Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PeerSpot user
System Engineer at ING Deutschland
Real User
Easily manage your Apple fleet, allowing for no-touch deployment to end-users
Pros and Cons
  • "If you want to manage macOS devices in your enterprise and want to make it as easy for the user as well as for the administrators, you should use the DEP with Jamf Pro."
  • "The integrated patch feature is good but needs some tweaking."

What is our primary use case?

We manage about 2,300 macs in our enterprise. Most of the devices are used by developers.

Right now, we manage only basics in our mac fleet. Like having a compliant mac, get the VPN Anti Virus, Firewall NoMAD, and other basic software on it. Also, users have the option to get additional software via self-service. So, when a user gets a device from us, it is pretty "vanilla" and they can customize the device themself. 

Additionally, we configure the device for printing and proxy usage.

We are aiming to manage a lot more with Jamf, which is certainly possible. At some point, we also want to make the mac available for all users, not just developers. Jamf will immensely help us with this goal.

How has it helped my organization?

Jamf pro gives you the best tool to manage your Apple macOS fleet in your company. Unfortunately, Apple is limiting the way you can manage macs compared to how you manage Windows devices. Therefore you need an elegant strategy to manage your devices. Jamf pro helps you with that. The combination of the Apple MDM commands and the Jamf binary helps you to get the most out of it.

Everything Apple does not enable with MDM commands, you can take care of with scripting and custom policies. With that, your options are almost endless for managing your Apple macOS devices.

I have been using Jamf pro since May 2015 and there is no other vendor who does such great work, helping you succeed with your macOS devices.

What is most valuable?

If you want to manage macOS devices in your enterprise and want to make it as easy for the user as well as for the administrators, you should use the DEP with Jamf Pro. It makes it very easy to deploy a new Apple Mac to a new user. IT does not need to touch the device even once. You could ship it directly from the vendor and all the user needs is an internet connection and their credentials. At the end of the setup, the user has a fully managed and functional Mac to use within the enterprise.

What needs improvement?

The integrated patch feature is good but needs some tweaking. As of now, there is no option for the user to defer the installation of a patch. You can either give them the option to install the patch through self-service, which needs an active part of the user to do it, or you can force the installation. However, with the force of the installation, there is potential data loss, because an App that you want to patch needs to be closed for it to work. The information explaining that the app will be closed for patching is almost not noticeable for the user.

Therefore we do no use the integrated patch management technology and build our own logic to work around it.

Buyer's Guide
Jamf Pro
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Jamf Pro. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Jamf Pro since May 2015.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
NitinKumar1 - PeerSpot reviewer
SecOps Lead at Barco
Real User
Top 20
Dynamic solution that makes it possible to manage Apple and Windows products remotely including releasing patches and specific configurations
Pros and Cons
  • "One of the most valuable features is the ability to apply apply granular level restrictions to our machines, making them easy to manage remotely from the backend."
  • "The upgrade process of this solutions could be improved. It is not possible to use Jamf Pro to upgrade devices."

What is our primary use case?

We use Jamf Pro for Mac and Desktop central for ManageEngine for Windows. It allows us to set up and configure hardware remotely. We also use this solution to release patches, configurations, applications, installations, and any restrictions when required. 

What is most valuable?

One of the most valuable features is the ability to apply apply granular level restrictions to our machines, making them easy to manage remotely from the backend.

What needs improvement?

The upgrade process of these solutions could be improved. It is not possible to use Jamf Pro to upgrade devices. This has to be done via the Apple site. In comparison, in Windows, it is possible to download patches and everything you need is readily available on the console of ManageEngine. However, using Jamf Pro and Mac, these packages need to be created and pushed out and sometimes fail due to the network or connectivity. 

There is no solution in Jamf Pro to remotely manage Mac machines if they are not on your network.

Patching packages aren't readily available. We have to create those packages and that is time-consuming.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used this solution for more than one year. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable solution. We have more than 2000 users.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support for this solution is not that good. 

I would rate their support team a five out of ten. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. 

What about the implementation team?

We used a vendor team who completed the POC and assisted with the installation.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The licensing costs for this solution are high. 

What other advice do I have?

Jamf Pro gives you control at a granular level such as blocking specific USB devices being used with hardware. This solution has great compatibility with the latest MacBook including offering a PPPC utility and a wide variety of scripts. 

The limitations of Jamf Pro are due to Apple restrictions and not the tool itself. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Jamf Pro
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Jamf Pro. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CEO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Its self-service feature has helped us minimize our support cases.
Pros and Cons
  • "Jamf Pro is the only product we can use at the moment because they are ahead of their competitors in zero-touch deployment for the end-user. Jamf Pro has a self-service feature that has helped us minimize our support cases. That's a feature the customers like very much."
  • "I'd like to see Jamf add Unified Endpoint Management, but it's not going to happen. It's too complex. We tried that for so many years, and no one can do this for Windows and macOS. It can be done with iOS, but that's not the case here. If you want device management for a real laptop operating system, you need two systems. They're very different."

What is our primary use case?

We use Jamf for zero-touch deployment and handling our customers' hardware and licenses. We use it for all the things you use device management or enterprise mobility management systems for, but it's not an inventory in our case. We use it mainly for zero-touch deployment with customers who operate worldwide and the headquarters can be in Sweden, England, or Germany, but the users are all over the world. 

What is most valuable?

Jamf Pro is the only product we can use at the moment because they are ahead of their competitors in zero-touch deployment for the end-user. Jamf Pro has a self-service feature that has helped us minimize our support cases. That's a feature the customers like very much.

What needs improvement?

I'd like to see Jamf add Unified Endpoint Management, but it's not going to happen. It's too complex. We tried that for so many years, and no one can do this for Windows and macOS. It can be done with iOS, but that's not the case here. If you want device management for a real laptop operating system, you need two systems. They're very different.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Jamf Pro for nearly seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The cloud version of Jamf Pro is extremely stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Jamf Pro is scalable. We have upwards of 50 customers, one of which has 200,000 users, and it's working, but our largest deployment is about 12,000 users. 

How are customer service and support?

Level 3 support is okay, according to what I hear from that department. When it's a level 3 question, no one expects that we will have the answer in one or two days, but sometimes it can take one or two weeks or even a few months. Generally speaking, we get the support we need. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We've worked with Intune. It's much harder and takes more time to provide the same level of customer experience with Intune that we can offer with Jamf Pro. We can do a lot more scripting for the end-user with Jamf Pro than we can do with Intune, and it takes more time.

How was the initial setup?

For someone who's familiar with device management and designing this type of environment, I wouldn't say it's hard to set up Jamf. It can take anywhere between two days and one month, but that depends on the type and size of the customer. 

What other advice do I have?

We've been in deployment for about 12 years, and we used open-source products initially, but now we need zero-day support for Apple, and the only good product we have found is Jamf. All others have been good for one or two years, but they stop delivering and maybe disappear. 

Jamf is still there after all these years, and they continue to improve the product. With Intune, Microsoft decided not to offer device management for the macOS. Instead, they chose to have Intune integrate with Jamf. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
PeerSpot user
Senior Technical Consultant at Softcell Technologies Limited
Reseller
Stable, easy to install, feature-rich, and provides one of the best cloud services available
Pros and Cons
  • "I am most excited about a feature that is called User-Initialed Enrollment."
  • "The response time for support could be significantly improved."

What is our primary use case?

As an organization, we are resellers, we provide services to our clients, and we work on various government and manufacturing projects.

We provide consultancy, as well as our services for both Jamf Pro and Apple products.

We also offer assistance if they encounter any problems with the integration of Apple products.

What is most valuable?

When I first started using this product, there were a couple of features that still excite me because there was no scope to address those issues. And these features completely eliminate some of our previous issues.

I am most excited about a feature that is called User-Initialed Enrollment.

I also like the Composer feature, which is a unique feature.

Snapshot is one of the tools that allows any package, container, or package creator to find a way to work with various applications. 

I really liked the Self Service applications as well. It is very convenient and useful.

What needs improvement?

The response time for support could be significantly improved.

I have some customers who are struggling to get a response.

The amount of time required for remediation is also a challenge. If the problem is identified on the first call, it should be tagged and resolved within the tag. This is something we have been dealing with, as well as a problem that some of our clients have encountered.

The cost could be lower.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been working with Jamf Pro for five years. I received my Jamf certification in 2017 and have been using it ever since.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Jamf Pro has been stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Jamf Pro is a product that can be scaled. Scalability is something that must and should exist, and I always believe in possibilities.

At the moment, the way the product is designed for managing Apple devices meets my needs.

When I need to scale it in the future, I know it's a possibility.

How are customer service and support?

Support is something I believe could have been improved.

They offer one of the best cloud services available.

However, the response time and remediation could have been significantly improved.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to Jamf Pro, I worked with three different products: SOTI, MaaS360, and VMware Workspace ONE.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quite simple. It is not at all complicated.

It is extremely simple for any user from an endpoint and an administrator's perspective.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It would be beneficial if it could be reduced slightly.

The price for these products is designed in such a way that I believe it is a little on the high side.

What other advice do I have?

They are really evolving, and there have been a lot of improvements since 2017. I like the changes that have been made.

It is now designed in such a way that it can serve the needs of any organization. I have not encountered any issues where I felt it could have been significantly improved, and a specific feature could have greatly aided in addressing issues. So far, everything is running smoothly.

It is recommended for any of our organizations. Jamf Pro is superior to MDM on an Apple platform. If you put Jamf into context and you only want to manage Apple, I believe this is one of the best options.

It can be argued that the fact that it only supports Apple is either an advantage or a disadvantage.

Jamf is your go-to solution for managing your Apple Suite. You should investigate and deploy this product.

I would rate Jamf Pro a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
PeerSpot user
Apple Administrator | Jamf Service Manager at a university with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Intuitive user interface, excellent technical support, and responsive to user requests for new features
Pros and Cons
  • "It is a first-rate product and well known in the industry as the gold standard for Apple device management."
  • "There's only one thing that I would like to see improved. It's potentially being worked on right now, actually. That is the ability to provide remote support access to use those devices. I'd like it to work in a similar manner to Desktop Central or other solutions like Team Viewer."

What is most valuable?

The interface is very intuitive. Anybody who has had a reasonable amount of experience with Macs will really appreciate the way this has been designed. It is only on the Mac platform anyway, and I'm given to understand Jamf engineers work at Apple and Apple engineers work at Jamf.

It is a first-rate product and well known in the industry as the gold standard for Apple device management.

When Apple has a new iOS or Mac OS, that particular OS often has new features. Jamf is ready for those features the moment that the OS is released. If there are additional benefits or features as part of a new macOS, Jamf is aware. Jamf has its own network of users and a portal, Jamf Nation. Jamf users are continually suggesting updates and additional features that get reviewed by Jamf and where appropriate are implemented. There is good communication, good end-user engagement, and great company response; there's visibility of user requests and what is getting implemented.

What needs improvement?

One of the included Jamf Applications, Jamf Remote, is somewhat flaky. It's never worked for me when I've tried to access a remote device that is not on the same network, so the one thing that I would like to see improved/implemented is remote support and I believe Jamf have something in the pipeline. The ability to provide remote support access to end user devices, preferably in a similar manner to Apple Remote Desktop (ARD), Desktop Central's solution or Teamviewer.

For how long have I used the solution?

We had it all set up and running in February 2018, so it's been about two to two and a half years since we began using the solution.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is ultimately stable and the ability manage most anything with an Apple device exists on the system. The product can be hosted by Jamf or on-prem, some Jamf resellers also provide their own hosting for clients, which is how our instance is configured. Our institution is very impressed with how reliable Jamf Pro is.

How are customer service and technical support?

If you decide to go with a hosted instance from a Jamf reseller/supplier, as we do, the reseller provides support in addition to Jamf themselves. The support we've received thus far is nothing short of excellent. When Apple release either a new iOS or macOS, Jamf is ready able to support the new operating systems from day one.

I'd give technical support full marks, ten out of ten, hands down.

How was the initial setup?

Jamf require clients to have two to three days initial training known as 'Jumpstart'. A Jamf expert comes to your location and goes through everything you need to do to get it up and running. If you're simply managing Mac OS, it's two days. If you're managing iOS as well, as we are, it's three days. Jumpstart is a paid-for service.

What about the implementation team?

We did get a specific 3-day in-person training session with a member of the Jamf engineering team. It was a paid service.

What other advice do I have?

Jamf Pro is used by some of the most notable enterprise organisations in the world. I believe IBM uses Jamf to manage all their devices, for example. That is pretty interesting, considering they make their own device management solution; and IBM has probably got the largest deployment of Macs on the planet! If that's not a recommendation for anybody, I don't know what is. I'm also aware ARM use Jamf as well, as does Dyson. These major companies would not be using the product if it wasn't doing what they wanted.

I would rate the solution ten out of ten. It's excellent. I have nothing bad to say about it at all.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1373802 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Support Technician at MLSE
Real User
Helped us have the ability to push security updates and standardize all of our Mac computers in our environment
Pros and Cons
  • "Being able to push out elevation policies to users on an Adhoc basis helps us when users are not in the office."
  • "I think that there should also be more integrations with Jamf that could better the intelligence-gathering when making business decisions."

What is our primary use case?

Our main use of Jamf is to manage our ever-growing Apple environment. We are 90:10 Windows to Mac ration environment which means that the adoption rates for macOS are also increasing after our pilot project for our choice program. Although we're predominantly a Windows environment we've had challenges integrating our macOS devices but Jamf has made it simple with compliance deployments and when it comes to pushing out security patches and monitoring the devices remotely. It also helps monitor devices in our zero-trust environment.

How has it helped my organization?

It has made the management of macOS much easier and we are able to standardize and have our Macs in compliance. Although we're predominantly a Windows environment we've had challenges integrating our macOS devices but Jamf has made it simple with compliance deployments and when it comes to pushing out security patches and monitoring the devices remotely. It also helps monitor devices in our zero-trust environment. 

Being able to push out elevation policies to users on an Adhoc basis helps us when users are not in the office.

What is most valuable?

The feature of having dynamic groups that can filter in the computers based on settings/apps/configurations/etc is the most valuable aspect of this solution. Jamf has helped us manage all our devices even remote users that are located in Europe or the States (we're in Canada) it also has helped us have the ability to push security updates and standardize all of our Mac computers in our environment. iOS devices have also been taken into consideration and having both iOS and macOS being managed in the same environment makes it more efficient and effective.

What needs improvement?

I've been thinking about improvement and I think it would be much advantageous to have some sort of remote desktop application that could be implemented to help the remote workforce during the Work From Home times. Also, I think that there should be some sort of mobile app that will help you manage the devices from an iOS device quickly in case some times you cannot be at your computer. I think that there should also be more integrations with Jamf that could better the intelligence-gathering when making business decisions. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I first used Jamf back in 2011 and started using it fulltime in 2018.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We didn't have a previous solution, but we use inTune as another MDM to manage our other devices.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think the pricing could be a little more cost-effective and maybe the training could be a little bit cheaper but other than that if your org is willing to pay for it it's definitely worth it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No other options were evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

Definitely collaborate with the community. The Jamf nation is huge and always willing to help!

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1496613 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Administrator at a educational organization with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Responsive support, assists in content filtering, easy to use, and has helped to streamline our process
Pros and Cons
  • "We are able to manage our full fleet of devices and can simply integrate with all of our systems."
  • "I would like to see tighter integration with Jamf Protect in the future releases of Jamf Pro."

What is our primary use case?

We use Jamf to manage our school's new 1:1 inventory of devices. Everything is in one place for our OS X and iOS deployments.

We are now starting to integrate with certificates for our new wireless system and it has been wonderful to work with the teams at Jamf. Jamf Pro has helped us to have the best management for all of our devices.

I was a manager of iOS devices in the past, and it was extremely cumbersome to use some of the other software out there. Jamf has made it so that I don't have to worry about anything.

How has it helped my organization?

Jamf Pro has streamlined and organized the way we do business. We are able to manage our full fleet of devices and can simply integrate with all of our systems. Jamf has made this a very easy task and has been amazing.

With Jamf, we are able to give specific access to our local admins so that they can manage devices without the help of our more senior admins. We can allow some things and not others. And, we now have a solid idea of where all of our devices are and who has and does not have them.

What is most valuable?

With our system being for students, one of the most important pieces of Jamf is to make sure that we are supplying a filter for all of them. In Jamf, I am able to see when an application is removed and then push it right back out. We are using Umbrella and if it is deleted by a student then Jamf knows and re-deploys it almost immediately.

Jamf has additional features that are helpful.

There is an easy configuration that we can set in the root of Jamf Pro to manage our Jamf Connect clients. It means that we do not have to get to much more granular, building config profiles that allow the keys right from Jamf Pro.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see tighter integration with Jamf Protect in the future releases of Jamf Pro. It has been a great system that allows us to know what is happening on all of our OS X Devices.

Jamf as a whole has come a long way and maybe more of an integration between the entire suite of Jamf products would be helpful.

Login info from Jamf Connect in the Jamf dashboard could be helpful but for the most part, we have nothing to complain about with our Jamf system.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for the last four years and if I had know about it sooner, I would have been using it for much longer.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This system is extremely stable and we have it now hosted in Jamf Cloud. That was a Solid Decision

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is fully scalable and extremely simple. We scaled up from 600 to 1,200 devices over the summer and nothing changed. It was phenomenal.

How are customer service and technical support?

They have amazing customer support that is very responsive. When we need assistance, it is only a phone call or email away.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously tried MaaS360 and a product by Meraki.

I was provided insight into Jamf and the full suite of products, and the ease is far greater.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was a little tricky, coming in with zero experience, but the support of Jamf and colleagues was there and we got it to a great place fairly quickly.

What about the implementation team?

We deployed with an in-house team.

What was our ROI?

This is the best value for a system that I am deeply involved with on a daily basis.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We did not evaluate other options before choosing Jamf.

What other advice do I have?

Being a School district, this is certainly the way to go. Even at the corporate level, the ease of integration with ABM and ASM is amazing and extremely helpful.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Vinay-M - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Lead Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Great UI, easy to set up, and is largely problem-free
Pros and Cons
  • "From the reviews that we are getting, the feedback from the client, the tool is very good on the Jamf side - especially for the Macs."
  • "For Windows, we have a reset option. We'd that option available for Mac."

What is our primary use case?

We are actually a service provider. Most of our clients are using Jamf.

The main use case is only with Macs. If you want to manage a complete Mac, For example, similar to how we do in a CCM for our core Windows devices, if you want to do that with Mac, then the Jamf tool is the best tool. You can manage everything for Mac devices.

What is most valuable?

It's a good product. From the reviews that we are getting, the feedback from the client, the tool is very good on the Jamf side - especially for the Macs. 

The initial setup is simple. 

The stability is good.

The solution offers a nice, updated UI.

What needs improvement?

For Windows, we have a reset option. We'd that option available for Mac. That will be great. Since we don't currently have that, the alternative takes up a lot of time and requires an engineer to visit, get a hold of the laptop, and reinstall the operating system. If we could do this as a reset and have the option to handle it remotely, that would be a big improvement. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for more than four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Clients always look for a kind of solution with no issues reported and also they want a kind of zero-touch deployment that doesn't need any user or any engineer interactions for the enrollment. This solution is perfect for this.

How are customer service and support?

In very rare cases, with the type of implementation we use, we used to get support from Jamf, from Windows. Otherwise, we don't interact with them. Everything, all the instructions, are already there in GitHub. Reaching out would be a very rare case. If any new setup needs to be done or any new whichever is not available in GitHub, definitely we'll reach out to Jamf. Otherwise, it's zero-contact.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use Microsoft Intune.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is simple, actually. We just need a Jamf URL and a basic connection. I'm just talking about for setting up a cloud instance. Since everything will be there in the cloud, you just need the URL, the Jamf cloud URL, and admin credentials. The APNs certificate is required. That allows them to enroll your device. After that, there are so many options; the configuration profile, et cetera, needs to be created. That's a different scenario. However, in general, the setup is fine. 

A Mac deployment usually will take three to four minutes. It's quite fast. However, it depends on how you're configuring it. If you have the URL and if you have the username and the password, you can do it immediately.

From the user's end, it will take some time in situations where a user is not familiar with the enrollment process. There'll be follow-ups with the documents. If you are an engineer, it's easy, it's minutes, and it's fast.

How many engineers you need for deployment depends on how big the project is. It depends on the devices. We do have a client where we have around 18,000 devices. For that, currently, we have four engineers and they're easily managing it.

What other advice do I have?

We are a service provider. We support various companies that need assistance with their Microsoft, Macs, et cetera.

Aside from the lack of a reset option, the solution is great and I would recommend it to those using Macs.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user