Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central Reviews

I am impressed with the tool's user authentication, compatibility , and policies. 

The tool needs to work on reporting issues and user interface. 

I am using the solution for two years. 

The product is stable. 

The solution is scalable. We have two customers for the solution. 

The tool's setup is straightforward. The solution's deployment took about two weeks to complete. 

We did the tool's deployment in-house. 

We have an agreement with Microsoft and pricing is okay for us.

I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

I mainly use it for PowerPoint presentations and Word documents.

I prefer on-premise solutions. So I need help to work in this environment. There is room for improvement in terms of stability, and it could be more stable.

I have been using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central for two years. I am using the latest version.

It is a stable solution. I would rate it an eight out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. There are more than 5,000 end users in my organization.

Speaking from my experience, I advise you to first educate yourself on how to use it properly. Additionally, you should ensure a stable internet connection before using it.

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.

We use Dynamics in the manufacturing industry. 

We like the manufacturing and case management modules.

The Power BI integration could be more seamless.

We just updated to Dynamics six months ago. 

I rate Dynamics 365 eight out of 10 for stability. 

Dynamics 365 is scalable. 

We mostly rely on our service provider for support. For some issues, we consult the forums to see what other users are saying.

Dynamics 365 is easy to deploy. We migrated from another version of the solution with the help of a partner. 

We pay an annual license.

I rate Microsoft Dynamics 365 nine out of 10. I recommend it for anyone who needs an ERP. It's a robust, scalable system that's easy to use and integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products. 

We implemented the solution for an insurance company. It was a full-stack implementation for new business units. The solution is used for communication and collaboration.

The tool covers most of the business requirements that most companies have, especially financial institutions.

The solution must provide more AI features. It will help in the collaboration of content generation and summarization of content.

I have been using the solution for a few years.

The product is quite stable. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. The stability of the communication platform is not always good.

The scalability is quite good. I didn’t have any issues with the scalability. We have a single customer with a user base of 5000. We have three people looking after the ongoing maintenance.

The support is good. It is better than the support I receive for other Microsoft products.

The setup is straightforward. It took us two and a half weeks to deploy the tool. The solution is deployed on the cloud. We have three engineers to deploy the product.

The solution is a little bit expensive. We pay a yearly licensing fee.

I recommend the solution to others. People who want to invest in the solution must look carefully at the business case they're trying to solve. They must ensure that they satisfy their requirements with a good price point. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I would like to improve the tool’s reporting and coding part.

I have been using the solution for five years.

The tool is stable. I would rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable. I would rate the product’s scalability a ten out of ten. My company has 300 users for the solution. The tool’s usage increase on a yearly basis.

The tool’s tech support is fast.

The solution is easy to setup. The time taken for deployment depends. The steps we followed for deployment included project analysis, development, and deployment.

The tool’s licensing is yearly. The solution is cheaper compared to other ERP products from Oracle or SAP.

I would rate the overall product a nine out of ten. One developer is enough to maintain the solution. Microsoft 365 is changing technology. The product is a user-friendly ERP solution. I would recommend this solution to people who want to use it.

We use the solution for financial management, our point of sale, and asset management. 

The product is customizable so we can tune it according to our requirements.  

The interface wasn't very good, although they have improved it quite a lot. 

The initial setup of the solution was quite complex and the troubleshooting involved with that needs to be improved.  

We have been using this solution for about four years. 

The product is stable. 

The solution is very scalable. There are three departments and around 20 users implementing it in our organization.  

We found technical support to be helpful. 

The deployment was quite complex and took about a year. 

We implemented the solution via a third-party consultant. 

The deployment cost us $70,000 and we pay around $18,000 annually for support, which we find to be expensive.  

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I think end-user training is important, consultancy and training are required for deployment.  

We are using Microsoft Dynamics NAV for warehousing functions, such as human resources and production.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV's most valuable feature is the integration with other Microsoft solutions.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV could improve the reporting.

I have been using Microsoft Dynamics NAV for four years.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV is stable, it has high availability.

The scalability of Microsoft Dynamics NAV is very good.

We have approximately 150 people using this solution. We do not plan o increase usage.

I have contacted technical support. However, we rely more on the consultant we have.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a straightforward initial setup.

We used a consultant to help us with the implementation. 

We have a perpetual license to use Microsoft Dynamics NAV.

I would recommend others to use this solution.

I rate Microsoft Dynamics NAV a nine out of ten.

Microsoft Dynamics NAV gets used for our internal financial services. It's the main finance application for us. We use it as our ERP software.

I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional.

A regular consultant will be able to do a lot more than that with some of the other platforms. With SAP, you may need a specialized consultant for each module. You won't get one person who is an expert in multiple modules that can do a lot of work easily. This is not the case with Microsoft Dynamics NAV.

So, it's cost effective in terms of price and maintenance as well. You get resources that are very helpful, and the application by itself is very flexible.

It's stable and scalable at small to medium load requirements.

Some of the control aspects such as auditing can definitely be improved. For example, auditing is not very easy, and the user permissions are complicated.

Also, Materials Management is a bit limited.

At the moment, I definitely want them to scale up and make audit control easy to manage.

Some of the code should be optimized for better performance.

I've been using it for 10 years.

I think we have around 1,000 NAV users with a peak load of around 400 to 500 users. At that load, our systems are actually stable.

It's being used in multiple use cases, whether it's small, medium, or large organizations. Because of the flexibility, it works in many of the use cases, but in large organizations where you need better structure, high scalability, and performance, SAP has a better profile.

We work very closely with technical support. I'm satisfied, but I won't say that it's great; it's just good. They are engaged with us, but there are times when we do not get the solution that we are looking for, and at other times, it just takes time. In general, the best part is that they're easily accessible and that they're supportive.

I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure.

We used SAP in my previous organization, and in this organization, we're on Microsoft Dynamics NAV. SAP is highly structured, and at times, it doesn't let you customize it the way you would want to. However, Microsoft Dynamics NAV provides a little bit of flexibility.

I think it's a decent product to evaluate. If you have use cases with small to medium load requirements, Microsoft Dynamics NAV is a good option. You can do other configurations as well with it.

However, if you have an excess load of 1,000 or 1,000 plus users, you would definitely need to look for a more enterprise solution like SAP or AX. 

With Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Materials Management is a bit limited. So if you're a small organization and have resources to manage that kind of thing, this solution will be cost effective.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Microsoft Dynamics NAV at seven.