Microsoft Project Reviews

Users experience improved resource utilization and cost efficiency with Microsoft Project, leading to quicker project completion. The tool's centralization streamlines reporting and administration, enhancing transparency. It is noted that proficient use is necessary for optimal returns. Microsoft Project simplifies project management, reducing dependency on tools like LiquidPlanner. The time and financial savings contribute to notable returns, making it an invaluable addition. Companies often renew licenses, highlighting its effectiveness in meeting project deadlines.

Enterprise reviewers find Microsoft Project's pricing varied, noting it is generally reasonable but can be costly, especially for extensive usage or additional plugins. Licensing is typically subscription-based, often tied to Office 365 or available as standalone options with both annual and monthly fees. Costs can be as low as $30 per user monthly, with standard versions around $1,200 and professional approximately $1,600, potentially hindering accessibility. Some perceive it as moderate, while others find it expensive compared to alternatives.

• "We purchase perpetual licenses due to the high cost of subscriptions, which are about 1,000 Australian dollars."
• "I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."
• "The product is not expensive. My company has opted for an annual subscription."

Companies primarily use Microsoft Project for managing projects in telecommunications, infrastructure, IT, distribution, and e-commerce. It enables detailed planning, scheduling, tracking, resource allocation, and reporting. Users leverage the tool for creating work breakdown structures, timelines, Gantt diagrams, and milestone tracking. It also supports agile methodologies and integrates with other platforms for collaborative projects. Organizations find it essential for budgeting, handling dependencies, and ensuring effective project execution across diverse industries.

Many organizations rely on internal teams and partners for technical assistance with Microsoft Project. Experiences vary, with some reporting responsive and supportive interactions, while others face delays and challenges reaching the right personnel. Community and online resources are often used due to reduced in-product help. Some consider the experience satisfactory, with ratings around seven out of ten, yet some users do not engage Microsoft support due to self-sufficiency or minor issues.

Users generally find Microsoft Project's initial setup straightforward and easy, often taking just a few hours. Enterprise installations may involve more complex configurations, especially with Project Server. Some report complexities requiring additional knowledge or consultancy. Online versions simplify the process. Training can enhance understanding and efficiency. Users note installation can depend on project size and demands, with maintenance typically minimal. Despite occasional complexities, the setup is manageable for most with basic technical skills.

Microsoft Project exhibits strong scalability, handling various user numbers from small teams to large enterprise implementations. While some face challenges with integration and performance at scale, many successfully implement it across thousands of users. It can support extensive projects, but complexities may arise in merging tasks and deploying diverse methodologies. Its cloud version enhances scalability, though license costs affect accessibility. Integration with Microsoft tools aids expansion but requires experience for effective scaling.

Users find Microsoft Project stable. Most report no bugs or crashing, though some mention issues with larger projects or complex interdependencies. It's known for strong performance and reliability, especially with standard features. Some explore improvements to enhance stability further. Collaboration features can affect stability. Microsoft Project is rated high on stability, with many users giving scores between eight and nine out of ten. It functions well even on minimal hardware requirements.