Camunda vs ServiceNow Orchestration comparison

Camunda and ServiceNow are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Camunda is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.4, while ServiceNow is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. Camunda holds a 16.3% mindshare in PA, compared to ServiceNow’s 3.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Camunda users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of ServiceNow users who would recommend it.

Camunda

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,291 Views
11,566 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ServiceNow Orchestration

Read 16 ServiceNow Orchestration reviews

1,954 Views
1,915 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Camunda

ServiceNow Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and ServiceNow Orchestration compete in the business process automation category. Camunda seems to have an upper hand in flexibility and integration capabilities, while ServiceNow Orchestration excels in out-of-the-box features and integration efficiency.

Features: Camunda offers a lightweight, scalable architecture, wide support for BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, and customization capabilities for specific use cases. ServiceNow Orchestration provides robust automation of business processes, seamless cloud service spin-up, and strong integration across industry-leading tools.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could improve its user interface customization, provide enterprise features in the community version, and offer better training resources. ServiceNow Orchestration would benefit from enhancements in automatic remediation, more flexible pricing, and improved event monitoring systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda supports diverse deployment options, including private and hybrid clouds, receiving feedback on good customer service, though inconsistency is noted. ServiceNow Orchestration is often deployed on public and hybrid clouds, offering exceptional support but perceived as less flexible in third-party integration.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda offers cost-effective options with its free open-source version, favorably impacting developer productivity. ServiceNow Orchestration is considered expensive, with quick ROI seen in business process automation, although costs are often hidden in complex contracts.

To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Camunda

Ranking in Process Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Business Process Management (BPM) (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (2nd), AI Customer Support (8th), AI IT Support (6th)

ServiceNow Orchestration

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Camunda is 16.3%, down from 27.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Orchestration is 3.2%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	16.3%
ServiceNow Orchestration	3.2%
Other	80.5%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Claude-Yameogo

Consultant at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has helped orchestrate processes and integrate workflows across cloud environments

I recommend ServiceNow Orchestration for larger companies because they have the capability to manage complex environments where it performs better. I promote low-code solutions for these implementations. I don't currently have an idea regarding the pre-built integrations of ServiceNow Orchestration, but I plan to check my area to determine what added value it can bring. I would rate this solution a nine overall.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."

"The BPMN diagram is valuable. For our use case of transferring money from one account to another, the connections have to be done in the traditional financial ways. There are a lot of unexpected errors and a lot of instability with this kind of system, and we are using Camunda in order to have clear flows. With BPMN, I can show a flow to my business partner, and the business team can easily understand what's going on. The technical team can understand what the implementation is, and we can model different errors and the process for recovering from these errors."

"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."

"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."

"Camunda seems to have a lot of traction, maturity, and stability. It also matches the need for agile development."

"The solution is good for data models."

"The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."

"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."

More Camunda pros

"It's probably the best product out there."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"It's scalable."

"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."

"There are a lot of ready to use orchestration custom packs."

"I use it to orchestrate processes and integration features to gather and update data during specified timeframes or exchange data in real-time when changes occur based on certain criteria."

"The data visualization is good."

"Employee onboarding, de-boarding, and other service-provision features make the process easier and it saves us a lot of time."

More ServiceNow Orchestration pros

Cons

"The migration strategy needs to be improved."

"It is not difficult to change existing processes. The difficulty was in integration, for example, to call an external web API, and in the security capabilities, to use a vault for secrets. That was difficult."

"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."

"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."

"The initial setup can be complex for business users."

"We have to wait to see if Bonita provided us with some features that Camunda does not or if we experience any stability issues."

"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."

"In terms of features, it meets my needs, but I would like Camunda to have an office in Brazil and provide training in Portuguese. They should provide regional support and training courses in Portuguese."

More Camunda cons

"There can be gaps in integration."

"The flow rate for releases and updates is very, very slow and does not meet customers' objectives for scalability."

"ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden."

"If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration."

"There is still room for more integrations. Or, it would be nice to bundle multiple products together rather than selling everything as a model as that turns out to be a bit costly."

"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."

"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."

"Frequent upgrades may negatively impact the performance of instances. Therefore, for now, I don't recommend any additional upgrades."

More ServiceNow Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license is quite expensive, which is why we went with the community version."

"Generally, the price could be better, as well as the licensing fees."

"The most attractive feature of the product is that it is open source."

"Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."

"Camunda Platform is an open-source product."

"We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."

"Camunda is a cheaply priced product, making it one of its major USPs."

"I use the open-source free version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

"It is quite expensive because we've had some customers come back and say it's quite pricey because in order for them to go ahead with Orchestration, they must have already been paying for Discovery, service mapping, and a few other things."

"ServiceNow doesn't give a clear cost indication. They have different contracts with different organizations and it's all about negotiation, so you don't know how they are doing at the cost level."

"The solution is costly and orchestrations are very expensive."

"It is not very expensive."

"In terms of price, this solution is at the higher end of what you'll find."

"This is an expensive product, but it is the best in the market considering the features and lack of competitors."

"The cost of the solution is based on the number of plugins, conductors and integrations used and is charged annually. The licensing cause has been increasing gradually which makes it difficult to access. Initially offer free features but over the time the charges rise which make it an expensive solution with limited features. Along with that, the integration issues persist and require additional middle where and internet connectivity for effective usage."

"Pricing is custom to every customer."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

See all answers

What do you like most about ServiceNow Orchestration?

The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in l...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Orchestration?

The cost of ServiceNow Orchestration is considered medium; it is expensive but powerful. I would rate the pricing experience as a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ServiceNow Orchestration?

If I compare the interface of ServiceNow Orchestration with Boomi, it is easier to use Boomi than ServiceNow Orchestration. Boomi is an ESB with orchestration features to integrate and exchange dat...

See all answers

Comparisons

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Camunda

Compared 2% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Control-M vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 13% of the time

Temporal vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 8% of the time

Nintex Process Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM BPM vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

Pega Platform vs ServiceNow Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More ServiceNow Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Camunda

January 2026

Download Camunda product report

Buyer's Guide

ServiceNow Orchestration

December 2025

Download ServiceNow Orchestration product report

Also Known As

Camunda BPM

No data available

Interactive Demo

Camunda

Demo not available

ServiceNow

Overview

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Camunda

ServiceNow is the fastest-growing enterprise cloud software company in the world above $1 billion (2018 revenue was $2.6 billion, up 36% year over year). We deliver digital workflows that create great experiences and unlock productivity to approximately 5,400 enterprise customers worldwide, including almost 75% of the Fortune 500.

ServiceNow

Sample Customers

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando

experian, BEACHBODY, HealthPartners, Banosoft

Buyer's Guide

Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

December 2025

Free Report: Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Camunda vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.