We compared Zoho CRM and Pipedrive across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Zoho CRM receives acclaim for its intuitive interface, customizable choices, cost-effectiveness, and extensive features. Pipedrive is notable for its visually appealing interface, customizability, and insightful reporting. Customers also praised its versatile automation capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Zoho CRM users said the mobile app could be simpler and that Zoho could improve its data organization and automation. Pipedrive should focus on improving ERP integration, documentation, and artificial intelligence.
Service and Support: Zoho CRM generally offers good customer service, with responsive support during regular business hours. However, some users had mixed experiences with knowledge and availability. Pipedrive's customer service has received mostly positive feedback. Users valued the vendor’s prompt responses and helpful assistance.
Ease of Deployment: Zoho CRM's setup process differs in terms of complexity and time required. While some users found it straightforward, others mentioned that it took a significant amount of time, ranging from weeks to months. Pipedrive's setup is described as simple, straightforward, and user-friendly.
Pricing: Zoho CRM is praised for its affordable pricing, being seen as competitive and reasonable. Customers appreciate the cost-effectiveness of using Zoho CRM in the cloud, which eliminates the need for hardware investment. Pipedrive offers a reasonable and cost-effective pricing structure, making it a suitable choice for moderately sized companies.
ROI: Zoho CRM enhances productivity and effectiveness, minimizing the requirement for extra personnel and leading to a positive return on investment. Pipedrive offers great value for the cost. Added features like document solutions and e-signature, making it a worthwhile investment.
Comparison Results: Zoho CRM is commended for its simplicity and intuitive interface. It is more cost-effective and offers more features than many competing solutions. However, users have said Zoho’s scalability and customization options are limited. Pipedrive is a cost-effective solution, and users say it’s easy to track progress with Pipedrive’s visual interface. Reviewers say that Pipedrive could integrate more seamlessly with ERP solutions and leverage artificial intelligence better.
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most useful stuff for me is that it's very flexible with all the data structures...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to create timelines and custom fields."
"The biggest and the best feature is the view that you get when you log in. You have a board like Kanban when you log in, and you've got a column on the left and several other columns that move to the right, depending on where you are in a particular deal. If it's a prospect or someone who is just looking, you move it along the process, and it really helps you keep track of where you are."
"Pipedrive's most valuable features are that you can keep the whole information that's related to managing your sales process and you can customize it easily. The person that we have who is customizing Pipedrive is very junior in means of software development or process development. He can easily use it, anyone can use the solution. It has a very easy user interface to customize your processes and apply them to the Pipedrive process."
"It is a stable platform."
"The solution is pretty easy to use and intuitive."
"The usability of the solution is its valuable feature."
"The most valuable solution of Zoho CRM is lead management and analytics. It has a powerful analytics tool."
"It has helped to manage, move forward, and also customize my processes. It has helped me with my sales pipeline, sales process, and performance."
"I think the whole pipeline tracking is most useful for us."
"The most valuable features include the dashboards, deal tracking, email tracking, notes, managing notes and the ability to manage databases in one place."
"Zoho CRM is easy to use and easy to understand."
"There are many features that capture customer data."
"I am impressed with the product's information on customers."
"The product is customizable."
"The tool's APIs are challenging. It should also be compliant with HIPAA, FINRA and GLBA. The data centers should be within US so that they are compliant with regulations."
"Reporting capabilities of the solution could be improved."
"The platform could be even more robust."
"The form builder works even though it has some shortcomings...Also, the forms don't have the ability to avoid or stop people from signing up if they don't have a corporate email."
"In future releases, I would like to have a highly intelligent integration service where you can easily connect PipeDrive with other tools, even if you are not a developer."
"Pipedrive could be more efficient. I want the management to be more transparent so it's easier to monitor the sales team's activities and results and do business forecasting. It would help them to improve the quality of the sales cycle."
"The automation process is challenging."
"Pipedrive has some weaknesses against Salesforce. The documentation of Pipedrive could improve. They need more qualified documentation because I had to fix my colleague's work to correct the reports because they did not find how they can do it, or develop reports. There are some misunderstandings about how to do reporting."
"It is hard to modify information around a customer. You need to pay for the features and the tool needs to improve it."
"There are at least two big pieces. One is just the ability to reorganize the data and clean it up to eliminate duplicates and things like that. It is very manual at the moment. It only gives us certain fields that we can check on. Because of our particular database, it creates a problem. We deal with hospitals, and there are 50 hospitals. It is tough to figure out which one is which. Is it this one or the other one? So, trying to clean things up is very difficult. I'd like to have more ability to share data fields. The data is structured into different buckets, and I frequently have to create the same field in two different buckets. It would be nice if I could just do a view-only field in another bucket. In my contact bucket, I would like to be able to have just a view-only of the account information so that I don't need to enter it again, which is what I have to do currently."
"It would be useful to have some way of mapping organizations that could add more value. If I have X company's database and am trying to create multiple contexts for different entities of the same company, I should be able to map it in such a way that I can see the organization chart."
"Zoho could be more user friendly by improving the UI of the interface."
"The solution's feature for forecast has limitations."
"Adding a new contract to the solution is quite complicated."
"The chatbot feature is not very intelligent and lacks AI capabilities."
"What needs improvement in Zoho CRM is the UI. It needs to be more user-friendly. I like Salesforce better than Zoho CRM in terms of the UI, so if Zoho CRM can make some UI changes, that would make the tool better."
Pipedrive is ranked 13th in CRM with 11 reviews while Zoho CRM is ranked 6th in CRM with 47 reviews. Pipedrive is rated 8.2, while Zoho CRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Pipedrive writes " An easy- to- use and scalable cloud-based CRM tool for managing and tracking". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoho CRM writes "A highly stable solution that allows customization and data sharing". Pipedrive is most compared with Apollo.io, monday.com and Real Estate CRM, whereas Zoho CRM is most compared with SAP CRM, monday.com, Bitrix24, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and LeadSquared. See our Pipedrive vs. Zoho CRM report.
See our list of best CRM vendors, best Opportunity Management vendors, and best Sales Force Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.