Bizagi Reviews

Our primary use case for Bizagi is about full automation. It's about the discovering process, modeling business processes, and training the people. It's at a very low stage of maturity. It's very early, it's in the beginning of this.

In our business space we are just researching, so everything is local.

To start with, the feature for training people is very interesting. Even if they had Bizagi in the office, you still have some tools that are just in the cloud, so you don't need to install things like IDOR, which is a series of tools for process utilization, what they call IU and IO. So, the feature for knowledge, discovery process, and drawing frameworks is very easy. It's the easiest at this moment. Even before we moved to process automation.

They have three or four tools for the entire SQL. They have mobility and process aging. This is good. But for the small business, this is very bad because it is still fragmented. The licensing policy should be more flexible and small company oriented. In micro-small companies, there should only be one or two. That's not the problem. Maybe it is too flexible, there are so many pieces that you need to put together.

When you have a small business, it can be a little complicated, not so easy.

I would like to see an intelligent architect included in the next release of Bizagi. There is a working process with intelligent process management right now, but that doesn't mean artificial intelligence.

I have been using Bizagi for five years.

So far its stability is good. It's not presenting a challenge. At the moment we are doing little experiments and so far it's not a problem.

Bizagi's scalability is good, but there are questions about how they will price it based on number of users. You don't know what it will cost with the number of users. It varies.

Their technical support is good. They have a lot of knowledge in whatever language. We are in Brazil and they have a machine that reads Portuguese. So that is a good thing.

I previously used the Bonitasoft tool, which is a business cross-management tool. Bonita is harder, but you can demand more from its technicians people.

We are now in the process of researching about other tools and changing to new tools. We are looking for a rather simple solution for end users with the same value chain for automation process management. We are evaluating WSO2.

Bizagi is simple. It's simple to learn. Bonita is more complex. Bonita is a tool of architecture. Bizagi is also an architecture tool and it is a business cross-management tool. They are a business cross-management system.

Bonita as a tool has an ecosystem within a better-end tool and other tools, so it's harder. It's harder than Bizagi and it's simpler than WSO2.

The complexity of the initial set up depends on the competencies of the people.

We do development in the healthcare industry, so there is a complexity with the decisions of who sees it first. There are a lot of holes in competencies.

At this stage it is just us implementing. In the next phase, we must do a selection for a contract for a specialist in each tool.

I would recommend people to test other tools. You need to compare these tools to Bizagi. 

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Bizagi an eight because it's simple. It's simple to implement. It's not perfect because of the cost aspect.

What I like best about Bizagi is that you can download the modeling software free of charge and start right away.

The most valuable feature is the simulation.

The speed of this solution needs to be improved.

Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it. The APQC Institute specifies the PCF, which has requirements for quality assurance and there are many processes that are categorized by it. If the software had a feature to manage all of these processes in a hierarchical structure then it would be a very good feature. It is not something that is available in any modeler.

I have been using Bizagi for about one month.

I have not experienced any bugs or errors, so I think that it is stable.

I have only used Bizagi on one computer, so I have not tested scalability. From what I can tell, I think that it is good.

I have not had a need to contact technical support.

I have worked with Visual Paradigm, Visio, and Camunda Modeler.

The initial setup is not complex. It is simple to deploy and only takes a couple of minutes.

I downloaded and installed the modeler on my own.

The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge.

I downloaded the latest modeler but I do not have access to the engine.

Overall, I like this product and it would be great if it had more features to handle all of my processes and BPM diagrams.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I used the solution for work. The solution helped us make process flow charts. It was specifically used for the BPMN process.

The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease.

The product did not work with very large and complicated charts. It became slow and barely usable. So, I stopped using it. The performance of the bigger charts must be improved. The import and export features must also be improved. There was a lot of trouble with exporting files that other people could use. The solution was very limited.

I used the solution for two months.

I rate the tool’s stability a seven out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a five out of ten. I was the only person using the solution in my organization. I used it daily to complete everyday work tasks.

The information was not readily accessible. It was mostly on forums. The product doesn't have a large section for frequently asked questions. If we send the team an email, it takes a very long time to get a response. It's not really useful.

Neutral

I have used Tableau. I switched to Bizagi because I wanted to try it out. It was recommended as a good tool for BPMN.

I rate the ease of setup a seven out of ten. We needed internet connectivity to access the product. It was one of the major disadvantages of the tool. The deployment took us minutes. It was fairly easy.

I deployed the solution myself.

I was using the free version. The paid version was quite pricey. Bizagi was one part of a bigger solution. Three parts worked together as a whole system. Hence, the price was high. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

I was comparing Bizagi and Visio. There were some features that I liked about Bizagi. It had some user-friendly features.

My recommendation depends on the needs of the person. If it's for complicated processes, then I wouldn't recommend it because it just gets slow and is barely workable. However, if it's for beginners who are learning BPMN, it is very good. It's self-explanatory. The solution explains the shapes and how they are used. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

We are using the solution to develop our purchase and contract system.

The solution works on BPMN functions, which provides ease of developing and sharing the process.

The solution could work faster on the cloud.

We have been using the solution for less than a year.

It is quite a stable solution. I rate its stability as an eight.

We have ten users of the solution in our organization.

The solution's initial setup is simple. It took us a week to develop the processes. Also, it requires one technical assistant for deployment and maintenance.

We deployed the solution in-house with the help of standard lessons available online.

The solution's cost is affordable.

I rate the solution an eight.

We use Bizagi for process visualization.

The way your organization functions is improving because Bizagi is user-friendly.

In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable.

I like the simplicity of the solution and that it is user-friendly.

I would like to see the automation process included in the next release.

I have been using Bizagi for approximately two years.

Bizagi has been used in the last 12 months.

We are using the latest version.

Bizagi is a stable solution.

I have not yet explored scalability, but I believe it is scalable.

Three people in our organization use this solution: myself, and two others.

At the moment, we have no plans to increase our usage. We are content with what we have.

My experience with technical support has been satisfactory, and I have no complaints.

We switched to Bizagi, because of the ease of use.

The initial setup was straightforward.

There are two or three people to maintain this solution.

The price could be lower. I would like to do more from an enterprise perspective, but I'm unable to do so at the moment.

The licensing fee is paid on a yearly basis.

I would rate Bizagi an eight out of ten.

I use Bizagi for modeling my own processes as well as teaching others business process modeling. I teach business process modeling at workshops. I teach my students how they can use this solution to model their processes.

I find Bizagi so user-friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users.

I think that they could improve their update process.

Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN.

Sometimes it requests me to update Bizagi and it takes some time working on it. It can be a challenge to update it when I don't have internet access.

I think the solution is scalable, but I haven't needed to scale.

I have not contacted technical support, but I saw Bizagi's website and I think that they would be great.

I previously worked with Microsoft Visio, but I think that Bizagi outperforms it. I am also trying to learn how to work with ProcessMaker.

I think the main competitive advantage of Bizagi is its user-friendly environment that allows you to drag and drop BPMN elements on its surface. Its simulation abilities are also great, but I think that they can be improved because some elements of BPMN and are not supported in the current version. I recently heard that Bizagi added performance evaluation or assessment and I know I'm not working with it yet.

It's easy to set up. I think it took less than an hour to deploy. I don't remember exactly, but I think that it was less than one hour.

I proposed Bizagi to my team because I'm a business process management consultant. My entire team, which is more than ten people, all installed and set up Bizagi on their computers.

As a process management consultant for different organizations, some of them have more users. Currently, we are working with an organization of over 100 people and we recommended Bizagi to them.

I think that its price is reasonable.

I would absolutely recommend Bizagi for many people. I would rate it as eight out of ten.

I use the solution to design and automate processes.

It is a low-code platform. The product enables the users to automate the processes and provides a good user experience.

The product must make automation easier.

I have been using the solution for six years.

The machines are stable. They stay stable 90 to 99% of the time.

I rate the tool’s scalability a five out of ten.

The product has been around for a few years. The support team has a lot of knowledge. Support is good.

Neutral

The initial setup can be complex when we need to create a personalized connector to integrate it with our system. I rate the ease of setup a seven out of ten.

The product must improve its cost. I rate the pricing a six or seven out of ten.

If we have a lot of raw materials and want to automate the processes, we can do it with the solution. I have some clients. We are partners with Bizagi, and we also resell the product. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.