Both Bizagi and KiSSFLOW compete in the BPM tools category aimed at streamlining business processes. Bizagi holds the upper hand in advanced functionalities and process mapping, while KiSSFLOW is favored for its ease of use and integration capabilities.
Features: Bizagi offers comprehensive process modeling capabilities, cloud and on-premises solutions, and advanced process mapping. KiSSFLOW provides simplicity in creating workflows, strong integration with applications like Google Workspace and Slack, and faster implementation of basic workflows.
Room for Improvement: Bizagi can improve with easier initial setup, reduced learning curve, and better performance in complex deployments. KiSSFLOW needs enhanced advanced customization options, better reporting features, and more robust functionality.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bizagi offers flexible deployment models, cloud, and on-premises options, but has a challenging initial setup. Customer support has mixed reviews with some users reporting delays. KiSSFLOW is quick to set up due to straightforward cloud deployment, and its customer service is generally responsive and praised.
Pricing and ROI: Bizagi has high initial setup costs but often reports good ROI due to its powerful features. KiSSFLOW is more affordable, providing quicker returns and easier setup, though with potentially less extensive ROI.
Bizagi’s industry-leading low-code process automation platform connects people, applications, robots, and information. As the most business-friendly and flexible solution on the market, Bizagi enables true collaboration between business and IT, delivering faster adoption and success. Fuelled by a community of 1 million users, Bizagi powers over 1,000 organizations worldwide including Adidas, BAE Systems, and Old Mutual. For more information visit www.bizagi.com
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.