Oracle Access Manager vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Oracle and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.3, while Ping Identity is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Ping Identity’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,227 Views
1,141 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

6,089 Views
2,557 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,961 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.0%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 6.3%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Ping Identity Platform	6.3%
Oracle Access Manager	2.0%
Other	91.7%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would tell others that this solution is reliable. If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"I rate Oracle Access Manager a nine out of ten."

"In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

"I find the authentication module, authentication scheme, and security policy most useful in Oracle Access Manager."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and is a very robust platform. It can take a high number of authentication, and authorization requests. It's very flexible."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"Ping Identity Platform can provide a solution for both workforce identity and access management and also for consumer identity and access management, which is CIAM."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"It offers robust features and customization options that justify the cost."

"PingFederate gives you granular control over the settings. There are many options for fine-tuning policies."

"PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tools like ForgeRock and Okta, but I find PingFederate to be the most customizable."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"The technical support is not very good at all."

"May not integrate easily with non-Oracle products."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the interface."

"There are problems with stability."

"The user interface is a bit complicated and could be made more lightweight. Simplifying the installation process, perhaps through a VDAR-based installation, would also be beneficial."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

"To improve Oracle Access Manager, they should consider integrating more policies and enhancing automation, especially in managing server load and cache cleanup."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

"The product's community has certain shortcomings that require improvement."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"PingFederate's UI could be streamlined. They have recently made several improvements, but it's still too complex. It's a common complaint. The configuration should be simplified because the learning curve is too steep."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is a little expensive."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"The tool is affordable."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingID?

The mobile biometric authentication option improved user experience. It's always about security because, with two-factor authentication, it's always a separate device verifying the actual user logg...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingID?

The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingID?

The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 13% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

February 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

February 2026

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,961 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.