Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ivanti Avalanche vs Ivanti Neurons for MDM comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.0
IBM MaaS360's customer service is praised, but technical support reviews are mixed, citing response time and solution adequacy issues.
No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM has mixed customer support reviews; some find it excellent, others face challenges and delays.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
3.9
IBM MaaS360 requires enhancements in UI, reporting, support, device management, security, and feature integration to match competitors.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Avalanche needs improved pricing, Android management, stability, kiosk mode, flexible subscriptions, and more automation and AI.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM faces challenges with user interface complexity, integration, multilingual support, and requires improved customer support.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 is praised for its scalability, effectively supporting both small and large organizations, despite some cost concerns for smaller businesses.
Sentiment score
9.0
Ivanti Avalanche is highly scalable, resource-efficient, and allows effective policy implementation with strong user ratings for scalability.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM efficiently scales to support growing businesses with flexible deployment and resource adjustment options.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
IBM MaaS360 is cost-effective for some users, yet pricing pressure and mixed reviews highlight concerns over affordability and value.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Avalanche licenses are paid yearly per device, considered somewhat expensive but justified, rated six to seven out of ten.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM's pricing receives mixed feedback regarding cost, varying by user engagement and organization sensitivity.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 is praised for stability and performance, though a few users experience minor issues like passcode delays and battery drain.
Sentiment score
10.0
Users highly rate Ivanti Avalanche, emphasizing its stability and reliability, often giving it nine or ten out of ten.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM is stable with minor internet-related issues, paralleled by MobileIron UEM's similar WiFi challenges.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.5
IBM MaaS360 offers efficient, secure device management with comprehensive tracking, BYOD support, user-friendly interface, scalability, and cost-effectiveness.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Avalanche is valued for remote control, package installation, file transfer, user-based policies, stability, ease of use, and support.
No sentiment score available
Ivanti Neurons for MDM offers centralized device management with ease of use, stability, scalability, and strong enterprise integration features.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MaaS360
Sponsored
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (10th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (7th)
Ivanti Avalanche
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (16th)
Ivanti Neurons for MDM
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)
Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Bijay Kumar Swain - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to segregate data, well-suited for medium enterprises and installation is quick
We have some challenges. If we look at the challenges we face in the market, there are a few products like Sophos, where there are features of MaaS360, and the IBM EDR product, ReaQta. So, there are features from both ReaQta and MaaS360 available in Sophos, as well as a few other products, which we have challenges in replacing. MaaS360 definitely caters to a few of the requirements, but when someone is going for a solution, all the features are not available in MaaS360. It is like a combo, MaaS360, and IBM ReaQta, that is, EDR, ReaQta. Both of them, together as a combo plan, actually offer a very good proposition in terms of market competitors. There are a few products like Sophos and another product which have features from both endpoint detection and response and mobile device management. Because we have two different products with those features, we face challenges in proposing a particular product for the client. It is like a marketing challenge. The way other competitor products are available in the market. So it is better to have a different positive team, but, again, to remain in competition and have better scalability. So, IBM needs to integrate a few features that the competitors have in their products. No doubt, this is a different product, MaaS360. We call it MDM. We call it endpoint mobile device management. Then we call it different names that MaaS360 falls into. But when we are talking about competitor products, to remain in the competition, you need to have features that others provide. IBM surely has those features in other products, but not in MaaS360. The only challenge was replacing already existing competitor products with MaaS360. So, that’s the only area where we struggle because they always come with those requirements that they are already getting in the competitor’s product, which is not available in IBM’s MaaS360. So this product lacks some features, like Unified Endpoint Management.
Marc Barnes - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution with a valuable terminal remediation feature and straightforward deployment
The terminal remediation feature is valuable There is a lack of flexibility. If we want to switch it on and off after three months, you can't. So there seems to be a lack of flexibility on the sales side. We have been using this solution for about eight years. It is a stable solution. It is…
Lorenzo Arcinue - PeerSpot reviewer
Feature-rich, easy to use, and has responsive technical support
We are working on the proof of concept for both MobileIron and Workspace ONE. We are only testing MobileIron and Workspace ONE. After that, we will decide which device to use. Workspace ONE by VMware Similarly, we will use MobileIron as a mobile device management tool, allowing us to manage our endpoints remotely. So far, we have not had any issues with VMware, and we have resolved some, if not all, of the issues. I have been testing with VMware Workspace ONE for the same amount of time as MobileIron UEM, three weeks. We are using the latest version, and it is deployed on a public cloud. The cloud provider is VMware. I have also been working with Google Chrome. Google Workspace is an email production tool provided by Google. We don't have a firewall because we're in the cloud right now. We have no on-premises network and all of our systems are hosted in the cloud.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
30%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Microsoft Intune vs IBM MaaS360 - which to choose?
Our organization researched both Microsoft Intune and IBM MaaS360 when considering the type of endpoint security tool...
What do you like most about IBM MaaS360?
We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the ope...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM MaaS360?
IBM products are a little pricey, so it’s expensive. I would rate the pricing and licensing model a seven out of ten,...
What do you like most about Ivanti Avalanche?
It is a very easy-to-manage and granular policy-based solution. Policies that you can create per device per user be...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Avalanche?
The license is based on assets. I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. ...
What needs improvement with Ivanti Avalanche?
In future releases, I would like to see more automation or bringing in AI into to understand device behavior.
What are the differences between MobileIron UEM and Microsoft Intune?
MobileIron UEM and Microsoft Intune are both Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions, but they have differences: ...
Which solution do you prefer: Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management or Ivanti Neurons for MDM?
Both Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) and Ivanti Neurons for MDM are enterprise mobility management (EMM...
 

Also Known As

Fiberlink MaaS360, MaaS360
No data available
MobileIron UEM, MobileIron Unified Endpoint Management, MobileIron EMM, MobileIron Enterprise Mobility Management
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bancroft, Garuda Indonesia
Goya, Gist, TaylorMade
Frontier Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Ivanti Avalanche vs. Ivanti Neurons for MDM and other solutions. Updated: November 2022.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.