Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Jamf Protect Logo

Top 10 Jamf Protect Alternatives

Vendor: JAMF
4.7 out of 5
Post review

Top Jamf Protect Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Jamf Protect based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Jamf Protect surpasses its competitors by offering real-time endpoint security tailored for Apple devices, providing robust threat monitoring, and seamless integration with existing Jamf solutions, ensuring comprehensive protection with minimal impact on system performance.

JAMF Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with JAMF, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Jamf Protect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Jamf Protect Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in advanced threat detection and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Jamf Protect is ideal for seamless integration with macOS and iOS. CrowdStrike Falcon supports easy deployment, while Jamf Protect's deployment suits Apple environments. CrowdStrike Falcon's pricing reflects its comprehensive features; Jamf Protect offers value in Apple-exclusive settings.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. Jamf Protect Report
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Jamf Protect. Jamf Protect offers a lower initial cost, making it more approachable for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon has a higher setup cost compared to Jamf Protect. Jamf Protect offers a lower initial cost, making it more approachable for smaller budgets.
Jamf Protect Logo
Jamf Protect Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.0 out of 5
Both products secure enterprise environments, but Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers comprehensive threat intelligence and cross-platform applicability. In comparison, Jamf Protect excels in macOS security and user-centric device management, making it ideal for Mac-centric setups. Defender's broader features contrast Jamf's specialized macOS focus.
Download Jamf Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews indicate a moderate setup cost while Jamf Protect users report a slightly higher initial expense. Differences in setup costs between the two solutions are notable.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews indicate a moderate setup cost while Jamf Protect users report a slightly higher initial expense. Differences in setup costs between the two solutions are notable.
Jamf Protect Logo
Jamf Protect Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Cortex XDR excels in advanced threat protection with comprehensive threat detection and strong analytics, ideal for those needing robust threat intelligence. In comparison, Jamf Protect offers seamless integration with Mac OS and iOS, making it an excellent choice for Apple-centric environments requiring real-time monitoring and compliance management.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. Jamf Protect Report
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Jamf Protect, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. Jamf Protect's lower setup expense might appeal to organizations with constrained initial budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has a higher setup cost compared to Jamf Protect, which offers a more budget-friendly setup. Jamf Protect's lower setup expense might appeal to organizations with constrained initial budgets.
Jamf Protect Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Jamf Protect Logo
Tanium
3.7 out of 5
Tanium provides comprehensive visibility and real-time data analytics, suitable for environments needing extensive functionality. In comparison, Jamf Protect is tailored specifically for macOS, ensuring efficient protection for Apple products. A tech buyer might choose Tanium for its broad features or Jamf Protect for Apple-centric environments.
Download Jamf Protect vs. Tanium Report
Tanium has higher setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has higher setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Jamf Protect Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
Jamf Protect Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in device management and security compliance, offering comprehensive features and robust endpoint management. In comparison, Jamf Protect specializes in Apple device protection, standing out with seamless integration with other Jamf products. BigFix is more versatile, while Jamf Protect delivers specialized macOS protection.
Download BigFix vs. Jamf Protect Report
BigFix has lower setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Jamf Protect, however, offers higher setup costs, which might indicate more robust initial configuration needs.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has lower setup costs compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Jamf Protect, however, offers higher setup costs, which might indicate more robust initial configuration needs.
Jamf Protect Logo
Jamf Protect Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust threat detection and comprehensive response measures suitable for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Jamf Protect offers deep integration with Apple's ecosystem, delivering efficient malware detection and seamless experiences for macOS-focused organizations.
Download Jamf Protect vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup costs are considered high, whereas Jamf Protect's setup costs are seen as moderate. VMware Carbon Black offers more robust features, while Jamf Protect stands out for its user-friendly interface.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup costs are considered high, whereas Jamf Protect's setup costs are seen as moderate. VMware Carbon Black offers more robust features, while Jamf Protect stands out for its user-friendly interface.
Jamf Protect Logo
Jamf Protect Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.6 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Business is cost-effective with broad security features, integration with Microsoft services, and ease of deployment. In comparison, Jamf Protect focuses on specialized macOS security and is valued for its Apple-specific threat detection. A tech buyer might choose based on platform compatibility and specific security needs.
Download Jamf Protect vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
Microsoft Defender for Business offers a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while Jamf Protect has a slightly higher setup cost, which could be justified by its specialized features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Business offers a lower setup cost, making it a cost-effective option, while Jamf Protect has a slightly higher setup cost, which could be justified by its specialized features.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Identity Management (IM)
Threat Intelligence Platforms