MuleSoft Composer vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Salesforce and SAP are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,650 Views
512 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

2,644 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

SAP Process Orchestration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (26th), Cloud Data Integration (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."

"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."

"In my opinion, SAP PO is the most mature suite of tools to integrate processes across SAP environments at this moment. It's really unbeatable because it allows you to integrate whatever scenarios you can imagine."

"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."

"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."

"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

Cons

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"It requires some maintenance."

"SAP should improve the user interface, as it often lacks modern features and aesthetic appeal."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."

"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"The pricing depends on what type of client you are with SAP and the contract you have. There is a licensing cost that needs to be paid."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"It's not an expensive solution."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

January 2026

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

SAP

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration

February 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.