Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs Fidelis Elevate comparison

Cybereason and Fidelis Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.2, while Fidelis Security is ranked #38 with an average rating of 9.0. Cybereason holds a 1.1% mindshare in EDR, compared to Fidelis Security’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fidelis Security users who would recommend it.

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Read 21 Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response reviews

3,210 Views
1,790 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Fidelis Elevate

Read 7 Fidelis Elevate reviews

866 Views
538 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Fidelis Elevate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Fidelis Elevate and Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response are two leading cybersecurity solutions. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response seems superior due to its advanced features and perceived value.

Features:Users value Fidelis Elevate for its comprehensive threat detection, automated response capabilities, and good ROI. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is praised for its intuitive integration, real-time analytics, and advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement:Fidelis Elevate users have noted the need for a more user-friendly interface, better integration with third-party tools, and usability enhancements. Cybereason users suggest improvements in reporting features, enhanced memory usage, and a more refined interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Fidelis Elevate is generally easier to deploy with strong customer support. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response receives mixed reviews about deployment complexity but has commendable customer service.

Pricing and ROI:Fidelis Elevate is seen as cost-effective with good ROI, highlighting its cost-benefit balance. Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, although more expensive, justifies its cost by its advanced feature set and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason Endpoint Detecti...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (32nd)

Fidelis Elevate

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

38th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Threat Deception Platforms (6th), SSL/TLS Decryption (2nd), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (13th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (24th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fidelis Elevate is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Chad Kliewer

Information Security Officer at PTCI

We can make more informed decisions on whether an action is malicious

The ease of use and dashboards are improving. We came in at a time when they were developing a new dashboard screen. Therefore, we have had some confusing times between the old and new dashboards. Knowing how the new one works, I have seen vast improvements with it. While the product is very good, there are still some areas for improvement. The initial triage area could be a bit simpler. They get into the weeds real fast; it gets very detailed very fast. I am still looking for an easier triage layer on top with the ability to dig deeper. They are improving on this because I have seen some improvements in the user interface that helps with this. Part of it was moving two different screens into one, merging the two together. It is very good, but it is very technically detailed and would be harder for an entry-level person to decipher. However, improvements are being made. It leverages indicators of behavior to help us remediate faster against attacks. Sometimes, I wish there was more detail on why they consider it malicious.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was easy and straightforward."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform. It is very straightforward."

"The solution is efficient."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"They do a very good job of providing multi-stage visualizations of malicious operations that immediately show all attack details across all devices and users. Since it is MalOp-centric model, you can see if there has been a similar operation across multiple machines. If it is the same thing appearing on multiple machines, you see all the machines and users affected in one screen."

"What I find most valuable is the clarity of the platform."

"What I like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is the support because the support is good. The solution is also easy to use, and it has a dashboard. Everything is good, and there's no problem with it."

"The interface is user-friendly."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pros

"Compared to similar solutions, it's quite scalable. You just need to add more storage to scale-up."

"It ensures the stability of network behavior across various aspects of our network and offers responsive capabilities to address incidents promptly"

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"The solution's technical support is perfect, so I rate the technical support a ten out of ten"

"It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies."

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"There are many valuable features. The NDR gives very good network visibility, and the endpoint module has a great feature called "Live Connect" for remote connections. They also have "Tasks" that can be run on endpoints to gather specific information or retrieve logs."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

Cons

"It initially took some time to deploy."

"Compared to our previous endpoint, we have a lot more false positives and a lot more duplication of alerts. So we're chasing more alerts."

"The deployment on individual endpoints is more geared toward larger organizations. It might prove to be a bit too complicated for a smaller organization. You need to know what you're doing when you're deploying the sensor."

"It should be more stable, and the sensor needs improvement in terms of connectivity."

"Its Microsoft PowerShell protections still need some compatibility improvements. We have run across just a few. It is compatible with 90% of what we have in our network, but there is that 10% that we are still struggling with as far as compatibility with the type of PowerShell scripts needed to run our day-to-day business."

"Reporting could be a bit more granular so that we had the ability to check regions and countries. I just noticed that, for instance, if I look at our servers, it's either "contained" or it's "not contained". I don't have the option, for instance, to look at countries. It only allows me to look at users as one big group."

"The network coverage becomes an issue most of the time."

"There can be problems with the EDI."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response cons

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We considered a few other solutions. Some were ridiculously overpriced, while others didn't have solutions for Mac endpoints. That was a deal-breaker because most of our organization is on Mac. It came down to two vendors: Cybereason and another. They had similar pitches and almost identical approaches, but in the end, Cybereason gave us the best value for our money."

"In terms of cost, this is a good choice for our needs."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing an eight."

"This product is somewhat expensive and should be cheaper."

"The pricing is manageable."

"Though it is not the cheapest solution but it fits our budget. We pay an annual licensing fee."

"In terms of pricing, it's a good solution."

"I had to go through a third-party to purchase it, which I wasn't really pleased about."

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response pricing and cost advice

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

Comparison with other products showed it be cheaper than some larger competitors. Set up cost for us were cheaper as we already had users experienced with the product in other business units. Initi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

We use it to improve detection in the whole industrial sector. We are a big energy company. Across multiple endpoints, we deploy the EDR to secure all, improve detection, and also attempt to automa...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response?

The interface is user-friendly.

See all answers

What do you like most about Fidelis Elevate?

It ensures the stability of network behavior across various aspects of our network and offers responsive capabilities to address incidents promptly

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fidelis Elevate?

It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high. We lose customers for price. It's not always worth it for them. Even for enterprise...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fidelis Elevate?

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 26% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

Compared 5% of the time

More Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Competitors

NetWitness NDR vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 13% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 9% of the time

Cynet vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response

February 2025

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response report

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

January 2025

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Also Known As

Cybereason EDR, Cybereason Deep Detect & Respond

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Overview

Cybereason's Endpoint Detection and Response platform detects in real-time both signature and non-signature-based attacks and accelerates incident investigation and response. Cybereason connects together individual pieces of evidence to form a complete picture of a malicious operation.

Cybereason

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Security

Sample Customers

Lockheed Martin, Spark Capital, DocuSign, Softbank Capital

First Midwest Bank

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate

January 2025

Free Report: Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. Fidelis Elevate report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.