ServiceNow Now Platform Reviews

For now, most of the clients come up with the requirement for catalogs. Based on those catalogs, we do some integration if needed. If not, then we'll give them the catalog with the tables. 

Other than that, we do discovery for the clients. If they want the asset to be located on the ServiceNow instance, we handle that as well. 

There are modules and processes available in ServiceNow, like HRSD, GRC, and other modules, which we implement for clients.

If we build a solution from the ground up, it incurs high costs, and the lack of a proper process can also lead to inefficiencies. ServiceNow provides a robust solution that saves time and allows quick implementation without delays, ultimately reducing costs in the long term.

The primary feature we find valuable is data management. ServiceNow is mainly a ticketing tool that offers additional features like workflows. Another valuable feature is its automation capabilities. 

We have integrated OpenAI's ChatGPT, Gemini, and other APIs for development and client resolutions in virtual chatbots. ServiceNow also provides RPA, which is useful but currently expensive.

The RPA feature in ServiceNow is quite good, but it is very expensive. If AI were better integrated into ServiceNow, it would lower the RPA costs and make the platform more accessible. 

Additionally, some core functionalities developed by ServiceNow can be challenging to change. Cloning with separate instances can be difficult, especially when dealing with multiple domains. Communication between developers and clients needs to be improved to avoid discrepancies.

I've been working with the ServiceNow Platform for about one year and around six to seven months.

I would rate the stability of ServiceNow at eight and a half out of ten. It is quite stable.

I would rate the scalability of the ServiceNow platform at seven and a half out of ten.

I would rate the customer support at seven and a half out of ten. They usually reply to the first ticket within 24 hours and set up calls to understand and resolve the issue. However, sometimes they don't have solutions for specific configurations, making it tedious to go back and forth.

Before ServiceNow, I worked with Jira and conducted some normal development on various websites. Jira is focused more on ITSM, whereas ServiceNow covers a broader range of modules.

The initial setup is relatively easy for the most part. Most out-of-the-box configurations are simple to tailor to specific requirements, but certain out-of-the-box configurations that need changes can be challenging. These challenges are generally special cases and don't occur very often.

If ServiceNow is used from the ground up, it provides a proper solution without wasting time. This decreases costs in the long term.

Pricing for ServiceNow depends on the model. Some models, like GRC and HRSD, are user-specific and can be quite expensive. Others are less costly but are based on the number of tickets or users.

Before working with ServiceNow, I also worked with Jira and conducted some normal development on various websites and other tools.

Clear up all the requirements with the developers you are going to hire. Sometimes there can be a communication gap between the developer and the client, leading to solutions that don't meet the actual requirements.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Managing business process automation related to primarily finance-related areas is what my company does with ServiceNow Now Platform.

There are three to four teams in my company, among which the first team deals with ServiceNow Request Management, the second team deals with workflow automation, and the third team deals with the portals, knowledge bases, chatbots, and other areas related to ServiceNow Now Platform.

Everything about the ServiceNow Now Platform is top-notch since ServiceNow is considered one of the market leaders. I don't see any other product delivering better services than ServiceNow, even though other companies are attempting to compete with it. Only on the UI front other companies might be offering better products than ServiceNow. Considering the functionalities provided, ServiceNow is way ahead of its competitors.

In ServiceNow Now Platform, UI is an area with certain shortcomings requiring improvements.

I want ServiceNow Now Platform to offer more in-built widgets that people or developers can use, as it can be quite helpful in the future.

I have been using ServiceNow Now Platform for almost three years. My company is a customer of the product.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution.

The solution's technical support is good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

Earlier, my company was using an old version of a product named BMC Remedy.

The product's initial setup phase did not have any issues as it is considered to be a strategic tool in our organization. From a finance-related perspective, for which my company chose the tool, we ensured that we carved out our own scope areas in the product as we have our own security measures and controls in place.

The solution is deployed on the cloud services offered by ServiceNow.

For the completion of the deployment phase of the product, a user needs to get the contract rolling, which may make the process tough since I feel that it takes more time internally in an organization as there are a lot of organizational compliances to take into consideration, owing to which many approvals might be required I can organizational level. After users get signed up, the deployment process doesn't take much time since they only have to set up the base structures to get things going in the solution.

During the evaluation phase, my company did consider options like Appian and Unqork. From an organizational standpoint, ServiceNow Now Platform was more of a strategic tool that could be utilized in all the departments of my company.

I think people should probably note down their requirements initially and then get the technical team to go through the listed needs before getting the sales team of ServiceNow to provide a small demo of the tool. ServiceNow shows some prototypes that can help potential customers decide whether to choose the tool or not. If potential users find that ServiceNow Now Platform suffices their needs, then it is a great tool for them.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

The solution is fast enough for our workflow automations and has integration capability. It aligns with many use cases in our organization and for others we have planned. 

The product also has the agility required for fast-paced deployment and has many out-of-the-box features.

The UI and mobile UI need to be improved. Some new features are being brought in with the San Diego upgrade and we will be upgrading to that version and hope to see some improvements there. 

We have been using this solution for about a year. 

The stability of the solution is good enough. 

The scalability is good, we rolled out the solution for all of our warehouses and have plans for further implementation in our manufacturing. 

The support depends on the availability of local partners. We don't work directly with the ServiceNow team, but the partner we use provides good support. There is a good support base in India. We have worked with two partners, the first didn't provide the best support which is why we switched to the second.

We previously used Microsoft Power Apps and SharePoint. When it comes to complex workflows, cross-functional projects and extended integration features, ServiceNow does a much better job. For simple functions and workflows, Power Apps and SharePoint are sufficient but for complex, cross-functional work we prefer an LCNC platform like ServiceNow.   

The initial setup is relatively simple, integration is fine but the UI holds the solution back somewhat. 

With five being the best, I wouldn't rate this solution any more than a three out of five for setup.

I would rate this solution seven out of ten.
If you are in India, the partner selection will be very important as there aren't many certified partners here. 

It's a very comprehensive platform. So, really, you can do anything with it that requires integration with other systems, as well as build bespoke applications on the platform itself. 

It's not just limited to service management; you can actually build your own applications.

When you activate the ServiceNow platform, the core ITIL processes—incident management, problem management, change management, and others—are enabled. This means your internal processes are aligned with ITIL v4 best practices from day one.

So, while ServiceNow's service management functionality is primarily internal, you're ultimately providing a service whether it's to internal or external users. 

By having those processes in place, the traceability, and features like virtual assistants that we're all used to – where we can just go in and start having a chat, and then the ability for it to pass the conversation to the actual agent, and then you can start chatting with the agent.... that all streamlines support.

The agent can also have internal discussions with other senior technical resources if they need to, all while they're looking at this issue.

Then, there's the dedicated Customer Service Management (CSM) application, which is primarily for external support in B2B or B2C scenarios. This module is all focused on end customers, how they can interact with the organization, and how the organization can provide the service. Because of the auditing and all those other reasons, the quality of service that you're providing to your customer is both monitored and maintained, and everything is audited in the system. 

So that's how you improve your service by looking at your processes, looking at any stage where there might be a blockage or something taking a long time, and fixing those issues. That's what these platforms are designed to do.

It integrates very well with most systems. I have yet to come across a system that it cannot integrate with.

It's very intuitive and easy to use. The flexibility and user-friendliness of ServiceNow are key reasons it's such a popular cloud solution.

There's always room for improvement, but I think the biggest challenge with ServiceNow is the licensing model. It's not very clear and changes frequently. And it is an expensive product. So, those are the things that are lacking. The platform itself is technically excellent, but licensing and cost can be barriers.

I have been working with this product for ten years. 

It's a cloud solution; scalability isn't a problem. So, it scales well aside from the licensing considerations.

The customer service and support are very good. 

Positive

I have worked previously with BMC Remedy for about 10 to 15 years, deploying both on-premise and cloud solutions.

ServiceNow was designed from the ground up as a cloud solution. BMC Remedy began as on-premise software and then adapted to offer a cloud solution. Because of that, ServiceNow often has a slight edge in terms of cloud-native features. 

BMC is catching up, and there's little difference in what the two platforms can do overall.

The initial setup is very straightforward. Obviously, you need to know what you're doing.
There are a lot of courses and training required to deploy a ServiceNow platform effectively. ServiceNow administrators can do a lot, but there might also be niche products, like HR for example, that require specialized understanding.

If you're going with out-of-the-box settings and just configuring your system, then you can actually deploy it as early as three months. So, the deployment time varies.

It saves money or brings profit for large enterprise organizations. For small or even medium-sized companies, the cost might be difficult to justify.

In my opinion, it is expensive. However, they do offer favorable licensing for charities, for example. 

For standard commercial use, it is one of the more expensive options.

A very rough minimum might be in the range of $50,000+ per year, but that depends on many factors.

Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. It's one of the best.

I would recommend using it. 

I'm a BI project manager. I work with a team of developers. If the report is not working, or if the users are having some issues in the data set, users create tickets to share with us about their issues, and we check the tickets.

The product is good. Assignment Group history is really important to me. It shows that even though my team did not solve the ticket, it was assigned to my team once. I can also see who tried to solve the ticket before they transferred it to another team.

The product is missing a dashboard. It is not practical to have tickets and see them as a list. I have to connect the product to Power BI to check everything and build KPIs. The product should be integrated with Power BI.

I have been using the solution for five months.

The product is stable.

Everyone in the organization uses the solution. The end users have access to the interface only to create tickets. The support team receives the ticket and analyzes it. Then, they transfer it to the developers. Sometimes, the issue is not a development issue. Sometimes we just have to refresh, and it starts working. Over 100 people use the solution in my company.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I am using the latest version of the solution. I haven’t fully explored it. The solution was installed before I joined the company. From my little experience, I would recommend the solution. I have everything in the product. If a ticket gets assigned to my team and is sent to another team, I would want to know how many tickets were solved by my team and how many tickets were assigned to us. I can check the Assignment Group history. I haven't looked for it yet, but the product must also provide how much time each person who handled the ticket took. Some people take an hour to solve the tickets, while others get it done in 30 minutes. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Our customers use the IT service management solution to manage their organizations' HR activities. They also use the HRSD feature to integrate with other solutions, such as ColdFusion or SuccessFactors. The solution's UI/UX is robust; thus, customers engage with it. They can find out how many rates their products have and how their portals appear to get an overview. The solution allows the users to analyze the number of customers.

The solution's most valuable feature is IT Operations Management. It acts as an aggregator for platforms such as Tray.io and Splunk.

They should reduce the solution's cost and make it more affordable for buyers.

We have been using the solution for eight years.

I rate the solution's stability as a nine.

I rate the solution's scalability as an eight. It is a scalable platform. You can manage many things using it, and it keeps growing as per work requirements. Presently, I have 8000 customers using the solution.

We provide technical support. We do not stay dependent on ServiceNow for support.

Positive

The solution's deployment takes twenty weeks for completion. But you can start using it within twelve weeks. You would need an engagement manager, a business analyst, two developers, and a tester for the deployment process. So, it requires around a team of five executives for deployment, depending upon the deployment size.

I rate the solution’s setup procedure as a seven.

The solution is expensive, and I rate it a ten for pricing.

I recommend the solution to others as it works well. Being high-priced is the only issue. The customers need to strike the right card to get the correct cost. I rate the solution as a nine.

I use ServiceNow Now Platform in my company for ITSM and ITAM.

The most valuable feature of the solution is related to ITSM. In general, I like all the features of the product. Some of its valuable features are the ease and flexibility of configuration that the ServiceNow Now Platform provides.

I have not yet seen an area where the solution needs improvement.

I have not yet seen an area where additional functionalities are required in the solution. In my company, we have not come across a functionality that is not available in the product.

From an improvement perspective, the product's complicated initial setup phase can be made a bit easier.

I have been using ServiceNow Now Platform for a year. My company has a partnership with ServiceNow.

It is a pretty stable solution.

Scalability-wise, it is a very good solution.

The solution's technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with products like SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM, with which I can compare ServiceNow Now Platform. Compared to SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM, ServiceNow Now Platform is a much better enterprise-based solution for bigger clients with a large user database. SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM are good for smaller user databases or companies.

My company switched from SymphonyAI Summit Service Management and Halo ITSM to ServiceNow Now Platform since it served the purpose or requirements of our bigger clients who wanted multiple functionalities, higher availability, and more robust systems with better performance.

The product's initial setup phase was a little complicated but can be managed.

I rate the initial setup phase around seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup process, and ten is an easy setup process.

In our company, the solution could be deployed in two months, considering that an out-of-the-box configuration feature is provided to users.

I have experienced a return on investment from the use of the solution. Our company has been able to implement the solution for our customers, and they have been really happy with it. With GenAI-based capabilities being introduced in ServiceNow, our company looks forward to implementing it as well, and we aim to get a higher return on investment from the product.

Price-wise, I would describe the product's cost to be more than the average, but it compensates for that with the functionalities that it provides.

My company offers some ETL tools and HaloITSM.

The solution should have provided ease of configuration to users. Every functionality that is required for users is available in the solution, but the configuration part is a bit complicated as it is not as easy as the other tools. You need to know ServiceNow's development area, and it is not easy for someone who has never worked on ServiceNow before to pick up such a skill.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

The primary use cases included configuration. From the basic configuration to ServiceNow, I used it to design workflows, business tools, and access control. Overall, it involved configurations, workflows, templates, and catalog management.

I worked at the administration level. 

In ServiceNow, the best features are the reports. We have more options there. However, when it comes to integration, it can be complex compared to other tools I'm currently using. The first service I use has a more user-friendly interface. ServiceNow relies more on coding and scripting, whereas Freshservice is more low-code and no-code, which is the main difference I've observed.

There is room for improvement in terms of coding and scripting. It could be a more low-code solution. There could be less coding and scripting.

Moreover, in my experience working with multiple customers for implementation, ServiceNow takes a lot of time to implement and deliver the product to our customers. Freshservice takes less time to implement. Moreover, for Freshservice, even an unknown person can also start and click learn on it. In contrast, we should have at least basic knowledge to start working on that at ServiceNow.

I have only a few months of experience with the ServiceNow Now Platform. I haven't used it frequently or regularly in real time. When we switched customers from ServiceNow to Freshservice, which are also ITSM tools, I worked on ServiceNow. During this switch, I worked on ServiceNow, but not extensively.

Stability is generally good. However, there are occasional issues when performing upgrades and changes, especially when integrating with different applications in the database. During those changes, we experienced difficulties and communication errors. 

I would rate the stability an eight out of ten. 

I would give it a rating of around seven in terms of scalability.

ServiceNow offers practical solutions and a supportive community. While we haven't extensively used their direct support, I would rate it around seven. There have been some instances where we faced challenges in getting satisfactory support, especially at the basic level.

Neutral

I would rate the initial setup a seven out of ten, where one is easy, and ten is easy. Many clients are moving towards the cloud. However, some still use on-premises applications. With cloud deployment, most people use ServiceNow for discovery and other features while using an approval distribution server somewhere to communicate with the client.

The deployment process usually takes a few months to complete the deployment if it's a complete project. However, for basic configuration and preconfigured elements, it can be done in a shorter time. We only need to design it according to our requirements and set up assignments, tools, and configurations. We already have some predefined rules that can be used, but additional configuration may be necessary based on our specific needs.

It is expensive only. While it offers many features, not all customers utilize all of them. Most customers only use a portion of the features, such as 30%, 40%, 50%, or 70%, but not 100%. ServiceNow charges for the features available in the tool, even if customers don't use all of them. OEMs are charging for all the features, that's why no customer uses 100% of the features. 

ServiceNow is a good platform nowadays. However, it's not that easy and can be a bit complicated. Only knowledgeable individuals can learn and work with ServiceNow. That's the only drawback. Other than that, ServiceNow is very good and currently the leading tool in the market.

Considering its features and functionality, I would rate it around eight out of ten.