Discover the top alternatives and competitors to vCenter Configuration Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix, and Red Hat Satellite.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
VMware Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with VMware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers comprehensive IT management solutions, excelling in software deployment, compliance, and automation. In comparison, vCenter Configuration Manager focuses on virtualization management with strong capabilities like vMotion. Tech buyers might choose Microsoft for IT integration, while vCenter suits virtualization needs.
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a moderate setup cost, while vCenter Configuration Manager incurs higher initial expenses. The difference in setup costs could influence organizations' decisions based on budget considerations.
Microsoft Configuration Manager has a moderate setup cost, while vCenter Configuration Manager incurs higher initial expenses. The difference in setup costs could influence organizations' decisions based on budget considerations.
vCenter Configuration Manager excels in integration with VMware products, offering extensive asset management and configuration control. In comparison, BigFix stands out with strong endpoint protection and compliance management, providing superior customer service and long-term value due to its focus on security features.
The setup cost for vCenter Configuration Manager is lower compared to BigFix. However, BigFix offers extensive capabilities that might justify its higher initial expense.
The setup cost for vCenter Configuration Manager is lower compared to BigFix. However, BigFix offers extensive capabilities that might justify its higher initial expense.
vCenter Configuration Manager excels in VMware environments due to deep integration, automated compliance, and monitoring. In comparison, Red Hat Satellite's strength lies in managing multiple Linux distributions with robust patch management and versatile provisioning. Both solutions provide unique advantages tailored to specific IT environments.
vCenter Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Satellite, which offers a more budget-friendly option. The significant difference in setup costs highlights the varying pricing strategies of these solutions.
vCenter Configuration Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Red Hat Satellite, which offers a more budget-friendly option. The significant difference in setup costs highlights the varying pricing strategies of these solutions.
vCenter Configuration Manager offers robust reporting and auditing capabilities with simplicity; however, it needs better scalability. In comparison, BMC TrueSight Server Automation excels in patch management and automation but requires an enhanced user experience. vCenter Configuration Manager is more budget-friendly, while BMC TrueSight Server Automation offers long-term value through advanced features.
