Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Kentik Logo

Top 10 Kentik Alternatives

Vendor: Kentik
4.6 out of 5
681 followers
Start review

Top Kentik Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Kentik based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and SolarWinds NPM. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Kentik surpasses its competitors by offering advanced network visibility and analytics that optimize performance, enhance security, and provide real-time insights, empowering businesses with faster decision-making and improved operational efficiency through its user-friendly interface and powerful data analysis capabilities.

Kentik Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Kentik, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Kentik Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring with shareable dashboards and seamless data visualization, while its alerting configuration aids comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Kentik delivers targeted network traffic analysis with features like DDoS detection, appealing to those focused on network optimization and connectivity insights.
Download Datadog vs. Kentik Report
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost while Kentik offers a flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a straightforward setup cost while Kentik offers a flexible pricing structure.
Kentik Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers comprehensive monitoring with flexibility and no added cost, ideal for users valuing customization. In comparison, Kentik excels in network traffic analysis, offering strong visualization tools and real-time insights, suited for buyers focused on deep network analysis and targeted ROI.
Download Kentik vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost compared to Kentik, which requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost compared to Kentik, which requires a higher initial investment.
Kentik Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Kentik Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers robust SNMP support and modular pricing, making it suitable for flexible network growth. In comparison, Kentik emphasizes real-time traffic insights through SaaS, ideal for detailed network behavior analysis. Both solutions cater to different network management needs.
Download Kentik vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for ease of deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kentik offers superior data exploration and real-time insights for complex environments, appealing to buyers focused on advanced analytics and deep traffic analysis.
Download Kentik vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Kentik requires a more tailored approach. PRTG's pricing is generally predictable, whereas Kentik's may vary based on specific network monitoring needs and configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Kentik requires a more tailored approach. PRTG's pricing is generally predictable, whereas Kentik's may vary based on specific network monitoring needs and configurations.
Kentik Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Kentik Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
ThousandEyes offers comprehensive monitoring and deep analysis across cloud providers and ISPs. In comparison, Kentik focuses on traffic monitoring and visualization with strong flow analysis. ThousandEyes emphasizes application monitoring, while Kentik enhances API usability and provides flexible pricing options.
Download Kentik vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes has a more complex setup cost compared to Kentik, which offers a simpler and more straightforward initial setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes has a more complex setup cost compared to Kentik, which offers a simpler and more straightforward initial setup process.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
Kentik's SaaS model and real-time traffic visualization appeal to those seeking flexible and maintenance-free solutions. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics offers strong threat detection and network management benefits through deep integration within Cisco’s ecosystem, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive security capabilities.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Kentik Report
Kentik's setup cost is low compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik's setup cost is low compared to Cisco Secure Network Analytics, which has a higher initial investment.
Kentik Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Kentik Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
LogicMonitor offers customizable dashboards and granular alerting, suitable for hybrid environments. In comparison, Kentik provides deep network traffic analysis and intuitive SQL reporting, ideal for detailed network visibility. Tech buyers may choose based on deployment flexibility and detailed network insights.
Download Kentik vs. LogicMonitor Report
LogicMonitor requires a moderate setup cost, while Kentik offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
LogicMonitor requires a moderate setup cost, while Kentik offers a more affordable initial investment.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Kentik offers advanced flow analysis for traffic management and security, appealing to organizations with high traffic volumes. In comparison, Auvik provides ease of use and automated network management, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive monitoring without extra device costs.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Kentik Report
Kentik's setup cost is considered moderate, whereas Auvik Network Management (ANM) often garners attention for its competitive pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik's setup cost is considered moderate, whereas Auvik Network Management (ANM) often garners attention for its competitive pricing.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE appeals to those needing detailed packet and voice traffic analysis, despite a complex interface. In comparison, Kentik offers user-friendly data exploration and real-time insights with customizable dashboards, appealing to buyers seeking intuitive, cloud-based network monitoring solutions.
Download Kentik vs. NETSCOUT nGeniusONE Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE has a higher setup cost compared to Kentik, highlighting a significant price difference. Kentik offers a more cost-effective setup solution, appealing to organizations with budget constraints.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne NPM delivers comprehensive network monitoring, ideal for scalability, while integrating performance and flow data. In comparison, Kentik excels in flow analysis and visualization, offering detailed traffic insights. Buyers may favor SevOne for complex infrastructures and Kentik for traffic-focused insights.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Kentik Report
IBM SevOne NPM involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective solution.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne NPM involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective solution.
Kentik Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Kentik Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX offers intuitive visualization and straightforward deployment, attracting those who value simplicity and responsive support. In comparison, Kentik's advanced data analytics and scalable architecture appeal to organizations seeking deeper insights and comprehensive features, despite a more complex initial setup and higher investment.
Download Kentik vs. LiveAction LiveNX Report
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX has an initial setup cost that is generally more substantial compared to Kentik, which tends to offer a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy between the two network monitoring solutions.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
vRealize Network Insight provides strong network visualization and monitoring tools with intuitive querying. In comparison, Kentik offers real-time traffic insights and flexible data exploration. A tech buyer might choose vRealize for its user-friendly analysis or Kentik for its cost-effective traffic optimization.
Download Kentik vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
View comparison
Pricing
vRealize Network Insight has a higher setup cost, offering advanced network insight features, while Kentik provides a more budget-friendly option suitable for monitoring needs.
Kentik Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint provides strong synthetic monitoring focused on user experience, appealing to those prioritizing ease of deployment and support. In comparison, Kentik caters to those needing comprehensive network observability with its advanced analytics capabilities, justifying its higher cost with detailed, long-term insights.
Download Catchpoint vs. Kentik Report
Catchpoint's setup costs are higher than Kentik's, making Kentik a budget-friendly option for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint's setup costs are higher than Kentik's, making Kentik a budget-friendly option for organizations seeking cost-effective solutions.
Kentik Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Flowmon
4.3 out of 5
Kentik offers real-time data processing and network visibility, appealing to those seeking cost-effective, efficient management. In comparison, Flowmon excels with deep packet inspection and anomaly detection, suitable for companies needing advanced analytics and infrastructure insights despite higher initial costs.
Download Flowmon vs. Kentik Report
Kentik shows a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon presents a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik shows a straightforward setup cost, while Flowmon presents a more flexible pricing structure.
Kentik Logo
Kentik Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
4.3 out of 5
ExtraHop Reveal(x) excels in traffic analysis with real-time threat detection and machine learning insights. In comparison, Kentik offers superior network performance optimization, advanced visibility, and data-driven decision capabilities, providing long-term value. ExtraHop is ideal for budget-conscious users; Kentik suits those desiring extensive support and scalability.
Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Kentik Report
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations involves higher initial setup costs compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. This distinction may appeal to businesses prioritizing up-front expense management.
View comparison
Pricing
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations involves higher initial setup costs compared to Kentik, which offers a more cost-effective setup option. This distinction may appeal to businesses prioritizing up-front expense management.
Kentik Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Plixer Scrutinizer
4.3 out of 5
Kentik simplifies management with SaaS, offering real-time insights and automation through a flexible API. In comparison, Plixer Scrutinizer excels in detailed NetFlow analysis and strong reporting, focusing on on-premises deployment, making it ideal for security and network performance.
Download Kentik vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik features a straightforward setup process with minimal initial costs, while Plixer Scrutinizer may involve a more complex setup and higher initial costs. Users often highlight these differences in their reviews when choosing a network monitoring solution.
Kentik Logo
Observer GigaStor
4.5 out of 5
Kentik Logo
Observer GigaStor
4.5 out of 5
Kentik enables real-time network analytics, efficient anomaly detection, and easy cloud-based deployment, appealing to businesses needing dynamic traffic insights. In comparison, Observer GigaStor offers deep packet inspection and comprehensive retrospective analysis, catering to organizations requiring in-depth on-premise network forensic capabilities and detailed historical data examination.
Download Kentik vs. Observer GigaStor Report
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Kentik's setup costs are lower, making it more accessible, while Observer GigaStor requires a higher initial expense, reflecting its comprehensive analytics capabilities.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability