Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cegid vs Oracle HCM Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Cegid
Ranking in Talent Management
22nd
Ranking in Cloud HCM
18th
Average Rating
7.2
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle HCM Cloud
Ranking in Talent Management
3rd
Ranking in Cloud HCM
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Benefits Administration (2nd), HR Analytics Software (2nd), Talent Acquisition (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Cloud HCM category, the mindshare of Cegid is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle HCM Cloud is 9.5%, down from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud HCM
 

Featured Reviews

Valda Coelho - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 23, 2024
Enhancing HR engagement with effective development but could benefit from AI-driven improvements
The primary feature I appreciate about the solution is the information connection, allowing us to have a full employee life cycle visibility over the platforms. It also enables the creation of interactions between employees, launching communication campaigns that raise engagement. From the HR side, the most valuable features are the Learning Management Systems (LMS) that allow providing a personalized service in terms of development, where each employee can choose and architect their development plans. The second valuable feature is the autonomy each employee has to update their personal data. In terms of talent management, it helps design development processes, backups, and clearly view the criteria for those backups being achieved.
OswinSteve - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 2, 2024
Capable of consolidating data from all countries and providing access to any employee information across locations but poor user experience
Oracle HCM Cloud definitely has a lot to improve from a user experience perspective. The platform is huge and feature-rich, but is it truly appealing to an end user? Is it a two-click solution? Does it match current market trends in user experience? No, it has a lot of catching up to do. For example, is the screen catchy for an employee to see their details or access essential information? No. The user experience is zero. An employee needs training to apply for leave, something as simple as that. They shouldn't need training materials or user guides to navigate the system. We're moving towards empowering users, especially with end-user-facing systems. People should be self-reliant and not need to rely on manuals. Oracle HCM Cloud is very old-school in this regard. It's still stuck in the "PeopleSoft" mentality instead of focusing on a user-friendly experience for employees and managers. So, the user experience needs a major overhaul. So, to summarize, it needs to be more user-friendly and present key information on the login screen. In future releases, I would like to see employee dashboards. Oracle HCM should come up with ready-made employee dashboards, like very simple ones. Right now, an employee dashboard or a manager dashboard, but these should be readily available. You shouldn't expect a customer to go and design something they need. There are a few basic things any employee or manager in any company would want to see. One of the best things would be a very simple org chart. Now, the org chart is quite poor on Oracle. There are applications that focus only on org charts and look really good, giving a lot of details about a team and its employees. But Oracle's org chart is bad, so to be specific, they should improve it a lot.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"It is a configurable, scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle HCM Cloud is the dashboards, customization, and configuration."
"The newer Redwood team is more client-focused and this is very valuable."
"Since it is an integrated solution, it brings speed and efficiency to the business process."
"The solution has new features like AI-embedded solutions that are very useful for helping customers gain a lot of new insights."
"This solution is user friendly and can be used on a mobile phone without a computer."
"In general, functionality is fine."
"Oracle HCM Cloud is easier to use than Oracle ETS. Everything is included on one page, and we no longer need to do workarounds. For example, creating elements, eligibility profiles, and formulas is much easier."
 

Cons

"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"There is room for improvements, such as including AI solutions for people management to improve job descriptions, recruitment reels, skills mapping, etc."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"training and performance could be improved."
"It would be very nice if we were able to roll back transactions from data that was loaded with the data loader."
"It's not so easy to customize as it's cloud-based."
"The solution has much room for improvement in all the modules."
"The tool's configurable side allows you to have more flexibility, but at the same time, it creates a lot of confusion that still has to do over so much of the configuration, which are areas that are conflicting in nature."
"The tool should allow more customization for specific requirements. Some processes could be streamlined, and certain features in specific modules must be added."
"HCM's analytics features could be improved."
"The support from Oracle HCM Cloud is great, they are responsive and helpful. However, they still could improve."
"Product integration, particularly with collaboration tools, is lacking in this solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Meta4 requires annual maintenance that needs to be paid for."
"From a cost perspective, I think this is a well-balanced option."
"Oracle HCM Cloud is pricey, but price-wise, it's now more competitive than in the past year. Here in Central Europe, people also look at the pricing, but Central Europe falls under the UAE and Abu Dhabi in terms of headquarters, management, and strategy, but those states don't care too much about the pricing. Pricing is a significant factor in choosing a solution. In the past, Oracle HCM Cloud was compared to the SAP solution, the largest competitor and up to thirty percent higher in price. Now, Oracle HCM Cloud has a price increase of five to ten percent, which could be pricier than SAP now, but it's a more competitive product nowadays and comparable to SAP."
"I rate the product's pricing a seven out of ten."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"It has a licensing cost. It has a cloud-based subscription, which is quite cheap."
"Pricing is largely determined by what is agreed upon."
"The price for Oracle HCM Cloud is expensive in Iran, but in other countries, such as Turkey, it can be reasonably priced."
"I cannot comment on the cost, as this is handled by a different team."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Retailer
14%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Educational Organization
52%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cegid?
The tool provides a lot of options.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cegid?
From a cost perspective, I think this is a well-balanced option.
What are the differences between Oracle HCM Cloud and PeopleSoft?
Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your organ...
What do you like most about Oracle HCM Cloud?
The most valuable features of the solution are the core HR, absence, payroll, and recruitment modules.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle HCM Cloud?
Compared to other products, Oracle HCM Cloud offers better pricing. It is low-cost and provides a good return on investment.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

TalentSoft, Meta4
Oracle Human Capital Management Cloud
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aeroports de Paris, Arkadin, Ingenico Payment Services, Bollor_ Group, Bull, FDJ, Limagrain
Kovaion Consulting India Pvt. Ltd., eVerge Group, Kalpataru, Logicalis Inc., Macmillan Science and Education, Drivestream Inc., Kamal Osman Jamjoom Group LLC, WAXIE Sanitary Supply
Find out what your peers are saying about Cegid vs. Oracle HCM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.