No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AWS Auto Scaling vs ITRS Geneos comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and ITRS are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.8, while ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to ITRS’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of ITRS users who would recommend it.
AWS Auto Scaling
Read 23 AWS Auto Scaling reviews
  • 1,113 Views
  • 1,046 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
ITRS Geneos
Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews
  • 4,758 Views
  • 2,950 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

ITRS Geneos and AWS Auto Scaling are highly-rated monitoring and scalability solutions, respectively. ITRS Geneos holds the upper hand in detailed monitoring and alerting, while AWS Auto Scaling excels in automated scalability features and performance management.

Features: ITRS Geneos offers detailed monitoring, real-time alerting, and comprehensive system metrics reporting. AWS Auto Scaling automatically adjusts capacity, integrates well with AWS services, and has efficient scaling policies.

Room for Improvement: ITRS Geneos could enhance ease of use and integration capabilities. AWS Auto Scaling could improve documentation and offer more customization options for scaling policies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ITRS Geneos deployment is straightforward, but more support is needed during complex setups. AWS Auto Scaling provides seamless deployment through AWS infrastructure, though better support insights are occasionally needed.

Pricing and ROI: ITRS Geneos has a higher initial setup cost, justified by detailed data insights. AWS Auto Scaling offers a clear, usage-based pricing model, often yielding a better return on investment due to automatic scaling efficiencies.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos Report (Updated: April 2026).
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos
April 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 885,880 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Auto Scaling
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
15th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ITRS Geneos
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
34th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (64th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (45th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of AWS Auto Scaling is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.0%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AWS Auto Scaling0.4%
ITRS Geneos1.0%
Other98.6%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

AmitMishra1 - PeerSpot reviewer
AmitMishra1
Software Engineer II at Jash Data Sciences
Automatic scaling has reduced costs and handles unpredictable traffic spikes for critical APIs
From my experience, the best features AWS Auto Scaling offers include target tracking scaling, which is very easy to configure. It also integrates with CloudWatch metrics, which is very important, and provides scheduled scaling, which helps some organizations. Two of my clients are using that. Predictive scaling for known traffic patterns and seamless integration with ALBs, ECS, and EC2 are also my favorite features of AWS Auto Scaling. Out of those features, target tracking scaling has saved me the most time and effort, making it my favorite feature. I find predictive scaling useful but in real-world scenarios, we rely more on dynamic scaling. AWS Auto Scaling has positively impacted my organization as it simplifies scaling decisions. I just need to define our target, such as CPU percentage, and AWS Auto Scaling handles everything. There is no need to fine-tune complex scaling rules, which has helped a lot. It has also significantly improved system reliability and reduced costs, as we no longer worry about sudden traffic spikes and we are not overpaying for idle resources. This has saved us significant costs, estimating around 25 to 30 percent after fine-tuning the scaling policy.
Read full review
reviewer2127225 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer2127225
Monitoring Specialist at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Does real-time monitoring, prevents failures, and has a reasonable price
Their cloud monitoring solution needs to be improved. I have already given them the feedback that it's not capable of meeting the latest technology needs. It's built like proprietary software. I can't expose the data to ITRS, and similarly, ITRS can't expose the data to the outside world. They have created a boundary. It's a bit binding solution. In the modern world, people like to be able to expose the data to do whatever they want. They can query the data, send it, or pull it. ITRS needs to provide more in terms of the API offering. They have documentation, but they can improve the documentation and provide videos to show how to do monitoring configuration or deployment.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Once we moved them to AWS and created the appropriate architecture, it solved the problem."
"The setup is not very complex."
"AWS Auto Scaling has positively impacted my organization as it simplifies scaling decisions, significantly improved system reliability, and reduced costs, as we no longer worry about sudden traffic spikes and we are not overpaying for idle resources, saving us an estimated 25 to 30 percent after fine-tuning the scaling policy."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
"I would highly recommend Auto Scaling to others because it is a fantastic feature that simplifies scaling processes and makes deployment efficient."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"AWS Auto Scaling is very good for managing traffic and creating new instances when necessary."
More AWS Auto Scaling pros
"This is the most amazing monitoring tool I've ever worked with, because it allows you to monitor a lot of things and also to address the issue and assign it to someone so everyone will know it's being investigated."
"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."
"The ability to build integrations to tools that are not monitored out of the box is the most valuable feature."
"One of the benefits is to have 24/7 automated monitoring of our most critical services; in general, it has drastically increased the visibility of our estate, definitely improved our response times to issues, and enabled us to proactively detect issues and prevent outages as well."
"For my application, Geneos is detecting and helping us avoid outages at least once a day."
"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."
"The tool is highly customizable and can be tailored to your requirements."
"The monitoring of queues which helps us to stay ahead of issues and fix them before users start complaining."
More ITRS Geneos pros
 

Cons

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"AWS Auto Scaling can be improved in many ways, such as providing better visibility into scaling decisions and clarifying why exactly scaling happens."
"Setting up the configuration involves too much work for the cloud engineer, like configuring the ALB, the target group, and all the steps."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched."
"There hasn't been a need for improvements."
More AWS Auto Scaling cons
"Sometimes, if there is a lot of data coming onto the servers, we have observed a little bit of slowness on the gateway servers which are doing the ITRS dashboard monitoring."
"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."
"We need more hassle free plug-ins that offer Load and Start with minimal manual efforts."
"Backward compatibility with deprecated features and in system documentation on what configuration areas are needed to be updated."
"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."
"Sometimes there were issues with the database. If the database logging was high then the gateway would be slow."
"The Geneos configuration has greatly improved since the nascent version 1.0 days, but still requires specialist knowledge and convoluted config debugging when something’s not monitoring as expected."
"We were a little bit confused but once we found out what was needed, it was smooth."
More ITRS Geneos cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS Auto Scaling is a pay-per-use and pay-as-you-use service."
"AWS Auto Scaling is a cheap solution."
"The pricing is good. I have not had any customers that have complained about the price."
"The product is expensive."
"AWS Auto Scaling's price is high."
"The product has moderate pricing."
"AWS Auto Scaling is an expensive solution."
"Given our spend and the amount of service we have in it, the pricing is quite reasonable."
"Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements."
"The pricing is fairly market-related. They have been very lenient because we have been working with them for so long. An example is that we're currently migrating some of our services to AWS, and they've given us a grace period for some of the things to help with the migration and not to grow additional costs while we are migrating, but it's still on par with the market."
"It is expensive. They have to look at the model around when we move to cloud and how that's going to work. The licensing cost does pay off because of the improvements in support to our business."
"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."
"When I first came in, their pricing was very high. ITRS had a high expectation of what their price should be based on perceived value. I think they have been realizing, more recently, that there are other competitors, so their pricing is a lot better. Licensing for on-premise is okay, however I feel there is quite some work to be done for cloud and containers. We're still working with them to try and work out what that pricing should look like."
"The organization is not just purchasing a license for the product, but also managing services and professional services from ITRS. Another factor is if the implementation is going to be in production, non-production, or both."
"Its price is reasonable. It isn't too expensive, and it isn't too cheap, but it also depends on a company's volume and negotiation."
More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
67%
Computer Software Company
6%
Construction Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise39
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Auto Scaling?
The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. W...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not sure about the pricing aspect of AWS Auto Scaling or the cost of it.
See all answers
What needs improvement with AWS Auto Scaling?
I'm not really sure what improvements I would want to see in AWS Auto Scaling because I haven't really used it extensively or explored most of it. To the extent that I've used it so far, I think it...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?
The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?
ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?
ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 16% of the time
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 13% of the time
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Akamai mPulse vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 13% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 10% of the time
eG Enterprise vs AWS Auto Scaling Logo
eG Enterprise vs AWS Auto Scaling
Compared 8% of the time
More AWS Auto Scaling Competitors
Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 7% of the time
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Grafana vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 5% of the time
Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Nagios XI vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 5% of the time
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos Logo
Prometheus-AI Platform vs ITRS Geneos
Compared 4% of the time
More ITRS Geneos Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
March 2026
AWS Auto Scaling reportDownload AWS Auto Scaling product report
Buyer's Guide
ITRS Geneos
March 2026
ITRS Geneos reportDownload ITRS Geneos product report
 

Also Known As

AWS Auto-Scaling
Geneos
 

Overview

AWS Auto Scaling monitors your applications and automatically adjusts capacity to maintain steady, predictable performance at the lowest possible cost. Using AWS Auto Scaling, it’s easy to setup application scaling for multiple resources across multiple services in minutes. The service provides a simple, powerful user interface that lets you build scaling plans for resources including Amazon EC2 instances and Spot Fleets, Amazon ECS tasks, Amazon DynamoDB tables and indexes, and Amazon Aurora Replicas. AWS Auto Scaling makes scaling simple with recommendations that allow you to optimize performance, costs, or balance between them. If you’re already using Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to dynamically scale your Amazon EC2 instances, you can now combine it with AWS Auto Scaling to scale additional resources for other AWS services. With AWS Auto Scaling, your applications always have the right resources at the right time.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS
 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.
Buyer's Guide
AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos
April 2026
Free Report: AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
885,880 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. ITRS Geneos report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.