Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer Remote Management comparison

"Even when the connection to the server is lost, the monitoring continues without interruption."

"Automation, in terms of the standard patches and standard updates, and remote support are valuable. When it does the standard Windows and patches, it works really well. This is something they focus on. Remote support is also something they focus on quite a bit, and it works really well. Being able to get to an agent or a client computer right away is very helpful."

"The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard."

"It has a single pane of glass, and it integrates well with other software."

"The remote tool is nice. If a user needs assistance, I don't have to tell the user to do anything. I just ask the user if I can remote in, and 30 seconds later, I have remoted in. It has been really handy."

"AEM support is great for Macs."

"I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system."

"The tool's main valuable features are its ease of use and intuitive console. It's very easy to implement and create policies. I don't need highly technical staff to manage the tool, which is a big advantage."

"The product is very stable."

"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."

"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."

"TeamViewer Remote Management is very easy and very good for remote work."

"The most valuable feature is the ease of use. Using this solution enables us to get support easily."

"It's stable and reliable."

"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."

"The product is secure."

"The only area where I see room for improvement is the ability to delay the application of patches for a set number of days."

"The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example."

"The main challenge was implementing patch management for software that was not in the tool's standard library or catalog."

"The actual setup and the automation of their product are horrific. When you buy it, there is nothing out of the box. You have to custom design it for everything you want it to do. You pay for implementation, but they don't really do a whole lot to help you get it going. I know it does a lot more than what ours is set up to do, which is frustrating. When I've demoed other systems, their setup is so much better. When you pay for their setup, there is so much more, whereas I just feel like we didn't get a very good setup."

"We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers."

"They have a tab to provide information about the type of hardware the computers have. One thing they don't specify is what model of hard drive the computers have. Identification of storage models would be nice."

"Be prepared to spend a lot of time on conversions if you have a lot of clients."

"I would like the ability to remotely manage configuration and settings on individual units. Some organizations have a certain device configuration that needs to be consistent across all computers. For example, if we have computers that cannot go to sleep or hibernate because they're being accessed remotely, we need to be able to quickly configure those computers to not hibernate. With Datto, there is no easy and/or direct way to accomplish this. I can't create a group called No Hibernate and drag all those computers to that group so that they do not go into hibernation. There is no easy way to put in a policy or a procedure like that. It's still back to going to each computer and doing it by hand, which is what I'm trying to get away from. I want to automate and simplify as much as possible. I write code and scripts to do most of my work anyways. The intention is to get away from me having to be so hands-on."

"One feature to add would be a mobile remote feature."

"The main issue with the solution is the stability problem arising from network issues."

"I want TeamViewer Remote Management to incorporate more integrations."

"It could be more secure."

"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."

"I don't like having so many updates."

"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."

"The price point would probably be an area of improvement with the number of competitors out there offering similar features. TeamViewer usually comes in a little high as compared to other solutions."

"It fluctuates on the number of computers you have. Depending on the number of computers you have, it can fluctuate anywhere between $5 to $10 per computer per month, which is not too bad. I am not aware of any additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee. It was one flat rate per device."

"It goes by how many endpoints you have. It is about $3,000 a month for us. If we can't figure it out ourselves and need additional help to set it up, we would have to pay for that."

"Regarding pricing, Kaseya sells it as part of a bundle called Kaseya 360. This package includes several tools, such as EDR, ransomware protection, and more. Considering the bundle, the price is reasonable. However, where I am in Brazil, the high dollar rate and taxes make it not cheap for mid-sized companies. Still, it's competitively priced compared to similar tools."

"The license typically depends on the number of endpoints. On the RMM side, I think we're paying around $2,250 per endpoint. Then there is also a license per user and tech, so that comes out to about a hundred bucks per tech, give or take."

"AEM is a lot more scalable as you just pay per agent instead of having to purchase expensive licenses."

"We had to pay out some overtime for a few problematic sites. Sites on domain networks are incredibly easy to install. We learned a few tricks that streamlined the process, but in the beginning, it was a bit tedious."

"Addition services could be lower priced."

"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."

"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."

"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."

"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."

"It is a licensed product."