Planisware vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Planisware and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Planisware is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Planview is ranked #16. Planisware holds a 10.2% mindshare in PPM, compared to Planview’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Planisware users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

Planisware

Read 15 Planisware reviews

2,625 Views
1,391 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

523 Views
241 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Planisware

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Planisware and Planview Daptiv are competing project portfolio management solutions. Planview Daptiv has an upper hand due to its comprehensive feature-rich platform.

Features: Planisware offers robust portfolio oversight with advanced analytics and time slicing capabilities. It supports resource management and integrates easily with PowerPoint for project roadmaps. Planview Daptiv provides extensive project and task management tools, agile workflows, and effective collaboration for enhanced project execution.

Room for Improvement: Planisware requires considerable resources for deployment and its user interface could be more intuitive. Additionally, more extensive offline documentation would benefit new users. Planview Daptiv could improve its training materials and offer better support for remote working environments. It also needs enhancements in its integration capabilities with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planisware provides a strong deployment model that requires significant resources but offers proactive customer service. Planview Daptiv, on the other hand, has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it accessible to a broader audience.

Pricing and ROI: Planisware involves a higher initial setup cost, which is justified by long-term ROI through advanced capabilities. Planview Daptiv offers a more affordable setup and delivers competitive ROI quickly, making it appealing for organizations balancing cost and performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Planisware

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Daptiv

Ranking in Project Portfolio Management

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Project Portfolio Management category, the mindshare of Planisware is 10.2%, up from 8.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Daptiv is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Portfolio Management

Featured Reviews

Avinash Padmanabhan

Solution Architect | Planisware Consultant at Schlumberger

Efficient project management and resource allocation, but agile capabilities need improvement

One drawback with Planisware is that it doesn't have good features for test management or agile; it lacks many concepts in agile such as retrospective, velocity planning, and backlog view. Some features are still missing because they have introduced these agile modules only in version seven and are still improving that product, so I see a good roadmap on those modules from Planisware's end. I find Planisware's collaboration tools to be good but not great as they still have certain restrictions. It can interact with Jira, it can interact with ADO, and you can have APIs created to interact with your internal HR systems or other systems for data flow. However, the error messages or fail scenarios don't provide good visibility of what is happening, why errors occur, or why something is not working. Regarding scenario planning, I haven't explored much on that side. We have the strategic module, strategic planning module, but we haven't explored much on the other side, so I don't have much experience or exposure to scenario planning.

Read full review

Antonio Lira

Territory Manager LATAM at LeaseWeb

It allows you to include empty document forms, which must be completed and signed on project execution.

I want to share another Daptiv PPM feature - the usage of templates and management All of us who have managed projects, or simply structured an action plan, have looked back on previous experiences by searching our personal files, either from past work, previous projects, university assignments,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have a variety of different modules, but it is mainly used for costs, risks, and resources."

"Planisware has introduced Agile concepts, making it capable of Agile management similar to Jira and other Agile tools."

"There are two things in particular that I enjoy. The first is the portfolio planning section. Another advantage is that it is highly customizable."

"It stands out by automating the intricate mechanics of project execution, eliminating the need for highly technical individuals to manage and reconfigure models."

"The solution is performance-oriented and easily customized accordingly to many areas, such as performance KPI."

"It has an inbuilt BI tool, which can be compared to Power BI or Tableau."

"Planisware offers integration with multiple tools and provides a good level of customization."

"The area that could benefit from improvement in this Planisware is the project management tool. I have previously used Project Server, which is a Microsoft solution, and I found it to be more user-friendly as it included a client solution. In contrast, with this solution, the only option available is the online version, making it difficult to create activities, milestones, and other necessary components. This is in comparison to Planisware, which offers a more comprehensive solution."

More Planisware pros

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

Cons

"The biggest con for Planisware is that if you are not a Planisware partner, you don't have access to their functions, making it difficult for beginners and new team members."

"Its stability should be improved. Its stability is the main issue, but we sometimes also have issues with calculations."

"The UI and UX of Planisware are not that advanced."

"They do not have anything that can assist customers with multi-year roadmap planning."

"I have experienced some issues, and that’s okay. It tends to be stable when the server's processing power and memory are adequate."

"More integration is needed with other kinds of products for better collaboration."

"The solution's user experience and user interface need improvement because they are not that great and intuitive."

More Planisware cons

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive and support is an extra cost. There are three license types to choose from, and we only pay for support and cloud services depending on our needs."

"There are training and certification costs."

"The solution could be less expensive and the cost of scaling is expensive too."

"It comes with a high cost."

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Energy/Utilities Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Educational Organization

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planisware?

I don't have any specific details, however, it might be expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planisware?

I haven't had the time to work with any other TPM tools, so I can't compare it to other tools just yet.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planisware?

We actually use it for project planning and estimating the cost for the projects, in resource management, and as a timecard application. Users can log their time using the timesheet.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Planisware

Compared 13% of the time

Smartsheet vs Planisware

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Project vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Asana vs Planisware

Compared 9% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planisware

Compared 8% of the time

More Planisware Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 50% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 50% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Planisware

June 2025

Download Planisware product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

June 2025

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Overview

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.

Planisware

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Sample Customers

Apotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv

July 2025

Free Report: Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Planisware vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.