ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Reviews

The solution has opened many doors for me. 

Technical support is good. 

It's a very complete solution. Aside from some complex analytics, the rest of the product is very simple and easy to use. 

There is some good documentation that you can go over. 

The price is too high. It's okay for a big company, however, for a medium-sized organization, it may be too much. They should lower the price so smaller companies can also leverage it. 

The performance analytics are too difficult and complex for me to figure out very well. 

I'd like to read more about the new features before commenting on them. 

I've been using the solution for five years. 

Technical support is very good. However, I always put someone on with better English when I will need to communicate with them.

The solution is very expensive and best for larger organizations, mostly due to the fact that it would be too costly to use for medium-sized companies. 

I'm an implementer of ServiceNow.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We are using the product for project resource and finance management.

As a product, the primary reason we like it is it gets integrated with our ITSM solution so that we don't have to go for an external product for project management like Jira. It seamlessly integrates with our ITSM. It pretty much has all the features you want to manage. You don't need separate products for your project, your resource, or your finance. It's an integrated solution where the same product will actually get us for all three.

The solution needs a few things in terms of resource management. It still lags behind some of the company leaders like Workday. It's not yet there yet. The solution, currently, whatever it is, it's very concrete. Customizing it is a bit of a tedious task. That's the one thing I pretty much feel is a downside.

The initial setup is complex. 

I've been using the solution for two or three years. 

It is getting stable, relatively compared to how it was one or two years back. Though it was not up to the mark, it's quite stable now.

Scalability-wise, it's good.

There are around 400 users who are using this.

Technical support is useful. There are a lot of things we incur during implementation, post-implementation, et cetera. There is some technical support that is required.

We are using pretty much each and every product of ServiceNow.

The initial setup is quite complex. It's not easy. I would say its implementation is on the complex side, since, unlike other modules, these are pretty much concept-oriented, and having a successful implementation is a pretty tedious task. It took four to five months to deploy the product.

The deployment was handled by our team in-house. We did not need any help from any integrators or consultants. 

Pricing-wise, I can't comment individually on this, as it depends on the region. It depends on the overall number of licenses. It also depends on other factors like what are the other solutions, are the products we are taking from ServiceNow. Generally, it's neither cheap nor very costly. For a customer who has already ServiceNow ITSM and some other products in place, I would say it's moderate.

We have enough products. We have one for project management, a separate one for time management. We had separate things. However, once we were into ServiceNow for ITSM, ITBM was offering all these solutions on the same platform. We didn't look into other options. We decided on ServiceNow to stay within the same umbrella solution.

We're a partner and reseller. 

Users should go with this product only if they are already planning to use ServiceNow for other IT like asset management or service management. If they are planning to use ServiceNow, then it makes sense to go with it. Otherwise, it is not necessary to go for ITBM.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We are using ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management for incident management project portfolio management.

The most valuable feature of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is incident management.

The portfolio managed is good for IT, but it's not good for non it's not necessarily great for construction projects, such as the building of physical infrastructure.

I have been using ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management for approximately four years.

The solution is stable.

I rate the stability of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management a nine out of ten.

The solution is scalable in our usage. We are not a large company.

We have approximately 100 users using the solution.

The solution is regularly used.

I rate the scalability of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management a six out of ten.

I previously used BMC prior to ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management.

The initial setup is of a medium difficulty level. It is not easy or complex. However, it is clunky. The user interface is difficult to find features and navigate around. The forms are generic and the solution was primarily developed as an incident management tool which it is good at, but project management is something they developed later. It feels like it was an afterthought.

I rate the initial setup of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management a five out of ten.

We have seen an ROI using this solution.

I rate the price of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management a seven out of ten.

My advice to others is this solution might not be for everyone and other options should be considered.

I rate ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management a seven out of ten.

There are aspects of the solution that are good, but it's not great at everything that it does.

The price keeps going up, and to remain competitive, it needs to have a competitive edge. I would like to see more of the latest innovations, in terms of AI, ML, and all of the latest cutting-edge technologies, included in the platform.

The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability.

The scalability is very good. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to scalability. Thousands of projects can be managed.

Technical support from ServiceNow is great. There is a good amount of documentation available. ServiceNow also has certain training programs and cohort programs through which they educate people regarding their platform.

We've previously used Anaplan, MS Project, and Clarity. We switched because of issues with integration in terms of the wider ITSM platform and other tool sets. 

The complexity of the initial setup can vary depending on the amount of data that needs to be migrated.

If you want to implement ServiceNow ITBM, I would recommend an organic approach rather than going full throttle and moving all your projects at once, for example, from Microsoft Project or Clarity, onto ITBM.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate ServiceNow ITBM at eight because it is not as intuitive as Microsoft Project.

I'm mostly involved with service management projects.

What I like about ServiceNow is how it operates as a complete platform. When I talk about a platform, what I mean is that you have end-to-end information about your whole company all in one place with ServiceNow. This also means that you need to have the layers in place, like the layers for service management, portfolio management, risk management, security, discovery service mapping as well as the iPhone layer and the software asset management layer. If you have all those assets in place, it's quite easy. Then you can do a lot of stuff inside the platform itself. The nice thing about ServiceNow is that it's also an older platform, where you can include and separate other information for more products. Plus the product brings something new to the market. ServiceNow brings to the market different layers with different pricing, so you can customize. And all the layers are really enterprise-ready.

ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit. It doesn't have to extend too far. In some other areas, like enterprise architecture, they already have the tools for it.

I've been using ServiceNow for a few years. 

ServiceNow is a very stable and scalable platform.

I have had no issues with ServiceNow's technical support so far.

I find found the setup to be quite easy.

They sell some things in bundles, and it could be handier that some of those things could be sold in another way, like purity models and other packages. Another thing that I'm struggling with is the pricing of ServiceNow's FYE experience, which includes the tools that are positioned for supporting HR.

I would never give service now a 10 because everything could always be better, but I would rate it nine or nine-and-a-half out of 10.

If you are planning to implement ServiceNow, I would consider it from the aspect of business management, especially portfolio management. Don't only look at companies that are mostly using portfolio management for their project portfolio. Portfolio management comprises three main portfolios: investment portfolio, product portfolio, and project portfolio. These are really linked to each other. And the nice thing about business management with ServiceNow is that you can manage all three of these portfolios like they need to be managed.

We use ServiceNow IT Business Management for production support.

The performance is good.

It could be more user-friendly.

I have been working with ServiceNow IT Business Management for two years.

We don't have any complaints regarding the stability of ServiceNow IT Business Management.

ServiceNow IT Business Management is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 1,000 users in our company.

At this time, we don't have plans to increase the usage.

I, personally, have not had any interaction with technical support.

The initial setup is straightforward.

It took three and six months to complete the deployment.

I am not aware of how much we are paying for the licensing.

We are not using it as a business management solution, so I would recommend it for ticketing and incident tracking. However, we are not utilizing the entire portfolio.

I would rate ServiceNow IT Business Management an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for project and portfolio management.

It's a good solution for portfolio management and to manage all the projects that you have with the client. It's easy to manage all the resources in projects as well as all the costs involved.

The interface is user-friendly. It's one of the most user-friendly on the market, and the most complete.

The cost could be improved. The solution is quite pricey.

The solution should have the capacity to integrate with the latest promotion of MES projects. Right now it's not working so well. 

The solution is very stable. The availability of service is 99.9% at the moment. It's very, very, good.

The solution is very scalable.

I've worked with the technical support team of ServiceNow many times. In the market, it's one of the best support teams I have dealt with.  I worked with BMC, CA and other solutions as well and this solution offers a faster response for MEA issues. Others take much longer to respond. Resolving issues with them is very fast.

We looked at CA technologies, which were acquired by Broadcom, specifically CAPPM. Gardner had recorded that CAPPM was the leader in the market, but at the moment ServiceNow is more complete and more user-friendly. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It's easy to implement. An average deployment takes about two months. CAPPM, in comparison, would take about four months.

All the processes of project management have to be very well defined. When these requirements aren't defined, we have to approach that first before we can implement the solution. It's very important for the success of deployment.

Compared to CA, ServiceNow is more expensive. When you pay for your licensing, you must also pay for an SLA.

We use the hybrid cloud deployment model. We're integrators for the solution.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We primarily used the solution for project management. At a previous company, I was working as a project manager for them, so I had used ServiceNow previously.

We have developed several mobile applications using end to IUSN technology.

The solution was quite easy to use. The interface was quite user-friendly, and I've become quite familiar with it.

The solution is quite extensive, and I’ve only used the sections related to project management. I’m not sure if it was lacking any features. For me, it had everything I needed. I’ve never experienced any technical issues at all.

The only issue for us is the pricing. It’s quite high in comparison with the competition.

I’ve used the solution for more than a year, however, I stopped using the solution about six months ago.

The solution is very stable.

The scalability of the solution is excellent. If I had to, I’d rate it nine out of ten. We currently have eight to ten people working no the solution, including myself.

I’ve contacted technical support and have been satisfied with their level of services. I like them. They’re quite good.

I’ve previously used Salesforce for some project management tasks as well as customer lead management. Both tools are very good. I’ve also used Bitrix, Jira and Zoho in the past when I was in India. Now I’m based in The Netherlands.

The initial setup was quite easy. It’s almost similar to setting up a Facebook account. It’s not difficult like other solutions. There is a lot of media that you can use to help your team deploy into the system. Deployment is rather quick and takes about 40 to 45 minutes to set up in total.

I deployed the solution myself with the help of our team.

I’m not a business owner, so I can’t speak to the pricing. I’m not sure if it’s expensive or not because I haven’t taken the time to compare pricing. However, it’s my understanding that it is a bit pricer than other options on the market.

We used the cloud deployment model as opposed to the on-premises model. We used the public cloud and use Microsoft’s cloud with Azure.

I’m a CTO and I have about 10-12 years of technical background. I’ve been a developer before, but over the past year I’ve moved into project management and our company is developing software for the energy sector. We may use this solution for that company going forward, although we aren’t using it right now.

I’m comfortable using both Salesforce and ServiceNow. I find ServiceNow easier to use in comparison, but Salesforce also has a good interface.

We have eight to ten people on the team working with the solution. We were working on a user based project, so there were 10 people to include in the design and then one person was there to develop the Java export and another one for running data for basic export.

I’d recommend the solution. I’d rate it nine out of ten. I’d rate it higher if it wasn’t so costly as a solution. Feature-wise it’s very good and unique compared to Salesforce and other business management software.