Oracle Access Manager vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Oracle and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.3, while Ping Identity is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Ping Identity’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,300 Views
1,209 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

6,348 Views
2,603 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Access Management

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (4th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.0%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 6.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	6.3%
Oracle Access Manager	2.0%
Other	91.7%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"If they are looking for a solution that is reliable and that is scalable, then this is a good one."

"Before using OAM we authenticated via RSA Web Services, Web Services are quick but OAM lets us be scalable and provides a performance improvement."

"I think that this product was really designed with scalability in mind, and we currently have about 1.6 million users and I am not aware of a limitation."

"In general, the customization that is offered is very good. The company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

"The product supports customization."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"The solution has a smooth and configurable user interface for single sign-on capabilities."

"From a security perspective, I highly value the product's biometric authentication methods such as FIDO, FaceID, YubiKey, and the mobile app."

"I like the self-service feature. The 502 and UBP systems are also excellent. PingID's ability to authenticate with SSH, RDP, and Windows login is pretty handy. It covers the entire spectrum of use."

"I like PingFederate."

"The soundness of the solution is its most valuable feature. For example, if you are in our corporate network, you can log on without any traffic interfering."

"PingFederate is a good product but there are limitations."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"There are problems with stability."

"The performance of Oracle Access Manager could be improved. It should be quick to install, but it wasn't, so this is another area for improvement. The Oracle Access Manager console also has room for improvement because it's slow."

"There could be some improvements in the documentation and overall knowledge base of the solution."

"Sometimes if a session takes too long, you have to log in again."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

"Customer Service: Poor. The EBS Access Gate support was delivered as a patch and support was not able to solve various problems, which I believe to be attributes to more current versions of OAM and WebLogic not being backwards compatible with the documented solution."

"Multi-factor authentication requires a lot of processes and technicalities."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

"PingID should put a little more effort into making a pretty self-explanatory deck about their tech features and the services they offer."

"Many times when we are authenticating, we'd like the freedom to set the time; maybe it needs to be slightly longer, and before we can authenticate it, it ends up in an error and then we have to create everything all over again in terms of launching the application."

"PingID would benefit from a better user interface for integration."

"They should promote more buyer's authentification, like a fingerprint or face recognition, something that's more convenient."

"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."

"We had issues with the stability."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is affordable."

"The product is a little expensive."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Compared to some SaaS-based solutions, the platform is relatively cost-effective."

"The product is costly."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

21%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 6% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.