Cisco Umbrella Reviews

The first thing that I found most valuable is that there is much differentiation within the licensing so if anyone wants DNS security from the DNS security log, we are there already, and if anyone wants to go to a secure internet gateway, that is also available. We can get the integrated cloud DLP license keys. That is a good benefit with Cisco Umbrella. You can get a complete solution in a single licensing.

Additionally, the cloud firewall is available to integrate if you want. Also, you can create side to side within everything in the cloud.

Right now there are modules just like cloud DLP that are implemented very well. You can just log onto the site, upload and download with the multiple options that are available. That is a good option with Umbrella. Also, you can integrate it with a Cisco Meraki switch as a firewall. That is also a good benefit with Cisco Umbrella.

In terms of what can be improved, it should have more integrations with multiple end user OEMs.

Also, the Linux agent is a big challenge because multiple companies are going with Linux. There is no Linux right now for people working from home and they are looking for security which is not available via Linux. That needs to improve.

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for the last two years.

In terms of the stability, if you're talking about DNS Security, it is very stable. They recently launched Cloud DLP,  so I can't comment on that. We are now working with it, but I do not have too much experience. DNS security is a stable product. There is no issue with that.

Cisco Umbrella is a scalable product. That means, when you have 4,000 users you can take the license for 4,000 users. If they just have 1,500 or 2,000, you can go for that license. Also, on the lower level, if you want 10 licenses, that is also available. That's scalability.

Cisco's technical support is always number one compared to other OEMs.

Deployment and implementation are straightforward for anyone going for the basic certificate for networking, meaning CCNS or CCNP security. The implementation resources are readily available for it. We don't think Cisco has a difficult deployment. Umbrella is very easy. Everything is straightforward. There is no need to Google much for every feature because there is a tab where you can go and configure them. One thing I would like to improve in Umbrella is to have a Linux client available.

On a scale of one to then, I would rate Cisco Umbrella just an eight.

I would recommend it. If you have a Cisco environment, then I must recommend Cisco Umbrella if you have a Cisco Meraki or a Cisco Router solution. There is the option available to integrate and use the firewall, as well. You can deploy policies from the cloud.

We needed the product to enable a whitelist-only browsing mode for certain computers for a client. After that was implemented, I was able to configure a virtual appliance (which became the DNS server) to connect to a local AD server and relate traffic to an AD user name. From there, we could track and monitor where users were going and perform web content filtering to prevent video streaming and certain social media sites. This in turn positively affected productivity.

I don’t remember the specific examples of data I was trying to filter out but it was related to ads being hosted by a CDN such as Akamai. Links and images were being hosted there for quicker localized delivery yet the users were not actually going to those sites. Due to that it was showing that those sites were being visited the most, which wasn’t the case.

There was a positive effect on productivity because we could track and confront the users that were frequently using social media or streaming video during the work day. They weren’t wasting as much time after OpenDNS was implemented.

It gave us new capabilities and made users accountable for their browsing while at work.

I would like to have the ability to prevent certain sites/data from showing on the reports. I have had this feature request open for a couple of years. It would be useful to have for filtering out unuseful data.

I have been using this solution for the past two years. I previously used the free solution 6-8 years ago.

I did not encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability. I had a Sales Engineer assist with the setup for one portion, but was able to figure out the rest with no issues.

No

Excellent

Excellent, their Sales Engineer was very helping in getting the AD sync setup.

No

Initial setup was straightforward. Any questions I had were already answered on the forums.

A vendor team was only needed for one small portion, which was setting up the virtual appliance. I would recommend trying to figure out the setting on your own first before reaching out to support. I found it very simple.

We were able to resell the service for a 100-200% profit.

Due to past experience, I knew it would do what we needed and the website has an intuitive interface, so there was no reason to research alternatives.

We are using the most updated version, although I cannot definitively give the number. I believe it is 1.6. 

I like the original functionality, which allows for providing secure DNS services. To define that, one's users can be on-net or off-net. This can be either in one's office or a remote location. This is the functionality that I find to be most prevalent in the area. 

While the way the solution works with the functions is fantastic, updates or the ability to secure the vault while offline for cloud-based services should be addressed. 

The integration with Cisco could be better. We already have something along these lines and so far so good. 

Local support should also be provided, so that there will not be a need to lump us in with the European pool. For other products, Cisco does have local support. There is a local number which can be reached should the need arise. The support should be more regionalized, as we are talking about an endpoint to endpoint solution. Owing to the number of people who interface with the tool and the response time, local support should be provided. The local support job should handle the app of Cisco Meraki.

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for over a year. 

Cisco Talks is just about the best technical assistance center in the world. I have no complaints or issues with it.

In the past I worked with Checkpoint Harmony, which is a similar tool that provides a certain level of endpoint support to users and a measure of coverage.

I like the responsiveness of the technical assistance center of Cisco Talks. As such, I will always go with Cisco. It was thanks to the technical assistance center that I went with Checkpoint Harmony on one occasion.

For organizations in which I have been involved, I start off easy and then proceed to compliant, since there is a need to ensure that one does not overly complicate his work. The deployment for each person is generally very difficult. We start with easy, at which point we are encouraged to have a good grasp of the technology, without which the entire environment will be locked down and nobody will be able to do anything. As such, I start with easy and migrate the customers to compliant over time. 

Each environment has two people who are responsible for deployment. 

In the region I'm from, that of EMAR, Europe, the Middle East, Eastern Asia and Africa, our organizations do not have many liquid cash assets, so the price could be better. 

We use the solution both internally and externally, as the company for which I work, Signal Alliance, is a systems integrator. 

One should keep an open mind when it comes to using the solution, start off easy and then proceed to compliant. 

I rate Cisco Umbrella as a seven out of ten. 

We use it to provide cloud-based security services for our customers.

We've found it to be stable and good for our customers.

It's a very new product, so it's quite immature at the moment. It can be more user friendly.

We took it in our company a couple of months ago.

It is stable.

It is very scalable. We've got it for very big customers. We probably have several thousand users.

I have not personally interacted with them because we have staff that does that on our behalf.

We switched because we just wanted to be in the Cisco ecosystem, not specifically because other products from other companies were not good enough.

I wasn't involved in that.

There is a subscription cost.

I would recommend this solution to others. We plan to keep using this solution.

I would rate Cisco Umbrella a seven out of ten.

Our customers used an older version of Cisco, but we proposed Cisco Umbrella for their POC phase.

The user interface is great. It's very easy to tailor to our client's environment and needs.

There should be some programs for the POC phase.

I would like to see more integration between Cisco Umbrella and Cisco DNA center

I have been using Cisco Umbrella for one and a half years.

Cisco Umbrella is very stable.

The support is very good.

The price of Cisco Umbrella is a little higher than similar solutions; however, I am not exactly sure what the price difference is.

We compared Cisco Umbrella to other solutions including Zscaler and Palo Alto.

Integration is better with Cisco. Cisco Umbrella performed very well compared to Zscaler and other solutions.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of nine.

To replace my original DNS servers and configure more than 50,000 computers through domain name resolution.

It has helped reduce my unit's security events. It possesses a visual graphics table, which enables me to understand the resolution of the blacklisted domain. Sometimes, I can understand which URL is visited most often by reviewing the user's resolution.

• Black list
• Visual graphics table

These can reduce security events and can find out which users have security issues.

• Its DNS service does not support IPv6 query.
  
• Some countries don't have a DNS server leading to a domain resolution IP, not at a local level.

The price could be lower.

It is a good cloud-based solution for DNS security.

Its on-prem rollout is quite challenging. It needs better coordination with the Internet Service Provider. It is a cloud-based solution, and any endpoint that connects to it has to go through all the gateway ISPs, but some of the ISPs block HTTPS-based DNS. That's where the challenge occurs with Umbrella.

I have been using this solution for almost two years.

Its scalability is good.

I have not interacted with them because it is done through the vendor.

They need to engage the local service provider to do the technology improvements, such as for HTTPS-based DNS, which is a primary requirement for the customers.

I would rate it a seven out of ten.

We use Cisco Umbrella for protecting the web surfing channel.

When users are accessing the internet, mainly for web surfing,  Umbrella will protect the access to the internet.

The most valuable feature is the ease of use.

It's very Robust.

It offers good visibility for the Administrator. The administrator has full visibility of what is blocked or has the knowledge of where users go when they are surfing the internet.

I would like to see more integrability with other products.

If I could take this information and integrate it with other products, it would be beneficial.

We have been using Cisco Umbrella for two years.

We are using the latest version.

We have no issues with the stability of the Cisco Umbrella.

Cisco Umbrella is a scalable product.

We have 100 users in our organization who are using this solution.

Technical support is fine.

For us, the installation was very easy. 

We had the option of using the on-premises device, which would give you better visibility, but we didn't use it. This choice made the installation very easy.

The licensing fee is paid on a yearly basis.

The price is okay. I don't have any issues with the price of the Cisco Umbrella.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Cisco Umbrella an eight out of ten.