SAP ERP Reviews

I use SAP ERP to make our internal processes run smoothly. It helps with finances, accounting, and reporting. I can manage inventory and purchasing efficiently, and the system ensures our production and manufacturing processes work seamlessly.

The most valuable features of SAP ERP are its stability, industry-specific package, and adaptable configuration. It is versatile in communication, making it easy to align with our business processes. 

One challenge we face with SAP ERP is the push to upgrade to S/4HANA, which comes with significant costs. While SAP encourages this transition, we need to carefully evaluate factors like our team's functions, existing customizations, and the overall expense involved in the upgrade process. Cost considerations are a major downside to this potential move. For the next release of SAP ERP, I would like to see enhanced financial planning and analysis features

I have been working with SAP ERP for six years.

SAP ERP is quite stable. Our current instance operates smoothly, and we have only made minor customizations for specific management reporting needs. When it comes to the standard functions and configurations, we haven't encountered the need for significant changes.

It is a scalable product. In our company, we have around 200 licensed users for SAP ERP. When it comes to administration and maintenance, we have only one system administrator for the basic IT needs. Additionally, we have less than ten people handling application-related IT tasks. Overall, the management is straightforward, with a small team handling the responsibilities.

Before SAP ERP, we used Oracle ERP. The decision to switch to SAP ERP was not driven by our IT team but it resulted from business organizational changes that forced us to adopt a different ERP package.

Deploying SAP ERP two years ago was a bit challenging. We moved from an existing instance to a new virtual one, rebuilding everything from scratch and converting Master DataOps. It took some effort, but with external support, we successfully made the transition. Deploying SAP ERP had its challenges because when we started using it six or seven years ago, it wasn't a new setup but a result of a merger. For the first three years, we were more focused on daily operations. When we decided to take full control three years ago, it was our first time setting up our processes. We needed external support to navigate the difficulties, given our limited familiarity with the new package.

It is on the expensive side. 

Overall, I would rate SAP ERP as a nine out of ten.

The payroll solution and the localization for advances are valuable.

There is room for improvement, especially since we are dealing with two systems, on-premises and on cloud, and so many connections could be interrupted. Sometimes the checking criteria on Success Factors are different than the criteria on S4Hana, so we enter master data, and the Success Factor accepts it. However, additional controls are done on S4Hana, so not all the data goes smoothly. Sometimes we have so many errors and must monitor them, which takes time.

It is not easily integrated with outside products because we purchased the finance, timesheet and project management modules on-premises and the HR module on cloud. Our integration issues may be specific to our company, and others may not have similar issues.

We have been using this solution for one year. We have Success Factors. I'm not sure of the version number, but we recently updated it. We have part of it on cloud and part of it on-premises.

We contact technical support when we have issues. I have only used them a few times, but my colleagues have said it takes some time to get a response from them.

The initial setup wasn't that complex. We went live for about eight branches, and it was complex in terms of size only. Everyone uses this solution because it is used for timesheets.

I have no details about the pricing.

I rate this product a seven out of ten.

When the company merged, we decided that we wanted to continue using SAP ERP because all the processes were much more mature, especially when it came to finance. The main value was the convenience for finance to run and manage the business.

The finance team was more comfortable using SAP, so that's why it was decided not to change the solution.

I wouldn't say it has improved the organization. The company was already using it before we merged.

Continuing to use it enabled continuity of business. It eliminated strife or angst for the employees in terms of experiences since they were already using SAP ERP.

We're using the main database. We're using the leave modules and transfers.

SAP needs to be more intuitive. It should be easy to use, mobile, and employee-friendly. You need to know the transaction codes. You need to study it to be able to use it. SAP needs to change that. They need to be more intuitive. Like how Facebook is so easy to use, or Uber. No one teaches you to use these apps, but they're intuitive and you're able to use them. So the HR applications need to be the same way.

I've been using it since 2018. Before that, I implemented SAP ERP in my previous job and used it for two years.

It's very stable.

It's scalable.

There are currently 8,000 users who use SAP in my company. Our IT team maintains it.

We do not have plans to increase usage. SAP has said that they are dropping the ERP part. They advise moving on to SuccessFactors for HR. SAP themselves has said not to go forward with more usage, but to change the system.

It has good support.

We previously used Oracle. When the company merged the new finance team preferred SAP, so HR also had to move along with the finance team. 

The company was already using SAP ERP when we joined, so I didn't have to do any setup here. But in my previous job, we did set it up.

It wasn't straightforward. We had to first align the HR processes. IBM was the implementation partner. We had to speak with SAP and also IBM. They understood our processes and they proposed the best solution. Some parts we did not agree to, so there were workarounds, but it went through. Once the design architecture was finalized, the implementation was smooth.

The deployment took six months.

IBM was the implementation partner.

On a scale from one to 10, I rate SAP ERP a five. 

It is for all business processes. It is for material management, financial accounting and controlling, sales and distribution, and HR.

Our SAP version is a little bit old. It is the ACC version.

The Material Management and Sales and Distribution modules are great. The Financial Accounting module is also great.  

One module that is not doing well is HR.

It should be less complex. It should also have better integration capability. I am using the ACC version, and in this version, the integration and the communication are very difficult and complicated.

We have been using it in our company since 2008.

It is stable.

I doubt if it is scalable. That's because it is on-prem, so you have a lot of parameters, and scalability would be a little bit hard.

We have 130 people, but in my company, only about 65 people are using it. It is being used every minute of every day. There might be a plan for expanding its usage, but I am not sure.

Every time we need technical support, we take the help of a local consultant.

I didn't do it, but I'm sure it's complex.

I don't know the price, but I know its licensing is on a yearly basis.

I would rate it a nine out of 10.

We are a consulting company and SAP ERP is one of the products that we implement for our customers. Our primary role is to advise them on tools and strategy, including business use cases that they want to transform.

With ERP, we are working with customers who are looking for S/4HANA transformation, mainly from a greenfield approach. For RPA, we want to add some value in the business case because the business case of the S/4HANA transformation is not so easy to find. So we use some techniques like RPA to find more money around this transformation.

Right now we try to automate some functionality, which is not yet really good, within ERP. We really want to connect via API to the RFP tool to S/4HANA in fact.

We do business consulting or IT consulting, and do not provide support. We do advise them on tools and strategy, including business cases that they have to transform. We work with them up to this point and do not do the implementation.

The most valuable features are the claim management. We also find the automation for the process within the "purchase to pay" can be valuable as well. We know that SAP already has an RPA solution to automate the reconciliation between the invoice and the orders, so we don't think that we can find a lot there. We would like to have some use cases with logistics and so on, but we don't have much right now.

We have a "purchase to pay" process, which is in SAP Ariba but mainly within the ERP. We would like to have more around purchasing because with purchasing we have a lot of money to gain and it could be very good for the business case.

There are a lot of manual tasks that are used by a lot of people, so it is a very good candidate for RPA. SAP says that if you want to extend the solutions, you need to use some solution outside of SAP for RPA, on a platform as a service or whatever. So, if SAP could have some option, but this not the tool or the best platform that is in the market. So we try to find some solutions to better convince our customers.

I began working with SAP in 1992, about 28 years ago.

We have experienced no problems with stability.

Scalability has not been an issue for our customers. Our smaller clients have between 2,000 and 3,000 users, whereas a large company has between 10,000 and 20,000 users.

Normally our customers are in retail, the chemical industry, and energy companies. The setup is usually quite complex. When we want them to transform to S/4HANA it has been mainly customized. There are a lot of specifics because their processes are generally not straightforward.

The deployment will take perhaps two months, on average.

When it comes to financing or accounting, SAP is quite enormous. When a company has to produce on every quarter, the numbers that would be in the SAP report, it is quite good. It has very long, long, long life behind it. Logistics, it's still okay. But for the rest, we just started G-Cloud first with a software as a service application. For HR, you have Workday, for instance.

For key purchasing, maybe go to SAP Ariba. If you are looking for Salesforce automation, for instance CRM, maybe you will go to Salesforce. It really depends on which process you want to clone and you want to target, but for the core finance, S/4HANA is a good solution.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company since I am responsible for business digitalization. The tool is used and it is a part of the top-down strategy. My company wants to use the tool since we want a digitalized ERP or to meet the requirements of the authority. The tool is used to meet the needs of the medical product authority and other national regulation authorities.

I think it's a very decentralized solution built for all different business units, so it acts as a separate solution on SAP.

In our company, we have an old system, so the effort to update to HANA was too big for all the ERPs. I think we will update only the ERP part to SAP HANA, and we can build the rest. For communication and CRM, we can build a portal so that we can directly communicate with our users or customers. The tool can be very much customized.

I have been using SAP ERP for fifteen years. I am a customer of SAP.

The product's initial setup phase was very complex, and you can have all the tools to build the process from business, and it depends on the system or on the SAP and not on the other way around. I have a lot of tasks that I have to do because the system says that they are without value, so I would like to change it, and go for digitalization. I have several solutions, one of which is Camunda for process automation. Camunda can be used for process management, documents, and enterprise management.

I think we have not seen any tangible benefits from SAP ERP.

I am not satisfied with the tool.

I use an old ERP tool, so it makes no sense to rate the product. I want to update it to a new architecture. I think SAP is an old ERP.

I rate the tool a one out of ten.

SAP ERP is essentially used for back-office functions, such as payroll and HR, as well as covering financials. It has many functional modules that can be used depending on the needs of your business.

Implementing SAP is typically very costly, and it takes a long time to deploy because of the huge amount of complexity. For smaller organizations, the implementation can be particularly challenging. Maybe the integration capabilities could be improved to increase the rest of the three tools. If you're trying to plug it into other best-of-breed products for HR or reporting, that's where you'll have charges.

I would suggest that the implementation lifecycle could be made simpler. Therefore, it would be easier and faster to implement and cost less.

I've been using SAP ERP for fifteen years.

It is a very scalable solution but it can be cost-prohibitive at the same time due to the time it takes.

The deployment process depends on various factors. For the bare minimum setup, the solution would take six to nine months to deploy. But the likelihood of it taking six to nine months is very low. It's probably going to be more like a year to eighteen months to get the whole thing up and running and fully working as you expect for an organization of over six thousand people. 

The time taken to deploy the solution depends on the implementation approach. More than likely, you would roll it out to one part of the organization, which could take six to nine months. Then you would expand it to other parts of the organization, which would take longer. So, there's a deployment that could be done in six months, but it's unlikely that the entire organization would be fully onboarded in that time.

If you're a large, professional organization with significant complexity, then SAP ERP would be a good fit as it comes with out-of-the-box support for more complicated processes. However, if you're a smaller organization or a quick-build company that's not planning to grow larger, then SAP ERP may not be advised. It's more about the complexity of the business you're running, and we run a manufacturing distribution component that is quite sophisticated compared to something you would find with Dynamics or 365. But it's more about the organization's size and complexity that determines how useful SAP ERP can be.  It may be the right solution for some and not for others, so it's subjective.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

We used SAP ERP for a variety of business processes including finance, sales, credit, distribution, and more.

The most valuable feature is the finance management. However, there are many good features.

Standardization and customization need to be improved.

Technical support is an area that is in need of improvement.

This product has been used by the company for about 12 years.

The stability is quite high and we used it on a daily basis.

This product is very scalable and easy to expand.

We have approximately 40,000 users.

I have been in touch with technical support and I think that it can be improved. It's quite inefficient.

We did not use another ERP solution prior to SAP.

The initial setup is complex. One of the main difficulties is that there are a lot of processes and you need to integrate all of your ecosystems. When you have a very complex environment you have to understand the details and complexity.

The deployment can be done either on-premises or in the cloud, depending on the requirements. It can be an ongoing process.

We deployed this solution with assistance from the vendor.

Both our in-house team and the vendor is responsible for maintenance.

I would say that the price is competitive. Some components are available at an additional cost, depending on the type of contract that you have.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.