and they're spinning off KVM virtual machines inside."
- "There's a lot that can be made better. For example, it could be more scalable."
What is our primary use case?
I've been deploying it for most of my clients because it comes in an appliance model and supports any operating system, including legacy operating systems. Some customers prefer the appliance model rather than just getting the software and worrying about integrating it.
It's been useful for our customers who rely on legacy systems and fail to find backup solutions that are compatible with their legacy systems. For example, in the industrial sector, we have people relying on a system that's running on Windows 2000 for 20 years. Nobody really supports these operating systems these days, and only a very few vendors do that.
What is most valuable?
Unitrends really has cross-compatibility and a broad area of support for various operating system backups. I like the fact that you can recover the VMs inside the appliance. For example, they're basically running this appliance on a Linux-based distribution, and they're spinning off KVM virtual machines inside. The customer has downtime to his advantage. He can absolutely spin-off some VMs from inside the backup appliance itself to start production or close instantly or as soon as possible.
Unitrends has a unique point in deduplication because it has global deduplication, and it can help make backup sizes much smaller than the software they're using. Because it deduplicates from a storage area and has a feature to recover a VM inside the appliance.
Their technical support is also good. It's actually one of the selling points, and we show the customer that their support is reliable.
What needs improvement?
becoming software defined rather than appliance based oriented, establishing alllainces with major oem vendors as that opens flexibility on HW
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using Unitrends for about a year and a half.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Unitrends is pretty much stable. It's been around in the market for quite some time. It's not very famous around here in the region of Saudi Arabia, but it's a well-established backup company, and they've been well-established in the market. It's pretty safe to say that it's stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Unitrends is not really enterprise-ready. It can scale, and there's a lot you can do with it, but it's more suitable for small and medium appliance-based backup solution models.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support was great at the time. They had this chat feature, and they are happy to support you. That's actually one of the selling points, and we show the customer that their support is reliable.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is pretty straightforward. There's a good interface where you can log in, and you can start deploying it in your business and start backing up the environment and the appliance. In terms of configuration, it's straightforward. The nightmare is racking and stacking the appliance. It's pretty heavy.
The deployment time is relative to the customer's environment. Some customer environments will be very smooth. It won't take much time to deploy and backup the environment. Some customer environments will have some bottlenecks, whether it be on the network or the storage level. Some things can be deployed in minutes, but the challenges are to be faced on site, and sometimes it can cause delays for as long as a month.
What about the implementation team?
We integrate this solution for our customers. It's a 2-person job. We go on-site and implement this solution. You just need to have product training and learn how to deploy it from the portal. You can just go on site and start deploying it. I mean, that really relies on the customer side. If he's an enterprise customer, then you need more than one person. It would help if you had a team to deploy it.
What other advice do I have?
I wouldn't recommend this product to potential customers because it's an appliance-based model, and you'll be locked in with that vendor. You'll have to pay whatever that vendor demands for the hardware. It's always best to go with a software-based solution because it scales, and basically, it's flexible for you to use compared to the hardware-based model.
I heard that they have software now, and you can deploy a software-based model and work with that. You don't need to tie yourself to their hardware. The other thing is the fact that the hardware becomes an area of support.
For example, I have one customer in the industrial sector. Three years ago, I sold them an appliance, and right now, that hardware is at the end-of-life stage. He needs to purchase new hardware unless he has some agreement with Unitrends, which they call a "pledge agreement." You pay more when you buy the appliance, but in exchange, when you renew their support, if the hardware reaches the end-of-life stage, they'll basically replace it.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Unitrends a 7.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Manager Technical Support at Ultrium Technologies
Great technical support and follow-up
Pros and Cons
- "They have great support."
- "I would like to see the real-time replication process improved, and a zero RPO feature added."
What is our primary use case?
We use Unitrends Appliance across our infrastructure to backup both physical servers and virtual machines.
How has it helped my organization?
Unitrends is efficient of running virtual machines and Physical servers inside it with a feature called instant recovery. With this, my business critical machines almost will never stop. Unitrends changed my backup window to half the time spent before and the space used too, the de-duplication is very high
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the technical support and instant recovery.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see the improve High availability features like switchover and switchback process. also unitrends boomerang compatibilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been dealing with Unitrends for about 2 years
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and technical support?
great Technical Support. they fixed some serious setup issues and made sure everything backed up correctly.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy and it can be deployed in a couple of minutes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
we are satisfied with the pricing and licensing options.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
In summary, this is great software and we like a lot of features.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Distributor
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Unitrends Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Product Categories
Backup and RecoveryPopular Comparisons
Veeam Data Platform
Commvault Cloud
Rubrik
Acronis Cyber Protect
Zerto
Veritas NetBackup
Cohesity DataProtect
Azure Backup
Veritas Backup Exec
Arcserve UDP
Quest Rapid Recovery
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Unitrends Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Software replication to remote sites during disaster recovery?
- When evaluating backup and recovery software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Veeam vs. Dell AppAssure vs. ShadowProtect
- Help! Need an opensource backup solution to work with OVM, Linux, Windows, Sql server, Exchange, Sharepoint. Plus bare metal recovery.
- What will be the best strategy for develop a up to date BCRS?
- CommVault vs. EMC NetWorker vs. Dell vRanger
- Should I get a third-party backup solution for Office 365?
- What is the best next generation backup tool?
- Best backup for 100Gbps+ read and write with hardware encryption?
- Major Differences Between These 4 Backup and Disaster Recovery Solutions?
Tech support that is available live in my time zone, is timely with advice and resolution, and they communicate well. Big plus.