Elastic Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager comparison

Elastic and IBM are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Elastic is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.8, while IBM is ranked #59. Elastic holds a 2.4% mindshare in APM, compared to IBM’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Elastic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Elastic Observability

Read 29 Elastic Observability reviews

8,483 Views
6,702 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews

907 Views
871 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Elastic Observability

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and Elastic Observability both compete in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management category. IBM Tivoli has the upper hand in customer support and feature comprehensiveness, while Elastic Observability is preferred for its user-friendly and modern interface.

What features are offered by IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager provides detailed monitoring, powerful analytics capabilities, and extensive customer support. Elastic Observability offers seamless integration, real-time data analysis, and a modern, user-friendly interface.

What areas of improvement can be found in IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager needs enhancements in usability, performance troubleshooting capabilities, and large-scale environment support. Elastic Observability requires improved documentation, support for large environments, and better customer support feedback.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is known for robust deployment options and superior customer service, though it has a steeper learning curve. Elastic Observability provides easier deployment, quicker setup times, but receives mixed reviews regarding customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager in comparison to Elastic Observability?

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has higher upfront costs but offers a solid return on investment due to its extensive features. Elastic Observability is initially more cost-effective, with competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI for smaller-scale deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Elastic Observability

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (15th), Log Management (16th), Container Monitoring (5th), Cloud Monitoring Software (10th)

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

59th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Elastic Observability is 2.4%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Elastic Observability	2.4%
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager	0.6%
Other	97.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Mohammed-Abdelalim

Assistant Vice President at QualityKiosk Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Has provided powerful customization for unique monitoring needs but needs more out-of-the-box capabilities

In my opinion, the best features of Elastic Observability are their flexibility to integrate with other existing systems and the ability to build a unified monitoring tool that can integrate with existing ones and end-to-end user journeys which require a lot of customizations. The greatest feature in Elastic is the ability to customize. This is similar to my comments about customizable dashboards in Elastic because it's visible to the analyst. However, it's very great. Customizing these dashboards can meet the customer's specific use cases and specific stories that they have in their environment, their special environment that doesn't look like other environments. The dashboarding in Elastic is highly customizable to the level of logos. If the customer wants his company logo in the dashboard, it can be done.

Read full review

Christian Campos

Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation

Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features

Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."

"The solution is open-source and helps with back-end logging. It is also easy to handle."

"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."

"We use AppDynamics and Elastic. The reason why we're using Elastic APM is because of the license count. It's very favorable compared to AppDynamics. It's inexpensive; it's economical."

"Elastic provides built-in features for queries and report generation. It's a very good tool for monitoring integration capabilities."

"It is very stable, and I would rate it ten out of ten based on my interaction with it."

"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."

"We can view and connect different sources to the dashboard using it."

More Elastic Observability pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."

Cons

"The cost must be made more transparent."

"In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana."

"The only challenging aspect for new users is often writing the query language."

"Elastic Observability is difficult to use. There are only three options for customization but this can be difficult for our use case. We do not have other options to choose the metrics shown, such as CPU or memory usage."

"When opening tickets, we cannot use our team mailbox."

"There could be more low-code features included in the product."

"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."

"If we had some pre-defined templates for observability that we could start using right away after deploying it – instead of having to build or to change some of the dashboards – that would be helpful."

More Elastic Observability cons

"The user interface was not good."

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay."

"One needs to pay for the licenses, and it is an annual subscription model right now."

"We have been using the open-source version."

"The price of Elastic Observability is expensive."

"There are two types: cloud and SaaS. They charge based on data ingestion, ingest rate, hard retention, and warm retention. I believe it costs around $25,000 annually to ingest 30GB of data daily. That is the SaaS version. There is also a self-managed license where the customer manages their own infrastructure on-prem. In such cases, there are three license tiers that respectively cost $5,000 annually per node, $7,000 per node, and $12,500 per node."

"Users have to pay for some features, like the alerts on different channels, because they are unavailable in different source versions."

"Elastic Observability is cheaper than other similar solutions, such as Dynatrace. Its license calculation is based on various factors like data volume and physical infrastructure, particularly related to RAM capacity."

"We will buy a premium license after POC."

More Elastic Observability pricing and cost advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Elastic Observability?

Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Observability?

The problem is their licensing model, which is a bit confusing. Many customers struggle to understand their total cost of ownership because Elastic licensing is not dependent on easy, quantifiable ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Elastic Observability?

After careful consideration about areas for improvement in Elastic Observability, aspects such as pricing, customization, implementation, and scalability could be improved. As a user of the system,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Sentry vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Grafana vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

New Relic vs Elastic Observability

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Elastic Observability

Compared 5% of the time

More Elastic Observability Competitors

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 23% of the time

Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Compared 13% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability

February 2026

Download Elastic Observability product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report

Download IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Overview

Elastic Observability offers a comprehensive suite for log analytics, application performance monitoring, and machine learning. It integrates seamlessly with platforms like Teams and Slack, enhancing data visualization and scalability for real-time insights.

Elastic Observability is designed to support production environments with features like logging, data collection, and infrastructure tracking. Centralized logging and powerful search functionalities make incident response and performance tracking efficient. Elastic APM and Kibana facilitate detailed data visualization, promoting rapid troubleshooting and effective system performance analysis. Integrated services and extensive connectivity options enhance its role in business and technical decision-making by providing actionable data insights.

What are the most important features of Elastic Observability?

Centralized Logging: Streamlines the collection, analysis, and storage of log data.
Powerful Search: Provides robust search capabilities for quick access to relevant information.
Scalability: Supports growing data needs across diverse environments.
Real-time Telemetry: Ensures up-to-date insights and monitoring.
Platform Integration: Seamlessly connects with services like Teams and Slack.
Data Visualization: Enhances visibility with Elastic APM and Kibana.

What benefits and ROI should users explore in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers significant savings through efficient data management.
Rapid Incident Response: Minimizes downtime with quick troubleshooting tools.
Comprehensive Insights: Supports better business decisions with detailed data analysis.
Performance Tracking: Enables assessment of system effectiveness and improvements.

Elastic Observability is employed across industries for critical operations, such as in finance for transaction monitoring, in healthcare for secure data management, and in technology for optimizing application performance. Its data-driven approach aids efficient event tracing, supporting diverse industry requirements.

Elastic

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.

IBM

Sample Customers

PSCU, Entel, VITAS, Mimecast, Barrett Steel, Butterfield Bank

Michelin Tire Corp

Buyer's Guide

Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

February 2026

Free Report: Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Elastic Observability vs. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.