ServiceNow Now Platform Reviews

I use ServiceNow Now Platform in my company for ITSM and ITAM.

The most valuable feature of the solution is related to ITSM. In general, I like all the features of the product. Some of its valuable features are the ease and flexibility of configuration that the ServiceNow Now Platform provides.

I have not yet seen an area where the solution needs improvement.

I have not yet seen an area where additional functionalities are required in the solution. In my company, we have not come across a functionality that is not available in the product.

From an improvement perspective, the product's complicated initial setup phase can be made a bit easier.

I have been using ServiceNow Now Platform for a year. My company has a partnership with ServiceNow.

It is a pretty stable solution.

Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution.

The solution's technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with products like SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM, with which I can compare ServiceNow Now Platform. Compared to SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM, ServiceNow Now Platform is a much better enterprise-based solution for bigger clients with a large user database. SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM are good for smaller user databases or companies.

My company switched from SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM to ServiceNow Now Platform since it served the purpose or requirements of our bigger clients who wanted multiple functionalities, higher availability, and more robust systems with better performance.

The product's initial setup phase was a little complicated but can be managed.

I rate the initial setup phase around seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup process, and ten is an easy setup process.

In our company, the solution could be deployed in two months, considering that an out-of-the-box configuration feature is provided to users.

I have experienced a return on investment from the use of the solution. Our company has been able to implement the solution for our customers, and they have been really happy with it. With GenAI-based capabilities being introduced in ServiceNow, our company looks forward to implementing it as well, and we aim to get a higher return on investment from the product.

Price-wise, I would describe the product's cost to be more than the average, but it compensates for that with the functionalities that it provides.

My company offers some ETL tools and HaloITSM.

The solution should have provided ease of configuration to users. Every functionality that is required for users is available in the solution, but the configuration part is a bit complicated as it is not as easy as the other tools. You need to know ServiceNow's development area, and it is not easy for someone who has never worked on ServiceNow before to pick up such a skill.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

The primary use cases included configuration. From the basic configuration to ServiceNow, I used it to design workflows, business tools, and access control. Overall, it involved configurations, workflows, templates, and catalog management.

I worked at the administration level. 

In ServiceNow, the best features are the reports. We have more options there. However, when it comes to integration, it can be complex compared to other tools I'm currently using. The first service I use has a more user-friendly interface. ServiceNow relies more on coding and scripting, whereas Freshservice is more low-code and no-code, which is the main difference I've observed.

There is room for improvement in terms of coding and scripting. It could be a more low-code solution. There could be less coding and scripting.

Moreover, in my experience working with multiple customers for implementation, ServiceNow takes a lot of time to implement and deliver the product to our customers. Freshservice takes less time to implement. Moreover, for Freshservice, even an unknown person can also start and click learn on it. In contrast, we should have at least basic knowledge to start working on that at ServiceNow.

I have only a few months of experience with the ServiceNow Now Platform. I haven't used it frequently or regularly in real time. When we switched customers from ServiceNow to Freshservice, which are also ITSM tools, I worked on ServiceNow. During this switch, I worked on ServiceNow, but not extensively.

Stability is generally good. However, there are occasional issues when performing upgrades and changes, especially when integrating with different applications in the database. During those changes, we experienced difficulties and communication errors. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. 

I would give it a rating of around seven in terms of scalability.

ServiceNow offers practical solutions and a supportive community. While we haven't extensively used their direct support, I would rate it around seven. There have been some instances where we faced challenges in getting satisfactory support, especially at the basic level.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup a seven out of ten, where one is easy, and ten is easy. Many clients are moving towards the cloud. However, some still use on-premises applications. With cloud deployment, most people use ServiceNow for discovery and other features while using an approval distribution server somewhere to communicate with the client.

The deployment process usually takes a few months to complete the deployment if it's a complete project. However, for basic configuration and preconfigured elements, it can be done in a shorter time. We only need to design it according to our requirements and set up assignments, tools, and configurations. We already have some predefined rules that can be used, but additional configuration may be necessary based on our specific needs.

It is expensive only. While it offers many features, not all customers utilize all of them. Most customers only use a portion of the features, such as 30%, 40%, 50%, or 70%, but not 100%. ServiceNow charges for the features available in the tool, even if customers don't use all of them. OEMs are charging for all the features, that's why no customer uses 100% of the features. 

ServiceNow is a good platform nowadays. However, it's not that easy and can be a bit complicated. Only knowledgeable individuals can learn and work with ServiceNow. That's the only drawback. Other than that, ServiceNow is very good and currently the leading tool in the market.

Considering its features and functionality, I would rate it around eight out of ten. 

The solution is fast enough for our workflow automations and has integration capability. It aligns with many use cases in our organization and for others we have planned. 

The product also has the agility required for fast-paced deployment and has many out-of-the-box features.

The UI and mobile UI need to be improved. Some new features are being brought in with the San Diego upgrade and we will be upgrading to that version and hope to see some improvements there. 

We have been using this solution for about a year. 

The stability of the solution is good enough. 

The scalability is good, we rolled out the solution for all of our warehouses and have plans for further implementation in our manufacturing. 

The support depends on the availability of local partners. We don't work directly with the ServiceNow team, but the partner we use provides good support. There is a good support base in India. We have worked with two partners, the first didn't provide the best support which is why we switched to the second.

We previously used Microsoft Power Apps and SharePoint. When it comes to complex workflows, cross-functional projects and extended integration features, ServiceNow does a much better job. For simple functions and workflows, Power Apps and SharePoint are sufficient but for complex, cross-functional work we prefer an LCNC platform like ServiceNow.   

The initial setup is relatively simple, integration is fine but the UI holds the solution back somewhat. 

With five being the best, I wouldn't rate this solution any more than a three out of five for setup.

I would rate this solution seven out of ten.
If you are in India, the partner selection will be very important as there aren't many certified partners here. 

I'm a BI project manager. I work with a team of developers. If the report is not working, or if the users are having some issues in the data set, users create tickets to share with us about their issues, and we check the tickets.

The product is good. Assignment Group history is really important to me. It shows that even though my team did not solve the ticket, it was assigned to my team once. I can also see who tried to solve the ticket before they transferred it to another team.

The product is missing a dashboard. It is not practical to have tickets and see them as a list. I have to connect the product to Power BI to check everything and build KPIs. The product should be integrated with Power BI.

I have been using the solution for five months.

The product is stable.

Everyone in the organization uses the solution. The end users have access to the interface only to create tickets. The support team receives the ticket and analyzes it. Then, they transfer it to the developers. Sometimes, the issue is not a development issue. Sometimes we just have to refresh, and it starts working. Over 100 people use the solution in my company.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I am using the latest version of the solution. I haven’t fully explored it. The solution was installed before I joined the company. From my little experience, I would recommend the solution. I have everything in the product. If a ticket gets assigned to my team and is sent to another team, I would want to know how many tickets were solved by my team and how many tickets were assigned to us. I can check the Assignment Group history. I haven't looked for it yet, but the product must also provide how much time each person who handled the ticket took. Some people take an hour to solve the tickets, while others get it done in 30 minutes. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Our customers use the IT service management solution to manage their organizations' HR activities. They also use the HRSD feature to integrate with other solutions, such as ColdFusion or SuccessFactors. The solution's UI/UX is robust; thus, customers engage with it. They can find out how many rates their products have and how their portals appear to get an overview. The solution allows the users to analyze the number of customers.

The solution's most valuable feature is IT Operations Management. It acts as an aggregator for platforms such as Tray.io and Splunk.

They should reduce the solution's cost and make it more affordable for buyers.

We have been using the solution for eight years.

I rate the solution's stability as a nine.

I rate the solution's scalability as an eight. It is a scalable platform. You can manage many things using it, and it keeps growing as per work requirements. Presently, I have 8000 customers using the solution.

We provide technical support. We do not stay dependent on ServiceNow for support.

Positive

The solution's deployment takes twenty weeks for completion. But you can start using it within twelve weeks. You would need an engagement manager, a business analyst, two developers, and a tester for the deployment process. So, it requires around a team of five executives for deployment, depending upon the deployment size.

I rate the solution’s setup procedure as a seven.

The solution is expensive, and I rate it a ten for pricing.

I recommend the solution to others as it works well. Being high-priced is the only issue. The customers need to strike the right card to get the correct cost. I rate the solution as a nine.

I mainly use Now Platform for change management and IT services, like if there are any issues with logins.

Now Platform's best features are collaboration, configurability, and customizability. I also like that there are multiple ways you can access ServiceNow data through the API.

I've been working with Now Platform for two months.

Now Platform is very stable.

Now Platform is scalable.

I previously worked with BMC Remedy, but I prefer Now Platform as it's more user-friendly.

The initial setup requires a lot of customization based on the individual company's processes. I would say the setup process is medium complex and would rate it as three out of five.

I would give Now Platform a rating of nine out of ten.

The solution utilizes SOPs to automate their business management processes, which are automated through various features of the ServiceNow platform, such as playbooks and other tools. They come from various domains. Based on their business requirements, they approach us with implementation requests, and that's where we assist.

There are several business cases in which we have implemented automation utilizing the out-of-the-box capabilities of the ServiceNow platform.

Cost savings are the main improvement area. It saves 30% time if you need to work with two different systems simultaneously and lack integration. Otherwise, you would have to maintain the data on both ends manually. Integration can help save this kind of time.

Since our platform is always evolving, the integration capabilities help customers expand their requirements based on increased scalability. As a service provider company, we assist our customers in continually enhancing their needs, as they have ever-evolving requirements. This necessitates us to adapt platform features to meet their demands continually.

We have a support division for our end customers, which provides support services on the platform. It has a technical support team available. In case of any issues, we can raise tickets through a customizable dashboard, and they respond by troubleshooting and resolving the problems.

Positive

ServiceNow's Now Platform utilizes different deployable environments like development, staging, and production. Specific standard processes facilitate these deployments, resulting in a highly standardized workflow.

The product is expensive.

We have previously integrated ServiceNow's Now Platform with various third-party applications, such as Salesforce and some of our customers' legacy applications. This enables centralized control over operations, consolidating disparate systems into a unified interface rather than requiring users to navigate different platforms simultaneously.

We have some sort of AI initiative, but a separate division within our company handles AI data analytics and related tasks. It boasts out-of-the-box AI capabilities, such as automating searches based on AI. Additionally, some chatbots automatically identify customers' needs based on their questions. So, the platform already has these features in place.

It's a continuously evolving platform, and new features are added with each release. This upgrade does not cause issues.

ServiceNow is one example of the platforms we've used to manage engineers throughout entire projects.

As a ServiceNow partner company, we recommend our end customers utilize this tool.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Currently, I work with ITSM and HR modules in ServiceNow, with some integrations with other third-party solutions, and the core of my experience is based on that.

For example, my recent project is related to HR, and we are helping the customer define all the HR processes based on the customer's requirements. We have managed all the cases in the organization for 120,000 users. It's a global client in the world, and we are responsible for creating and defining all the processes to manage all the cases in the organization.

In HR, we are across all the features of the HR model. We have created the portals for each one of the countries in the customer and all the service catalogs. After that, for particular customer processes, we are using HR to define them and implement them in that firm.

The simplicity is great. Based on my experience with other solutions in the market, the most important is the simplicity of implementing all the features that we have in ServiceNow and helping customers to simplify the work process in the daily journeys that they have.

It is easy to set up the product.

The interface is perfect.

It's very stable.

The scalability is great.

In ServiceNow, it's difficult to mention some points, as I have other experiences with other solutions, and the gap between ServiceNow and the other ones is huge. There are no missing features. 

The price is a bit high and can be a bit of a barrier for some customers.

I've used the solution for about four years. 

The solution is very stable. You are talking about 99.9% of the stability that that solution has. It's great.

The solution can scale well. It is very good.

They offer very good support. With ServiceNow we can define priorities based on impact and the urgency in our cases. We are open to ServiceNow support and ServiceNow manages responses very well.

The implementation of the process is very straightforward and simple. 

How many people you need for deployment and maintenance depends on if you are looking only for the base implementation. I'd say two or three people are enough to deploy the solution. It does vary based on the requirements of the project and customer, however, two or three people are enough.

The solution is very expensive. 

We are a partner. We deal with different versions of the product. Right now, we are using San Diego.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. It's not something for everybody. However, we have a team of people that can justify a proof of concept. The company needs to be mature to get some real functionality out of it. If the company doesn't have the maturity, it may be a bad investment.