Oracle Access Manager vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

Oracle and Ping Identity are both solutions in the Access Management category. Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.3, while Ping Identity is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 2.1% mindshare in AM, compared to Ping Identity’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Ping Identity users who would recommend it.

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,524 Views
1,387 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Ping Identity Platform

Read 30 Ping Identity Platform reviews

7,264 Views
2,833 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Ping Identity Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Access Manager and Ping Identity Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Access Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 886,576 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Access Manager

Ranking in Access Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ping Identity Platform

Ranking in Access Management

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (5th), Authentication Systems (7th), Data Governance (10th), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd), Directory Servers (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Access Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Access Manager is 2.1%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ping Identity Platform is 6.1%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Access Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Ping Identity Platform	6.1%
Oracle Access Manager	2.1%
Other	91.8%

Access Management

Featured Reviews

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

Shruthi R Varikoti

Senior ServiceNow Developer at Wells Fargo

Generative AI automates access reviews and provides workflow efficiencies

I work with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), IT Service Management (ITSM), and Customer Service Management (CSM) modules of ServiceNow. My project is related to cybersecurity. I have touched on generative AI and integrations like SOAP APIs. I have used the Ping Identity Platform for seamless…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In general, the customization that is offered is very good, and the company that I am working with currently is using this feature quite extensively."

"The most valuable features of Oracle Access Manager are the single sign-on capability and a very robust platform that can take a high number of authentication and authorization requests, and it is very flexible."

"The stability of the solution is good, we have never had any issues and neither have any of our clients."

"My company has used most features of Oracle Access Manager for various implementations, but the most helpful feature of the solution for the business and customers is single sign-on."

"I think that this product was really designed with scalability in mind, and we currently have about 1.6 million users and I am not aware of a limitation."

"From a technical perspective, the solution is very good we can operate and control the user by ourselves."

"Excellent SSO solution for Oracle products."

"The MFA is the most valuable aspect."

More Oracle Access Manager pros

"This is a user-friendly solution."

"I find the auto-discovery feature the most valuable. It helps us automate a lot of things using a single password across applications."

"This is a user-friendly solution."

"Setting up the infrastructure with Ping Identity Platform is very easy compared to other IAM products."

"What I like best about PingID is that it's very user-friendly. PingID is well-built as a developer tool and regularly upgrades and updates via patches. I also like that PingID has clear documents that will help you integrate it with other solutions."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

More Ping Identity Platform pros

Cons

"Although Oracle Access Manager is generally stable, we experienced issues with multi-domain configurations and web agent settings."

"The mobile access to the solution isn't ideal. They should work to improve its functionality."

"There are problems with stability."

"The pricing of the solution is in need of improvement. Oracle products are very expensive."

"Technical Support: Bad, when we have problems Oracle Support doesn't fix it."

"The solution's lifecycle management is troublesome. Also, another area of issue in the solution is the part involving documentation of certain features."

"Customer Service: Poor. The EBS Access Gate support was delivered as a patch and support was not able to solve various problems, which I believe to be attributes to more current versions of OAM and WebLogic not being backwards compatible with the documented solution."

"The initial implementation can definitely be improved because you have to work on several components to configure it correctly."

More Oracle Access Manager cons

"We can choose a drop-down to search for which certificate we have to create, which is difficult."

"For external customers, they do have challenges, although there are solutions for that available, as well."

"In the beginning, the initial setup was very complex."

"Currently, the main integration is SAML-based, but other integration methodologies need to be supported."

"Some colleagues have mentioned API connectivity, data security, and privacy issues."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"The management console needs to be improved. PingID should revise it."

"It requires some expertise to set up and manage."

More Ping Identity Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is really good and it is flexible because they have CPU licenses. The license is a one-time-only purchase."

"The product is a little expensive."

"The tool is affordable."

"I cannot comment on the exact pricing because Oracle has different licensing models for other clients, making it flexible."

"On a scale where one is a high price, and ten is a low price, I rate the solution a one. Purchasing a license for the solution is very expensive now."

"Can be expensive as a solution."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"PingID pricing is a ten out of ten because it's a little bit cheaper than other tools, such as Okta and ForgeRock, and supports multiple tools."

"The product is costly."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

More Ping Identity Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other products. I have not dealt with the setup cost concern as we have a team responsible ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redundant nodes to load balance across multiple nodes for Oracle Access Manager and Or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Internet Directory as LDAP, which contains the user store for authentication. We have...

See all answers

What do you like most about PingFederate?

PingFederate is very flexible. We can do many customizations, and it also provides an SDK to tailor it to our specific requirements. There are also numerous plugins available. I've worked with tool...

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingFederate?

It requires some expertise to set up and manage. Also, having dedicated support is helpful. It's not something anyone can just set up and run without assistance – ideally, a team using PingFederate...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PingFederate?

We use PingFederate to provide SSO (Single Sign-On) solutions to enterprise applications. We support protocols like SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language), OAuth, and OpenID Connect. For example...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 16% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 11% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 9% of the time

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Okta Platform vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 5% of the time

ForgeRock vs Ping Identity Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Ping Identity Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

March 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Download Ping Identity Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Ping Identity (ID), PingFederate, PingAccess, PingOne, PingDataGovernance, PingDirectory, OpenDJ

Overview

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

IDENTITY DEFINED SECURITY PLATFORM delivers a unified, standards-based platform that can be deployed as SaaS, software or both and can scale to handle millions of identities. From multi-factor authentication and single sign-on to access security, directory and data governance, our capabilities work together to give employees, partners and customers secure access to cloud, mobile and enterprise applications, securing and streamlined everything from sign-on to sign-off and everywhere in between.

Ping Identity

Sample Customers

SekerBank, University of Melbourne

Equinix, Land O'Lakes, CDPHP, Box, International SOS, Opower, VSP, Chevron, Truist, Academy of Art University, Northern Air Cargo, Repsol

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

March 2026

Free Report: Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

886,576 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Access Manager vs. Ping Identity Platform report.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.