Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Broadcom and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #34 with an average rating of 7.8, while OpenText is ranked #41 with an average rating of 7.8. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Read 161 Broadcom DX Application Performance Management reviews

1,639 Views
819 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 24 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,788 Views
889 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Broadcom DX Application Per...

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management are robust monitoring tools in the IT landscape. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management generally has the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

OpenText SiteScope offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, easy integration with other tools, and a user-friendly interface. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management provides advanced analytics, extensive metric collection, and proactive alerts. Broadcom DX APM's extensive analytics give it an advantage in feature offerings.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

OpenText SiteScope needs a more intuitive dashboard, better alerting mechanisms, and enhanced reporting capabilities. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management can improve in scalability, streamline its configuration options, and reduce resource consumption. OpenText SiteScope's dashboard and alerting system require significant improvements, while Broadcom DX APM needs to address scalability and configuration issues.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

OpenText SiteScope is known for quick deployment and responsive customer service. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management may require a longer setup time but offers excellent customer service. OpenText SiteScope scores higher on deployment speed, whereas both products are strong in customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

OpenText SiteScope's pricing is competitive, and users report good ROI. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is more expensive, but users believe its advanced features justify the cost. While OpenText SiteScope is cost-effective, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management offers value through its extensive feature set, leading to higher ROI expectations.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom DX Application Per...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

161

Ranking in other categories

Container Monitoring (8th)

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

41st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is 0.5%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

A tool helpful for dashboard creation and reporting

The area of improvement is related to the areas of application onboarding and instrumentation, where the product has certain shortcomings. Broadcom needs to work on application instrumentation and the onboarding-related part. With the tool, there is a very lengthy process to do the onboarding of an application. I don't know which version of the tool is currently running in the market. I use a very old version of the product, and I don't know what kind of features Broadcom has made available in the current release of the tool. If technical support related to the product is improved, considering what kind of product has been provided to users to ensure that the product is supported in an environment, then it would be great. Suppose there is a Java application in an environment, and it may be related to Java 5, Java 6, Java 7, or Java 8, and a user receives no technical specification related to what kind of version the application supports, including Java JDK 11 and Java JDK 17, it poses a challenge. The product does not provide details about which version of Java is supported, meaning such information related to the product is unavailable. The product's technical support is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required. The technical support of the product is an area with certain shortcomings, where improvements are required. The aforementioned scenario is not just related to Java but also to all the application languages. The tool is required to build correct documentation related to its product and versions, explaining what kind of version is supported related to their onboarded applications, and it is not just related to Java but also to Python, .NET, Python.js, and PHP.

Read full review

Christopher M Cook

Senior Service Analyst at Exelon

Doesn't require much custom coding and can run on different platforms, but the types of scripting files you can execute on it are limited

In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Crash analytics goes down to the level of code you need to check."

"Now, we know we have a problem, because there is a primary layer of alerting or metrics monitoring put in place, that is the good part."

"With the new feature CA Team Center is much easier to view the information of my user experience, with this unified vision, it was even practical for lay users to use the tool"

"We use it to create dashboards and executive view dashboards, so our higher up managers can take a look and see where our application status stands."

"Being able to pull in and merge the infrastructure and application data."

"Standard available reports provide us with an automatic insight into the top ten situations to watch. It would have been extremely difficult to program such a report ourselves, and to my knowledge no other competitor can match this functionality."

"We are using the on-premise and cloud versions of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management."

"I like that it gives you a wide range of data where you can see the application outage response from concurrent locations and the number of stalled jobs."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pros

"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."

"SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability."

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"The tool has capabilities other than managing web-based applications, like URL Monitor and EPI Script. It is also easy to use the tool."

"It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates."

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."

"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"With respect to SQL monitoring, it would be nice to have a little more information because it doesn't provide the full statement all of the time."

"Dashboards need to be improved in order to make them self-explanatory."

"They need to add support for new frameworks, or at least provide a broader guide/perspectives to add them to monitoring specific agents to retrieve metrics with thresholds as a reference to guide the customer as to where they must go to achieve this."

"We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure."

"The area of improvement is related to the areas of application onboarding and instrumentation, where the product has certain shortcomings."

"Technical support is slow to respond and also asks redundant questions."

"Broadcom DX Application Performance Management could improve its supportability to the current technologies and the end-to-end correlation feature should be done automatically without custom configurations. Additionally, there should not be any configuration changes to the client-side when deploying the solution."

"The product displays some graphics and sometimes we want to have some different metrics in the same graphic but it doesn't display in the same scale, so it's quite complicated to see the metrics. If the product would be able to manage a double scale, it would be perfect."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management cons

"You can use OpenText SiteScope for small or middle environments. But if you want to monitor a large environment, it is not scalable. If you can monitor a large environment with OpenText SiteScope, it can be a valuable product."

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"Sometimes in a huge environment, I think the documentation does not provide the required calculations so you can't know what the required set up should be. You need to test."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is definitely expensive for what we get, but there isn't an alternate option at the moment."

"Negotiate a lot, but do not forget to buy the product because it is worth it."

"The pricing structure should be based on memory or CPU usage rather than the number of agents, as it makes the solution more expensive for us."

"Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth it"

"The license for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is annual. The licensing model could improve because there is not any limit to deploying the agent, there should be some limits on it."

"Pricing and licensing are not issues."

"Depends on the size of the product you need."

"Dynatrace is the most expensive of these tools followed by AppDynamics which is "medium-expensive." CA APM is a bit lower in price than either Dynatrace or AppDynanics... In my opinion, if you can afford it, go for AppDynamics instead of CA APM."

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management pricing and cost advice

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

32%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...there is a very easy way to deal with it by adding more servers to the application.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

The pricing structure should be based on memory or CPU usage rather than the number of agents, as it makes the solution more expensive for us. The pricing structure is too high and becomes increasi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Broadcom DX Application Performance Management?

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

I would rate the pricing of SiteScope as a five out of ten in terms of costliness. It is not overly expensive, but there is room for improvement in terms of cost-effectiveness in some areas.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

In terms of improvement, OpenText SiteScop could become a better solution by adding more monitoring templates, like RedScope, to make it easier to track specific technologies. It should also improv...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 45% of the time

AppDynamics vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

New Relic vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus vs Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

Compared 8% of the time

More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 14% of the time

AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 14% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 10% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management

November 2024

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management report

Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

November 2024

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

DX APM, CA APM, CA NetQoS Performance Center, Wily Introscope, CA Wily APM, CA App Experience Analytics, CA AXA

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Learn More

Broadcom

OpenText

Overview

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is a cutting-edge next-generation APM that goes beyond the traditional aspects of what other APMs provide by offering fully integrated AIOPS (Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations) capabilities embedded in the solution. This enables Broadcom DX Application Performance Management better opportunities to detect anomalies faster, correctly anticipate behavior, and perform intuitive automatic corrective processes. The solution is able to provide comprehensive full stack end-to-end monitoring and deliver complete visibility and a nearly flawless user experience.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Benefits

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has many valuable key features. Some of its most useful features include:

Improves visibility: Users gain complete 360-degree visibility with all applications, infrastructure, and end users in modern, traditional, and all cloud-based environments.
Continuous improvement: Intuitive automated feedback is provided throughout the entire software development lifecycle.
Scalability: The solution is easily scalable to the enterprise level with very easy to use administration.
Improved user experience: The solution provides intuitive dynamic insights concerning overall application performance and across the complete user journey.

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Features

There are many benefits to implementing Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Custom personalized dashboards: Users are able to create their own specific views based on unique task-driven individualized requirements. This allows for comprehensive intuitive cross-domain analysis of the entire ecosystem and application usage from both synthetic and real user perspectives.
Fast, straightforward deployment: The solution offers an automated, zero-touch deployment process that better facilitates the monitoring and discovery of cloud-based and container applications.
Improved administration processes: Agent administration and overall lifecycle processes are simplified, making configurations, deployments, and upgrades very simple.
Intuitive analysis: The solutions AIOPS processes provide for inherent root-cause detection and anomaly discovery to diagnose potential issues or problems immediately.
Improved visibility: Presented views are task-relevant to facilitate improved group topologies, and time-based to display the impact of performance anomalies.
Improved mapping: Relationship mapping enables users to visualize all aspects of the environment with options to deep dive across entire applications, network layers, and infrastructure.
Application support: The solution has functionality with Java, .Net, PHP, Node.js, Docker, Kubernetes, AWS, Google Cloud, and more.
Flexibility: The solution is available both on premises and as a SaaS.

Reviews from Real Users

“The most valuable feature of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management for me is transaction monitoring. “ A Peerspot user who is an Applications Engineer at a financial services firm.

“The most valuable features are the low overhead, the ability to monitor production on 24/7 principle, the ability to decrease time to discover the point of failure in the IT infrastructure or the application environment in a short period of time, reporting for analyzing the performance of the application for improving the code optimizing process.” A.Jurisic, CEO at Pio Pet d.o.o.

“What is most valuable about this solution is that it completely monitors code-level visibility. We benefit from this as we're able to capture any performance issues from an application, then raise and forward those issues to the applicable team more quickly.” S. Doddi, APM consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

Sample Customers

Lexmark, Intermountain Healthcare, National Australia Bank, BBVA Compass Bank, Innovapost, Dansk Supermarked Group, U.S. Cellular, Orange, Cetip

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope

October 2024

Free Report: Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.