Breezy HR vs UKG comparison

"A valuable feature is that it provides an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure recruitment process for different roles, and it also allows you to customize the recruitment process for different roles, which is very good."

"A valuable feature is that it provides an easy-to-use and easy-to-configure recruitment process for different roles. It also allows you to customize the recruitment process for different roles, which is very good."

"UTA assists our plants with keeping time and making sure our employees get paid timely and accurately."

"The implementing staff has been very friendly."

"Immediate data and reporting Reliable (based on parameters given)"

"It enables us to manage the system ourselves. We don't need an additional team to do a lot of maintenance and add the things that we want."

"We've definitely realized ROI on the module."

"It allows me to disseminate the information in the way I see fit."

"Customer service is good."

"Customer service is fabulous by some levels."

"Breezy HR could be improved with better integration. The only drawback I see is that it's a bit disconnected from other online tests or evaluations that we have to do, which means we may need to engage another tool. There is no easy or seamless way to integrate that information, so people have to go back and forth to fill in that information, and we find it a bit disjointed. Another improvement is in regards to resume filtering. For example, there is no internal solution for being able to score a resume for the relevant skill sets. If we get 100 resumes for a role, how do we stack-rank those files without having to manually read through each of the profiles? There are a few other tools that have embodied those advanced techniques which Breezy doesn't have."

"Breezy HR could be improved with better integration. The only drawback I see is that it's a bit disconnected from other online tests or evaluations that we have to do, which means we may need to engage another tool."

"I would love to see a Text Box added to the Status page."

"Inactivates DD when employees leave for a short period."

"Implementation in 2009-2010 was a bit bumpy due to changes with the UltiPro project team."

"When the translation is conducted by non-SME support, much is “lost in translation” and this can be very costly, because it is extremely time-consuming and often results in miscommunication."

"Customer Support model could use improvement."

"Technical support is 4/10."

"A chat feature for customer support would be great. Some questions are simple that we shouldn't have to create a case just to get an answer for (emails do not get answered for several days, if at all)."

"Reporting is always a hurdle for any user just because it is so extensive."

"The pricing depends on the number of licenses we buy."

"The platform is not affordable but also not the most expensive."

"UKG's pricing and licensing model involves ongoing expenses based on the number of employees paid. The initial implementation cost is low when UKG implements it directly. However, when partners handle the implementation, it becomes more expensive since partners don't receive the monthly recurring fees."

"If you're going for the full suite, it can be fairly pricey."

"While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing."

"I wasn't involved in the pricing part. I'm a user, and I believe it is based on the user count. One thing that is nice about Ultimate is that you can learn how to use the system without additional fees. The learning aspect is the life of a product, and the training was a huge reason why we went with Ultimate. We did have some integration costs. They were a part of the implementation because of the integrations to other systems that we included in our implementation."