SAP ERP Reviews

I mostly work with SAP implementation projects as a project manager.

Implementation of a new ERP system usually does not give you immediate measurable benefits, but it helps you to evaluate how the company functions and improve internal business processes, this is where most benefits can be seen. Plus long-term effects in data quality and transparency, better-balanced decision making, higher satisfaction and motivation of employees, and internal and external image of the company. 

The most valuable features depend on the company's needs and area of expertise. For example, PP is quite an important module for industrial companies, but FI-CO is the most useful module for any company.

SAP is more reliable in terms of data quality than other systems, but it still has room for improvement. If it is planned well, it can really help users avoid mistakes. However, sometimes the cost is not reasonable, usually, it is the case of smaller companies.

I have been using it for many years, since 2014. We are currently using S/4HANA, which we use on-premises, but we plan to move to the cloud soon.

Stability is quite high. I would give it an eight out of ten. Sometimes the connection depends on the infrastructure and other things that are not exactly SAP's responsibility if we talk about on-premise solutions. Possible issues with stability could be partially resolved when moving to the cloud based solutions.

In terms of scalability, SAP offers quite a high grade for organizational change possibilities. It's manageable to plan organizational changes, and there is a lot of information available and SAP consultants on the market who can help with this.

In general, every SAP project is quite unique. It depends on how well we understand the requirements and what is expected from this implementation. The success of the whole implementation is actually meeting these expectations or maybe lowering expectations somewhere. I have participated in several end-to-end implementations, but the time varied for each deployment process and the processes differ in each company.

The pricing depends on the implementation functions. I work with implementations, and the cost varies depending on whether it's an internal or external team and the contractual basis or employees involved. Typically, it could start from 100,000 EUR and go up to 1 mio EUR and be much higher if we include more SAP solutions, locations, and cycles. The cost would vary greatly based on the specific requirements.

In comparison to others on the market, I would rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten. There is still room for improvement, as nothing is ideal. But it's one of the strongest on the market I have worked with.

It's good to learn from the best in this industry. And keep learning new things because sometimes you could be not aware that there are new solutions available to help you with your everyday tasks. And being in the area of professionals helps a lot.

We are using SAP ERP for typical ERP use cases.

The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise.

The solution has helped organizations with the integration of other systems.

The most valuable features of SAP ERP is the flexibility and functionality. It is one of the best ERPs I have seen in the market.

The reporting feature could improve in SAP ERP. It could benefit from being more flexible.

I have been using SAP ERP for approximately 10 years.

I rate the stability of SAP ERP a ten out of ten.

I rate the scalability of SAP ERP a ten out of ten.

I rate the support of SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of SAP ERP is complex. However, if you have a good team it can be easier.

The deployment time can depend on the size of the company.

I have received a return on investment using SAP ERP.

The price of SAP ERP is high, but it is worth the money. The maintenance and support can be expensive. There should be a different price model for businesses that are not as large to be able to afford it.

If the price of the solution was less it would be able to reach more of my customer.

I rate the price of SAP ERP a three out of ten.

I rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

Within the organization, I use SAP ERP on a daily basis.

The most significant elements of this solution are the ability to create a virtual product, a service product, and delivery.

Data analytics can be improved.

The problem with SAP is that whenever there is a modification, or if a new field needs to be added, they charge tens of thousands, hundreds, or even two hundred thousand dollars. That is not anything in which I am really interested. 

For instance, consider a single-use case. I have to enter the root causes for a certain operation or failure. That option does not exist anywhere in SAP, not in manufacturing, not in logistics, not in anything. It is completely missing.

The root cause analysis is very common across industries, yet SAP does not offer this option.

A line field or a metaparticle, for example, was delayed. If you have the choice to input the warehouse operator or if the person who submitted the document has the opportunity to enter, this has been postponed for N, X, Y, or Z reasons.

That would have been ideal, but sadly, that option is not available in SAP. I checked other modules, but that option does not exist anywhere.

I have been working with SAP ERP, for eight years.

It is a very stable product. I would rate the stability of SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

In terms of scalability, everything is very modular. It would be great if you could combine everything.

I would rate the scalability a five or six out of ten.

Technical support could be improved. It comes with an additional cost.

It was set up for me. I didn't have to do anything.

I am not sure. However, extensions cost approximately $100,000 or$200,000.

SAP ERP is a great product, but its flexibility is limited.

It's a great product, but it has been driven from the top. It has been driven from the top. It is not a customer-based solution. We are offered something as it is and we are expected to use it as it is.

I would rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten. 

I use SAP in the finance department for two manufacturing subsidiaries of my company. 

SAP ERP provides the perfect database and options for additional production. It's also good for finance analytics, production drill-down, and other types of analysis.

The reporting could be improved, such as the casework, production, and activity reports. Our consultants in a subsidiary enterprise have requested that we develop a new production report. They could also improve production, financial, and HR analysis. 

My company has used SAP ERP for more than 10 years.

SAP ERP is stable.

SAP ERP is scalable.

I rate SAP support seven out of 10. 

Neutral

It might be difficult for people who are new to the platform. I rate it seven out of 10 for ease of setup.

SAP ERP is worth the money.

It was expensive. I rate SAP ERP about three out of 10 for affordability. This software is designed to meet the individual needs of each company.

I rate SAP ERP eight out of 10. SAP ERP is a good system for optimizing processes for various employees and it offers information for company decision-making. It provides databases and other tools for HR, production, and financial analysis. 

My advice to new users is to forget everything they know about other software and ERP systems because SAP is specific and customized for different types of activities. 

The solution is simple to use.

Introducing diversity into this solution could be beneficial for discovering new and improved deployment processes. Once we acquire experience with one, we can then utilize the other as needed. The pricing of the solution could be improved.

I will need to have more experience with the product to comment on this.

The initial setup is straightforward.

The pricing could be improved.

I rate SAP ERP a seven out of ten.

We are using SAP ERP in the public sector for manufacturing and R & D.

The solution can be deployed on-premise and in the cloud.

The most valuable feature of SAP ERP is the financial module, pre-configured packages, and plenty of features. The solution is updating and adding new features that are helpful.

I have been using SAP ERP for approximately seven years.

There can be some stability issues.

SAP ERP is scalable. You are able to add administrative modules to increase the features. There are many other modules that can be added, such as the Linux framework and the business technology platform.

For an on-premise deployment, there needs to be administration monitoring of all services. This is because there can be a lot of resources being used that have to be monitored on the server. We have found some instances of overloading in the reports.

The cloud deployment is managed by the cloud provider and it is highly scalable.

I have approximately 10 clients using this solution.

I rate the scalability of SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

When there is a system error it provides an error code and a lot of times these can be complicated. The support team could have more knowledge to be able to assist with these situations more promptly.

The setup of SAP ERP can be simple because there are pre-configured setups. This allows for similar implementation for clients. Cloud deployment can be easier. The on-premise takes more time to build the servers and systems.

We followed the active SAP methodology for the implementation of the solution. We then gather all the details needed for the business to complete the implementation, such as realization, customer training, and integration. We then support the customer for a few months after we deploy it.

A typical project can take seven to eight months to finish implementation.

We do the implementation of the solution.

There is a one-time license that is needed to use the solution. The support is what is needed to be renewed annually.

I would recommend this solution.

I rate SAP ERP a nine out of ten.

Our company uses the solution within our European branch for ERP functionality such as configurations for sales, purchases, and production. 

We have 15,000 users across various departments including IT, sales, and business development. We are planning to upgrade to the newest version soon. 

The solution can easily be standardized across processes. 

Customizations are a bit expensive. 

I have been using the solution for fourteen years. 

The solution's stability is perfect across our 15,000 users. 

Any stability issues are likely caused by manual configurations that do not have correct master data to run properly. 

Technical support is not very good so I rate it a seven out of ten. 

Neutral

We previously used Infor but switched because we needed a global solution. 

The setup is difficult so implementation consultants are needed. 

We utilized consultants for our first implementation and it took eighteen months. Our internal team included ten IT specialists and ten business development staff.

Typical rollouts include a team of 20-30 people. 

The solution is expensive so I rate cost a five out of ten. 

To save costs, use the standard solution with few customizations and ensure your data is good quality.  

I rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

One of the most relevant features is that the product connects to every software. Our third parties can integrate through SAP ERP extremely easily, integrate with data transfer and communicate within the solution. The solution is reliable for external connections that other software doesn't provide.

The service could be more user-friendly regarding transition codes. There are more than 65,000 four and six-digit codes from every field and domain. A person like me, or anyone else, can't remember all of them. So something easier to remember or work with would be an improvement for all SAP products, not just ERP.

I started working with S/4HANA three years back. But overall, I've been working in SAP ERP for more than nine years. Right now, most clients are on S/4. If we have the latest version of SAP ERP, we call it S/4. 

The solution is not 100% stable. Working in a 24/7 environment, I face disasters day and night. Every work process operates in the backend. If a process goes down, once we identify the exact issue, we have a disaster center with all the data we copied on our servers. We can recover all the files and data from there. So the solution needs improvement.

I work for a parent company, and they have some other vendors to whom we provide support because we work for tech.

If we're talking only about administration, setting up our landscape is very complex. 

We have a huge number of servers. The SAP software itself is more than 100 gigabytes. It takes two to three days to download SAP software from the SAP service marketplace. And installing the server itself takes months. It's not easy.

Because I was representing third parties as their solution provider. I already knew most features and functions, so I never went to another vendor for support. But in such cases, if I can't resolve an issue, I log a ticket to an SAP technical team like the core SAP team or the SAP Support Portal. 

Overall, I would rate the solution seven out of 10.

Most S/4 ERP solutions are cloud-based. BPC is totally cloud-based. Most of our data servers are cloud-based, and Information Steward is also cloud-based.

All the data and more used to be stored locally. Nowadays, however, all the data, including S/4HANA, is only on the cloud. They're planning to move everything into the cloud, even ACC, because of space and wasted storage issues.

We have 22,263 SAP ERP end users, for which we require a team comprising around 25 technical and as many as 74 functional members.