Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Hyland OnBase comparison

Boomi and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Boomi is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.0, while Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Boomi holds a 0.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 5 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

537 Views
463 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 12 Hyland OnBase reviews

380 Views
252 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Boomi AtomSphere Flow are enterprise content management platforms with distinct features, deployment models, and user feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration capabilities and responsive customer service.

Features: Hyland OnBase is praised for its robust document management, workflow automation, and secure storage. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is noted for its strong integration capabilities, flexibility, and comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could improve its reporting features, scalability, and user interface. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users mention the need for enhanced documentation, better customization options, and improved user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase offers a straightforward deployment model but has mixed customer service feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is highlighted for its seamless deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase users feel the initial setup cost is justified by its return on investment. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users also see value in their investment despite higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

23rd

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets

From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.

Read full review

Phemy Lekalakala

Manager of Information Systems at University of the Witwatersrand

Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module

We use this solution for record management and digitization of records. We also use it for workflows and to build online forms The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"Its stability could be improved."

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The tool's price is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

24%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is considered a bit expensive yet not excessively so, particularly when compared to similar solutions like MuleSoft. I would rate the pricing at 6.5 to seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities. We are particularly interested in exploring AI features more thoroughly, focusing on next-generation enhancements like ChatGPT. Additionall...

See all answers

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

As we had an enterprise license, we were not limited in terms of user access. We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application. The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 22% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 18% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 17% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 14% of the time

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 13% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 19% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 13% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

February 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

February 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

OnBase

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

February 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.