Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Elastic Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Elastic and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1, while IBM is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.0. Elastic holds a 5.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.
Elastic Observability
Read 26 Elastic Observability reviews
  • 9,946 Views
  • 8,673 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews
  • 565 Views
  • 334 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Elastic Observability both compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management category. IBM Tivoli has the upper hand in customer support and feature comprehensiveness, while Elastic Observability is preferred for its user-friendly and modern interface.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager provides detailed monitoring, powerful analytics capabilities, and extensive customer support. Elastic Observability offers seamless integration, real-time data analysis, and a modern, user-friendly interface.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager needs enhancements in usability, performance troubleshooting capabilities, and large-scale environment support. Elastic Observability requires improved documentation, support for large environments, and better customer support feedback.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is known for robust deployment options and superior customer service, though it has a steeper learning curve. Elastic Observability provides easier deployment, quicker setup times, but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher upfront costs but offers a solid return on investment due to its extensive features. Elastic Observability is initially more cost-effective, with competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI for smaller-scale deployments.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,253 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
7th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Log Management (15th), Container Monitoring (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th)
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
55th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 5.4%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Adelina Craciun - PeerSpot reviewer
Customization enables tailored monitoring and alerting across departments
The possibility to customize it has been quite useful. Whatever the other departments want to dream up, we implement. Whatever they want to monitor, the granularity of it, the changes in the threshold, and the anomalies that they want reported all require some development. So far, every single request has been fulfilled.
Read full review
CC
Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."
"The most valuable feature of Elastic Observability is the text search."
"The product has connectors to many services."
"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."
"The most valued feature of Elastic is its log analytics capabilities."
"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."
"Elastic APM has plenty of features, such as the Elastic server for Kibana and many additional plugins. It's a comprehensive tool when used as a logging platform."
"I found Elk to be excellent for log analytics, security analytics, application code-level analytics, collaboration with DevOps teams, CI/CD, microservices, and Kubernetes, specifically cloud-native or cloud-specific tasks."
More Elastic Observability pros
"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
 

Cons

"Elastic Observability’s price could be improved."
"Elastic Observability needs to have better standardization, logging, and schema."
"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."
"The cost must be made more transparent."
"Simplifying the parsing of logs and manual efforts would also be beneficial."
"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."
"The tool's scalability involves a more complex implementation process. It requires careful calculations to determine the number of nodes needed, the specifications of each node, and the configuration of hot, warm, and cold zones for data storage. Additionally, managing log retention policies adds further complexity. The solution's pricing also needs to be cheaper."
"They need more skills in the market. There are not enough skills in the market. It is not pervasive enough on the market, in my opinion. In other words, there isn't a big enough user base."
More Elastic Observability cons
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The user interface was not good."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."
"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."
"So far, there are just the standard licensing fees. Several of the components are embedded in the license or are even open source. They're even free depending on what you use, which makes it even more appealing to someone that is discussing pricing of the solution."
"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."
"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."
"Elastic Observability's pricing could be better for small-scale users."
"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."
More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice
"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
41%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?
Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?
Elastic Observability is cost-efficient and provides all features in the enterprise license without asset-based licensing. However, sizing and licensing information could be clearer.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?
Of course, maintenance is necessary, as with any software, requiring updates with the latest features and security enhancements. It lacked some capabilities when handling on-prem devices, like netw...
See all answers
What do you like most about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?
I would rate IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager a six out of ten. The monitoring tool we currently use is outdated and lacks essential features for monitoring customer experience. We face lim...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

New Relic vs Elastic Observability Logo
New Relic vs Elastic Observability
Compared 15% of the time
Sentry vs Elastic Observability Logo
Sentry vs Elastic Observability
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability Logo
Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability
Compared 12% of the time
Grafana vs Elastic Observability Logo
Grafana vs Elastic Observability
Compared 9% of the time
Zabbix vs Elastic Observability Logo
Zabbix vs Elastic Observability
Compared 8% of the time
More Elastic Observability Competitors
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 29% of the time
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 21% of the time
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Azure Monitor vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 18% of the time
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability
April 2025
Elastic Observability reportDownload Elastic Observability product report
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2025
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reportDownload IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Tivoli Composite Application Manager
 

Overview

Elastic Observability is primarily used for monitoring login events, application performance, and infrastructure, supporting significant data volumes through features like log aggregation, centralized logging, and system metric analysis.

Elastic Observability employs Elastic APM for performance and latency analysis, significantly aiding business KPIs and technical stability. It is popular among users for system and server monitoring, capacity planning, cyber security, and managing data pipelines. With the integration of Kibana, it offers robust visualization, reporting, and incident response capabilities through rapid log searches while supporting machine learning and hybrid cloud environments.

What are Elastic Observability's key features?
  • Economic licensing: Offers cost-effective plans.
  • Extensive metrics tracking: Helps in comprehensive system monitoring.
  • Comprehensive logging: Centralizes log data efficiently.
  • Performance Monitoring: Provides robust APM capabilities.
  • Integration: Seamlessly integrates with other solutions.
  • Kibana visualization: Facilitates data visualization and reporting.
  • Machine learning support: Enables advanced data analysis.
  • Flexible deployment: Supports various deployment environments.
  • Rapid log searches: Enhances quick incident response.
  • Accessibility: Offers extensive online documentation and connector support.
What benefits or ROI should users look for in Elastic Observability reviews?
  • Stability: Look for consistent performance and reliability.
  • Compliance: Effective monitoring aids in regulation adherence.
  • System Security: Enhanced system monitoring and alert management.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Evaluate the economic pricing models.
  • Scalability: Adequate scalability options for growing needs.

Companies in technology, finance, healthcare, and other industries implement Elastic Observability for tailored monitoring solutions. They find its integration with existing systems useful for maintaining operation efficiency and security, particularly valuing the visualization capabilities through Kibana to monitor KPIs and improve incident response times.

Elastic
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.
IBM
 

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank
Michelin Tire Corp
Buyer's Guide
Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
April 2025
Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,253 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.