Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kentik based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and SolarWinds NPM.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Kentik Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kentik, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Datadog excels in integration with various cloud services, making it appealing for tech buyers seeking comprehensive analytics across platforms. In comparison, Kentik offers deep traffic analysis and real-time visibility, attracting those needing detailed network insights. Datadog’s wide integration contrasts with Kentik’s traffic analysis focus.
The setup cost for Datadog is high compared to Kentik's more budget-friendly options. Kentik offers a cost-effective setup, making it a preferable choice for those mindful of initial expenses.
The setup cost for Datadog is high compared to Kentik's more budget-friendly options. Kentik offers a cost-effective setup, making it a preferable choice for those mindful of initial expenses.
Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring with flexibility and no added cost, ideal for users valuing customization. In comparison, Kentik excels in network traffic analysis, offering strong visualization tools and real-time insights, suited for buyers focused on deep network analysis and targeted ROI.
SolarWinds NPM offers robust SNMP support and modular pricing, making it suitable for flexible network growth. In comparison, Kentik emphasizes real-time traffic insights through SaaS, ideal for detailed network behavior analysis. Both solutions cater to different network management needs.
PRTG Network Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring and real-time network performance data, appealing to those prioritizing affordability and support. In comparison, Kentik provides advanced traffic analysis and scalability. PRTG's ease of deployment contrasts with Kentik’s complex setup, balanced by Kentik’s extensive features and scalability.
Kentik's SaaS model and real-time traffic visualization appeal to those seeking flexible and maintenance-free solutions. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers strong threat detection and network management benefits through deep integration within Cisco’s ecosystem, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive security capabilities.
ThousandEyes offers comprehensive monitoring and deep analysis across cloud providers and ISPs. In comparison, Kentik focuses on traffic monitoring and visualization with strong flow analysis. ThousandEyes emphasizes application monitoring, while Kentik enhances API usability and provides flexible pricing options.
LogicMonitor offers customizable dashboards and granular alerting, suitable for hybrid environments. In comparison, Kentik provides deep network traffic analysis and intuitive SQL reporting, ideal for detailed network visibility. Tech buyers may choose based on deployment flexibility and detailed network insights.
Kentik offers advanced flow analysis for traffic management and security, appealing to organizations with high traffic volumes. In comparison, Auvik provides ease of use and automated network management, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive monitoring without extra device costs.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE appeals to those needing detailed packet and voice traffic analysis, despite a complex interface. In comparison, Kentik offers user-friendly data exploration and real-time insights with customizable dashboards, appealing to buyers seeking intuitive, cloud-based network monitoring solutions.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
IBM SevOne NPM delivers comprehensive network monitoring, ideal for scalability, while integrating performance and flow data. In comparison, Kentik excels in flow analysis and visualization, offering detailed traffic insights. Buyers may favor SevOne for complex infrastructures and Kentik for traffic-focused insights.
vRealize Network Insight provides strong network visualization and monitoring tools with intuitive querying. In comparison, Kentik offers real-time traffic insights and flexible data exploration. A tech buyer might choose vRealize for its user-friendly analysis or Kentik for its cost-effective traffic optimization.
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
LiveAction LiveNX offers intuitive visualization and straightforward deployment, attracting those who value simplicity and responsive support. In comparison, Kentik's advanced data analytics and scalable architecture appeal to organizations seeking deeper insights and comprehensive features, despite a more complex initial setup and higher investment.
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
Catchpoint provides strong synthetic monitoring focused on user experience, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and support. In comparison, Kentik caters to those needing comprehensive network observability with its advanced analytics capabilities, justifying its higher cost with detailed, long-term insights.
Kentik offers real-time data processing and network visibility, appealing to those seeking cost-effective, efficient management. In comparison, Flowmon excels with deep packet inspection and anomaly detection, suitable for companies needing advanced analytics and infrastructure insights despite higher initial costs.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in traffic analysis with real-time threat detection and machine learning insights. In comparison, Kentik offers superior network performance optimization, advanced visibility, and data-driven decision capabilities, providing long-term value. ExtraHop is ideal for budget-conscious users; Kentik suits those desiring extensive support and scalability.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations involves higher initial setup costs compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. This distinction may appeal to businesses prioritizing up-front expense management.
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations involves higher initial setup costs compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. This distinction may appeal to businesses prioritizing up-front expense management.
Kentik simplifies management with SaaS, offering real-time insights and automation through a flexible API. In comparison, Plixer Scrutinizer excels in detailed NetFlow analysis and strong reporting, focusing on on-premises deployment, making it ideal for security and network performance.
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.
