Jamf Pro Reviews

We manage a one-to-one hybrid work environment of 800 Macs with Jamf Pro. We can manage OS and Software Updates, Wifi, and security protocols and have deep environment insight to assist remote workers.  

It gives us the flexibility to offer near zero-touch deployment when onboarding employees remotely and allows us to standardize our policies organization-wide. 

Patch management and associated policies help us manage and update our fleet's software.

We need better reporting options. We would like the ability to see all software applications that are inventoried fleet-wide, and deeper integrations for OS updating. 

I have been using this specific instance for just over a year, however, I have used the solution for nearly five years in total.

We use the product to manage everything Apple, including MacBooks, iPhones, and iPads.

In general, it just has allowed us to deploy Macs and iPhones easier and more securely to our end users. We can also maintain software updates.

The ease of use is very good. Patching is also really easy with the tool as well.

We found the initial setup to be simple.

Anything could always use improvement. The patching can definitely use a little bit of improvement. They should make it a little bit more automated. That's the only thing I would say could use a little bit of enhancement.

I'd like to see more security-based profiling. One of the other competitor products, Kandji, has an entire section of pre-built profiles for things like initial security requirements. You can just pick the security requirement and then implement it. You don't have to code it all up as you do with Jamf, since they don't have that feature in there right now. If you're going through major security changes in your company. 

I've used the solution probably for about six years at this point.

The product is about 100% stable. It's the best solution in the industry.

We've had no issues with scalability. You go from a small number of devices to thousands of devices, and there's no change. There's no slowness or anything like that. It just continues to function.

We have about 700 iPhones, and about 250 to 300 MacBooks right now, and user roles range from developers to CEOs.

We will increase usage. We always have a desire to increase usage, however, we have a choice program in place for our users. Therefore, if a Windows person wants to switch, when their time is ready for a refresh, they can choose a Mac device.

There are no issues with support. I've always had great service with them.

We used Workspace ONE by AirWatch for iPhones, and we switched due to the fact that we wanted a single solution to manage all the back Apple devices.

The solution's initial setup is very straightforward. They also provide a guide for you to come in, and they help you with everything from start. 

It was already in the current company I work with. It was already deployed in the previous one. We did it in a pilot project for about a month, and then we were able to move it into production pretty quickly. It all depends on your skill level. When you bring the vendor in with their sort of prep package; they do it in about four days with you.

We have a first-level service desk. We also have first-level desktop support, and then third-level would be me. I'm probably the only one with a lot of Macs or Apple experience, therefore, I'm probably the single person maintaining it other than like the basic day-to-day stuff, that the other people do.

This is my second company using it, so I didn't really need any assistance to get it going.

ROI is always hard. With Microsoft solutions, everything's baked into your 365 licensing, including Intune. It's hard to break out the licensing, like an ROI properly due to the fact that Microsoft doesn't do that. They just have the one-time costs for everything Microsoft these days.

We only really look at the numbers once a year. I would not say it's the cheapest solution on the market, however, I would also say you get what you pay for when you sign up for any of these services. While there are cheaper ones, I would also say the cheaper ones are the cheaper ones across the board, so it's not necessarily great to go with the cheaper solution.

There are no extra fees. Once you have that in place, you're pretty much good to go.

We did not evaluate other solutions before choosing this product.

I'm just an end-user.

I would advise users to definitely go with a Cloud solution if they can. It just makes life that much easier.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I've used it for a long time. I've never had a problem and it works great. That said, I could see there are a couple of little things that they could do, to definitely improve the product.

The primary use case for us is MyChart Bedside, as we work to provide in-house iPads for different areas of our hospital. The iPads have entertainment apps, as well as tools to help improve their stay in our hospital.

We also use this solution for macOS deployment. We use the hosted Jamf Pro and cloud app shares. We internally use Jamf for the healthcare listener and the AD proxy. 

Jamf has improved patient care and our ability to be more productive when delivering our end-users a nearly zero-touch onboarding experience for their Macs. We have seen our patient care experience improve with the use of Jamf and the ability to take the work out of our nurses' hands.

Automating the refresh of the devices is huge for both sides of the end-user experience. 

The most valuable features are Smart groups, branding Self Service, Jamf Connect, and the health care listener. These tools allow information technology to automate services and improve our end-user deliverables. The self-service branding enables our end-users, the patients, to identify us when using our provided products. These include apps and other tools for them to use.  

Some improvement can be made in the customer service realm, while also making additional training level courses available for online study and exam-taking. For example, exams at the 200 level.

We have been using Jamf Pro for ten years.

The stability of the on-premises and hosted versions are solid. 

My impressions of the scalability are good. 

The support experience I have had with Jamf has been amazing. If you have an idea or a dream to make something happen with Jamf then their technical support and expert services can do it, or they will try very, very hard.

There is always a good explanation as to why something may or may not work. 

We did use a different solution and still do for other aspects of our deployments. We integrated Jamf to solve our MyCharBedside issues. 

The initial setup is easy to understand and is absolutely straightforward. 

In the very early days, we leveraged the kickstart option. The rate of knowledge and help was exceptional. 

Our ROI is superior patient care and improved end-user experiences. 

Licensing cost is dependent on the footprint and foreseen growth. I think another positive is Jamf's flexibility to understand what you need to be done while molding the product to be as successful as possible. 

We did not evaluate other options or solutions.

If I can give anyone advice, I would go with the hosted product. Jamf is serious about providing a secure and separated hosted environment, as well as working with your internal teams to see that the job is done to your liking and not just the way they want it done. Collaboration is key.

Otherwise, Jamf continues to make good improvements time after time.

Our primary use case is managing our one-to-one iPad environment for our lower school students and maximizing our efficiency.

By utilizing Configuration profiles, we are able to push out all of our apps to our classroom sets of one-to-one iPads. They install without us having to handle the devices, and then auto-update. We can then wipe the iPads all at once at the end of the year, by simply performing the startup procedure, everything will reset for the next school year.

Ultimately, it saves us a lot of time and headaches.

We have been able to keep our tech department lean and mean, maximizing our efficiency by utilizing Jamf to set up our iPads for us, rather than installing each app one at a time.

We are able to manage each iPad cleanly, and users do not have to handle the maintenance.

The most valuable feature is the Configuration Profiles, for sure! This is what we use to get all of our iPads set up and uniform. We also push out apps to our devices, which does not require any touching of the devices and they auto-update!

Every once in a blue moon, we wind up with a rarely-seen superbug that takes support weeks to months to solve. The good news is that they are rare and not across the platform. Just us. 

We have been using Jamf Pro since 2012.

This product is very stable. Since 2012, it was only down once, and only on our premises.

It works well for small simple setups like ours but is robust enough for the large setups with experts of code behind them.

Tech support is always friendly and ready to help.

While the tech support professionals are great, and happy to help, sometimes it takes a while to get one back on board with your setup since you no longer have a designated contact who "knows you". Additionally, since they need to get to "know you" I have found that I have had to do a lot of convincing to get them to believe that I know what I am talking about and that I have indeed "already tried that."

We tried Mosyle concurrently, but it was a mess.

As far as I have heard, it was straightforward, and the switch to Cloud only took an hour. It was much shorter than the quoted time.

We worked with the vendor and they walked us through the setup. They were great when they walked me through it over video call when we made the switch to Cloud.

While this is hard to quantify, it has allowed us to keep our tech department at two people.

Cloud is worth the small increase in price, but make the switch before you need it, and not during a global pandemic.

To my knowledge, we did not evaluate other options. Rather, we just jumped aboard.

This solution is a ten out of ten. A great friend.

We use this solution for device management. We have multiple locations, as well as remote workers. Our entire workforce use Apple tech. Therefore, Jamf allows us to manage all of our end-user technology from one place. This includes pushing apps, profiles (restrictions, settings, etc.), and more.

We were able to dramatically enhance our cybersecurity, and better support our users.

Through Jamf, we were able to enforce things like encryption (escrow keys), password policies, the firewall on the Mac, etc. We can also remotely wipe/lock devices as required.

The most valuable features are Inventory and Self Service.

Inventory is all about auditing your estate (super easy). You can drill into a specific device, check out the model, what OS it’s running, which apps are installed on it, and even basic usage stats.

Self Service is about empowering users to take control of their tech in a safe way, such as proving them with apps that they can install as required.

This solution would benefit from more focus on Self Service, such as Office 365 and GSuite integration. At the moment, if you want to display cloud-hosted content in the Self Service app for distribution to all staff then you have to add it as a web link (it’s a little clunky). Direct integration would make this better.

We’ve never experienced any issues from a stability perspective.

This solution is easy to scale. We adopted this after not being able to scale Profile Manager.

All ongoing support is in-house, and I’m not aware of any support calls raised with Jamf.

We previously used Profile Manager; however, we found that it was unable to scale as our business grew.

The initial setup of this solution is really simple. You commit to something called a JumpStart, which is basically a consultancy and training session to ensure that your Jamf meets your organization's needs from day one.

We implemented using Jamf Direct, who provided us with a JumpStart. All ongoing support is in-house.

This solution has been a huge timesaver. It also allows you to leverage and control a lot of built-in Apple services, which can help you save money on buying third-party software.

If you have the in-house capability to support Jamf, then paying for onboarding / JumpStart training is a no brainer. It will help you get up to speed on the product. It will not, however, cover the enrolment of all of your client devices into Jamf, so make sure to set aside time to do this.

If you don’t have a tech team, buy Jamf MSP. You won’t have access to manage the product yourself, but your Jamf MSP reseller can do that for you under some sort of contract / SLA.

We did evaluate other options including Xinca (they’ve since been purchased by Jamf as part of the ZuluDesk sale), and Meraki.

This solution is worth every penny! I don’t know how I got by without it.

We are actually a service provider. Most of our clients are using Jamf.

The main use case is only with Macs. If you want to manage a complete Mac, For example, similar to how we do in a CCM for our core Windows devices, if you want to do that with Mac, then the Jamf tool is the best tool. You can manage everything for Mac devices.

It's a good product. From the reviews that we are getting, the feedback from the client, the tool is very good on the Jamf side - especially for the Macs. 

The initial setup is simple. 

The stability is good.

The solution offers a nice, updated UI.

For Windows, we have a reset option. We'd that option available for Mac. That will be great. Since we don't currently have that, the alternative takes up a lot of time and requires an engineer to visit, get a hold of the laptop, and reinstall the operating system. If we could do this as a reset and have the option to handle it remotely, that would be a big improvement. 

I've been using the solution for more than four years. 

Clients always look for a kind of solution with no issues reported and also they want a kind of zero-touch deployment that doesn't need any user or any engineer interactions for the enrollment. This solution is perfect for this.

In very rare cases, with the type of implementation we use, we used to get support from Jamf, from Windows. Otherwise, we don't interact with them. Everything, all the instructions, are already there in GitHub. Reaching out would be a very rare case. If any new setup needs to be done or any new whichever is not available in GitHub, definitely we'll reach out to Jamf. Otherwise, it's zero-contact.

We also use Microsoft Intune.

The initial setup is simple, actually. We just need a Jamf URL and a basic connection. I'm just talking about for setting up a cloud instance. Since everything will be there in the cloud, you just need the URL, the Jamf cloud URL, and admin credentials. The APNs certificate is required. That allows them to enroll your device. After that, there are so many options; the configuration profile, et cetera, needs to be created. That's a different scenario. However, in general, the setup is fine. 

A Mac deployment usually will take three to four minutes. It's quite fast. However, it depends on how you're configuring it. If you have the URL and if you have the username and the password, you can do it immediately.

From the user's end, it will take some time in situations where a user is not familiar with the enrollment process. There'll be follow-ups with the documents. If you are an engineer, it's easy, it's minutes, and it's fast.

How many engineers you need for deployment depends on how big the project is. It depends on the devices. We do have a client where we have around 18,000 devices. For that, currently, we have four engineers and they're easily managing it.

We are a service provider. We support various companies that need assistance with their Microsoft, Macs, et cetera.

Aside from the lack of a reset option, the solution is great and I would recommend it to those using Macs.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

I use Jamf Pro to deploy software on my computers in our school and manage them.

Jamf Pro has improved my organization because I can have all my computers up to date on certain software, and it's very convenient for me.

I have found the most valuable feature to be the policies.

 I think there's room for improvement on the automation. For example, uploading a package to Jamf Pro and then updating the policy and other aspects, should be automatic. For instance, if I put a new version of the software, version 11 and the previous one was 10, Jamf Pro should be able to recognize if there's an update and update the policy automatically. It's not a big deal, but I think there's room for improvement.

There are a few additional features I am looking for in the next release. There should be a better way to implement malware protection. I know that Jamf is selling a product to do it, but I think a large part of it can be maintained directly inside the MDM without more cost. I think buying another software to protect the computer is a bit abusive. For instance, most of it can be done by running a script. It should be implemented in a better way.

I have been using Jamf Pro for a year and a half.

Jamf Pro is highly stable. I have never had a day of downtime since I have been using it.

I have found Yannick Jamf Pro to be scalable. I can work with a very small group of computers or I can update 500 of them in a few minutes.

We have approximately 500 people using the solution and they are mainly teachers.

I use it every day and I update the software once a week. Friday is a big day for me for the usage of the solution and for the rest of the time, it's only small maintenance or emergency operations that I use once in a while. Every day I check in if I've had issues or I check the logs for problems with deployments, and so on. I check it all the time, even when I'm not working, I check it on my phone. It's very convenient.

I have never had the need to use technical support. If I have an issue, I go to the website Jamf Nation, which is a community of Jamf users and I usually I find my solution there.

I have used two different solutions previously to Jamf Pro, which were MDM and FileWave. There was a third solution we were using but we had to remove it because it was bought by another software company, and it turned into abandonware. I had to look for another solution because all three that I used previously were not good solutions. Jamf Pro was a good solution.

The installation was very easy. It was done by the software company which I work with. The implementation took one day.

We used an integrator for the implementation and my experience with them was great.

I do the maintenance and support of the solution in my organization.

I did evaluate many other solutions from different vendors. There were approximately six or seven of them. The closest one I found that met my needs was not even close to matching the useability of Jamf Pro. Jamf Pro is very focused on the Mac system, which gives it a large advantage over the competition.

I would recommend those wanting to use this solution to try out the on-premise trial version to see how it works and how you can use it to do deployments. I tried it and it was a real eyeopener. The trial is very good and done well.

I rate Jamf Pro a nine out of ten.

We're moving from on-prem to cloud. It's a significant improvement because our previous on-prem solution for the Apple Mac we quite frail. But the kits we're using were out of warranty, so we were looking for a cloud solution that's easy to manage and partner up with.

For me, the most helpful feature is Jamf's smart groups. I also like the capabilities of the small groups because it gives you a nicer, cleaner, more polished view of your dashboard, and the dashboard is a lot more customizable for an administrator than Workspace ONE. With Workspace ONE, you have to navigate, and it isn't easy to articulate to leadership what it means if you're a non-technical person.

I would like to see Jamf add more training tutorials and documentation.

Jamf Pro, we just bought our own instance about three months ago, and for the last six months, I've been upskilling myself in that space. I think I'm convincing my colleague to reconsider our setup. At work, we use scanners in Workspace ONE because I know that Apigee also offers quite a bit of technology around that space as well.

Jamf is far more stable than Workspace ONE.

I think Jamf is definitely scalable. 

My experience with Jamf support has been quite seamless. When you load a ticket, you get support immediately.

Installing Jamf is pretty easy once you understand how DEP works and how to enroll devices. Zero-touch because we were aiming for a zero-touch environment, and it's entirely in the cloud. I'm not an expert in Jamf yet— I'm still learning— but for me, it was a lot easier to understand than Workspace ONE. Navigation is straightforward. It's not hard to create policies and manage the device. It's a lot simpler to create smart groups, view inventory, and see what the estate looks like. Jamf makes it easier to create a roadmap by giving me that view of where we need to be.

Jamf is quite up there. It wasn't the cheapest solution, but it's reasonable.  Apigee was cheaper than Jamf.

We were looking to put our Apple environment in Workspace ONE, and it didn't work well. It worked when we tried SCCM, but it wasn't something we were fond of based on who our partners were. So we looked at Parallels as well. 

I would rate Jamf nine out of 10.