Acronis Cyber Protect vs Barracuda Intronis Backup comparison

"It's always stable. It's very good, useful, and user-friendly."

"The solution is exceptional for desktop backup."

"The image backup and image restore features have been very beneficial to us."

"One of the most valuable features of Acronis is its AnyData Engine which allows any device to connect to any other device for the purpose of data restoration."

"The most valuable feature of Acronis Backup is the data recovery and restoration details."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ease of use and its user-friendly interface compared to other tools."

"The most valuable feature is the quick restoration. We can restore the data quickly."

"I have found the product's LiveBoot feature to be most valuable."

"The main feature we like about Barracuda is that we can map devices directly to the cloud. It operates as a security device to run a backup of the cloud in case one of our physical machines goes down."

"The performance is good and the interface is user-friendly."

"The backup feature is most valuable. That's why we took it."

"The configuration and the onboarding process are pretty good."

"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."

"The most valuable feature is the speed of backup, which is very good compared to other solutions."

"It's a one-stop shop, meaning we just program and schedule the backups, decide what is being backed up, and then it automatically replicates and deduplicates."

"I would like to see better centralized management, because I use it across multiple clients. To have a console that centrally manages them would be nice."

"I would like to have more hardware space. It would make it better. I would like to have two more terabytes."

"It could back up more things. I don't think it can back up Box and some of the other third-party ones. Not that we use them that much, but the more they can do, the better it would be. There could also be better integrations with RMM tools."

"The UI performance can be slow at times, especially when handling operations like checking backup status or initiating a restore. The response time for these actions could be improved."

"The reporting can be improved."

"On the cloud side, security could always be better."

"It does not delete locked files."

"Improved support for immutability and Utility AirGAP could be beneficial."

"The backup feature could be a bit simpler to utilize. They should make the process of backing up individual files simpler."

"Compared to Avamar and Data Domain (our other systems), the backup speed is slow."

"I am working in some of the more rural areas of Sweden, and some of the customers here are a little bit wary of cloud technology at the moment. It is not like in Gothenburg or Stockholm, where people rely on it so much more. In the rural areas, companies are saying that we do need to use the cloud, and they are being very wary about their data, especially with GDPR and all that kind of stuff. Having more control and having an option for backing up locally, even if you don't want to use it, would be something very good. The cloud backup is brilliant, but there should be an option to take that cloud backup and save it locally as well. If you lose connection to the internet or you lose access to your data in the cloud, having a backup copy of the latest data on your server is helpful. You need to be able to get access to your customers' files, especially with GDPR, where you need to know where your customers' details are. If they're in the cloud and you've lost access to them, then you'll go into those GDPR regulations. This is somewhere where both Barracuda and Veeam haven't gone as far. As far as I have understood, with Veeam, you can back up your local servers to the cloud but not vice versa. I haven't worked on it much."

"The tool is not user-friendly. The solution should also improve its compatibility. It is also not license-based."

"The restore time can be improved. The restore time for large quantities of folders is slow. Sometimes, if I'm doing a full recovery of a server, it takes multiple hours, which probably is natural. It might also be because of our internet speed to the cloud."

"I would like to see the automatic backup of critical applications to the cloud."

"It is not always stable."

"Setting up Barracuda Backup is straightforward."

"The license is a perpetual license. The cost is an area for improvement."

"​I like the pricing​, and that it is easy to use and has performed well. ​"

"There is a license required for this solution and it can be on a monthly basis."

"You don't have to pay for licenses. You can pay per gig per month. It is pretty reasonable, especially when you do it per gig."

"The tool's subscription costs are monthly. The product's pricing is fair."

"There are monthly fees to use Acronis Backup."

"The pricing model is a little complex to find the right size for what you need. It takes a lot of hours to figure it out."

"The pricing is reasonable. However, it depends on the storage that you use. It would be great to have a package that we can use up to a certain size of the backup, this would allow us to know what the price is going to be up to that capacity."

"It allows us a low cost backup solution for hardware-based, VMware, and Hyper-V systems all from a single platform."

"You have two options, which we have. We pay for it bi-monthly. Then, you can purchase the project hours and support annually."

"You don't need to buy an extra license or agent. With one box, you have licenses for any amount of devices that you want to backed up for whatever is backed up."

"The price of the five-year contract was approximately three million Rupees ($42,000 USD)."

"Low, fixed cost with great savings."

"The licensing is charged yearly. It's my understanding that the cost of the solution is somewhere around $7,000 every two years."

"Normally, there is the hardware on the site. So, essentially, there is a server and storage. They can price it a little lower because the customers are making a little investment upfront. Even though it is trouble-free for the end-users, and once it is set up and running, they don't have to really think about it, there is essentially an initial investment. It is not really pricey. We're actually competitive, but we are in a different market. In Asia, customers are a little more price-sensitive than in the west. It is not really a real issue."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."