Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs Huntress comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
2.3
BlackBerry Cylance's customer service is praised, but technical support experiences vary, with some requiring improved responsiveness and expertise.
Sentiment score
9.0
Huntress support is praised for prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive service, consistently rated excellent by users for reliability and responsiveness.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
2.4
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity needs enhancements in user interface, reporting, threat detection, integration, support, pricing, and training.
Sentiment score
5.9
Huntress needs enhanced reporting, better integration, expanded features, improved dashboards, and seamless AV and endpoint protection integration.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
BlackBerry Cylance is scalable for various deployments, supports many users, but may require additional dashboard licenses for extensive use.
No sentiment score available
Huntress scales efficiently with rapid deployment, high responsiveness, and minimal expansion effort, supporting diverse user needs and endpoints.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
3.8
BlackBerry Cylance's pricing is competitive and flexible, typically $55-$60 per device, often compared to SentinelOne, Kaspersky, Symantec.
No sentiment score available
Huntress is priced per endpoint, seen as fair due to consistent development, with adaptive, cost-effective enterprise pricing.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
3.5
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is stable, resource-efficient, and reliable, with minor issues reported by a small number of users.
Sentiment score
8.6
Huntress is highly rated for stability and reliable performance, with minor compatibility issues, ensuring seamless low-impact integration.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity provides AI-driven threat detection with minimal resources, user-friendly management, and seamless integration for comprehensive defense.
Sentiment score
8.6
Huntress provides 24/7 threat detection, automatic remediation, and AI-enhanced security, ideal for small to medium businesses.
The automated remediation feature also provides significant value.
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Cylance Cybersec...
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
27th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.6
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Huntress
Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
10th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (9th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Huntress is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
 

Featured Reviews

Sooraj Makkancherrry - PeerSpot reviewer
Doesn't have daily updates, which is important for healthcare IT
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immediately due to medical device protocols and validation testing. I wish support would try to understand our issues better instead of giving this standard response. The machine learning feature they use often tells us to upgrade the agent or add things to the exclusion list, which isn't unacceptable. It's a very good and new technology as a tool and antivirus. But sometimes, it doesn't work properly with our medical devices and products, quarantining files it shouldn't even after we add them to exclusions. This is tricky for us.
Andy Larin - PeerSpot reviewer
Effortless to use and is one of the easiest products to deploy
Huntress is effortless to use. It's one of the easiest products to deploy. Pushing out through our RMM is simple, and using it is straightforward once it's on a machine. The end user doesn't have to do anything. Everything comes back to us. I love that the alerts are human-curated. They take a look at alerts before we get them. Other products are very noisy. They'll send you an alert about anything. About 95 percent of those alerts go to Huntress first. They check to make sure that it's real and only alert us if it's actionable, something that requires our attention. When I get an alert from Huntress, it must be looked at. I love that. It saves a ton of time for my people. It can fix low-severity threats. Their team is 24/7, whereas my team is not. We want them to take action on known bad things. Sometimes, that means fixing the problem or isolating the machine so multiple machines aren't getting hit. I love that they can address those issues within a very short time.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
19%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
7%
Healthcare Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Blackberry Protect?
It is a good endpoint solution. It is very easy to manage and detect the threat immediately. It will take the necessary actions.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Blackberry Protect?
The price is reasonable for us at the moment. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.
What needs improvement with Blackberry Protect?
I face challenges with the exclusion policy - it still scans folders we told it not to, causing issues. When we contact support, they tell us to update the latest agent, but we can't do that immedi...
What do you like most about Huntress?
It is very easy to use. It is a great solution. They are one of the better vendors that I have ever worked with since I have been in the industry.
What needs improvement with Huntress?
One issue is the managed antivirus. Huntress takes control of the antivirus built into Windows Defender, but it doesn't if, for some reason, Defender isn't working properly and doesn't attempt to f...
What is your primary use case for Huntress?
We roll Huntress out across the board. It's in our base security shield, so we use it everywhere. We also use ThreatLocker. It's an application for allowlisting and blocklisting. It blocks any soft...
 

Also Known As

Blackberry Protect
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Panasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. Huntress and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.