Amazon CloudWatch vs Logz.io comparison

Read 8 Logz.io reviews

940 Views
677 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Amazon CloudWatch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Amazon CloudWatch and Logz.io are leading tools in monitoring and log analysis. Logz.io has the upper hand due to its advanced analytics and user-friendly approach.

Features: CloudWatch integrates seamlessly with the AWS ecosystem and provides comprehensive data insights, though with limited data visualization flexibility. It offers extensive metrics coverage. Logz.io stands out with open-source architecture, customizable dashboards, and advanced machine learning capabilities.

Room for Improvement: CloudWatch could be simplified and expanded for better third-party integration and enhanced real-time analytics. Logz.io may improve by addressing performance lag, expanding support documentation, and refining their onboarding process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudWatch's setup is challenging due to AWS's layered configurations, albeit supported by reliable customer service. Logz.io offers a straightforward deployment but needs to enhance customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: CloudWatch provides cost-effective solutions for AWS users with a strong ROI due to AWS alignment. Logz.io's higher pricing is justified by its advanced features and analytical capabilities, offering significant ROI despite the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon CloudWatch vs. Logz.io Report (Updated: January 2025).

Amazon CloudWatch vs. Logz.io

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch

Ranking in Log Management

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (12th), Cloud Monitoring Software (11th)

Logz.io

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Amazon CloudWatch is 1.7%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logz.io is 0.4%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Rasanpreet Singh

Senior Consultant at Infosys

Reliable AWS monitoring and logging

The choice of logging solution should always be determined by the specific business requirements. It is crucial to align the logging strategy with what type of logs are needed and how they should be used. There are instances where we require custom solutions to retrieve logs, especially application logs that may not be easily accessible through CloudWatch or similar services. When we heavily rely on AWS native services, CloudWatch is indeed a robust choice. However, in certain scenarios, we might need integration capabilities with other tools, and if they can incorporate such features, it would enhance overall logging capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Derrick Brockel

Senior Manager of Operations at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

The solution is a consistent logging platform that provides excellent query mechanisms

We can query a lot of data points and build dashboards. The vendor is good at adjusting their models. Most companies want us to forecast our yearly use and pay it upfront on day one. With Logz.io, we commit to use 14 TB in a year. However, they measure us every month and give us a monthly bill. Depending on our monthly usage, we pay for 14 TB divided by 12 months or a little extra. It's a little bit more like AWS. Other solutions do not do it. They want their money upfront. We really like the dashboards. We have 36 sub-accounts. Each sub-account is an app, and we could put restrictions on that app. Previously, there were capacity restrictions on the sub-accounts. If we have a sub-account of 1 TB and use only 100 GB, we waste 900 GB that day. We could not share it between sub-accounts. Now, they provide an overhead volume. We do a reserve, and any sub-account could use anything over the reserve. It utilizes our footprint better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is collecting the logs from Lambda."

"The most valuable feature of Amazon CloudWatch is its ease of use and logs. You do not have to go to each separate system to see the logs, such as Syslog and they are located in one dashboard GUI."

"CloudWatch provides essential monitoring capabilities that integrate seamlessly with other AWS services."

"The most valuable features of Amazon CloudWatch are metrics, dashboards, alarms, logs, events, logs insight, and application insights."

"The alarms are one thing I love about AWS CloudWatch. It has alerts that notify us when resource use is approaching the limit."

"We can set CPU thresholds using the solution."

"We can create events and alerts. We use the information to dive down into the infrastructure performance."

"The tool's UI is good. One can scroll through the logs very easily."

More Amazon CloudWatch pros

"We use the tool to track the dev and production environment."

"It is massively useful and great for testing. We can just go, find logs, and attach them easily. It has a very quick lookup. Whereas, before we would have to go, dig around, and find the server that the logs were connected to, then go to the server, download the log, and attach it. Now, we can just go straight to this solution, type in the log ID and server ID, and obtain the information that we want."

"The visualizations in Kibana are the most valuable feature. It's much more convenient to have a visualization of logs. We can see status really clearly and very fast, with just a couple of clicks."

"InsightOne is the main reason why we use LogMeIn. This is mostly because of log data that we are pushing tools and logs in general."

"We use the product for log collection and monitoring."

"The tool is simple to setup where it is just plug and play. The tool is reliable and we never had any performance issues."

"The other nice thing about Logz.io is their team. When it comes to onboarding, their support is incredibly proactive. They bring the brand experience from a customer services perspective because their team is always there to help you refine filters and tweak dashboards. That is really a useful thing to have. Their engagement is really supportive."

"The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable."

Cons

"Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features."

"There is some delay in logging that they need to improve on."

"The drill-down aspect on the dashboard of the solution needs improvement. We get a very good high-level overview, but when we drill down, it becomes a little less clear. We have given this feedback to AWS as well and hope they will improve this in the future."

"Amazon CloudWatch's pricing needs improvement."

"The integration with third-party tools must be made easier."

"Better reporting is always something needed. That could be an answer to just about anything. But you always want better reporting, better dashboards, things that are just more dynamic and more accessible."

"I would like to monitor inbound and outbound transfer. I would also like to control the traffic for load balancing."

"It's not an advanced way of monitoring."

More Amazon CloudWatch cons

"I would like granularity on alerting so we can get tentative alerts and major alerts, then break it down between the two."

"The product needs improvement from a filtering perspective."

"Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle."

"The solution needs to expand its access control and make it accessible through API."

"The solution needs to improve its data retention. It should be greater than seven days. The product needs to improve its documentation as well."

"When it comes to reducing our troubleshooting time, it depends. When there are no bugs in Logz.io, it reduces troubleshooting by 5 to 10 percent. When there are bugs, it increases our troubleshooting time by 200 percent or more."

"The price can be cheaper and they should have better monitoring."

"I would like them to improve how they manage releases. Some of our integrations integrate specifically with set versions. Logz.io occasionally releases an update that might break that integration. On one occasion, we found out a little bit too late, then we had to roll it back."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I consider it as a medium-priced solution."

"Amazon CloudWatch has very cheap pricing, and it hardly costs my company $25-$30 a month for fifty systems, so it's pretty affordable."

"The pricing can be considered reasonable, especially when already operating on a cloud platform."

"The solution is expensive."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"What's were using is the free service of Amazon CloudWatch, so they're not charging us. As for hidden fees, we're not aware of them because we're using what our clients provided us."

"We have monthly licensing costs. The licenses are probably in the vicinity of about $300 - $350/month."

"The price of Amazon CloudWatch is reasonable for detailed basic monitoring."

More Amazon CloudWatch pricing and cost advice

"At the time it was set up, we thought Logz.io was very reasonable for what we were getting in terms of how much time and hosting costs it was saving us, because you don't have to run the servers for it anymore."

"The product is a little expensive."

"You pay for what you need, and that is a good model. They are also quite happy to talk to you about your uses and your use case. They will even go as far as suggesting things that you don't need to do in order to save you money. At one point, I was quite surprised at how cheap it could be if we wanted it to be or how much they would help us manage our costs."

"The product's pricing is cheaper than other solutions."

"The tool is an open source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon CloudWatch?

The monitoring features are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?

In general, Amazon CloudWatch is cheaper compared to Dynatrace. However, there are potential costs to be mindful of, like running a log query that returns trillions of bytes of data.

What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?

CloudWatch itself is fine. That said, maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.

What do you like most about Logz.io?

The query mechanism for response codes and application health is valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Logz.io?

The product is a little expensive. We're pushing 17 TB. It costs us one and a half million dollars a year.

What needs improvement with Logz.io?

Capacity planning could be a little bit of a struggle. The product must add some AI capabilities to learn from previous behaviors. Instead of us setting thresholds, the tool should learn the thresh...

Grafana Loki vs Amazon CloudWatch

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 16% of the time

Dynatrace vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 8% of the time

New Relic vs Amazon CloudWatch

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon CloudWatch Competitors

Datadog vs Logz.io

Compared 30% of the time

Coralogix vs Logz.io

Compared 22% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Logz.io

Compared 12% of the time

Graylog vs Logz.io

Compared 10% of the time

Amazon OpenSearch Service vs Logz.io

Compared 10% of the time

More Logz.io Competitors

Product Reports

Download Amazon CloudWatch product report

Amazon CloudWatch

February 2025

Download Logz.io product report

February 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Logz

Overview

Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.

Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.

What are the most important features?

Seamless integration with AWS: Ensures smooth operation with AWS services.
Real-time data and alerts: Provides immediate insights and notifications.
Detailed metrics: Offers in-depth data on infrastructure and application performance.
Scalability: Supports growing needs with ease.
Ease of setup: Quick and straightforward installation.
Affordability: Cost-effective monitoring solution.
Alarms and dashboards: Customizable alerts and visual insights.
Automated responses: Facilitates automatic actions based on set criteria.
System and application health insights: Delivers comprehensive health reports.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Optimized cloud utilization: Ensures efficient use of resources.
Improved troubleshooting: Identifies and resolves issues quickly.
Enhanced service availability: Keeps services running smoothly.
Effective log analysis: Provides valuable insights from collected logs.
Performance profiling: Assesses and optimizes application performance.
Scalable monitoring: Adapts to growing business needs.

Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Logz.io is a leading cloud-native observability platform that enables engineers to use the best open source tools in the market without the complexity of operating, managing, and scaling them. Logz.io offers four products: Log Management built on ELK, Infrastructure Monitoring based on Prometheus, Distributed Tracing based on Jaeger, and an ELK-based Cloud SIEM. These are offered as fully managed, integrated cloud services designed to help engineers monitor, troubleshoot and secure their distributed cloud workloads more effectively. Engineering driven companies like Siemens, Unity and ZipRecruiter use Logz.io to simplify monitoring and security workflows, increasing developer productivity, reducing time to resolve issues, and increasing the performance and security of their mission-critical applications.

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus

Dish Network, The Economist, Forbes, Holler, Kenshoo, OneSpan, Siemens, Sisense, Unity, ZipRecruiter