Top 10 AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

14 reviews
92% willing to recommend

700 followers

Top AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include New Relic, Elastic Observability, and Grafana. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

AppDynamics Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with AppDynamics, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic is preferred for its affordability and easy deployment featuring in-depth analytics, real-time monitoring, and user-friendly interface. In comparison, AppDynamics is chosen for superior end-to-end visibility and advanced diagnostics, despite its higher complexity and pricing, offering excellent customer support and robust features.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. New Relic Report

Pricing

New Relic users report higher setup costs compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring, highlighting a notable difference in initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

New Relic users report higher setup costs compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring, highlighting a notable difference in initial expenditure.

Elastic Observability

4.0 out of 5

Elastic Observability

4.0 out of 5

AppDynamics offers superior pricing and customer service satisfaction, providing detailed browser metrics and customizable dashboards for enhanced monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in features and overall value with extensive integrations and powerful search functionalities, making it worth the higher initial complexity and cost.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Elastic Observability Report

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, making it a significant consideration in budget planning. Elastic Observability offers a more economical setup, providing cost-efficiency without compromising essential features.

View comparison

Pricing

Grafana

3.9 out of 5

Grafana

3.9 out of 5

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring excels in ease of use and detailed performance metrics, making it ideal for seamless deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, Grafana's strengths lie in its powerful visualizations and flexible dashboards, with cost-efficiency driven by its open-source model.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Grafana Report

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring has moderate setup costs, while Grafana offers a more cost-effective installation process. Grafana's simplicity and affordability contrast with the more complex and expensive setup of AppDynamics.

View comparison

Pricing

Sentry

4.3 out of 5

Sentry

4.3 out of 5

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers comprehensive real-user data and detailed transaction analysis, ideal for those needing expansive monitoring. In comparison, Sentry provides strong error monitoring and real-time updates, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with its straightforward deployment and competitive pricing.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. Sentry Report

Pricing

The setup cost for AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is relatively higher compared to Sentry. Sentry offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is relatively higher compared to Sentry. Sentry offers a more budget-friendly setup cost option.

AWS X-Ray

3.9 out of 5

AWS X-Ray

3.9 out of 5

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers detailed performance metrics and real-time user insights. In comparison, AWS X-Ray features powerful tracing capabilities and seamless AWS integration. AppDynamics is known for easy deployment and excellent customer support, while AWS X-Ray justifies its higher price with advanced features.

Download AWS X-Ray vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Report

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring involves a high initial setup cost, whereas AWS X-Ray offers a minimal setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring involves a high initial setup cost, whereas AWS X-Ray offers a minimal setup cost.

ITRS Geneos

4.1 out of 5

ITRS Geneos

4.1 out of 5

ITRS Geneos excels in monitoring and alerting for financial services. In comparison, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers deep application performance insights and broader industry functionalities. ITRS Geneos could improve dashboard customization, while AppDynamics might enhance backend performance and ease of complex configurations.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. ITRS Geneos Report

Pricing

ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring; however, the latter provides a more streamlined initial setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

ITRS Geneos has a higher setup cost compared to AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring; however, the latter provides a more streamlined initial setup process.

OmniPeek

3.9 out of 5

OmniPeek

3.9 out of 5

OmniPeek excels in network analysis and real-time monitoring, offering cost-effectiveness and responsive support. In comparison, AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring provides robust performance insights with a comprehensive feature set. AppDynamics is seen as more complex but offers extensive support resources and justified long-term investment returns.

Download AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring vs. OmniPeek Report

Pricing

OmniPeek has a high setup cost, while AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers a more affordable initial setup fee.

View comparison

Pricing

OmniPeek has a high setup cost, while AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring offers a more affordable initial setup fee.

Akamai mPulse

3.3 out of 5

Akamai mPulse

3.3 out of 5

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring provides detailed data insights and efficient performance issue identification. In comparison, Akamai mPulse offers advanced performance tracking and real-time data visualizations. AppDynamics excels in analytics, whereas Akamai mPulse stands out with its robust monitoring capabilities and satisfactory ROI. AppDynamics is cost-efficient, while Akamai mPulse offers sophisticated features.

Download Akamai mPulse vs. AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring Report

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai mPulse, emphasizing a notable difference in initial investment for businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to Akamai mPulse, emphasizing a notable difference in initial investment for businesses.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Network Monitoring Software

IT Infrastructure Monitoring