Appmon:
- Drill downs to root causes.
- Easy to find the performance bottlenecks.
- Full insight into all classes.
- UEM helps to identify user experience and detailed steps performed by the user.
Appmon:
I have identified and fixed the following performance issues in non-production before we release the app:
There are so many!
DT Saas: Does not have all the features that Appmon has. Maybe in the future releases it may have all features.
Application performance monitoring for testing our pre-production environments. Along with that, we use AppMon to create B/T's for alerting and graphing trends.
Prior to the use of Appmon, our team was in the dark. We had zero visibility into our production application, and it would take up to days to find out why our clients were being impacted and how.
Since Appmon has been leveraged, we are now down to just hours (sometimes minutes) in resolution times.
PurePath analytics, I can't imagine not having this feature in your application. Not only have we been able to improve troubleshooting, but we have also used PurePath data (response times) to improve and tune application performance.
Ease of Use. I find it is very difficult to train someone in using this application. As amazing as it can be, the learning curve is extensive.
Monitoring our production systems and diagnosing the critical and difficult to find issues. Great tool for deep diving into performance data and tracking issues through all the connected systems to better diagnose and pinpoint the real issues.
This tool has been essential for monitoring our systems, gathering all performance data, and helping to quickly resolve difficult problems affecting our customers ability to process their work through our systems.
With Dynatrace PurePath information and performance data, we can trace through all our systems end-to-end. It is one of the critical features that we primarily use. This feature has helped us diagnose and resolve quite a few difficult problems affecting our customers over the years.
Dynatrace has been difficult to set up and use to diagnose problems in the past due to the complex nature of the tool. However, I have seen great improvements over the years to make this easier to do as well as the latest versions incorporating smart technology to more quickly help diagnose issues and pinpoint the problem. Looking forward to seeing continued improvements in this area.
We use it for identifying issues in production.
We had an issue with Web Services going down in production, and we used Dynatrace to monitor the exceptions and alert the vendor to correct the service. This, in turn, helped minimize end-user impact.
Every time I want to see the PurePath, I have to launch the client. It would be helpful if they introduced this in the browser application.
Also, configuring alerts is bit confusing.
We need to have accurate, reliable real-time alerts when issues arise in our production environments.
Thanks to Dynatrace, we now spend less time figuring out what went wrong and where. Instead, we can focus more on why it happened and work towards resolving the issue sooner.
Real-time alerts are the best feature. Often, we are busy working on other tasks when something goes wrong with the site. Getting timely alerts is very important to our needs as a business.
It has given us a one stop solution for projects and applications independent of the application type and OS.
They could increase the restrictions available for user-based roles.
I have worked with Dynatrace for two years.
We did have some deployment issues but they were resolved with help from the vendor.
We had issues with the garbage collection and heap usage, which have been resolved.
I would rate customer service very good.
Technical Support:I would rate technical support very good.
We were using different solutions from HP. After doing a POC with Dynatrace, and as its features replace other vendor solutions, we have started using Dynatrace in our organization.
It was very user friendly.
We implemented it in-house with minimal support from the vendor.
No other options were evaluated.
I would recommend this product, specifically if you are really looking for one product which is useful to monitor/instrument various applications independent of application type and OS.
My primary use case is application performance monitoring.
The move valuable feature is the AI engine, which is amazing.
The reporting could be better.
I have been using Dynatrace for around three years.
Dynatrace is very stable.
This solution is definitely scalable.
I've had no issues with technical support.
It was very, very, very easy to set up.
The pricing is not bad, but it could be better.
Dynatrace is best-suited for large enterprises. I would advise those looking into implementing this solution to do the training because it's not easy to understand without it. I would give Dynatrace a score of nine out of ten.
We use this solution for monitoring a monolithic application in ASP Classic 3.0 over IIS server. The database is SQL Server 2016 in an AlwaysOn cluster. Over three IIS instances for the core application, two IIS instances for reporting services, and two instances for the batch process in .NET 4.0.
The major improvement was the ability to find errors immediately and predict future failures, or when resources reach the maximum capacity.
The most valuable feature is Session Record because the developers can reproduce an incomplete issue after it is reported.
This solution needs better support for security and monolithic batch processes.
Good article because it is very objective. At a previous company we used Dynatrace and the tool is so detailed you can get the details of the keystrokes of an actual end user when troubleshooting where a production situation occurred.