Acronis Cyber Protect vs Barracuda Intronis Backup comparison

"It makes a full image of the hard drive. If a hard drive fails, all we do is recover to another hard drive."

"The main reason we went with Acronis Cyber Protect is because it provides a virtual machine backup feature."

"Centralized management is valuable to us."

"​I have everything I need in the backup or in the partition. ​"

"The web-based interface makes it easy to use."

"The Acronis panel is user friendly and tracking backups across a number of different devices is great. Acronis provides prompts and reminders to users if certain files are not backed up."

"It is a very stable solution."

"The stability of Acronis Cyber Protect is very high."

"The scalability of the product is fine."

"The most valuable features are the deduplication that analyzes data to identify duplicate patterns and granular restore."

"The most important feature in Barracuda Backup is the ability to archive the backup of emails."

"The backup feature is most valuable. That's why we took it."

"Easy, immediate protection for data that is virtually infinitely scalable."

"The configuration and the onboarding process are pretty good."

"The product is easy to install and use while doing what it is expected to do."

"We perform backup drills to test the functionality, and we don't have any problems."

"It would be nice to have a partition that I can boot and reinstall when taking a backup image from the operating system."

"No technical support and minimal documentation."

"The product would be better if they offered more integration capabilities."

"The licensing approach becomes intricate when dealing with SharePoint."

"The biggest problem that we have is when the antivirus is installed, the whole machine runs very slowly and some of the machines hang."

"If I could create a protected image backup on a computer partition that just would be just for the image backup; and only the program could access it to prevent viruses from getting into it. That would be very, very good."

"We have issues with the SQL databases which are a little shaky."

"In some cases, at the time of reinstallation, some disasters happen. For the licensing on the computer the name of the computer and domain, everything is removed from the registry level. Then we have to install the Acronis from the start for it to work properly. Otherwise, the Acronis software will cause a lot of trouble at the time of reinstallation. That's where they need to improve the product. In the case people want to install the same software with the same hardware, it should not stop me."

"I am working in some of the more rural areas of Sweden, and some of the customers here are a little bit wary of cloud technology at the moment. It is not like in Gothenburg or Stockholm, where people rely on it so much more. In the rural areas, companies are saying that we do need to use the cloud, and they are being very wary about their data, especially with GDPR and all that kind of stuff. Having more control and having an option for backing up locally, even if you don't want to use it, would be something very good. The cloud backup is brilliant, but there should be an option to take that cloud backup and save it locally as well. If you lose connection to the internet or you lose access to your data in the cloud, having a backup copy of the latest data on your server is helpful. You need to be able to get access to your customers' files, especially with GDPR, where you need to know where your customers' details are. If they're in the cloud and you've lost access to them, then you'll go into those GDPR regulations. This is somewhere where both Barracuda and Veeam haven't gone as far. As far as I have understood, with Veeam, you can back up your local servers to the cloud but not vice versa. I haven't worked on it much."

"Barracuda Backup could use some more integration."

"Its speed can be a bit improved, and of course, its pricing can go a lot cheaper."

"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see cloud support and deduplication functionality."

"The backup feature could be a bit simpler to utilize. They should make the process of backing up individual files simpler."

"Barracuda works great for smaller network environments, which are not that complex. It is hardware-based with a Linux core, which you don't have access to, and a lot of stuff happens on the back-end. Even from a troubleshooting perspective, it is a bit challenging."

"Compared to Avamar and Data Domain (our other systems), the backup speed is slow."

"The tool is not user-friendly. The solution should also improve its compatibility. It is also not license-based."

"It is very cost-effective for the SMB segment, especially for start-ups and smaller environments. It is cost-effective for on-premises and on-cloud deployments in such environments."

"If the solution was less expensive it would be better."

"​I like the pricing​, and that it is easy to use and has performed well. ​"

"Acronis Backup is cheaper. If you install it on a hypervisor, you only pay for a single license. It would be for the backup server, and everything else will be covered by it. In that sense, it becomes a much cheaper option. However, if you have virtual machines, then it can be more expensive. Also, if you have a lot of physical machines the cost can be higher because each entity will need a separate license. There is a monthly license cost."

"The pricing is comparable to the newest solution available on the market, Altaro."

"There are monthly fees to use Acronis Backup."

"The tool is cheap compared to other products."

"The pricing is significantly higher than it was last year, which is understandable since they have introduced new technology, such as transitioning from backup to cybersecurity."

"The price of the five-year contract was approximately three million Rupees ($42,000 USD)."

"Its pricing is very reasonable, but it can be reduced."

"It is about 6,900 or 7,000 a year. It goes up a little every year. Its price includes live updates, support, antivirus, and cloud storage. If I increase the cloud space, then the price would increase. It has been consistent for us."

"The tool's pricing is reasonable."

"You don't need to buy an extra license or agent. With one box, you have licenses for any amount of devices that you want to backed up for whatever is backed up."

"Normally, there is the hardware on the site. So, essentially, there is a server and storage. They can price it a little lower because the customers are making a little investment upfront. Even though it is trouble-free for the end-users, and once it is set up and running, they don't have to really think about it, there is essentially an initial investment. It is not really pricey. We're actually competitive, but we are in a different market. In Asia, customers are a little more price-sensitive than in the west. It is not really a real issue."

"Because it is a single package that includes everything, they are worth the money that you need to pay for it. You are paying for the hardware, licensing, the software that runs on it, regular updates, the cloud features included with it along with the replication, and your space allocated in the cloud for replication. It is fairly priced for what you get."

"What I like best about Barracuda Backup is the licensing model."