Jira Reviews

Our organization is a software development company. We serve financial institutes that have between 8,000 and 13,000 employees.

We use Jira for process automation and as a workflow engine on the client's side. For example, a customer can fill out a form and ask a question, which is operated by Jira, and someone will be prompted to contact you with the answer. We created the forms designer and the roof engine and handle the process with the customer contact.

We are using Jira for automatic tools, so it is run on-premise.

The most valuable feature is that it has different APIs available, with good services, and it is completely by the books.

Jira could improve the documents management level. Our customers compare it to Office 365 and Sharepoint Online. They are focused on versioning of the document; Jira is missing this in their environment. It is missing functions for collaboration, like instant messaging. Currently, we try to connect the systems, we use Jira workflow which is connected to Office 365. 

Jira is trying to push for the online version, however, our customers are not ready to do that due to safety concerns.

The features are not intuitive. It would be good if there were templates.

I have been using Jira for eight years.

Stability at the beginning had some troubles, but it is okay now. To maintain a large network, we divide it between operations and development. We have approximately six people involved.

Jira is scalable.

The initial setup depends on the project. Smaller projects where we are using minimal functionality can be quite simple. On the other hand, we have a monthly deployment process where we extend the solution, which is a complicated process because it's running a system with a lot of users.

Pricing of licensing is too high.

From a user perspective, Jira is simple to understand if they use its data functionality. If you want to extend it to custom feeds then you need further education.

If you are considering Jira, take a look at the online versioning and online pricing.

I would rate Jira an 8 out of 10. 

The primary use cases for this solution are backlog management and sprint planning. Customers deploy this solution on-premises. 

The two features that have been most valuable have been backlog management and sprint planning and tracking. 

This solution could be improved by including a different model for the overall planning perspective. There's a Jira portfolio that we aren't using. The only challenge we're facing is that we cannot see the overall planning. 

I have been using Jira for almost three years now. 

This solution is stable. On-premises, the stability is okay, but when it's cloud-deployed, I think it will be more stable. 

This solution is scalable, but I think it will be more scalable when we go with a cloud deployment. 

I have never contacted support directly, but our team that takes care of maintenance, support, and customization connects with them. 

I previously used Micro Focus ALM Quality Center for around five years. 

Installation was done by someone else. For deployment and maintenance, we have a DevOps team of two or three. 

I implemented through an in-house team. 

We don't pay for licensing because we are using the Open Source version. 

I rate this solution an eight out of ten. I think it's much better than other competitors' products. 

We use Jira mostly for task coordination and assignment. Additionally, scrum methodologies defined work items and bug issues. If we create any bugs all of them are fixed.

Jira can improve by making methodologies better, such as scrum and agile. Additionally, improvements in Kanban boards are needed.

I have been using Jira for approximately five years.

The stability of Jira is good.

Jira is scalable, this is in part because in our company we use it on the cloud.

We have not needed to use the support from Jira. It is easy to find information on Google or any other search platform. If we encounter an issue we can find the solution online.

The initial setup of Jira was simple.

The standard package of Jira is for 100 users. They should offer more packages for other increments, such as 500 or 2,000. In my previous company, there was a free package that provided a minimal number of users.

I rate Jira an eight out of ten.

Jira is used by my clients across their organizations. They use it for everything related to IT solutions.

Jira has been a good, powerful tool for collaborating across large groups of people.

I use structures as well as the reporting features, personally. The JQL feature is powerful and easy to use. 

The Jira dashboards could be more useful. The dashboards have good widgets but the comparison of data over time or extraction of trends from the data is not easy. This is important for us from a governance perspective. Currently, we do this outside of Jira in Excel manually or using other reporting tools. 

Secondly, it would be useful if the graphs in Jira could be more customizable. If you draw a graph on Excel sheet, you are able to do a lot of customizations. Those kinds of customizations are not possible with the current implementation of Jira. 

When you create structures such as hierarchy, including epics and stories, if you change something, the fields are not correlated. This makes the tracking of changes a manual process.

I have been using Jira for more than a year, but I'm working on a project which has been using it for five years.

This is a stable solution but it can be quite slow. The speed at which Jira operates depends on how it is implemented. 

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten. 

My primary use case is using the boards in working stories for freeing up the backlog and assigning tasks to my developer team. 

No other stats of graphics or reports from Jira are used. We use Grafana instead of that.

I really enjoy the easy way I can follow up the story's progress even when they are in progress or we test bug stories. When issues arise, they can play back to the team in order to fix all the bugs. They have a view of the backlogs in the current sprint and the next sprint. 

The initial setup is straightforward. 

There are many Jira add-ons available, however, we aren't using those yet.

The solution is stable.

We've found the scalability to be good.

I alternate Jira with Excel. I manage the progress of the stories in an Excel chart with dates on work progress or thing to do. I don't like the progress or the stage changing from the stories in Jira.

I've been using Jira for about four years. It's been a while. 

The stability is quite good. There are only some updates that are made by IT, however, it's working fine for me. I haven't dealt with bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution is scalable. I've tried other solutions, and this one seems to be the most adequate for my needs.

We have about 1,000 users worldwide. There are several projects running in several parts of the world. 

We do not plan to increase usage. We are using it as we need it and no more than that.

We've never faced any big issues and we have never had Jira go down. Therefore, we've never had a need to contact technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are.

I found the initial setup to be pretty simple and straightforward. It was not an overly complex process. 

However, largely, we are just testing Jira. I can't speak to how long the deployment takes. 

I have three teams that can handle deployment tasks. There are six people in one, seven in another, and ten in the third one.

We do not use resellers or integrators to assist with the initial setup. We can handle the process ourselves.

I don't have any information in regards to the licensing or cost of the solution. It's not an aspect of Jira I handle. 

I have tried or tested other options such as Excel, Monday, Trello, Tetra. In comparison, for how I use it, Jira is the most adequate for my daily job.

We're a customer and an end-user.

Nowadays I'm using the web version of Jira for my client. I'm managing my boards, my sprints, and my backlog which are all working on Jira except the retrospectives. These are made in a code and not written down in Jira.

I would recommend the solution to others. It's easy to learn, easy to handle, and we've never experienced any downtime for a year and a half at least.

I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten. I haven't fully utilized the entire product, however, from what I have seen, it's exactly what we require. 

I use the solution for software project management and software lifecycles. Jira covers the entire process from requirement analysis to deployment. 

I prefer Azure DevOps and Microsoft Ecosystem to Jira. 

I consider Azure DevOps to be more user-friendly and to provide a better user experience. I feel Jira to be a bit difficult to work with. I specifically recall that i encountered difficulties with Jira when I wished to receive or generate a report. Azure DevOps offers a simpler and more user-friendly panel than Jira. Jira's reporting panel is not user-friendly and a bit on the difficult side. Azure DevOps also offers more options for generating queries and reports, especially when it comes to great dashboard visualization capabilities for the monitoring of one's project. This poses a big problem with Jira, as Azure DevOps does a better job of providing this feature. 

I find the dashboard to be Jira's most problematic feature. I do not like it and feel Jira is troublesome when it comes to visualizing the reports. These should be improved. 

Azure DevOps offers more simplified processes, maintenance and development than Jira. 

I used Jira for around one year, at which point I left my previous company and made use of it in the new one I joined, where I continued to do so. 

I find the solution to be stable, though a bit hard to use. 

We have not encountered difficulties with the scalability. 

We have had no issues with support. As with Azure DevOps, we take advantage of the open community and forums for resolving any issues which may arise. 

I prefer Azure DevOps and Microsoft Ecosystem to Jira.

I consider Azure DevOps to be more user friendly and to provide a better user experience. I feel Jira to be a bit difficult to work with. I specifically recall that i encountered difficulties with Jira when I wished to receive or generate a report. Azure DevOps offers a simpler and more user-friendly panel than Jira. Jira's reporting panel is not user-friendly and a bit on the difficult side. It also offers more options for generating queries and reports, especially when it comes to great dashboard visualization capabilities for the monitoring of one's project. This posed a big problem with Jira, as Azure DevOps does a better job of providing this feature.

I find the dashboard to be Jira's most problematic feature. I do not like it and feel Jira is problematic when it comes to visualizing the reports. These should be improved.

Azure DevOps offers a more simplified processes, maintenance and development than Jira.

As with Azure DevOps, we take advantage of the open community and forums for resolving any issues which may arise.

We make use of the solution free of charge. 

My recommendation, for sure, is that a person go with Azure DevOps. 

I rate Jira as a six out of ten. 

We are using Jira Interview to handle all the facts from clients and schedule calls with them. We have a different operations department that configures Jira, and we have technical people that help us choose the deployment model. 

The main reason we are using Jira at this time is for a different dashboard and chart. The major one that we are using is for the stock analysis, and it's nice to get that time log for our team, get the score of the game, 40 points delivered in a week or a month. we are using Jira for following purposes:

Issue tracking
Customizable workflows
Estimation & work logging
Progress reporting
Scrum boards
Kanban boards
Project-level permissions
Project backlogs
Email notifications
Roadmaps

Productivity increased by using this tool and organization can measure the productivity of a resource. early alert being displayed in the case of project failure and success. Org can identified the work load on resources for a day. 

We like the test cases in Jira. The orange dash items view was great, and we like the features and layout of the data. It's quite different, and people are now getting their items so quickly. We love the bulk edit feature. Jira also integrates well with Bitbucket.

Sometimes it takes time to load the data.

I've been using Jira since 2015.

Performance-wise, Jira is good, but sometimes it takes time to load that data. 

Jira is scalable. We have about 470 people working with Jira in our company.

The support team is very helpful and supportive. I requested multiple things and faced some concerns, they were very cooperative and responsive.

Asana. Jira has better work flow and features relative smart and easy to use.

It is easy to set up. We can use project templates. We can use classic projects templates or create new templates. We have also build the custom workflows for the custom templates.  We use templates for our daily progress.

I would tell potential users that they should all get it.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Jira an eight.

It is helpful for bug tracking in software development. If developers are doing some work and testers notice some defects, they can flag it in JIRA. For example, I track my day-to-day work in JIRA so that others know what I'm working on. They can look at JIRA and don't need to contact me. From JIRA, they can find out that I am working on this project and spent two days on it, etc. It's used for so many things, like task management, bug tracking, and release management. 

JIRA is not for deployment. For deployment, you are going to use some tools like Jenkins. It's meant for all the features that are going into that deployment. 

Different teams within the company use JIRA. For example, everybody in the engineering section uses it, so altogether, that's around 200 people.

JIRA gives us a lot of visibility. For example, if you're planning to release a given feature, you can track the status of that feature. Is it working correctly, or does it have some bugs? So you have a high level of visibility on the work. 

The JIRA user interface looks great. It's an overall good experience. It's very intuitive in the sense that you understand how it's going to work. It's very self-explanatory, and it's beneficial overall. Each release has different steps and phases, and the whole thing can mostly be captured on JIRA. The workflows are really helpful. 

So at one point in time, they did a huge UI upgrade. At that time, I felt like they had changed something, so it was hard to figure out. Now that we are habituated, it's not an issue now. We had gotten used to the old interface, so things changed, we felt an initial discomfort. That's the only thing. Otherwise, there is nothing I dislike about JIRA.

I've used JIRA since the beginning of my career and nothing else.

I haven't had any issues with JIRA's stability so far.

The scalability of JIRA has always been good. The response time is always fast. I've never had any issues with scalability. I think no matter how much our usage increases, we'll continue to use JIRA.  But, I think our usage is at an optimal level. 

From our end, setup is basically book-keeping. I can't say much about the overall setup because there is an administrator for JIRA who adds users and sets everything up. I haven't been an administrator. I'm just consuming the JIRA. 

Initially, I think administrators are going to set some things like configuring the workflow should and then how you want to say things. But other than that, if you set it up once, it's going to work. You don't have to do much maintenance.

I rate JIRA nine out of 10. I would recommend it.