Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Camunda and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while ServiceNow is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Camunda holds a 15.8% mindshare in PA, compared to ServiceNow’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,866 Views
11,894 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Orchestration

Read 16 ServiceNow Orchestration reviews

2,099 Views
2,057 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Camunda

ServiceNow Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and ServiceNow Orchestration compete in the business process automation category. Camunda seems to have an upper hand in flexibility and integration capabilities, while ServiceNow Orchestration excels in out-of-the-box features and integration efficiency.

Features: Camunda offers a lightweight, scalable architecture, wide support for BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, and customization capabilities for specific use cases. ServiceNow Orchestration provides robust automation of business processes, seamless cloud service spin-up, and strong integration across industry-leading tools.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could improve its user interface customization, provide enterprise features in the community version, and offer better training resources. ServiceNow Orchestration would benefit from enhancements in automatic remediation, more flexible pricing, and improved event monitoring systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports diverse deployment options, including private and hybrid clouds, receiving feedback on good customer service, though inconsistency is noted. ServiceNow Orchestration is often deployed on public and hybrid clouds, offering exceptional support but perceived as less flexible in third-party integration.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers cost-effective options with its free open-source version, favorably impacting developer productivity. ServiceNow Orchestration is considered expensive, with quick ROI seen in business process automation, although costs are often hidden in complex contracts.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,180 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (3rd), AI Customer Support (51st), AI IT Support (5th)

ServiceNow Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 15.8%, down from 27.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 3.0%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	15.8%
ServiceNow Orchestration	3.0%
Other	81.2%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Claude-Yameogo

Consultant at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has helped orchestrate processes and integrate workflows across cloud environments

I recommend ServiceNow Orchestration for larger companies because they have the capability to manage complex environments where it performs better. I promote low-code solutions for these implementations. I don't currently have an idea regarding the pre-built integrations of ServiceNow Orchestration, but I plan to check my area to determine what added value it can bring. I would rate this solution a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Camunda is a scalable product."

"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."

"The platform's approach to BPMN modeling is straightforward and versatile, making it easy to adopt and use effectively."

"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."

"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."

"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."

"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."

"The most valuable features are that it's lightweight, can be embedded in existing Java code, and keeps track of the workflow state and the instances that we need."

More Camunda pros

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"The product has a flexible interface for development."

"It has competitive AI capabilities."

"It's probably the best product out there."

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."

"It is a very stable product, highly affordable."

More ServiceNow Orchestration pros

Cons

"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."

"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."

"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."

"It would be better if the tool were made less reliant on Java."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"We have to wait to see if Bonita provided us with some features that Camunda does not or if we experience any stability issues."

"Initial setup can be quite complex."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

More Camunda cons

"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."

"ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden."

"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."

"The third-party integrations are challenging when the tools are not from ServiceNow partners. This presents issues when integrating solutions from other vendors."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

"I would like a user experience module to be added."

"It is a highly complex platform to work on."

More ServiceNow Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Camunda's pricing is good."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

"We have an annual subscription to this solution."

"We are using the paid edition because there is no separate support and service license yet. We are yet to find a suitable licensing model for Camunda because we only use the engine, and we have implemented our solution around Camunda Cloud. So, we are mainly interested in the support and service, and that's what we mainly use in the paid edition."

"Cheaper licensing and resources than competitors"

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"The product is expensive for a small or medium-sized company."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"It is not very expensive."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?

The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?

The cost of ServiceNow Orchestration is considered medium; it is expensive but powerful. I would rate the pricing experience as a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?

If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration. Boomi is an ESB with orchestration features to integrate and exchange dat...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Camunda

Compared 2% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Control-M vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

Temporal vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

Pega Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

February 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Orchestration

January 2026

Download ServiceNow Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

ServiceNow

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

February 2026

Free Report: Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,180 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.