OpenText Diagnostics vs Sentry comparison

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #58, while Sentry is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText Diagnostics

Read 4 OpenText Diagnostics reviews

928 Views
909 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 14 Sentry reviews

8,483 Views
7,974 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Diagnostics

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Diagnostics and Sentry are both prominent in their fields, each with distinct advantages according to user reviews. Sentry seems to have the upper hand due to its superior integration capabilities and real-time monitoring effectiveness.

What features are offered by OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Diagnostics provides detailed analytics, extensive reporting tools, and robust data insights. Sentry offers real-time error tracking, seamless integrations, and immediate notifications. Users find Sentry's real-time features crucial for application stability, while OpenText Diagnostics excels in providing comprehensive data features.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Diagnostics could improve with better integration options, a modern approach to alerting, and more user-friendly interfaces. Sentry needs enhancements in historical data analysis, customization of notification settings, and a more robust reporting mechanism.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Diagnostics is praised for its thorough deployment documentation and broad customer support. Sentry gains favor for its quick and straightforward deployment process but sometimes lacks the depth of customer support that OpenText Diagnostics provides. OpenText is preferred for initial guidance, while Sentry is valued for hassle-free implementation.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Diagnostics in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText Diagnostics users find pricing justified by its advanced analytical capabilities, though initial setup costs can be high. Sentry is generally perceived as cost-effective, with a significant ROI delivered through its real-time monitoring benefits. OpenText's cost reflects its detailed feature set, whereas Sentry appeals through its practical efficiency and return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Diagnostics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

58th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Diagnostics is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 3.3%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Sentry	3.3%
OpenText Diagnostics	0.6%
Other	96.1%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Ravi Suvvari

Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees

Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training

HP Diagnostics is a very good monitoring tool especially for transaction level monitoring -- it shows hot spots which can be drilled down to DB level, table, query, SP's, record and field level and also at Object level, Classes level,method or Augment levels instead of pinpointing bottlenecks at layer level it goes deep inside for information. It has very good tracing capabilities despite being an agent based tool compared to other agent less monitoring tools. Overall a very good tool for monitoring application diagnostics for quick and easy resolution with help of thread information. Drills down from slow, end-user transactions to the bottle necked component, method, or SQL statement, helping to solve memory, exception, and other common problems Key features and benefits • Automatically detects all components touched by a business process and traces them with no user intervention • Provides complete application visibility across the application lifecycle, enabling higher application quality when applications go live • Reduces mean time to resolution (MTTR) in your J2EE, .NET, ERP, or CRM (SAP, Oracle®, PeopleSoft) environment • Integrates fully with HP Business Availability Center software, HP LoadRunner, and HP Performance Center.

Read full review

NelsonMendaros1

Founding Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Real-time error tracking assists the QA team in swiftly identifying and reporting bugs

One of the greatest advantages of Sentry is its support for Azure Web Services, which New Relic does not support. Sentry integrates with common developer communication platforms like Discord and WhatsApp, which allows developers to easily track notifications and findings in the applications. Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For banking and telecom solutions, it's been quite useful."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Diagnostics is the information reported from an application that has timed out. For example, when you're Googling, or you're booking a ticket for Burj Khalifa here, the longest tower in the world, there are situations where the system can time out. There are times when you might not receive a response on the payment gateway or you are not able to find the reservation. The customer only receives the information that the session has timed out."

"The diagnostics and configuration are the solution's most valuable aspects."

"The product performs well."

"Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues."

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"The implementation is easy. After one or two days, I can learn and use it. It's not too hard."

"Sentry's performance monitoring has helped us understand where the bottlenecks are in our application and allowed us to optimize critical transactions for a faster user experience."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"The interface could be more user friendly."

"The GUI and metrics of Micro Focus Diagnostics can be improved. The metrics the solution gathers can be limited and could be enhanced by giving more details."

"The interface is very old, and not very user-friendly. Most of our clients don't like the UI."

"The price could be lowered."

"One area where I think Sentry can improve is in the granularity of its alerting system, as it sometimes feels too sensitive or not customizable enough."

"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"One area where I think Sentry can improve is in the granularity of its alerting system, as it sometimes feels too sensitive or not customizable enough."

"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sentry?

We use Sentry for application performance management and tracking bugs and issues in the application.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 15% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 14% of the time

Correlsense SharePath vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Diagnostics

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText Diagnostics Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 6% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download OpenText Diagnostics product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics

No data available

Overview

Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.

OpenText

Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.

Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sentry?

Integration capabilities: Connects with Slack, GitLab, Jira, AWS Lambda.
Real-time error tracking: Alerts users instantly about errors.
Event grouping: Groups related errors for easier management.
Code trace logs: Provides detailed trace logs linked to Git repositories.
Comprehensive context: Offers a complete view of events and context.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Sentry?

Enhanced reliability: Provides critical insights for robust application performance.
Accessibility: Easy deployment and quick adaptation make it user-friendly.
Security: Maintains high security standards with timely updates.
Utility in error management: Detects silent failures, aiding ETL processes.
Cost efficiency: Favored over alternatives like New Relic due to comprehensive features.

In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.

Sentry

Sample Customers

BSkyB, Alior Bank

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Diagnostics vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.