Veritas NetBackup Reviews

Veritas NetBackup is a solution for system backups. They have recently integrated anti-ransomware.

Veritas NetBackup has some limitations and it would be a benefit if we had better documentation.

I have been using Veritas NetBackup for a few months.

Veritas NetBackup is a scalable solution.

The support has been good for Veritas NetBackup.

I have used Veritas Backup Exec previously. Veritas NetBackup is a far better solution.

The initial setup of Veritas NetBackup could be easier.

We had Veritas NetBackup do one of the installations in Algeria. We have good communications with the sales and technical teams.

We recommend this solution to a lot of customers. If they are using Veritas Backup Exec, I would advise them to upgrade to Veritas NetBackup.

I rate Veritas NetBackup a nine out of ten.

Easily integrated with Claude

Netbackup is useful for providing dedicated backup services.

From a technical point of view, all EMC products have to improve the troubleshoot feature like, log should be in human readable format.

Past 5 to 6 years.

Easy to deploy.

Wrong integration is always the

Not yet.

4.5/5

4/5

I used Sympana commvault and CA arc serve. Both the products are good for small organisations but not up to the mark for enterprise level.

Through vendor team; try to just know how to fix the hardware and plug the networker cable. Rest of the things we had to do remotely.

For enterprise level backup solution – No.

We use it for general backup on our servers. 

The most valuable features are: 

• The VMware VADP backups
• The support for data domains

In terms of improvement, it's very difficult to make it work with multiple business units. Its security model is too constricted.

I have been using Veritas Backup for eight years. 

One of the best features is the performance is very good.

Their technical support is average. Not perfect and not bad. 

The initial setup was complex. The networking was very complex; there are a lot of firewall ports.

It takes a few days to deploy and we do it with somebody in-house. 

Both our side and the vendor's side are required for maintenance. 

I think it's probably a solution that has passed its prime. There are probably better ones out there.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.